`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00443-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`ORDER
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`HMD GLOBAL, ET AL.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`v.
`
`ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., ET AL.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PANASONIC CORPORATION, ET AL.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY CORPORATION, ET AL.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00440-JRG
`(MEMBER CASE)
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00447-JRG
`(MEMBER CASE)
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00448-JRG
`(MEMBER CASE)
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Partial Stay and Notice of
`
`Settlement of Claims Involving Google Products (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 39.) In the Motion, the
`
`parties request a stay of the case deadlines on a subset of claims involving accused products based
`
`on Google products. (Id.) Specifically, for Case No. 2:22-cv-00443 against Defendants HMD
`
`Global OY (“HMD Global OY”) and HMD America, Inc. (“HMD America”) (collectively,
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 45 Filed 01/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 947
`
`“HMD”); Case No. 2:22-cv-00440 against ASUSTek Computer Inc. (“ASUSTek Computer”) and
`
`ASUS Computer International (“ASUS Computer”) (collectively, “ASUS”); and Case No. 2:22-
`
`cv-00448 against Sony Corporation formerly known as Sony Mobile Communications, Inc.
`
`(“Sony”), the parties request that the stay apply to the entire case. For Case No. 2:22-cv-00447
`
`against Panasonic Holdings Corporation, formerly known as Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic
`
`Corporation of North America (collectively, “Panasonic”), the parties request that the stay apply
`
`only to the claims and issues involving Google products accused products. (Id.) The request for
`
`partial stay does not apply to Panasonic’s accused products based on (1) Connect applications,
`
`products, and solutions; (2) TAK applications, products, and solutions; (3) ATAK applications,
`
`products, and solutions; and (4) CivTAK applications, products, and solutions. (Id.)
`
`The parties jointly move the Court to enter a partial stay of the January 16, 2024, deadline
`
`to respond to the Complaint in the Court’s Order (Dkt. No. 23) and the unreached deadlines in the
`
`Court’s Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 33), including the February 5, 2024, deadlines to comply
`
`with P.R. 3-3, P.R. 3-4, and the Standing Order Regarding Subject-Matter Eligibility Contentions,
`
`for thirty (30) days in this consolidated matter to allow the settlement to be finalized and the
`
`dismissal papers for the subset of claims involving Google products.
`
`Having considered the Motion, and noting its joint nature, the Court finds that the Motion
`
`should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the deadlines with respect
`
`to the Google products are stayed for thirty (30) days.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`So Ordered this
`Jan 17, 2024
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
