Pursuant to Section 853(n), the United States could, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have an alleged interest in the First Substitute Assets and as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified; WHEREAS, the provisions of Title 21, United State Code, Section 853(n)(1), Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Rules G(4)(a)(iv)(C) and G(5)(a)(ii) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, require publication of a notice of forfeiture and of the Government’s intent to dispose of the First Substitute Assets before the United States can have clear title to the First Substitute Assets; WHEREAS, the Notice of Forfeiture and the intent of the United States to dispose of the First Substitute Assets was posted on an official government internet site (www.forfeiture.gov) beginning on July 12, 2024, for thirty (30) consecutive days, through August 10, 2024, pursuant to Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions and proof of such publication was filed with the Clerk of the Court on February 28, 2025 (D.E.

Pursuant to Section 853(n), the United States could, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have an alleged interest in the Second Substitute Assets and as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified; WHEREAS, the provisions of Title 21, United State Code, Section 853(n)(1), Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Rules G(4)(a)(iv)(C) and G(5)(a)(ii) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, require publication of a notice of forfeiture and of the Government’s intent to dispose of the Second Substitute Assets before the United States can have clear title to the Second Substitute Assets; WHEREAS, the Notice of Forfeiture and the intent of the United States to dispose of the Second Substitute Assets was posted on an official government internet site (www.forfeiture.gov) beginning on September 19, 2024, for thirty (30) consecutive days, through October 18, 2024, pursuant to Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions and proof of such publication was filed with the Clerk of the Court on February 28, 2025 (D.E.

WHEREAS, the Defendant is the only person and/or entity known by the Government to have a potential interest the Second Substitute Assets; Case 1:10-cr-00895-PGG Document 1029-1 Filed 02/28/25 Page 4 of 7Case 1:10-cr-00895-PGG Document 1031 Filed 03/03/25 Page 4 of 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n)(7), the United States shall have clear title to any forfeited property if no petitions for a hearing to contest the forfeiture have been filed within thirty (30) days of final publication of notice of forfeiture as set forth in Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n)(2);

One 14K w/gold "EFFY" black leather bracelet with ~ 1ct rfc diamond pave set square and w/gold clasp; xviii.

One 18K white gold "huggy" style earring, 20 princess cut !.60pts and 30 rfc diamonds ~.60pts, 3.2DWT; and xxxix.

Paul A Engelmayer Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall US Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 RE: USA v. Cueto, 11-cr-01032 Dear Judge Engelmayer: This office was re-appointed on November 25, 2024, to represent Moises Cueto pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act for the limited purpose of responding to Mr. Cueto’s inquiry to the Court regarding his eligibility for relief under recent amendments to the U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines that are intended to benefit youthful individuals convicted of federal crimes.

I have communicated extensively with Mr. Cueto and determined that he does not qualify for any sort of automatic or retroactive relief.

2 (2024 ed.) and the unique circumstances of Mr. Cueto’s case – he was only 16 years old when he committed his crime – Mr. Cueto would be a good candidate for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C 3582(c)(1)(a)(i).

Accordingly, I respectfully request an expanded appointment under the Criminal Justice Act to investigate and submit a motion for Mr. Cueto under 18 U.S.C 3582(c)(1)(a)(i), Thank you for your attention to this case.

In turn, the Sentencing Commission promulgated Guidelines Section 1B1.13, a policy statement which describes four categories of reasons that should be considered extraordinary and compelling.

777, 2022 WL 2159890 (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2022), arguing that this case is a change in law regarding the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) that constitutes an extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release under Subsection (b)(6).1 (See Dkt. No. 696 at 27-29.)

Santiago maintains that a sentence reduction is warranted because he is remorseful of his past actions, accepts full responsibility of his criminal conduct, and has engaged in all available programs to improve himself while incarcerated.

941, 2024 WL 2830825, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. June 3, 2024) (“Simply put, the evidence of rehabilitation offered by Defendant does not, alone or in combination with all other relevant considerations, establish extraordinary and compelling reasons for a reduction in his sentence.”); United States v. Raposo, No. 98 Cr.

In the lead up to trial, Santiago attempted to dissuade individuals who had witnessed members of his crew commit violent acts from cooperating with law enforcement authorities.

The plea and sentencing scheduled for February 6, 2025 is adjourned to - Febr uy13, eB10:30a.m, rfp 05 2025.

< eDor 2 Re: United States v. Jonathan Feliz et al. Docket No. 09 Cr, 195 (GBD — Dear Judge Daniels: ] represent defendant Jonathan Narvaez in the above-referenced matter.

Plea and sentencing of Mr. Narvaez with respect to pending VOSR proceedings presently is scheduled for February 6, 2025 at 10:00 a.m.

I am writing to request that the plea and sentencing be adjourned one week to February13, 2025 at 10:30 a.m., which I understand is an available date and time on the Court’s calendar.

The adjournmentis being requested because counsel for Mr. Narvaez has a family medical matter which requires his attention.

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge: The Violation of Supervised Release Hearing scheduled for today, January 28, 2025, is adjourned to 1:30 p.m.

Dated: New York, New York January 28, 2025 ~7~

United States District Judge

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge: A Violation of Supervised Release Hearing is scheduled for January 28, 2025, at 12:00 p.m.

Dated: New York, New York January 24, 2025 /7Jkitv7~.

United States District Judge