`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HMD GLOBAL, et al.
`
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., et al.
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PANASONIC CORPORATION, et al.
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SONY CORPORATION, et al.
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00443-JRG
`§
` (Lead Case)
`§
`
`
`§
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00440-JRG
`§
`
` (Member Case)
`§
`
`
`§
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00447-JRG
`§
`
` (Member Case)
`§
`
`
`§
`
`§
`§
`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00448-JRG
`§
`
` (Member Case)
`§
`
`
`§
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`Before the Court are the Unopposed Motions for Extension of Time to Respond to
`
`Complaint (the “Motions”) filed by Defendant Sony Corporation (“Sony”) (Dkt. No. 19),
`
`Defendants Panasonic Holdings Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America
`
`(“Panasonic”) (Dkt. No. 20), Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer
`
`International (“ASUS”) (Dkt. No. 21), and Defendants HMD Global Oy and HMD America, Inc.
`
`(“HMD”) (Dkt. No. 22) (collectively, “Defendants”). Each of the Defendants represents that they
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 23 Filed 11/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 200
`
`have not yet been served with Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s (“Plaintiff”)
`
`Complaint, and that they have each agreed to waive service in exchange for a 60-day extension of
`
`time for the Defendants to respond.1 (See, e.g., Dkt. No. 19 at 2.) The Defendants request an
`
`extension to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until January 16, 2024.2 (See, e.g., id.)
`
`The Motions are unopposed. (Dkt. No. 19 at 3; Dkt. No. 20 at 3; Dkt. No. 21 at 3; Dkt. No. 22 at
`
`4.)
`
`Having considered the Motions, and noting their unopposed nature, the Court is of the
`
`opinion that the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED
`
`that each of the Defendants’ deadlines to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is
`
`extended up to and including January 16, 2024.
`
`1 In January 2023, these cases were stayed pending an ITC investigation. (See, e.g., Dkt. No. 19 at 2.) In October 2023,
`this Court lifted the stay and ordered the Defendants to respond in mid-November.
`2 Only Panasonic requests an extension until January 15, 2024. (Dkt. No. 20 at 2.) The Court grants all Defendants
`an extension until the same day for the sake of uniformity in this consolidated action.
`
`So Ordered this
`Nov 13, 2023
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
