EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 2039
`
`I. U.S. Pat. No. 8,385,966
`
`
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`1. A method comprising:
`
`“preamble power”
`
`“preamble power”
`
`
`
`
`
`using a processor to initialize
`for i=0 a first power control
`adjustment state g(i) for an
`uplink control channel and a
`second power control
`adjustment state f(i) for an
`uplink shared channel to each
`reflect an open loop power
`control error;
`
`using the processor to compute
`an initial transmit power for
`the uplink shared channel using
`full path loss compensation,
`wherein the initial transmit
`power depends on a preamble
`power of a first message sent
`on an access channel and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0); and
`
`sending from a transmitter a
`third message on the uplink
`shared channel at the initial
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“a transmit power of a
`preamble sent on an access
`channel”
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power depends on a preamble
`power of a first message sent
`on an access channel and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power depends on a preamble
`power of a first message sent
`on an access channel and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power takes into account both
`the preamble power and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`“wherein the second power
`control adjustment state f(i) for
`i=0 is initialized as:
`
`“wherein the second power
`control adjustment state f(i) for
`i=0 is initialized as:
`
`
`
`P 0 — UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup”
`
`P 0 — UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“wherein f(0) is calculated
`
`
`1 Defendants consist of AT&T Mobility LLC; LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics USA, Inc.; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless;
`Sprint Solutions, Inc.; Sprint Spectrum L.P.; Boost Mobile, LLC; T-Mobile USA, Inc.; T-Mobile US, Inc.; Sony Mobile Communications
`(USA) Inc.; and Kyocera Communications, Inc. Each Defendant proposes constructions only with respect to the claims asserted against
`that Defendant.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 22 PageID #: 2040
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`from the values of PO_UE_PUSCH,
`ΔPPC , and ΔPrampup by
`calculating a sum of f(0) and
`PO_UE_PUSCH and a sum of ΔPPC
`and ΔPrampup and equating the
`two calculated sums”
`
`“ΔPPC”
`
`“the difference between a
`target preamble power and a
`power actually observed at a
`base station”
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`transmit power;
`
`wherein the second power
`control adjustment state f(i)
`for i=0 is initialized as:
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Alternatively, “wherein the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(i) for i=0 is
`set such that PO_UE_PUSCH + f(0)
`= ΔPPC + ΔPrampup”
`
`P 0 — UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup;
`
`“ΔPPC”
`
`in which:
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`P0 — UE — PUSCH is a power
`control constant for the uplink
`shared channel that is specific
`for a user equipment executing
`the method;
`
`ΔPrampup is a ramp-up power for
`preamble transmissions; and
`
`ΔPPC is a power control
`command indicated in a second
`message that is received in
`response to sending the first
`message.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. The method according to
`claim 1, wherein the first
`message comprises a random
`access request message, the
`
`“preamble power”
`
`“preamble power”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“a transmit power of a
`preamble sent on an access
`channel”
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 3 of 22 PageID #: 2041
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`method further comprising:
`
`computing the preamble power
`using full path loss
`compensation,
`
`sending from the transmitter on
`the access channel the first
`message and in response
`receiving at a receiver a second
`message that comprises an
`allocation of resources on
`which the third message is
`sent;
`
`and after sending the third
`message, the method further
`comprises using the processor
`to compute an updated transmit
`power for the uplink shared
`channel using fractional power
`control and sending from the
`transmitter a subsequent
`message on the uplink shared
`channel using the updated
`transmit power.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. The method according
`to claim 1, wherein the first
`power control adjustment state
`g(i) for i=0 is initialized as:
`
`“wherein the first power
`control adjustment state g(i)
`for i=0 is initialized as:
`P 0 — UE —
` PUCCH +g(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup”
`
`“wherein the first power
`control adjustment state g(i)
`for i=0 is initialized as:
`P 0 — UE —
` PUCCH +g(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup”
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 4 of 22 PageID #: 2042
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`Alternatively, “wherein the
`first power control adjustment
`state g(i) for i=0 is set such
`that PO_UE_PUCCH + g(0) = ΔPPC
`+ ΔPrampup”
`
`“wherein g(0) is calculated
`from the values of
`PO_UE_PUCCH, ΔPPC , and
`ΔPrampup by calculating a sum
`of g(0) and PO_UE_PUCCH and a
`sum of ΔPPC and ΔPrampup and
`equating the two calculated
`sums”
`
` P
`
` 0 — UE —
` PUCCH +g(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup;
`
`wherein: PO — UE — PUCCH is a
`power control constant for the
`uplink control channel power
`that is specific for a user
`equipment executing the
`method.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“preamble power”
`
`“preamble power”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“a transmit power of a
`preamble sent on an access
`channel”
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power PMsg3 of the third
`message for i=0 is equal to:
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power PMsg3 of the third
`message for i=0 is equal to:
`
`P Msg3=min{P max ,P preamble+Δ0,
`preamble — Msg3+ΔPC —Msg3+10
`log10(M PUSCH(i))+ΔTF(TF(i))}”
`
`P Msg3=min{P max ,P preamble+Δ0,
`preamble — Msg3+ΔPC —Msg3+10
`log10(M PUSCH(i))+ΔTF(TF(i))}”
`
`No construction necessary. Not
`indefinite.
