throbber
Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 287-29 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 16871
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 287-29 Filed 08/07/18 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 16872
`
`Sung, Ye-Eun
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Wisnia, Howard N. [howard.wisnia@pillsburylaw.com]
`Thursday, June 14, 2018 3:52 PM
`Levy, Kfir B.
`Beaber, Jamie B.; ZTE_Hitachi; Brian Craft; Eric Findlay; US-CLIENT-HM-ZTE-Service; Geoff
`Culbertson
`Re: meet and confer re asserted claims and prior art
`
`We don’t intend to present an invalidity case on non asserted claims.
`
`Best Regards, Howard
`
`On Jun 14, 2018, at 2:50 PM, Levy, Kfir B. <KLevy@mayerbrown.com> wrote:
`
`Howard,
`
`This confirms the asserted claims are:
`
`729: 1, 2
`493: 5, 6
`794: 1, 2
`695: 1
`491: 1, 8
`193: 1
`317: 1, 2, 3
`
`Thank you for confirming the prior art references and combinations, however your email states that ZTE is asserting
`anticipation and obviousness against at least claims of the 317 patent that are not being asserted. Is that ZTE’s plan? If
`so, we may need to rethink the claims Maxell will assert at trial for any patents for which this is the case. Please confirm
`one way or the other.
`
`In terms of the order of live witnesses we plan to present, they are:
`
`M. Caloyannides
`K. Nakamura
`R. Maher
`J. Phinney
`V. Madisetti
`T. Erdem
`C. Mulhern
`
`We have not yet determined which deposition designations we intend to play, when, or in what order. We will provide
`that information in accordance with the Court’s rules, the Joint Pretrial Order, and the Court’s Order on Trial Procedures.
`
`We look forward to your response regarding ZTE’s assertions of prior art against non-asserted claims. Please also get
`back to us on the issue of confidentiality in the court room—i.e., whether we can agree the courtroom can be sealed
`once per witness, per patent—so that for witnesses covering more than one patent, the courtroom can be sealed twice.
`This may not be a problem for all experts covering multiple patents, but it will be at least for Dr. Caloyannides.
`
`Thanks,
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 287-29 Filed 08/07/18 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 16873
`
`Kfir B. Levy
`Partner | Intellectual Property
`Mayer ♦ Brown
`Direct Dial - 202.263.3136
`klevy@mayerbrown.com
`
`From: Wisnia, Howard N. [mailto:howard.wisnia@pillsburylaw.com]
`Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 2:33 PM
`To: Beaber, Jamie B.; Levy, Kfir B.
`Cc: ZTE_Hitachi; Brian Craft; Eric Findlay; US-CLIENT-HM-ZTE-Service; Geoff Culbertson
`Subject: RE: meet and confer re asserted claims and prior art
`
`Jamie,
`
`Following up on our call, here is a list of prior art issue.
`
`317:
`
`ZTE does still plan to assert the following with respect to the ‘317 Patent:
`•
`U.S. Patent No. 6,266,614 (“Alumbaugh”) anticipates Claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 15; and
`•
`Alumbaugh in combination with U.S. Patent No. 5,592,382 (“Colley”) renders obvious Claim 17
`
`491/695:
`
`Asserted claims are Obvious in view of Huang, Ozkan, Inagaki, Bergher, and Ko
`
`193:
`
`Asserted claims are obvious based on
`Ground A: Wheatley + Mucke + IS-95
`Ground B: Wheatley + Mucke + IS-95 + Kim
`Ground C: Wheatley + Mucke + IS-95 + Kim + Weiland
`
`794:
`
`Asserted claims are obvious
`
`Nongaki and Reichelt
`
`493:
`
`Asserted claims are obvious:
`
`Claim 5: Paruluski 406 and Dunton
`
`Claim 5: Paruluski 335 and Paruluski 343
`
`Claim 6: either of above plus Ishizuka
`
`729:
`
`Ground A: Paruluski 406 and Paruluski 343 and Ishizuka
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 287-29 Filed 08/07/18 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 16874
`
`Ground B: Paruluski 335 and Dunton and Ishizuka
`
`We understand that after dropping of certain claims these are the only remaining asserted claims. Please confirm:
`
`729: 1, 2
`493: 5, 6
`794: 1, 2
`695: 1
`491: 1, 8
`193: 1
`317: 1, 2, 3
`
`From: Beaber, Jamie B. <JBeaber@mayerbrown.com>
`Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 10:01 AM
`To: Wisnia, Howard N. <howard.wisnia@pillsburylaw.com>; Levy, Kfir B. <KLevy@mayerbrown.com>
`Cc: ZTE_Hitachi <ZTEHitachi@Pillsburylaw.com>; Brian Craft <BCraft@FindlayCraft.com>; Eric Findlay
`<EFindlay@FindlayCraft.com>; US-CLIENT-HM-ZTE-Service <HM-ZTE-Service@mayerbrown.com>; Geoff Culbertson
`<gpc@texarkanalaw.com>
`Subject: Re: meet and confer re asserted claims and prior art
`
`Howard,
`
`We are almost there with our witness ordering. If we are able to get the invalidity combinations ZTE intends to
`rely on at trial during the call along with our narrowing of terms we should be able to chat internally and have
`our tentative witness ordering back to you by COB today.
