Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 225-11 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 19650
`Case 2:17-cv-00514—JRG Document 225-11 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 19650
`
`
` EXHIBIT 10
`EXHIBIT 10
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 225-11 Filed 02/21/19 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 19651
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
`DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-0514-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-0515-JRG
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`EXPERT REPORT OF SCOTT ANDREWS REGARDING INVALIDITY
`OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 8,213,970, 9,408,055, 9,445,251, AND 9,467,838
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 225-11 Filed 02/21/19 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 19652
`
`H
`
`I
`
`J
`
`K
`
`The Asserted Dependent Claims Of The ‘838 Patent Simply Recite
`Well-Known Elements ...................................................................... 619
`Claims 1, 10, 15, 18, 19, 20, and 54 are obvious over the combination
`of Fumarolo, Fumarolo-844 and Muramatsu .................................... 620
`i.
`Combination of Fumarolo, Fumarolo-844 and Muramatsu .... 620
`ii.
`Claims 1 and 54....................................................................... 628
`iii.
`Claim 10 .................................................................................. 650
`iv.
`Claim 15 .................................................................................. 652
`v.
`Claim 18 .................................................................................. 652
`vi.
`Claim 19 .................................................................................. 654
`vii. Claim 20 .................................................................................. 657
`Claims 5 and 7 are obvious over the combination of Fumarolo,
`Fumarolo-844, Muramatsu, and Liu ................................................. 658
`i.
`Combinbation of Fumarolo, Fumarolo-844, Muramatsu and Liu658
`ii.
`Claim 5 .................................................................................... 663
`iii.
`Claim 7 .................................................................................... 666
`Claim 27 is obvious over the combination of Fumarolo, Fumarolo-
`844, Muramatsu, and Spaargaren ...................................................... 668
`i.
`The Combination of Fumarolo, Fumarolo-844, Muramatsu and
`Spaargaren ............................................................................... 668
`Claim 27 .................................................................................. 670
`ii.
`Claim 22 (unasserted) ............................................................. 670
`iii.
`Claim 23 (unasserted) ............................................................. 676
`iv.
`Claim 24 (unasserted) ............................................................. 681
`v.
`Claim 25 (unasserted) ............................................................. 685
`vi.
`vii. Claim 26 (unasserted) ............................................................. 686
`viii. Claim 27 .................................................................................. 687
`Claims 38 and 40 are obvious over the combination of Fumarolo,
`Fumarolo-844, Muramatsu, and Sheha ............................................. 688
`i.
`Combination of Fumarolo, Fumarolo-844, Muramatsu and
`Sheha ....................................................................................... 688
`Claim 38 .................................................................................. 692
`ii.
`Claim 40 .................................................................................. 695
`iii.
`M The Asserted Dependent Claims Of The ‘838 Patent Simply Recite
`Well-Known Elements ...................................................................... 698
`XIII. THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE ’055 PATENT ARE INVALID ..... 699
`A
`Independent Claims 1, 28, 41, and 54 of the ‘055 Patent are Invalid
`for Lack of Written Description ........................................................ 699
`p
`The Asserted Claims of the ‘055 Patent are Anticipated by or Obvious
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ‘055 Patent are Anticipated by or Obviousp y
`
`over the LifeRing Software Product ................................................. 706
`over the LifeRing Software Product ................................................. 706
`
`L
`
`B
`B
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 225-11 Filed 02/21/19 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 19653
`
`F
`
`G
`
`Claim 28 .................................................................................. 818
`vi.
`vii. Claim 32 .................................................................................. 833
`viii. Claim 36 .................................................................................. 834
`ix.
`Claim 42 .................................................................................. 838
`x.
`Claim 49 .................................................................................. 855
`xi.
`Claim 54 .................................................................................. 859
`Claims 1, 2, 7, 22, 24, 28, 32, 36, 42, 49, and 54 are obvious over
`Fumarolo, Sheha, and Lazaridis ........................................................ 874
`i.
`Claims 1, 28, and 41 ............................................................... 881
`ii.
`Dependent Claims 2 and 42 .................................................... 910
`iii.
`Dependent Claim 7.................................................................. 916
`iv.
`Dependent Claim 22 ............................................................... 920
`v.
`Dependent Claim 24 ............................................................... 922
`vi.
`Dependent Claim 32 ............................................................... 925
`vii. Dependent Claims 36 and 49 .................................................. 927
`The Asserted Claims Of The ‘055 Patent Are Anticipated By Poulin
`Or, At A Minimum, Rendered Obvious By Poulin Alone Or In
`Combination With Altman ................................................................ 929
`viii. Claim 54 .................................................................................. 963
`XIV. THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE ‘251 PATENT ARE INVALID ..... 966
`A
`Independent Claims 1 and 24 are Invalid for Lack of Written
`Description ........................................................................................ 966
`Claims 1 and 24, and Claims 5, 6, 12, 15, 19, 24, 27, 29, 31, and 35 of
`the ‘251 Patent are Anticipated by and/or Obvious Over the ‘724
`patent ................................................................................................. 971
`i.
`Claims 1 and 24....................................................................... 971
`i.
`Claim 5 and 28: ....................................................................... 988
`ii.
`Claim 6 and 29: ....................................................................... 989
`ii.
`Claim 12 and 35 ...................................................................... 991
`iii.
`Claim 13 (not asserted): .......................................................... 992
`iv.
`Claim 14 (not asserted): .......................................................... 994
`v.
`Claim 15: ................................................................................. 995
`vi.
`Claim 19: ................................................................................. 997
`vii. Claim 27: ............................................................................... 1000
`viii. Claim 29: ............................................................................... 1001
`ix.
`Claim 31: ............................................................................... 1002
`Claims 1 and 24, and claims 5, 6, 12, 15, 19, 24, 27, 29, 31, and 35 of
`
`Claims 1 and 24, and claims 5, 6, 12, 15, 19, 24, 27, 29, 31, and 35 of , , , , , , , , , ,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the ‘251 patent are anticipated by or obvious over the AGIS LifeRing the ‘251 patent are anticipated by or obvious over the AGIS LifeRing p
`Software Product ............................................................................. 1003
`Software Product .
`i.
`Claims 1 and 24..................................................................... 1003
`
`B
`
`C
`C
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 225-11 Filed 02/21/19 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 19654
`
`728. My statements regarding the FBCB2 system, below, are based on my review of
`728. My statements regarding the FBCB2 system, below, are based on my review of
`
`documents describing that system.
`documents describing that system. I have cited documents for the purpose of illustrating or
`
`further explaining certain features of the system.
`
`729.
`
`In the below analysis, any references to the state of the art refer to the state of the art as of
`
`September 20, 2004. Similarly, all references to the knowledge or understandings of a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art refer to the knowledge or understandings of a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the art as of September 20, 2004. Likewise, all references to the features of
`
`FBCB2 refer to features that were part of the system as of September 20, 2004. My analysis
`
`of the invalidity issues in this case would not change if the Court ultimately decides that the
`
`priority date of the ’838, ’251, and ’055 patents (the “Location Patents”) is later than
`
`September 21, 2004.
`
`730.
`
`I understand that AGIS has asserted ’838 patent claims 1, 5, 7, 10, 15, 18, 19, 20, 27, 38,
`
`40, and 54 against Defendants. I understand that claims 5, 7, 10, 15, 18, 19, 20, 27, 38, and
`
`40 depend from claim 1.
`
`i.
`
`Claim 1
`
`731.
`
`In my opinion Claim 1 is anticipated by FBCB2, or, at a minimum, is obvious over
`
`FBCB2 in view of the knowledge of a POSITA at the time of the invention.
`
`732. Claim 1 of the ’838 patent recites:
`
`1. A computer-implemented method comprising:
`performing, by a first device:
`joining a communication network corresponding to a group, wherein
`joining the communication network comprises transmitting a message
`including an identifier corresponding to the group;
`participating in the group, wherein participating in the group includes
`sending first location information to a first server and receiving second
`location information from the first server, the first location information
`
`464
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 225-11 Filed 02/21/19 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 19655
`
`appear that the experiment described in the NUSTL report was used to evaluate LifeRing as a
`
`replacement for all or part of that system.
`
`XVII. CONCLUSION
`
`2525. For the above reasons, it is my opinion that the asserted claims of the ’970, ’838, ’055,
`
`and ’251 Patents are invalid.
`
`2526.
`
`I declare that the foregoing is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and I will
`
`testify as such if called to do so.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Scott Andrews
`12/14/2018
`
`US:164108641v1
`
`