`
`Indefinite.
`
`5. The method according
`to claim 1,
`
`wherein the initial transmit
`power PMsg3 of the third
`message for i=0 is equal to:
`
`P Msg3=min{P max ,P preamble+Δ0,
`preamble — Msg3+ΔPC —Msg3+10
`log10(M PUSCH(i))+ΔTF(TF(i))};
`
`in which:
`
`PMAX is a maximum allowed
`transmission power;
`
`Ppreamble is the preamble power
`of the first message;
`
`MPUSCH(i) is determined from
`an uplink resource allocation of
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 5 of 22 PageID #: 2043
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`a second message received in
`response to sending the first
`message;
`
`ΔTF(TF(i)) is calculated from
`received signaling;
`
`ΔPC — Msg3 is indicated by a
`power control command
`received at the receiver; and
`
`Δ0,preamble — Msg3 is an offset
`from the preamble power.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9. A computer readable
`memory storing a computer
`program that when executed by
`a processor results in actions
`comprising:
`
`initializing for i=0 a first power
`control adjustment state g(i) for
`an uplink control channel and a
`second accumulation power
`control adjustment state f(i) for
`an uplink shared channel to
`each reflect an open loop
`power control error;
`
`computing an initial transmit
`power for the uplink shared
`channel using full path loss
`
`“preamble power”
`
`“preamble power”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“a transmit power of a
`preamble sent on an access
`channel”
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power depends on a preamble
`power of a first message sent
`on an access channel and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power depends on a preamble
`power of a first message sent
`on an access channel and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power takes into account both
`the preamble power and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 6 of 22 PageID #: 2044
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`compensation, wherein the
`initial transmit power depends
`on a preamble power of a first
`message sent on an access
`channel and the second power
`control adjustment state f(0);
`and
`
`outputting the initial transmit
`power for transmission of a
`third message on the uplink
`shared channel;
`
`wherein the second
`accumulation power control
`adjustment state f(i) for i=0 is
`initialized as:
`
`P 0 — UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup;
`
`in which:
`
`P0 — UE — PUSCH is a power
`control constant for the uplink
`shared channel that is specific
`for a user equipment which
`sends the first and third
`messages;
`
`ΔPrampup is a ramp-up power for
`preamble transmissions; and
`
`ΔPPC is a power control
`command indicated in a second
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`“wherein the second
`accumulation power control
`adjustment state f(i) for i=0 is
`initialized as:
`
`“wherein the second
`accumulation power control
`adjustment state f(i) for i=0 is
`initialized as:
`
`P 0—UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔPPC +ΔPrampup”
`
`P 0 — UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔPPC +ΔPrampup”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`Alternatively, “wherein the
`second accumulation power
`control adjustment state f(i) for
`i=0 is set such that PO_UE_PUSCH
`+ f(0) = ΔPPC + ΔPrampup”
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power takes into account both
`the preamble power and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`“ΔPPC”
`
`“ΔPPC”
`
`
`
`
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“the difference between a
`target preamble power and a
`power actually observed at a
`base station”
`
`6
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 7 of 22 PageID #: 2045
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`message that is received in
`response to the first message.