`
`Thanks,
`
`J.B.
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`
`Partner | Intellectual Property | Chair of ITC Intellectual Property Practice Group
`MAYER ♦ BROWN
`
`jbeaber@mayerbrown.com
`Direct Dial - 202.263.3153
`Mobile 1 - 202.459.3647
`Mobile 2 - 202.904.7284
`Fax - 202.263.5209
`
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006
`www.mayerbrown.com
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 287-29 Filed 08/07/18 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 16875
`
`-------- Original Message --------
`From: "Wisnia, Howard N." <howard.wisnia@pillsburylaw.com>
`Date: Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 11:26 AM
`To: "Levy, Kfir B." <KLevy@mayerbrown.com>
`CC: ZTE_Hitachi <ZTEHitachi@Pillsburylaw.com>,Brian Craft <BCraft@FindlayCraft.com>,Eric Findlay
`<EFindlay@FindlayCraft.com>,US-CLIENT-HM-ZTE-Service <HM-ZTE-Service@mayerbrown.com>,Geoff
`Culbertson <gpc@texarkanalaw.com>
`Subject: Re: meet and confer re asserted claims and prior art
`
`Your order of witnesses. As we discussed, we would then be agreeable to giving you ours in a couple days. We need
`yours to finalize ours.
`On Jun 14, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Levy, Kfir B. <KLevy@mayerbrown.com> wrote:
`
`Phone is fine. Please use the following dial-in information.
`
`USA Toll-Free:
`Access Code:
`
`888-299-9913
`4700936
`
`If you want to discuss any of the other issues—other than the asserted prior art and claims—please let is know right
`away so we can be prepared and have a meaningful meet and confer.
`
`Thanks,
`
`Kfir B. Levy
`Partner | Intellectual Property
`Mayer ♦ Brown
`Direct Dial - 202.263.3136
`klevy@mayerbrown.com
`
`From: Wisnia, Howard N. [mailto:howard.wisnia@pillsburylaw.com]
`Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 11:04 AM
`To: Levy, Kfir B.
`Cc: ZTE_Hitachi; Brian Craft; Eric Findlay; US-CLIENT-HM-ZTE-Service; Geoff Culbertson
`Subject: Re: meet and confer re asserted claims and prior art
`
`2 works. You’re welcome to come to Residence Inn by Marriott if you’d like. Otherwise by phone is ok for us. Thanks,
`Howard
`
`Best Regards, Howard
`
`Howard N. Wisnia | Partner
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`501 West Broadway, Suite 1100 | San Diego, CA 92101-3575
`t 619.544.3120 | m 858.245.1591
`howard.wisnia@pillsburylaw.com | website bio
`
`On Jun 14, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Levy, Kfir B. <KLevy@mayerbrown.com> wrote:
`
`Howard,
`
`In order to finalize the amended pretrial order today, we propose a meet and confer to finally determine which prior art
`you plan to assert—including identifying the combinations for the 193—and which claims we plan to assert. Are you
`available at 2 pm today?
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 287-29 Filed 08/07/18 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 16876
`
`It may be worthwhile to conduct this in person now that your team is in Texarkana. We have space downtown not far
`from the courthouse if that works.
`
`If you’ve had time to review the jury instructions and the deposition designations, we can meet and confer on those
`issues as well.
`
`Thanks,
`
`Kfir B. Levy
`Partner | Intellectual Property
`Mayer ♦ Brown
`klevy@mayerbrown.com
`Direct Dial - 202.263.3136
`Fax - 202.263.5209
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006
`www.mayerbrown.com
`
`__________________________________________________________________________
`This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
`addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named
`addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
`
`Information about how we handle personal information is available in our Privacy Notice.
`
`The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the individual or
`entity to which they are addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
`exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
`distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
`message in error, please notify the original sender or the Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Help Desk at Tel:
`800-477-0770, Option 1, immediately by telephone or by return E-mail and delete this message, along with any
`attachments, from your computer. Thank you.
`
`The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the individual or
`entity to which they are addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
`exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
`distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
`message in error, please notify the original sender or the Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Help Desk at Tel:
`800-477-0770, Option 1, immediately by telephone or by return E-mail and delete this message, along with any
`attachments, from your computer. Thank you.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 287-29 Filed 08/07/18 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 16877
`
`The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the individual or
`entity to which they are addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
`exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
`distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
`message in error, please notify the original sender or the Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Help Desk at Tel:
`800-477-0770, Option 1, immediately by telephone or by return E-mail and delete this message, along with any
`attachments, from your computer. Thank you.
`
`The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the individual or
`entity to which they are addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
`exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
`distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
`message in error, please notify the original sender or the Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Help Desk at Tel:
`800-477-0770, Option 1, immediately by telephone or by return E-mail and delete this message, along with any
`attachments, from your computer. Thank you.
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket