throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 2831
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION,
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., ZTE
`CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC., and
`ZTE (TX), INC.,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-514-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`
`
`MEMBER CASES
`


















`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC, and Defendants LG Electronics, Inc.,
`
`Defendant HTC Corporation, Defendants ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE (TX), Inc. (collectively
`
`“ZTE”) (“Parties”), hereby submit this Joint Motion For Entry of a Docket Control Order and
`
`show the Court as follows:
`
`Original Date
`
`Event
`
`April 1, 2019
`
`*Trial – 9 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`April 1, 2019
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas
`
`February 1, 2018
`
`*Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before Judge
`Rodney Gilstrap
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2832
`
`January 31, 2019
`
`January 28, 2019
`
`January 28, 2019
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached During Meet and Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer on any outstanding
`objections or motions in limine. The parties shall advise the Court
`of any agreements reached no later than 1:00 p.m. three (3) business
`days before the pretrial conference.
`
`*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions, Joint
`Proposed Verdict Form, Responses to Motions in Limine, Updated
`Exhibit Lists, Updated Witness Lists, and Updated Deposition
`Designations
`
`File Motions in Limine
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine to issues that if
`improperly introduced at trial would be so prejudicial that the Court
`could not alleviate the prejudice by giving appropriate instructions
`to the jury.
`
`January 28, 2019
`
`Serve Objections to Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`January 23, 2019
`
`Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and Serve Rebuttal Pretrial
`Disclosures
`
`January 18, 2019
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (Witness List, Deposition Designations,
`and Exhibit List) by the Party with the Burden of Proof
`
`January 18, 2019
`
`January 14, 2019
`
`January 11, 2019
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time
`Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is
`requested for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file
`a notice with the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Shelly
`Holmes, at shelly_holmes@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`Deadline to Complete Mediation
`
`The parties are responsible for ensuring that a mediation report is
`filed no later than 5 days after the conclusion of mediation.
`
`*File Motions to Strike Expert Testimony (including Daubert
`Motions)
`
`No motion to strike expert testimony (including a Daubert motion)
`may be filed after this date without leave of the Court.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 2833
`
`January 11, 2019
`
`*File Dispositive Motions
`
`No dispositive motion may be filed after this date without leave of
`the Court.
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and Local Rule CV-7.
`Motions to extend page limits will only be granted in exceptional
`circumstances. Exceptional circumstances require more than
`agreement among the parties.
`
`January 7, 2019
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7 (Opinion of Counsel Defenses)
`
`January 7, 2019
`
`Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery
`
`December 21, 2018
`
`Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`December 17, 2018
`
`*Claim Construction Hearing – 1:30 p.m. in Marshall, Texas
`before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`December 7, 2018
`
`Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the Party with the
`Burden of Proof
`
`December 7, 2018
`
`Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File Motions to Compel
`Discovery
`
`December 3, 2019
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(d) (Joint Claim Construction Chart)
`
`August 29, 2018
`
`Defendants to elect no more than 15 prior art references against each
`patent and no more than a total of 40 references.
`
`
`
`(*) indicates a deadline that cannot be changed without showing good cause. Good cause is not
`shown merely by indicating that the parties agree that the deadline should be changed.
`
`ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`
`Notice of Mediator: The parties are to jointly file a notice that identifies the agreed upon
`mediator or indicates that no agreement was reached. If the parties do not reach an agreement,
`the Court will appoint a mediator. The parties should not file a list of mediators to be considered
`by the Court.
`
`Summary Judgment Motions, Motions to Strike Expert Testimony, and Daubert
`Motions: For each motion, the moving party shall provide the Court with two (2) copies of the
`completed briefing (opening motion, response, reply, and if applicable, sur-reply), excluding
`exhibits, in D-three-ring binders, appropriately tabbed. All documents shall be single-sided and
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 2834
`
`must include the CM/ECF header. For expert-related motions, complete digital copies of the
`relevant expert report(s) and accompanying exhibits shall submitted on a single flash drive.
`These copies shall be delivered as soon as briefing has completed.
`
`
`Indefiniteness: In lieu of early motions for summary judgment, the parties are directed
`to include any arguments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their Markman briefing, subject
`to the local rules’ normal page limits.
`
`Motions for Continuance: The following excuses will not warrant a continuance nor
`justify a failure to comply with the discovery deadline:
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;
`
`The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day,
`unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special
`provision for the parties in the other case;
`
`The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it
`was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.
`
`Amendments to the Docket Control Order (“DCO”): Any motion to alter any date on
`the DCO shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion to amend the DCO
`shall include a proposed order that lists all of the remaining dates in one column (as above) and
`the proposed changes to each date in an additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a
`date the proposed date column should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). In other
`words, the DCO in the proposed order should be complete such that one can clearly see all the
`remaining deadlines and the changes, if any, to those deadlines, rather than needing to also refer
`to an earlier version of the DCO.
`
`Proposed DCO: The Parties’ Proposed DCO should also follow the format described
`above under “Amendments to the Docket Control Order (‘DCO’).”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Parties have conferred and agreed upon all provisions of the Joint Docket Control
`
`Order and hereby jointly move that the Court approve and enter same, a copy of which is attached
`
`hereto for the Court’s entry.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 2835
`
`Dated: August 29, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`
` /s/ Alessandra C. Messing
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Joseph Mercadante
`NY Bar No. 4784930
`Email: jmercadante@brownrudnick.com
`Alessandra C. Messing
`NY Bar No. 5040019
`Email: amessing@brownrudnick.com
`John A. Rubino
`NY Bar No. 5020797
`Email: jrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`NY Bar No. 5526280
`Email: eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`Daniel J. Shea Jr.
`NY Bar No. 5430558
`dshea@brownrudnick.com
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-209-4800
`Facsimile: 212-209-4801
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 2836
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, AGIS
`SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Miguel J. Bombach
`Matthew C. Bernstein, (Lead Attorney)
`CA State Bar No. 199240
`mbernstein@perkinscoie.com
`Miguel J. Bombach
`CA State Bar No. 274287
`mbombach@perkinscoie.com
`James Young Hurt (Pro Hac Vice)
`CA State Bar No. 312390
`jhurt@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`Tel: (858) 720-5700
`Fax: (858) 720-5799
`
`Eric Findlay
`State Bar No. 00789886
`efindlay@findlaycraft.com
`FINDLAY CRAFT, P.C.
`102 N. College Ave., Suite 900
`Tyler, TX 75702
`Tel: (903) 534-1100
`Fax: (903) 534-1137
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT HTC
`CORPORATION
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
`FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER,
`LLP
`
`
`/s/ Lionel M. Lavenue
`Lionel M. Lavenue (Lead Attorney)
`Virginia Bar No. 49,005
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Bradford C. Schulz
`Virginia Bar No. 91,057
`bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 2837
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Phone: (571) 203-2700
`Fax: (202) 408-4400
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
`ZTE (TX) INC. AND ZTE (USA) INC.
`
`
`
`ARNOLD & PORTER
`KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`
` /s/ James S. Blackburn
`James S. Blackburn
`James.blackburn@arnoldporter.com
`Nicholas Lee
`California SBN: 259588
`Nicholas.Lee@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER
`KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street
`44th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017-5844
`Tel: 213-243-4000
`Fax: 213-243-4199
`
`Michael A. Berta
`Michael.Berta@arnoldporter.com
`Marisa Armanino Williams
`Marisa.armanino@arnoldporter.com
`ARNOLD & PORTER
`KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`Three Embarcadero Center
`10th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
`Tel: 415-471-3277
`
`J. Mark Mann
`SBN: 12926150
`mark@themannfirm.com
`G. Blake Thompson
`SBN: 24042033
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 2838
`
`blake@themannfirm.com
`MANN TINDEL THOMPSON
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, Texas 75652
`Tel: 903-657-8540
`Fax: 903-657-6003
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 60 Filed 08/29/18 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 2839
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that, on August 29, 2018, all counsel of record who are
`
`deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via
`
`the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Alessandra C. Messing
` Alessandra C. Messing
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket