Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 1 of 118 PageID #: 11076
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A: JOINT CLAIM CONTSTRUCTION CHART
`
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4-5(d), Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC and Defendants Huawei Device USA Inc.;
`
`Huawei Device Co., Ltd.; Huawei Device (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; and Apple Inc. (“Defendants”) hereby provide a Joint Claim
`
`Construction Chart containing the disputed claim language for the disputed claims for U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970, 9,467,838,
`
`9,408,055, 9,445,251, and 9,749,829. The following chart includes claim language for either (1) asserted claims that include disputed
`
`or agreed-upon term(s) or (2) unasserted claims that include disputed or agreed-upon term(s) and from which certain asserted claims
`
`depend. In addition, the parties hereby identify the claim number(s) where the disputed terms appear.
`
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`’970 Patent, Claim1
`
`A communication
`system for
`transmitting,
`receiving, confirming
`receipt, and
`responding to an
`electronic message,
`comprising:
`
`
`a predetermined
`network of
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`[AGREED]
`
`[AGREED]
`
`“a data
`transmission means
`that facilitates the
`transmission of
`electronic files
`between said
`PDA/cell phones in
`different locations”
`
`(’970 Claim 1)
`
`
`1
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`Function: facilitating the
`transmission of electronic
`files between said PDA/cell
`phones in different
`locations.
`
`Structure: communication
`network server. See ’970
`Patent at 1:39-43; 2:36-43;
`4:1-36; Figs. 2, 3A, 3B,
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 2 of 118 PageID #: 11077
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6)
`
`Function: attaching a
`forced message alert
`software packet to a voice
`or text message creating a
`forced message alert that is
`transmitted by said sender
`PDA/cell phone to the
`recipient PDA/cell phone.
`
`
`
`
`Structure:
`Algorithm set forth in Fig
`2, 3A, 3B. 7:8-63.
`
`
`“means for
`attaching a forced
`message alert
`software packet to a
`voice or text
`message creating a
`forced message
`alert that is
`transmitted by said
`sender PDA/cell
`phone to the
`recipient PDA/cell
`phone, said forced
`message alert
`software packet
`containing a list of
`possible required
`responses”/ “means
`for attaching a
`forced message
`alert software
`packet to a voice or
`text message
`creating a forced
`message alert that is
`transmitted by said
`sender PDA/cell
`
`and 4.
`
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`Function: attaching a
`forced message alert
`software packet to a voice
`or text message creating a
`forced message alert that is
`transmitted by said sender
`PDA/cell phone to the
`recipient PDA/cell phone,
`said forced message alert
`software packet containing
`a list of possible required
`responses.
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: No sufficient
`corresponding structure
`disclosed. To the extent
`any structure is disclosed,
`it is a general purpose PDA
`or cell phone for
`implementing an
`undisclosed algorithm.
`
`2
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`participants,
`wherein each
`participant has a
`similarly equipped
`PDA/cell phone
`that includes a CPU
`and a touch screen
`display a CPU and
`memory;
`
` a
`
` data
`transmission
`means that
`facilitates the
`transmission of
`electronic files
`between said
`PDA/cell phones in
`different locations;
`
` a
`
` sender PDA/cell
`phone and at least
`one recipient
`PDA/cell phone for
`each electronic
`message;
`
` a
`
` forced message
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 3 of 118 PageID #: 11078
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`alert software
`application
`program including
`a list of required
`possible responses
`to be selected by a
`participant recipient
`of a forced message
`response loaded on
`each participating
`PDA/cell phone;
`
`means for
`attaching a forced
`message alert
`software packet to
`a voice or text
`message creating a
`forced message
`alert that is
`transmitted by
`said sender
`PDA/cell phone to
`the recipient
`PDA/cell phone,
`said forced
`message alert
`software packet
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`phone to the
`recipient PDA/cell
`phone”
`
`(’970 Claim 1)
`
`“[means for. . .]
`requiring the forced
`message alert
`software on said
`recipient PDA/cell
`phone to transmit
`an automatic
`acknowledgment to
`the sender PDA/cell
`phone as soon as
`said forced message
`alert is received by
`the recipient
`PDA/cell phone”
`
`(’970 Claim 1)
`
`
`
`The disclosures set forth at
`’970 Patent at Fig 2, 3A,
`3B. 7:8-63. ’970 File
`History, Application
`12/324,122, Claims, 2008-
`11-26 do not provide an
`algorithm that corresponds
`to the claimed function.
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`Function: requiring the
`forced message alert
`software on said recipient
`PDA/cell phone to transmit
`an automatic
`acknowledgment to the
`sender PDA/cell phone as
`soon as said forced
`message alert is received
`by the recipient PDA/cell
`phone.
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: No sufficient
`corresponding structure
`
`Plain Meaning – not
`Governed by
`35 U.S.C. § 112(6).
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies
`the following structure
`corresponding to
`Defendants’ proposed
`function:
`’970 Patent, Fig 4; 2:7-35;
`8:16-62.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 4 of 118 PageID #: 11079
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`containing a list of
`possible required
`responses and
`requiring the
`forced message
`alert software on
`said recipient
`PDA/cell phone to
`transmit an
`automatic
`acknowledgment
`to the sender
`PDA/cell phone as
`soon as said forced
`message alert is
`received by the
`recipient PDA/cell
`phone;
`
`means for
`requiring a
`required manual
`response from the
`response list by the
`recipient in order
`to clear recipient's
`response list from
`recipient's cell
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`disclosed. To the extent
`any structure is disclosed,
`it is a general purpose PDA
`or cell phone for
`implementing an
`undisclosed algorithm.
`The disclosures set forth at
`970 Patent, Fig 4; 2:7-35;
`8:16-62. ’970 File History,
`Application 12/324,122,
`Claims, 2008-11-26 do not
`provide an algorithm that
`corresponds to the claimed
`function.
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`Function: requiring a
`required manual response
`from the response list by
`the recipient in order to
`clear recipient's response
`list from recipient's cell
`phone display.
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`
`
`
`“means for
`requiring a required
`manual response
`from the response
`list by the recipient
`in order to clear
`recipient's response
`list from recipient's
`cell phone display”
`
`(’970 Claim 1)
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(6).
`
`Function: requiring a
`required manual response
`from the response list by
`the recipient in order to
`clear recipient’s response
`list from recipient’s cell
`phone display.
`
`Structure: Algorithm set
`forth in Figure 4 and 8:37-
`57.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 5 of 118 PageID #: 11080
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`phone display;
`
`means for
`receiving and
`displaying a listing
`of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`have automatically
`acknowledged the
`forced message
`alert and which
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones have not
`automatically
`acknowledged the
`forced message
`alert;
`
`means for
`periodically
`resending said
`forced message
`alert to said
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones that have
`not automatically
`acknowledged the
`forced message
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`Structure: No sufficient
`corresponding structure
`disclosed. To the extent
`any structure is disclosed,
`it is a general purpose PDA
`or cell phone for
`implementing an
`undisclosed algorithm.
`The disclosures set forth at
`’970 Patent at Figure 4 and
`8:16-57; 11:1-21. ’970 File
`History, Application
`12/324,122, Claims, 2008-
`11-26 do not provide an
`algorithm that corresponds
`to the claimed function.
`[AGREED]
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`Function: receiving and
`displaying a listing of
`which recipient PDA/cell
`phones have automatically
`acknowledged the forced
`message alert and which
`recipient PDA/cell phones
`have not automatically
`acknowledged the forced
`
`[AGREED]
`
`“means for
`receiving and
`displaying a listing
`of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`have automatically
`acknowledged the
`forced message
`alert and which
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones have not
`automatically
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 6 of 118 PageID #: 11081
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`message alert.
`
`Structure: PDA/cell phone
`hardware including touch
`screen 16, and wireless
`transmitter or cellular
`modem. See, e.g., ’970
`Patent at 4:12-46.
`
`
`
`acknowledged the
`forced message
`alert”
`
`(’970 Claim 1)
`
`“means for
`periodically
`resending said
`forced message
`alert to said
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones that have
`not automatically
`acknowledged the
`forced message
`alert”
`
`(’970 Claim 1)
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(6).
`
`Function: periodically
`resending said forced
`message alert to said
`recipient PDA/cell phones
`that have not automatically
`acknowledged the forced
`message alert.
`
`Structure: PDA/cell phone
`hardware including WiFi
`connectivity or a cellular
`modem. ’970 Patent at col.
`4:12-46.
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`Function: periodically
`resending said forced
`message alert to said
`recipient PDA/cell phones
`that have not automatically
`acknowledged the forced
`message alert.
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: No sufficient
`corresponding structure
`disclosed. To the extent
`any structure is disclosed,
`it is a general purpose PDA
`
`6
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`alert; and
`
`means for
`receiving and
`displaying a listing
`of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`have transmitted a
`manual response
`to said forced
`message alert and
`details the
`response from
`each recipient
`PDA/cell phone
`that responded.
