`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-3 Filed 03/15/24 Page 1of5
`
`EXHIBIT 6
`EXHIBIT 6
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-3 Filed 03/15/24 Page 2 of 5
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Stephanie Mandir
`Nguyen, Lisa; Jason Charkow; AO_Realtek_PV; MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com; Wang, Grace:LT (NY)
`Ron Daignault; Chandran Iyer; Scott Samay; Cathy Pampinella; Zak Ellis
`RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek (6:22-cv-01162-ADA) - Amended Scheduling Order
`Tuesday, February 27, 2024 11:29:06 AM
`image001.png
`
`Caution: non-A&O email
`
`Lisa,
`
`Thank you for your response. However, we believe it is in the parties’ best interest to
`expediate our actions.
`
`Since December, we’ve requested modifying the scheduling order so that the parties
`could resolve the outstanding schematic issues without involving the court. We also
`extended the courtesy of allowing extra time for your response through the Lunar
`New Year, yet we still have not heard back.
`
`In light of these circumstances, we plan on filing a motion with the court today without
`awaiting the interim deadline. As such, we kindly request that you promptly inform us
`if you intend to oppose the motion. We appreciate your cooperation.
`
`Best,
`Stephanie
`
`
`From: Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com <Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com>
`Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:25 PM
`To: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir
`<smandir@daignaultiyer.com>; AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com; MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com;
`Grace.Wang@allenovery.com
`Cc: Ron Daignault <rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>; Cathy Pampinella <cpampinella@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek (6:22-cv-01162-ADA) - Amended Scheduling Order
`
`Jason, our client is still considering the extension but will agree to an interim extension for the final
`contentions until this Friday. We will provide our position on the longer extension by Friday.
`
`From: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:58 AM
`To: Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>; AO_Realtek_PV
`<AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Nguyen, Lisa <Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com>;
`MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com; Wang, Grace:LT (NY) <Grace.Wang@allenovery.com>
`Cc: Ron Daignault <rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>;
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-3 Filed 03/15/24 Page 3 of 5
`
`Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>; Cathy Pampinella <cpampinella@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek (6:22-cv-01162-ADA) - Amended Scheduling Order
`
`
`Caution: non-A&O email
`
`
`
`Counsel
`
`If we cannot come to an understanding by today or early tomorrow AM, we will file a
`motion tomorrow.
`
`Such a motion seems unnecessary given that the parties have been trying to work
`through the schematic issue (including giving Realtek time through the Lunar New Year
`to respond to our request to be able to access Cadence remotely - which directly affect
`our preparing charts) and that we proposed modifying the schedule back in Dec (to
`which Realtek did not respond).
`
`If Realtek will not agree to modify the date, please let us know if you oppose a motion to
`modify the date.
`
`
`
`
`Jason S. Charkow
`
`Partner
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`914.843.8138
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`
`
`
`From: Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 9:34 AM
`To: AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com <AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>;
`Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com <Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com>; MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com
`<MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Grace.Wang@allenovery.com <Grace.Wang@allenovery.com>
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-3 Filed 03/15/24 Page 4 of 5
`
`Cc: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; Ron Daignault <rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>; Cathy
`Pampinella <cpampinella@daignaultiyer.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek (6:22-cv-01162-ADA) - Amended Scheduling Order
`
`Counsel,
`
`In our email below, we proposed pushing the date of final infringement/invalidity
`contentions from tomorrow, February 27, 2024 to April 23, 2024. We have not heard
`back from you regarding this deadline. Given our ongoing discussions regarding the
`production of schematics, as well as the minimal discovery to date, can we agree to
`push this date and file an amended scheduling order? We also think we need to
`rework the schedule a bit in general.
`
`Please let us know if your team has availability today for a call to discuss.
`
`Thanks,
`Stephanie
`
`
`
`Stephanie R. Mandir
`Associate
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`202.270.5666
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`From: Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Friday, December 22, 2023 1:40 PM
`To: AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com; Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com; MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com;
`Grace.Wang@allenovery.com
`Cc: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; Ron Daignault <rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>; Cathy
`Pampinella <cpampinella@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: ParkerVision v. Realtek (6:22-cv-01162-ADA) - Amended Scheduling Order
`
`Counsel,
`
`Due to the current scheduling order conflicting with deadlines in ParkerVision, Inc. v. MediaTek, Inc.,
`6:22-cv-01163-ADA, ParkerVision proposes amending the scheduling order to the attached format.
`Please let us know whether Realtek opposes a motion for entry of the amended scheduling order.
`
`
`Thanks,
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-3 Filed 03/15/24 Page 5 of 5
`
`Zak
`
`
`
`
`This transmission, and any attached files, may contain information from the law firm of Daignault
`Iyer LLP which is confidential and/or legally privileged. Such information is intended only for the use
`of the individual or entity to whom this transmission is addressed. If you are not the intended
`recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any
`action in reliance on the contents of this transmitted information is strictly prohibited, that copies of
`this transmission and any attached files should be deleted from your disk directories immediately,
`and that any printed copies of this transmission or attached files should be returned to this firm. If
`you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail immediately,
`and we will arrange for the return to Daignault Iyer LLP of any printed copies.
`
`
`This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify
`us immediately by telephoning or e-mailing the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose
`its contents to any other person.
`Allen & Overy LLP
`550 High Street
`Palo Alto
`CA 94301
`Tel: +1 650 388 1650
`Fax: +1 650 388 1699
`http://www.allenovery.com
`
`Allen & Overy LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number
`OC306763 and SRA number 401323. It is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of
`England and Wales. Allen & Overy LLP is a multi-jurisdictional legal practice with lawyers admitted to practice in
`a variety of jurisdictions. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Allen & Overy LLP or an employee or
`consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of Allen & Overy LLP and of the non-
`members who are designated as partners is open to inspection at its registered office, One Bishops Square London
`E1 6AD and at the above address.
`For further information about how Allen & Overy LLP is regulated, please see our website at
`www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/legal-notices
`
`Our privacy policy is available at https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/legal-notices/privacy-policy
`
`