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. An apparatus comprising:
`
`“preamble power”
`
`“preamble power”
`
`a processor; and
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“a transmit power of a
`preamble sent on an access
`channel”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a memory storing a computer
`program;
`
`in which the processor is
`configured with the memory
`and the computer program to
`cause the apparatus to:
`
`initialize for i=0 a first power
`control adjustment state g(i) for
`an uplink control channel and a
`second accumulation power
`control adjustment state f(i) for
`an uplink shared channel to
`each reflect an open loop
`power control error, and
`
`compute an initial transmit
`power for the uplink shared
`channel using full path loss
`compensation, wherein the
`initial transmit power depends
`
`
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power depends on a preamble
`power of a first message sent
`on an access channel and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power depends on a preamble
`power of a first message sent
`on an access channel and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power takes into account both
`the preamble power and the
`second power control
`adjustment state f(0)”
`
`“wherein the second power
`control adjustment state f(i) for
`i=0 is initialized as:
`
`“wherein the second power
`control adjustment state f(i) for
`i=0 is initialized as:
`
`
`
`P 0 — UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup”
`
`P 0 — UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup”
`
`“wherein f(0) is calculated
`
`7
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 8 of 22 PageID #: 2046
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`Alternatively, “wherein the
`second accumulation power
`control adjustment state f(i) for
`i=0 is set such that PO_UE_PUSCH
`+ f(0) = ΔPPC + ΔPrampup”
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`from the values of PO_UE_PUSCH,
`ΔPPC , and ΔPrampup by
`calculating a sum of f(0) and
`PO_UE_PUSCH and a sum of ΔPPC
`and ΔPrampup and equating the
`two calculated sums”
`
`“ΔPPC”
`
`“ΔPPC”
`
`
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“the difference between a
`target preamble power and a
`power actually observed at a
`base station”
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`on a preamble power of a first
`message sent on an access
`channel and the second power
`control adjustment state f(0);
`and
`
`compile a third message to be
`sent on the uplink shared
`channel at the initial transmit
`power;
`
`wherein the second power
`control adjustment state f(i)
`for i=0 is initialized as:
`
`P 0 — UE —
` PUSCH +f(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup;
`
`in which:
`
`P0 — UE — PUSCH is a power
`control constant for the uplink
`shared channel that is specific
`for a user equipment;
`
`ΔPrampup is a ramp-up power for
`preamble transmissions; and
`
`ΔPPC is a power control
`command indicated in a second
`message received at a receiver
`of the apparatus in response to
`the transmitter sending the first
`message.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 9 of 22 PageID #: 2047
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“preamble power”
`
`“preamble power”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“a transmit power of a
`preamble sent on an access
`channel”
`
`11. The apparatus according
`to claim 10, wherein the first
`message comprises a random
`access request message, and:
`
`the processor is configured
`with the memory and the
`computer program to compute
`the preamble power using full
`path loss compensation,
`
`the apparatus further
`comprising a transmitter is
`configured to send on the
`access channel the first
`message;
`
`the apparatus further
`comprising a receiver
`configured to receive, in
`response to the transmitter
`sending the first message, a
`second message that comprises
`an allocation of resources on
`which the third message is
`sent;
`
`the processor with the memory
`and the computer program is
`configured, after the
`transmitter sends the third
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 10 of 22 PageID #: 2048
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`Alternatively, “wherein the
`first power control adjustment
`state g(i) for i=0 is set such
`that PO_UE_PUCCH + g(0) = ΔPPC
`+ ΔPrampup”
`
`“wherein g(0) is calculated
`from the values of
`PO_UE_PUCCH, ΔPPC , and
`ΔPrampup by calculating a sum
`of g(0) and PO_UE_PUCCH and a
`sum of ΔPPC and ΔPrampup and
`equating the two calculated
`sums”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`message, to compute an
`updated transmit power for the
`uplink shared channel using
`fractional power control;
`
`and the transmitter is
`configured to send a
`subsequent message on the
`uplink shared channel using the
`updated transmit power.
`
`
`
`
`
`12. The apparatus according
`to claim 10, wherein the first
`power control adjustment state
`g(i) for i=0 is initialized as:
`
` P
`
` 0 — UE —
` PUCCH +g(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup;
`
`wherein: PO — UE — PUCCH is a
`power control constant for the
`uplink control channel that is
`specific for a user equipment.
