`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HMD GLOBAL, ET AL.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`v.
`
`ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., ET AL.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`v.
`
`PANASONIC CORPORATION, ET AL.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`v.
`
`SONY CORPORATION, ET AL.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00443-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00440-JRG
`(MEMBER CASE)
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00447-JRG
`(MEMBER CASE)
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00448-JRG
`(MEMBER CASE)
`
`ORDER
`
`Before the Court is Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of
`
`North America’s (collectively, “Panasonic”) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer
`
`or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and to Serve Invalidity Contentions (the “Motion”).
`
`(Dkt. No. 40.) In the Motion, Panasonic requests an extension of its deadline to answer or otherwise
`
`respond to Plaintiff’s complaint from January 16, 2024 to January 30, 2024. (Id.) Additionally,
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 46 Filed 01/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 949
`
`Panasonic requests that its deadline to serve invalidity contentions be extended from February 5,
`
`2024 to February 19, 2024. (Id.)
`
`Having considered the Motion, and noting that it is unopposed, the Court finds that the
`
`Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the deadline for
`
`Panasonic to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to January 30, 2024. It
`
`is further ORDERED that the deadline for Panasonic to serve invalidity contentions is extended
`
`to February 19, 2024.
`
`2
`
`So Ordered this
`Jan 17, 2024
`
`