• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
47 results

Darren Duncan, et al v. Bayer CropScience LP, et al

Docket 24-3104, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit (Oct. 17, 2024)
Anti-Trust (Appeals)
Case Type3410 Anti-Trust
Tags3410 Anti-Trust, 3410 Anti-Trust
In re: Crop Inputs Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant Darren Duncan, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant Jones Planting Co. III, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Rosales v. Adir International LLC

Docket 0:24-cv-03727, Minnesota District Court (Sept. 24, 2024)
Judge Laura M. Provinzino, presiding, Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz
Statutory Actions - Other
DivisionDMN
FlagsCV
Cause11:362(h) Bankruptcy: Violation of Automatic Stay
Case Type890 Statutory Actions - Other
Tags890 Statutory Actions, Other, 890 Statutory Actions, Other
Plaintiff Valeria Garza Rosales
Defendant ADIR International LLC d/b/a Curacao
Plaintiff Rosales
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

S.M.O. v. Mayo Clinic et al

Docket 0:24-cv-01124, Minnesota District Court (Apr. 2, 2024)
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan, presiding, Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty
Employee Retirement (ERISA)
DivisionDMN
FlagsCV
Cause29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Case Type791 Employee Retirement (ERISA)
Tags791 Employee Retirement, Erisa, 791 Employee Retirement, Erisa
Plaintiff S.M.O.
Defendant Mayo Clinic
Defendant MMSI
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

(ASBESTOS) Allen Lorenz, Coral Lorenz vs 3M COMPANY, A. H. BENNETT COMP...

Docket 62-CV-22-6219, Minnesota State, Ramsey County, District Court (Nov. 18, 2022)
Segal, Susan L, Nelson, Laura, McKeig, Anne K., presiding
Case TypeProduct Liability
Plaintiff Allen Lorenz
Plaintiff Coral Lorenz
Defendant 3M COMPANY
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Reck-N-Rack LLC v. Just Encase Products Inc

Docket 2:22-cv-00503, Wisconsin Eastern District Court (Apr. 27, 2022)
Judge Brett H Ludwig, presiding
Fraud
DivisionMilwaukee
FlagsATTYOPEN, BHL-PW, RF
Cause28:1441 Petition for Removal
Case Type370 Fraud
Tags370 Fraud, 370 Fraud
Plaintiff Reck-N-Rack LLC
Defendant Just Encase Products Inc
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

In Re: Crop Inputs Antitrust Litigation

Docket 4:21-md-02993, Missouri Eastern District Court (June 8, 2021)
District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk, presiding
Anti-Trust
09/27/2021
09/27/2021 124 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Tom Burke. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Brandt, Derek) (Entered: 09/...
09/27/2021
09/27/2021 123 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff James Koch. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Brandt, Derek) (Entered: 09...
09/20/2021
09/20/2021 106 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Eagle Lake Farms Partnership. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Brandt, Derek) (Entered: 09/20/2021)
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 00805215831 BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by BASF Corporation, Bayer CropScience Inc., Bayer CropScience ...

Document Darren Duncan, et al v. Bayer CropScience LP, et al, 24-3104, No. 00805215831 (8th Cir. Mar. 12, 2025)
None are both (1) “similar” and (2) temporally proximate, and thus none indicates parallel conduct.
None of this comes close to meeting Plaintiffs’ burden to plead “parallel conduct.” A. Plaintiffs’ Conclusory Allegation of a Group Boycott Does Not Establish Parallel Conduct.
None of these cases aid Plaintiffs because none disavow that parallel conduct requires acts that are both similar and near in time.
... to the CAC (Br. at 31-33), comprising: non-parallel specific actions, discussed above (see Sections II.B.1 & II.C, supra); trade-association membership (see Section II.B.3, supra); and purported plus factors rather than conduct, none ...
Such a review would make plain that none of Plaintiffs’ alleged plus factors raise a plausible inference of conspiracy rather than lawful, unilateral behavior.
None suggests a conspiracy.
Plaintiffs plead none of these facts.
None of that properly preserves the issue of amendment.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

No. 00805215831

Document Darren Duncan, et al v. Bayer CropScience LP, et al, 24-3104, No. 00805215831 (8th Cir. Mar. 12, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 >>