`
`
`
`“wherein the first power
`control adjustment state g(i)
`for i=0 is initialized as:
`P 0 — UE —
` PUCCH +g(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup”
`
`“wherein the first power
`control adjustment state g(i)
`for i=0 is initialized as:
`P 0 — UE —
` PUCCH +g(0)=ΔP PC +ΔP rampup”
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 11 of 22 PageID #: 2049
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction1
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`14. The apparatus according
`to claim 10,
`
`wherein the initial transmit
`power PMsg3 for i=0 is equal to:
`
`“preamble power”
`
`“preamble power”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“a transmit power of a
`preamble sent on an access
`channel”
`
`P Msg3=min{P max ,P preamble+Δ0,
`preamble — Msg3+ΔPC —Msg3+10
`log10(M PUSCH(i))+ΔTF(TF(i))};
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power PMsg3 of the third
`message for i=0 is equal to:
`
`“wherein the initial transmit
`power PMsg3 of the third
`message for i=0 is equal to:
`
`
`
`
`
`P Msg3=min{P max ,P preamble+Δ0,
`preamble — Msg3+ΔPC —Msg3+10
`log10(M PUSCH(i))+ΔTF(TF(i))}”
`
`P Msg3=min{P max ,P preamble+Δ0,
`preamble — Msg3+ΔPC —Msg3+10
`log10(M PUSCH(i))+ΔTF(TF(i))}”
`
`No construction necessary. Not
`indefinite.
`
`Indefinite.
`
`in which:
`
`PMAX is a maximum allowed
`transmission power;
`
`Ppreamble is the preamble power
`of the first message;
`
`MPUSCH(i) is determined from
`an uplink resource allocation of
`a second message received in
`response to sending the first
`message;
`
`ΔTF(TF(i)) is calculated from
`received signaling;
`
`ΔPC — Msg3 is indicated by a
`power control command
`received at the receiver; and
`
`Δ0,preamble — Msg3 is an offset
`from the preamble power.
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 12 of 22 PageID #: 2050
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`II. U.S. Pat. No. 8,848,556
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`13. A non-transitory computer
`readable medium encoded with
`a computer program that, when
`executed in hardware, causes
`the hardware to perform a
`process, the process
`comprising:
`
`preparing a power headroom
`report control element, based
`on a trigger configured by a
`base station, the trigger
`determining when the power
`headroom report control
`element is to be sent in an
`uplink, the preparing of the
`power headroom report control
`element includes incorporating
`a bitmap indicating which
`power headroom reports are
`being reported, the preparing
`of the power headroom report
`control element further
`includes preparing the bitmap
`to include bits for power
`headroom reports for a
`plurality of secondary cells;
`and
`
`sending the prepared power
`headroom report control
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`“bitmap”
`
`“a data structure that
`represents information in the
`form of a collection of
`individual bits”
`“a bitmap indicating which
`power headroom reports are
`being reported”
`
`No construction necessary. See
`“bitmap” above.
`
`“bits for power headroom
`reports for a plurality of
`secondary cells”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“secondary cells”
`
`No construction necessary,
`other than to clarify that a
`primary cell is different than a
`secondary cell.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`“bitmap”
`
`“a collection of bits”
`
`“a bitmap indicating which
`power headroom reports are
`being reported”
`
`“a collection of bits indicating
`which power headroom reports
`are being reported”
`“bits for power headroom
`reports for a plurality of
`secondary cells”
`
`“bits for power headroom
`reports for a plurality of
`secondary cells in a
`configuration such that a single
`bit in the bitmap does not
`correspond to a single
`secondary cell”
`“secondary cells”
`
`“serving cells/component
`carriers configured for a UE
`that are different from the
`primary serving cell”
`
`12
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 13 of 22 PageID #: 2051
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`element to the base station.
`
`
`
`14. The non-transitory
`computer readable medium of
`claim 13, wherein the
`preparing of the power
`headroom report control
`element includes preparing the
`bitmap in one of: a MAC
`subheader and a payload.
`
`
`
`15. The non-transitory
`computer readable medium of
`claim 13, wherein the power
`headroom report control
`element includes at least one
`of: a type 1 power headroom
`report for a primary serving
`cell and a type 2 power
`headroom report for the
`primary serving cell.
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“bitmap”
`
`“a data structure that
`represents information in the
`form of a collection of
`individual bits”
`
`
`“bitmap”
`
`“a collection of bits”
`
`
`
`
`
`“type 1 power headroom
`report”
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`No construction necessary,
`other than to clarify that a
`Type 1 power headroom report
`is different than a Type 2
`power headroom report.
`
`“type 1 power headroom
`report”
`
`Indefinite.
