`
`Exhibit B
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00907-RWS-KNM Document 102-3 Filed 07/08/16 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 2801
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00319-AT Document 88 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 3
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
`ATLANTA DIVISION
`
`)
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.,
`FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, )
`INC., and ROSEMOUNT INC. )
`)
`
`) )
`
`))
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
` Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00319-AT
`
`SIPCO, LLC, AND IP CO, LLC )
`(dibia INTUS IQ),
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`) O
`
`RDER
`
`Before this Court is Declaratory Judgment Plaintiffs' Emerson Electric Co.,
`
`Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., and Rosemount, Inc. (together, "Emerson") and
`
`Declaratory Judgment Defendants' SIPCO, LLC and IP CO LLC (together,
`
`"SIPCO") (collectively "the Parties") First Joint Motion to Extend all Dates in the
`
`Scheduling Order•. Having considered the briefing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
`
`AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED, and all remaining dates in the
`
`Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 25) are extended as follows:
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00907-RWS-KNM Document 102-3 Filed 07/08/16 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 2802
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00319-AT Document 88 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 3
`
`Event/Description
`
`Plaintiffs must serve
`advice of counsel and
`related information
`rebutting a willfulness
`charge (LPR 5.2)
`
`Fact Discovery Closes
`
`Initial Rule 26 Expert
`Witness disclosures due
`on issues that a party
`bears the burden of proof
`(for non-claim
`construction issues) (LPR
`7.1)
`
`Second Rule 26 Expert
`Witness disclosures due
`on issues that opposing
`party bears the burden of
`proof (for non-claim
`construction issues) (LPR
`7.1)
`
`Rebuttal expert
`disclosures (when
`pettnitted by Rule 26)
`(LPR 7.1)
`
`Original Date
`
`May 27, 2016
`
`June 27, 2016
`
`July 27, 2016
`
`Revised Date
`
`August 26, 2016 or 2
`weeks after claim
`construction ruling,
`whichever is later
`
`September 27, 2016 or 6
`weeks after claim
`construction ruling,
`whichever is later
`
`October 27, 2016 or 1
`month after fact discovery
`closes, whichever is later
`
`August 26, 2016
`
`November 28, 2016, or 2
`months after fact
`discovery closes,
`whichever is later
`
`September 6, 2016
`
`December 12, 2016 or 15
`days after the second Rule
`26 Expert Witness
`Disclosures are due,
`whichever is later
`
`
`
`Case 6:15-cv-00907-RWS-KNM Document 102-3 Filed 07/08/16 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 2803
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00319-AT Document 88 Filed 05/02/16 Page 3 of 3
`
`Expert depositions ( PR
`7.2)
`
`September 13-October 13,
`2016
`
`Summary Judgment
`Motions due (LR 56,1D)
`
`November 14, 2016
`
`Beginning 1 week after
`rebuttal expert
`disclosures; ending 5
`weeks after rebuttal
`expert disclosures
`
`1 month after the end of
`the period for expert
`depositions
`
`Briefs Opposing
`Summary Judgment due
`(LR 7.1B)
`
`Reply Briefs for
`Summary Judgment (LR
`7.1C)
`
`December 7, 2016
`
`1 month after summary
`judgment motions are due
`
`December 21, 2016
`
`2 weeks after summary
`judgment oppositions are
`due
`
`IT SO So ORDERED this 2nd day of May, 2016.
`
`The Ho able Amy Tote rg
`United States District Judge
`Northern District of Georgia
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
