`
`Exhibit 1
`Public Rellactell Version
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1462-1 Filed 04/05/23 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 39459
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. I :20-cv-00393-LMB-TCB
`
`DECLARATION OF CHRISTY CANARY-GARNER
`
`I, Christy Canary-Garner, declare:
`
`I.
`
`I am the Vice President of Consumer Marketing for Defendant R.J. Reynolds Vapor
`
`Company's ("RJRV") VUSE Vapor Brand. In that role, I am responsible for the commercial
`
`business management of the VUSE brand, including portfolio design; promotion strategy; volume
`
`and share; and financial P&L delivery.
`
`2.
`
`I make this declaration in support of RJRV's Opposition to Philip Morris Product
`
`S.A.'s ("PMP's") Motion for a Permanent Injunction or, Alternatively, an Ongoing Royalty.
`
`3.
`
`RJRV is a North Carolina corporation, headquartered in Winston-Salem, North
`
`Carolina.
`
`4.
`
`RJRV does not make, market, or sell combustible cigarettes. Instead, RJRV's
`
`business is directed exclusively to the development and introduction of reduced risk tobacco
`
`products that present an alternative for adult smokers of combustible cigarettes.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1462-1 Filed 04/05/23 Page 3 of 7 PageID# 39460
`
`5.
`
`RJRV's product line currently consists of four e-cigarette products, which are
`
`marketed under the trade name VlJSE. The VlJSE products are the cornerstone of RJRV's future
`
`and a key embodiment of Reynolds' s comm itment to its guiding principles regarding tobacco harm
`
`reduction. (https:/fa ww.revnt1ldsamcrican.corn/abo11t-us/gui<ling-principles.)
`
`6.
`
`The VUSE lineup includes Alto, Solo, Ciro, and Vibe, shown in the below pictures:
`
`(https://vusevapo r.com/blog/find-your-favoritcs-complctc-comparison-of-vusc-vapes)
`
`7.
`
`Solo (Generation 1) was RJRV's first e-c igarette product in the United States. It
`
`was launched in 2013, a time when e-cigarettes were relatively new in this country. At that time,
`
`it was our belief that the best way to encourage smokers to try this this new reduced risk technology
`
`was to desig n the product to have a physical form that resembled a combustible cigarette, and was
`
`thus fami liar to the customers in terms of physical feel. Consistent with this design goal, the Solo
`
`product is long and cy lindrical, and mimics the dimensions and shape of a cigarette.
`
`8.
`
`Solo was successful in the early years after its launch, and RJRV fo llowed with the
`
`launch of the Solo (Generation 2) product in 2015, and the Ciro and Vibe products in 20 16. Like
`
`the Solo devices, those products a lso offered a form that approx imates a combustible c igarette in
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1462-1 Filed 04/05/23 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 39461
`
`shape and physical feel.
`
`9.
`
`These products were initially popular with U.S. consumers, and RJRV became the
`
`market leader fore-cigarettes by 2016, with a market share of approximately 37.0%. The Solo
`
`devices were our best-selling products at that time.
`
`10.
`
`Over the years, as adult smokers became more comfortable with vaping as an
`
`alternative to smoking combustible cigarettes - which was RJRV's goal - we noticed that their
`
`preferences were shifting. More e-cigarette users no longer wanted their products to resemble
`
`combustible cigarettes. To the contrary, as they moved away from smoking to RJRV's reduced
`
`risk products, customers affirmatively did not want to be reminded of, or perceived by others to
`
`be using, cigarettes.
`
`11.
`
`This shift in consumer preference gave rise to a new category of e-cigarette devices,
`
`referred to as "pod-mod," that have a completely different look, style, and feel from the cylindrical,
`
`cigarette-shape and design used in Solo, Ciro, and Vibe. One such device is the JUUL, shown
`
`below with the associated JUUL pods:
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1462-1 Filed 04/05/23 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 39462
`
`( https://\\ ,1.,1, .juul.com/shop)
`
`12.
`
`The pod-mod design and style resonated with U.S. consumers who wanted to
`
`distance themselves from combustible cigarettes. JUUL launched in 2015, and by 20 17, it held
`
`23.8% of thee-cigarette market, while RJRV 's market share had dropped to 3 1.0%. Just one year
`
`later, JUUL overtook RJRV as thee-cigarette market leader, with a market share of 68.0%, while
`
`RJRV's market share decreased to just 12.5%.
`
`13.
`
`Partly to respond to that market shift in consumer preferences, RJRV acquired the
`
`Alto product, which it began selling in August 2018. A lto does not mimic the experience and form
`
`factor of a c igarette. To the contrary, Alto has a different, non-cyl indrical form factor and a
`
`different mouthpiece than So lo, Vibe, and Ciro, and Alto uses a "pod-based" system that is
`
`different from the ''cartridge-based" system of Solo and C iro and the "closed-tank" system of Vibe:
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1462-1 Filed 04/05/23 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 39463
`
`(https:/ /vusc, apor.com/b log/thc- vusc-gu idc-tu-vaping)
`
`14.
`
`Alto's features have proven to be very popular with consumers. Following RJRV's
`
`nationwide launch of Alto in 2018, its market share has steadily increased, and in the first half of
`
`2022, RJRV replaced JUU L as the four-week market leader for the first time since 2018.
`
`(https://vapnn llice.nd/:!0:!:!/06/02/, usc-continucs-to-cxpanJ-LH,-marl-cL-:.harc-over-juul .)
`
`15.
`
`In 2021, total VUSE sales (for all four products combined) were approximately
`
`Of that, -
`
`was attributable to Alto sales.
`
`In the first half of 2022, Alto
`
`accounted fo r -
`
`of al I VUSE product sales.
`
`16.
`
`Alto is the single most popular vaping product among U.S . consumers, recently
`
`surpassing JUU L. A lto is currently used by more than 4.5 million U.S. consumers.
`
`17.
`
`If the Court were to enter an injunction barring U.S. sa les of the Alto product, a
`
`substantial portion of RJRV's e-cigarette business would be devastated,
`
`18.
`
`RJRV will not be able to avoid or even m itigate the losses that will follow from the
`
`exclusion of the A lto product. A lthough no injunct ion is being sought against Solo (Generation
`
`I), Ciro, or Vibe, there is no reason to believe that Alto users w ill switch to one of these other
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00393-LMB-WEF Document 1462-1 Filed 04/05/23 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 39464
`
`products if Alto is barred from the market. As I described in paragraphs 7-13 above, consumer
`
`preferences have moved away from the shape and design of products I ike Solo, Ciro, and Vibe.
`
`19.
`
`Beyond the potential consequences to existing Alto users, removal of Alto would
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`~
`Executed this~ day of August, 2022.
`
`~h~~~
`
`Christy Cary-Garn
`
`6
`
`