• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
482 results

Cedar Point Nursery, et al., Petitioners v. Victoria Hassid, et al.

Docket 20-107, Supreme Court of the United States (Aug. 3, 2020)
Petitioner Cedar Point Nursery, et al.
Respondent Victoria Hassid, et al.
Other American Farm Bureau Federation
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Cedar Point Nursery, et al v. Victoria Hassid, et al

Docket 16-16321, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (July 28, 2016)
Civil Rights - Other (Appeals)
Case Type3440 Civil Rights - Other
Tags3440 Civil Rights, Other, 3440 Civil Rights, Other
Plaintiff - Appellant, CEDAR POINT NURSERY
Plaintiff - Appellant, FOWLER PACKING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee, WILLIAM B. GOULD IV
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED

Document Cedar Point Nursery, et al., Petitioners v. Victoria Hassid, et al., 20-107, Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED (U.S. Jun. 23, 2021)
In this case, however, none of these considerations undermine the Court’s determination that the ac- cess regulation gives rise to a per se physical taking.
It employs over 400 seasonal workers and around 100 full-time workers, none of whom live on the property.
As with Cedar Point, none of Fowler’s workers live on the premises.
... by members of the pub- lic, we cited Causby and Portsmouth for the proposition that 8 9 Cite as: 594 U. S. (2021) Opinion of the Court “even if the Government physically invades only an ease- ment in property, it must nonetheless ...
None of these considerations undermine our determina- tion that the access regulation here gives rise to a per se physical taking.
The majority concludes that the regulation nonetheless amounts to a physical taking of property because, the ma- jority says, it “appropriates” a “right to invade” or a “right to exclude” others.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

Order filed for PUBLICATION (EDWARD LEAVY, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and RICHARD A. PAEZ) The Supreme ...

Document Cedar Point Nursery, et al v. Genevieve Shiroma, et al, 16-16321 (9th Cir. Aug. 4, 2021)
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed August 4, 2021 Before: Edward Leavy, William A. Fletcher, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
* Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), Julia L. Montgomery, Barry Broad, Ralph Lightstone, and Cinthia N. Flores are substituted for their predecessors.
Mario Martínez, Martínez Aguilasocho & Lynch APLC, Bakersfield, California; Jacob C. Goldberg and Henry M. Willis, Schwartz Steinsapir Dohrmann & Sommers LLP, Los Angeles, California; for Amici Curiae United Farm Workers of America and United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 770.
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision, the judgment of the district court relating to the Fifth Amendment claim is reversed.
For the reasons stated in Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma, 923 F.3d at 534–36, the judgment of the district court dismissing the Fourth Amendment claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is affirmed.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Brief amicus curiae of United States - Proof of Service

Document Cedar Point Nursery, et al., Petitioners v. Victoria Hassid, et al., 20-107, Brief amicus curiae of United States, Proof of Service (U.S. Jan. 7, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Amicus brief of New England Legal - Certificate of Word Count

Document Cedar Point Nursery, et al., Petitioners v. Victoria Hassid, et al., 20-107, Amicus brief of New England Legal, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Jan. 6, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal - Main Document

Document Cedar Point Nursery, et al., Petitioners v. Victoria Hassid, et al., 20-107, Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal, Main Document (U.S. Jan. 6, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal

Document Cedar Point Nursery, et al., Petitioners v. Victoria Hassid, et al., 20-107, Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal (U.S. Jan. 6, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>