`
`Exhibit J
`
`(Public)
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 491-10 Filed 03/12/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID# 11088
`Case 1:20-cv-OO393-LO-TCB Document 491-10 Filed 03/12/21 Page 2 of 5 PagelD# 11088
`Jennifer Kol‘l
`12670 High Bluff Drive
`Direct Dial: +1.858.523.3949
`San Diego, California 92130
`ienniter_koh@lw.com
`Tel: +1.858.523.5400 Fax: +1.858.523.5450
`www.mxom
`
`FIRM I AFFILIATE OFFICES
`Beijing
`Moscow
`Boston
`Munich
`Brussels
`New YOI1(
`
`Century City
`Chicago
`
`Dubai
`Dusseldorf
`Frankfurt
`
`Hamburg
`Hong Kong
`Houston
`London
`Los Angeles
`
`Orange County
`Pan‘s
`
`Riyadh
`San Diego
`San Francisco
`
`Seoul
`Shanghai
`Silicon Valley
`Singapore
`Tokyo
`
`3:23“
`
`Was“'"9‘°“- ”C-
`
`LATHAMémWATKINSLLP
`
`March 5, 2021
`
`VIA EMAIL
`—
`
`CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION,
`SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Sanjiv Laud
`
`Jones Day
`90 South Seventh Street. Suite 4950
`
`Minneapolis. MN 55402
`slaud@jonesday.con1
`rjredva@jonesday.com
`
`Re:
`
`RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. et a]. v. Altria Client Services LLC, et (1].,
`No. 1:20-cv—393-LO—TCB ED. Va.
`
`Dear Sanjiv:
`
`We write in response to your March 2. 2021 letter.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 491-10 Filed 03/12/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID# 11089
`Case 1:20-cv-OO393-LO-TCB Document 491-10 Filed 03/12/21 Page 3 of 5 Page|D# 11089
`March 5, 2021
`Page 2
`
`LATHAM8WATKINSLL“
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 491-10 Filed 03/12/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID# 11090
`March 5, 2021
`Page 3
`
`LATHAM8~WATKINSW
`
`to Mr. Hawes’
`
`1‘e aration and answers 011 this to ic. Regardless, the identi of the com an that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LO-TCB Document 491-10 Filed 03/12/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID# 11091
`Case 1:20-cv-OO393-LO-TCB Document 491-10 Filed 03/12/21 Page 5 of 5 Page|D# 11091
`March 5, 2021
`Page 4
`
`LATHAM6WATKINSLL“
`
`
`
`We t111st that this resolves the issues in your letter, but remain willing to meet and confer
`should you fmd it still necessaly.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`/s/ Jennifer Koh
`
`Jennifer Koh
`
`of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