`
`If not indefinite:
`
`“type1 power headroom
`report” should be construed as
`“a power headroom report
`computed as: P_cmax,c minus
`PUSCH power”
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 14 of 22 PageID #: 2052
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`“type 2 power headroom
`report”
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`No construction necessary,
`other than to clarify that a
`Type 1 power headroom report
`is different than a Type 2
`power headroom report.
`
`
`
`
`
`21. An apparatus, comprising:
`
`at least one processor; and
`
`at least one memory including
`computer program code, the at
`least one memory and the
`computer program code being
`configured to, with the at least
`one processor, cause the
`apparatus at least to:
`
`“bitmap”
`
`“a data structure that
`represents information in the
`form of a collection of
`individual bits”
`“a bitmap indicating which
`power headroom reports are
`being reported”
`
`No construction necessary. See
`“bitmap” above.
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`“type 2 power headroom
`report”
`
`Indefinite.
`
`If not indefinite:
`
`
`“type 2 power headroom
`report” should be construed as
`“a power headroom report
`computed as: P_cmax,c minus
`PUCCH power minus PUSCH
`power”
`
`
`“bitmap”
`
`“a collection of bits”
`
`“a bitmap indicating which
`power headroom reports are
`being reported”
`
`“a collection of bits indicating
`which power headroom reports
`are being reported”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 15 of 22 PageID #: 2053
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`“bits for power headroom
`reports for a plurality of the
`secondary cells”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“secondary cells”
`
`No construction necessary,
`other than to clarify that a
`primary cell is different than a
`secondary cell.
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`“bits for power headroom
`reports for a plurality of the
`secondary cells”
`
`“bits for power headroom
`reports for a plurality of
`secondary cells in a
`configuration such that a single
`bit in the bitmap does not
`correspond to a single
`secondary cell”
`“secondary cells”
`
`“serving cells/component
`carriers configured for a UE
`that are different from the
`primary serving cell”
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`prepare a power headroom
`report control element, based
`on a trigger configured by a
`base station, the trigger
`determines when the power
`headroom report control
`element is to be sent in an
`uplink; preparation of the
`power headroom report control
`element includes incorporating
`a bitmap indicating which
`power headroom reports are
`being reported, the preparation
`of the power headroom report
`control element further
`includes preparing the bitmap
`to include bits for power
`headroom reports for a
`plurality of the secondary
`cells; and
`
`send the power headroom
`report control element to the
`base station.
`
`
`
`
`
`22. The apparatus of claim 21,
`wherein the at least one
`memory and the computer
`program code are configured
`to, with the at least one
`processor, cause the apparatus
`at least to prepare the power
`
`
`
`“bitmap”
`
`“a data structure that
`represents information in the
`form of a collection of
`individual bits”
`
`
`
`“bitmap”
`
`“a collection of bits”
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 16 of 22 PageID #: 2054
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`headroom report control
`element by preparing the
`bitmap in one of: a MAC
`subheader and a payload.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23. The apparatus of claim 21,
`wherein the at least one
`memory and the computer
`program code are configured
`to, with the at least one
`processor, cause the apparatus
`at least to prepare the power
`headroom report control
`element by including at least
`one of: a type 1 power
`headroom report for a primary
`serving cell or a type 2 power
`headroom report for the
`primary serving cell.
`
`
`
`“type 1 power headroom
`report”
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`No construction necessary,
`other than to clarify that a
`Type 1 power headroom report
`is different than a Type 2
`power headroom report.
`
`“type 2 power headroom
`report”
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`No construction necessary,
`other than to clarify that a
`Type 1 power headroom report
`is different than a Type 2
`power headroom report.
`
`“type 1 power headroom
`report”
`
`Indefinite.
`
`If not indefinite:
`
`“type1 power headroom
`report” should be construed as
`“a power headroom report
`computed as: P_cmax,c minus
`PUSCH power”
`
`
`“type 2 power headroom
`report”
`
`Indefinite.
`
`If not indefinite:
`
`
`
`“type 2 power headroom
`report” should be construed as
`“a power headroom report
`
`16
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 17 of 22 PageID #: 2055
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`computed as: P_cmax,c minus
`PUCCH power minus PUSCH
`power”
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 18 of 22 PageID #: 2056
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`III. U.S. Pat. No. 8,868,060
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`1. A method of communicating
`with a terminal in a cellular
`wireless communication
`system, the method
`comprising:
`
`storing, at the terminal of the
`cellular wireless
`communication system, a
`group of specific identifiers
`common to a plurality of
`terminals supporting an
`emergency warning, at least
`two specific identifiers in the
`group of the specific
`identifiers being for different
`types of emergencies, the
`cellular wireless
`communication system being a
`bi-directional cellular wireless
`communication system
`between a base station and the
`plurality of terminals;
`
`checking, by the terminal,
`whether a paging message
`received from the base station
`includes at least one specific
`identifier of the group of the
`specific identifiers;
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`“storing, at the terminal of the
`cellular wireless
`communication system, a
`group of specific identifiers”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`
`
`
`“at least two specific
`identifiers … being for
`different types of emergencies”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“paging message”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“establishing at least one of a
`physical channel and a logical
`channel”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`“storing, at the terminal of the
`cellular wireless
`communication system, a
`group of specific identifiers”
`
`“storing, at the terminal, a
`plurality of specific identifiers
`prior to receipt of the paging
`message”
`
`“at least two specific
`identifiers … being for
`different types of emergencies”
`
`“at least two specific
`identifiers each uniquely
`indicating a different type of
`emergency”
`“paging message”
`
`“a message sent by a base
`station on a shared channel and
`carrying information
`corresponding to unique
`identifiers”
`“establishing at least one of a
`physical channel and a logical
`channel”
`
`“establishing at least one
`communication channel
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 19 of 22 PageID #: 2057
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`switching, by the terminal, to a
`broadcast mode for receiving
`broadcast content on a
`broadcast channel only if the
`received paging message
`includes the at least one
`specific identifier of the group
`of the specific identifiers; and
`
`establishing, by the terminal,
`at least one of a physical
`channel and a logical channel
`only if the received paging
`message includes a temporary
`mobile subscriber identity
`allocated to the terminal.
`
`
`
`7. A terminal operating in a
`cellular wireless
`communication system having
`a plurality of terminals, the
`terminal comprising:
`
`a memory unit configured to:
`
`store a group of specific
`identifiers common to the
`plurality of the terminals
`supporting an emergency
`warning, at least two specific
`identifiers in the group of the
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`Alternatively, “establishing a
`physical channel, a logical
`channel, or both.”
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`between the terminal and the
`base station”
`
`“temporary mobile subscriber
`identity”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“temporary mobile subscriber
`identity”
`
`“a temporary identifier
`allocated to the terminal to
`uniquely identify the mobile
`subscriber”
`
`
`“store a group of specific
`identifiers”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`
`
`“at least two specific
`identifiers … being for
`different types of emergencies”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`
`“store a group of specific
`identifiers”
`
`“store, at the terminal, a
`plurality of specific identifiers
`prior to receipt of the paging
`message”
`
`“at least two specific
`identifiers … being for
`different types of emergencies”
`
`“at least two specific
`identifiers each uniquely
`indicating a different type of
`
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 20 of 22 PageID #: 2058
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`emergency”
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`“paging message”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`“establish at least one of a
`physical channel and a logical
`channel”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`Alternatively, “establish a
`physical channel, a logical
`channel, or both.”
`“temporary mobile subscriber
`identity”
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“paging message”
`
`“a message sent by a base
`station on a shared channel and
`carrying information
`corresponding to unique
`identifiers”
`“establish at least one of a
`physical channel and a logical
`channel”
`
`“establishing at least one
`communication channel
`between the terminal and the
`base station”
`
`“temporary mobile subscriber
`identity”
`
`“a temporary identifier
`allocated to the terminal to
`uniquely identify the mobile
`subscriber”
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`specific identifiers being for
`different types of emergencies,
`the cellular wireless
`communication system being a
`bi-directional cellular wireless
`communication system
`between a base station and the
`plurality of terminals; and
`
`a control unit configured to:
`
`check whether a paging
`message received from the
`base station includes at least
`one specific identifier of the
`group of the specific
`identifiers;
`
`switch to a broadcast mode for
`receiving broadcast content on
`a broadcast channel only if the
`paging message received from
`the base station includes the at
`least one specific identifier of
`the group of the specific
`identifiers; and
`
`establish at least one of a
`physical channel and a logical
`channel only if the received
`paging message includes a
`temporary mobile a subscriber
`identity allocated to the
`terminal.
`
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A - P.R. 4-5(d) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 164-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 21 of 22 PageID #: 2059
`
`Disputed Claim
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15. A terminal operating in a
`cellular wireless
`com