throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 174 Filed 01/08/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 7667
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.
`
`
`
`V.
`
`§
`§
`§
`APPLE, INC.
`______________________________________________________________________________
`MINUTES FOR MARKMAN and MOTIONS HEARING
`HELD BEFORE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`JANUARY 8, 2020
`
`CAUSE NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`§§
`
`ADJOURN: 6:04 pm
`OPEN: 10:01 a.m.
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF:
`See Attorney Sign-In Sheet
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT: See Attorney Sign-In Sheet
`
`TECHNICAL ADVISOR:
`
`Shane Nelson
`
`LAW CLERK:
`
`Melissa Keech
`
`COURTROOM DEPUTY:
`
`Betty Schroeder
`
`Anna Lafrenz
`COURT REPORTER:
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`10:01 a.m.
`
`Case called; parties make introductions and announce ready; Court welcomes
`everyone
`
`10:04 a.m. Mr. Saqid Siddiqui begins with the term “device for getting location information
`denoting a present place of said terminal”; agrees with Court’s construction
`
`10:10 a.m. Ms. LuAnn Simmons argues the term
`
`10:13 a.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`10:16 a.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`10:25 a.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`10:30 a.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 174 Filed 01/08/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 7668
`
`10:33 a.m. Mr. Siddiqui responds to Ms. Simmons’ argument
`
`10:41 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Siddiqui; Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`10:42 a.m. Ms. Simmons responds
`
`10:46 a.m. Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`10:47 a.m. Mr. Siddiqui argues the terms “a device for getting location information of
`another portable terminal from said another portable terminal via connected
`network”; “a device for getting a location information of another portable
`terminal”; and “a device for retrieving a route from said present place to said
`destination”
`
`10:50 a.m. Ms. Simmons responds to argument
`
`10:52 a.m. Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`10:53 a.m. Ms. Simmons responds
`
`10:54 a.m. Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`10:56 a.m. Ms. Simmons responds
`
`10:57 a.m. Mr. Tripp Fussell argues the term “capacity detector for detecting a remaining
`capacity of said battery”
`
`11:11 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fussell; Mr. Fussell responds
`
`11:14 a.m. Ms. Simmons responds to argument
`
`11:15 a.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`11:18 a.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`11:33 a.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`11:35 a.m. Mr. Fussell responds
`
`11:38 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fussell; Mr. Fussell responds
`
`11:43 a.m. Ms. Simmons responds
`
`11:45 a.m. Mr. Fussell responds
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 174 Filed 01/08/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 7669
`
`11:47 a.m.
`
`Recess
`
`1:02 p.m.
`
`Mr. Fussell argues the term “ringing sound generator”
`
`1:14 p.m.
`
`Ms. Simmons responds to argument
`
`1:17 p.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`1:19 p.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`1:27 p.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Simmons; Ms. Simmons responds
`
`1:29 p.m.
`
`Mr. Fussell responds
`
`1:31 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fussell; Mr. Fussell responds
`
`1:32 p.m.
`
`Ms. Simmons responds
`
`1:34 p.m.
`
`Mr. Fussell responds
`
`1:35 p.m.
`
`Mr. Kfir Levy argues the term “an input unit for receiving an input entered by a
`user”
`
`1:38 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Levy; Mr. Levy responds
`
`1:43 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Levy; Mr. Levy responds
`
`1:44 p.m.
`
`Ms. Simmons responds to argument
`
`1:55 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`2:03 p.m.
`
`Ms. Simmons responds
`
`2:04 p.m.
`
` Mr. Levy argues the term “means for selecting an object displayed on said display
`apparatus”
`
`2:07 p.m.
`
`Ms. Simmons responds to argument
`
`2:09 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`2:10 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy argues the term “display apparatus”
`
`2:13 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Levy; Mr. Levy responds
`
`2:19 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Levy; Mr. Levy responds
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 174 Filed 01/08/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 7670
`
`2:22 p.m.
`
`Mr. Tony Beasley responds to argument
`
`2:23 p.m.
`
`Court addresses Mr. Beasley; Mr. Beasley responds
`
`2:28 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`2:31 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Levy; Mr. Levy responds
`
`2:32 p.m.
`
`Recess
`
`2:52 p.m.
`
`Mr. Bryan Nese argues the term “effective scanning lines M of a display screen”
`
`2:55 p.m.
`
`Mr. Vincent Zhou responds to argument
`
` 2;59 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Zhou; Mr. Zhou responds
`
`3:06 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Zhou; Mr. Zhou responds
`
`3:10 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese responds
`
`3:14 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Nese; Mr. Nese responds
`
`3:17 p.m.
`
`Mr. Zhou responds
`
`3:21 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Nese; Mr. Nese responds
`
`3:22 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese advises that Maxell agrees to the Court’s construction of the “culling”
`and “mixing” terms
`
`3:22 p.m.
`
`Mr. Zhou argues the “culling” term
`
`3:26 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Zhou; Mr. Zhou responds
`
`3:27 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese responds to argument
`
`3:31 p.m.
`
`Mr. Zhou responds
`
`3:34 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese responds
`
`3:35 p.m.
`
`Mr. Zhou argues the “mixing” term
`
`3:38 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese responds to argument
`
`3:40 p.m.
`
`Mr. Zhou responds
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 174 Filed 01/08/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 7671
`
`3:41 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui argues the term “communication apparatus”
`
`3:43 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beasley responds to argument
`
`3:43 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Beasley; Mr. Beasley responds
`
`3:47 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`3:50 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beasley responds
`
`3:51 p.m.
`
`Courtroom sealed
`
`3:51 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beasley argues Apple’s Motion to Compel Licensing and Negotiation
`Documents (dkt. #156)
`
`4:00 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Beasley; Mr. Beasley responds
`
`4:03 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds to argument
`
`4:18 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beasley responds
`
`4:19 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`4:20 p.m.
`
`Mr. Zhou argues Apple’s Motion to Compel Compliant Infringement Contentions
`(dkt. #123)
`
`4:28 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Zhou; Mr. Zhou responds
`
`4:36 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui responds to argument
`
`4:57 p.m.
`
` Court questions Mr. Siddiqui; Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`5:00 p.m.
`
`Mr. Zhou responds
`
`5:00 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Zhou; Mr. Zhou responds
`
`5:08 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`5:09 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Siddiqui; Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`5:12 .p.m.
`
`Mr. Khou responds
`
`5:15 p.m.
`
`Cout questions Mr. Siddiqui; Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`5:17 p.m.
`
`Recess - Courtroom unsealed
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 174 Filed 01/08/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 7672
`
`5:33 p.m.
`
`Ms. Melissa Smith argues Apple’s Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity
`Contentions (dkt. #130)
`
`5:35 p.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Smith; Ms. Smith responds
`
`5:41 p.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Smith; Ms. Smith responds
`
`5:45 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds to argument
`
`5:55 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Levy; Mr. Levy responds
`
`5:57 p.m.
`
`Ms. Smith responds
`
`5:59 p.m.
`
`Court questions Ms. Smith; Mr. Zhou responds
`
`6:00 p.m.
`
`Ms. Smith continues
`
`6:01 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`6:04 p.m.
`
`Recess
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket