The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 43, 46, 80, 82, 83, 86, 87, 88, 89, 91 were read on this motion to/for

Upon the foregoing documents, it is

Motion 1 (the petition itself) has already been decided and has been the subject of an appeal.

Therefore, this order is merely to close out the case as motion 1 is essentially moot having already been decided.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 103 were read on this motion to/for

Upon the foregoing documents, it is

The motion to renew and reargue the court’s decision and order on motion 2 in this proceeding for PRE ACTION disclosure is denied.

Page 1 of 2 161557/2018 DELGRANGE, JESSICA vs. REALREAL, INC. Motion No. 003

In this long running proceeding for pre action disclosure, defendant has fought tooth and nail to avoid handing anything over to plaintiff, who allegedly has had valuable couture stolen from her and sold on defendant’s website.

The initial order only required the names, city and state, and only for 20 of the 154 items plaintiff identified as possibly hers.

She claims she needs the rest of the information, because “thieves using the internet have multiple alias's and even recruit unknowing victims to sell their stolen merchandise” and that “any competent investigation requires the ability to link the consignors using email address, addresses, and other identifying information, and also to investigate "up the chain" of title from suspects” (EDOC 82 p 7).

One would think that it would want to cooperate with plaintiff in her investigation, given the claim that she has uncovered a possible gang of thieves that is selling stolen merchandise on defendant’s website.

As plaintiff professes to recognize some of the names, she should end up with enough information to commence a proper lawsuit and there gain the rest of the discovery she needs to flesh out her claims.

This matter having come before the Court by application under CPLR 3102(c) of Petitioner, Jessica Delgrange, and Respondent, The RealReal, Inc., requesting that the Court enter a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3103(a), limiting the review, copying, dissemination and filing of confidential and/or props letary documents and information to be produced by either and their respective counsel or by any non-party in the course of discovery in this matter to party the extent set forth below; and for good cause having been shown; IT IS hereby

Except with the prior written consent of the Produciiig party or by Order of the or disclosed person or Court, Confidential Information shall not be furnished, shown to any entity except to:

expert witnesses, agents, or consultants retained by the parties or their counsel to furnish technical, investigative, or expert services in connection with this action or to give with and/or such testimony respect to the Petition a Related Action; provided, however, that Confidential Information is furnished, shown or disclosed in accordance with paragraph hereof;

In the case of deposition Testimony, designation shall be made by notifying all counsel in writing of those portions which are to be stamped or otherwise treated as such time days after the transcript is received for at any up to fifteen

05/03/2019 prejudice to the rights of a party to move for relief from any of its provisions, or to seek or agree to different or additional protection for any particular material or information.