`
`Exhibit B
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00907-RWS-KNM Document 102-3 Filed 07/08/16 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 2801
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00319-AT Document 88 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 3
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
`ATLANTA DIVISION
`
`)
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.,
`FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, )
`INC., and ROSEMOUNT INC. )
`)
`
`) )
`
`))
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
` Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00319-AT
`
`SIPCO, LLC, AND IP CO, LLC )
`(dibia INTUS IQ),
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`) O
`
`RDER
`
`Before this Court is Declaratory Judgment Plaintiffs' Emerson Electric Co.,
`
`Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., and Rosemount, Inc. (together, "Emerson") and
`
`Declaratory Judgment Defendants' SIPCO, LLC and IP CO LLC (together,
`
`"SIPCO") (collectively "the Parties") First Joint Motion to Extend all Dates in the
`
`Scheduling Order•. Having considered the briefing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
`
`AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED, and all remaining dates in the
`
`Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 25) are extended as follows:
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00907-RWS-KNM Document 102-3 Filed 07/08/16 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 2802
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00319-AT Document 88 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 3
`
`Event/Description
`
`Plaintiffs must serve
`advice of counsel and
`related information
`rebutting a willfulness
`charge (LPR 5.2)
`
`Fact Discovery Closes
`
`Initial Rule 26 Expert
`Witness disclosures due
`on issues that a party
`bears the burden of proof
`(for non-claim
`construction issues) (LPR
`7.1)
`
`Second Rule 26 Expert
`Witness disclosures due
`on issues that opposing
`party bears the burden of
`proof (for non-claim
`construction issues) (LPR
`7.1)
`
`Rebuttal expert
`disclosures (when
`pettnitted by Rule 26)
`(LPR 7.1)
`
`Original Date
`
`May 27, 2016
`
`June 27, 2016
`
`July 27, 2016
`
`Revised Date
`
`August 26, 2016 or 2
`weeks after claim
`construction ruling,
`whichever is later
`
`September 27, 2016 or 6
`weeks after claim
`construction ruling,
`whichever is later
`
`October 27, 2016 or 1
`month after fact discovery
`closes, whichever is later
`
`August 26, 2016
`
`November 28, 2016, or 2
`months after fact
`discovery closes,
`whichever is later
`
`September 6, 2016
`
`December 12, 2016 or 15
`days after the second Rule
`26 Expert Witness
`Disclosures are due,
`whichever is later
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00907-RWS-KNM Document 102-3 Filed 07/08/16 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 2803
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00319-AT Document 88 Filed 05/02/16 Page 3 of 3
`
`Expert depositions ( PR
`7.2)
`
`September 13-October 13,
`2016
`
`Summary Judgment
`Motions due (LR 56,1D)
`
`November 14, 2016
`
`Beginning 1 week after
`rebuttal expert
`disclosures; ending 5
`weeks after rebuttal
`expert disclosures
`
`1 month after the end of
`the period for expert
`depositions
`
`Briefs Opposing
`Summary Judgment due
`(LR 7.1B)
`
`Reply Briefs for
`Summary Judgment (LR
`7.1C)
`
`December 7, 2016
`
`1 month after summary
`judgment motions are due
`
`December 21, 2016
`
`2 weeks after summary
`judgment oppositions are
`due
`
`IT SO So ORDERED this 2nd day of May, 2016.
`
`The Ho able Amy Tote rg
`United States District Judge
`Northern District of Georgia
`
`