• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
1,150 results

St. Mary Catholic, et al v. Roy, et al

Docket 24-1267, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit (June 24, 2024)
Civil Rights - Other (Appeals)
Case Type3440 Civil Rights - Other
Tags3440 Civil Rights, Other, 3440 Civil Rights, Other
Plaintiff - Appellant ST. MARY CATHOLIC PARISH IN LITTLETON
Plaintiff - Appellant ST. BERNADETTE CATHOLIC PARISH IN LAKEWOOD
Plaintiff - Appellant LISA SHELEY
...
cite Cite Docket

Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania, e...

Docket 19-431, Supreme Court of the United States (Oct. 2, 2019)
Petitioner The Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home
Respondent Federal respondents
Respondent Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al.
...
cite Cite Docket

Sharonell Fulton, et al., Petitioners v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al.

Docket 19-123, Supreme Court of the United States (July 25, 2019)
Petitioner Sharonell Fulton, et al.
Respondent Intervenor Support Center for Child Advocates and Philadelphia Family Pride
Respondent City of Philadelphia, Department of Human Services for the City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations
...
cite Cite Docket

Kendra Espinoza, et al., Petitioners v. Montana Department of Revenue, et al.

Docket 18-1195, Supreme Court of the United States (Mar. 14, 2019)
Petitioner Kendra Espinoza, et al.
Respondent Montana Department of Revenue, et al.
Other Montana Catholic School Parents, et al.
...
cite Cite Docket

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, dba NIFLA, et al., Petitioners v. Xav...

Docket 16-1140, Supreme Court of the United States (Mar. 21, 2017)
Petitioner NIFLA, et al.
Respondent Becerra, Att'y Gen. of CA, et al.
Respondent Morgan Foley
...
cite Cite Docket

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED

Document Sharonell Fulton, et al., Petitioners v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al., 19-123, Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED (U.S. Jun. 17, 2021)
None of that mattered to Philadelphia.
... protected by the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and thus beyond the power of the State to control, even under regu- lations of general applicability”; “[a] regulation neutral on its face may, in its application, nonetheless ...
In so holding, the Court reiterated that “‘[a] regulation neutral on its face may, in its application, nonetheless offend the constitutional re- quirement for governmental neutrality if it unduly burdens the free exercise of religion.’” Id., at 717 ...
None of these decisions questioned the validity of Sherbert’s interpretation of the free-exercise right.
None of these obstacles stopped the Smith majority from adopting its new rule and displacing decades of precedent.
None was based on the rule that Smith adopted.
None of those opinions contained a hint that they were limited in that way.
Are there countervailing factors? E None is apparent.
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

01-2021

Document Sharonell Fulton, et al., Petitioners v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al., 19-123, 01-2021 (U.S. Apr. 1, 2021)
None of these objectives advances demographic diversity of owners for the sake of owners.
12903, 12910–12912, ¶¶15, 17 (1999).1 Here, as in 2003, once the FCC determined that none of its policy objectives for ownership rules—viewpoint diver- sity, competition, and localism—justified retaining its rules, the FCC was free to ...
cite Cite Document

No. 50 [11114440] Amicus Curiae brief filed by The Conscience Project

Document St. Mary Catholic, et al v. Roy, et al, 24-1267, No. 50 (10th Cir. Aug. 21, 2024)
And that's the premise that we start with at a private Catholic school – no matter what, we're all sinners.” At the same time, he explains, “there is objective truth given to us by God, that we were created a certain way to be beautiful in his eyes, and for the world.” Thanks to St. Mary’s Appellate Case: 24-1267 Document: 010111098426 Date Filed: 08/21/2024 Page: 10 Appellate Case: 24-1267 Document: 50 Date Filed: 08/21/2024 Page: 10 preschool, Andy says “our kids came home well-rounded, beautiful little people, understanding what God teaches about loving everyone.” If UPK Colorado provided for three-year old Lily’s preschool education, Andy would use the savings to “go towards the betterment of our family as a whole.” They could think about moving to a larger house.
Schools that wish to participate in the program must agree to “provide eligible children an equal opportunity to enroll and receive services regardless of race, ethnicity, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, lack of housing, income level, or disability, as such characteristics and circumstances apply to the child or the child’s family.” Id. § 26.5-4-205(2)(b).
In Gravissimum Educationis, the Second Vatican Council’s Declaration on Christian Education, Pope Paul VI proclaimed that “Holy Mother Church must be concerned with the whole of man's life, even the secular part of it insofar as it has a bearing on his heavenly calling.
The Supreme Court, in a recent case also involving the state of Colorado, rejected this circuit’s assertion that the very “uniqueness” of the services by a wedding website designer could justify the state’s attempt to conscript her voice to disseminate the government’s preferred message.
For the sake of the families hoping to offer their young children a Catholic preschool education and in order to remedy Colorado’s unconstitutional restrictions on UPK Colorado, amici respectfully request this Court to reverse the decision below.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>