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 6
`
` A
`
` method of sending
`a forced message
`alert to one or more
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones within a
`predetermined
`communication
`network, wherein the
`receipt and response
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 7 of 118 PageID #: 11082
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`to said forced
`message alert by each
`intended recipient
`PDA/cell phone is
`tracked, said method
`comprising the steps
`of:
`
`
`accessing a forced
`message alert
`software
`application
`program on a
`sender PDA/cell
`phone;
`
`creating the forced
`message alert on
`said sender
`PDA/cell phone by
`attaching a voice or
`text message to a
`forced message
`alert application
`software packet to
`said voice or text
`message;
`
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`or cell phone for
`implementing an
`undisclosed algorithm.
`The disclosures set forth at
`’970 Patent at Figures 2,
`3A, 3B, 6:38-7:4; 7:17-
`8:15 do not provide an
`algorithm that corresponds
`to the claimed function.
`[AGREED]
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6)
`
`Function: receiving and
`displaying a listing of
`which recipient PDA/cell
`phones have transmitted a
`manual response to said
`forced message alert and
`details the response from
`each recipient PDA/cell
`phone that responded
`
`Structure: PDA/cell phone
`hardware including touch
`screen 16, and wireless
`transmitter or cellular
`modem. See, e.g., ’970
`Patent at col. 4:12-46.
`
`[AGREED]
`
`“means for
`receiving and
`displaying a listing
`of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`have transmitted a
`manual response to
`said forced message
`alert and details the
`response from each
`recipient PDA/cell
`phone that
`responded”
`
`(’970 Claim 1)
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 8 of 118 PageID #: 11083
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`designating one or
`more recipient
`PDA/cell phones in
`the communication
`network;
`
`electronically
`transmitting the
`forced message
`alert to said
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones;
`
`receiving automatic
`acknowledgements
`from the recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`that received the
`message and
`displaying a listing
`of which recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`have acknowledged
`receipt of the forced
`message alert and
`which recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`have not
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`“a forced message
`alert software
`application
`program”
`
`(’970 Claims 1, 6)
`
`“Application software that
`allows an operator to create
`and transmit forced
`message alerts comprising
`a text alert that is displayed
`until cleared or a voice
`alert that repeats until
`cleared”
`
`“manual response”
`
`(’970 Claims 1, 6)
`“the repeating voice
`alert”
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`
`8
`
`“application software that
`allows an operator to create
`and transmit forced
`message alerts,
`automatically transmit an
`acknowledgement of
`receiving them,
`periodically resend them
`when no acknowledgement
`is received, indicate on a
`display which recipient
`devices have
`acknowledged the forced
`message alert, provide a
`manual response list on the
`display of the recipient
`device, and provide an
`indication of the status and
`content of the manual
`response selected by the
`recipient devices”
`“user-selectable reply that
`is sent back to the sender
`PDA/cell phone”
`Indefinite
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 9 of 118 PageID #: 11084
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`acknowledged
`receipt of the forced
`message alert;
`
`periodically
`resending the forced
`message alert to the
`recipient PDA/cell
`phones that have
`not acknowledged
`receipt;
`
`receiving responses
`to the forced
`message alert from
`the recipient
`PDA/cell phones
`and displaying the
`response from each
`recipient PDA/cell
`phone; and
`
`providing a manual
`response list on the
`display of the
`recipient PDA/cell
`phone that can only
`be cleared by the
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`
`(’970 Claim 6)
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 10 of 118 PageID #: 11085
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`“a first device
`programmed to
`perform operations
`comprising:
`
`[a] joining a
`communication
`network
`corresponding to a
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge Defendants’
`contention that this term
`should be governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. AGIS
`contends that the claim
`term provides sufficient
`
`
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(f); functions
`underlined in claim term
`column.
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b)
`
`Structure: No sufficient
`
`10
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`recipient providing
`a required response
`from the list;
`
`clearing the
`recipient's display
`screen or causing
`the repeating voice
`alert to cease upon
`recipient selecting a
`response from the
`response list
`required that can
`only be cleared by
`manually selecting
`and transmitting a
`response to the
`manual response
`list.
`’838 Patent, Claim 54
`
` A
`
` system comprising:
`
` a
`
` first device
`programmed to
`perform operations
`comprising:
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 11 of 118 PageID #: 11086
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`joining a
`communication
`network
`corresponding to a
`group, wherein
`joining the
`communication
`network comprises
`transmitting a
`message including
`an identifier
`corresponding to
`the group;
`
`participating in the
`group, wherein
`participating in the
`group includes
`sending first
`location information
`to a first server and
`receiving second
`location information
`from the first
`server, the first
`location information
`comprising a
`location of the first
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`group, wherein
`joining the
`communication
`network comprises
`transmitting a
`message including
`an identifier
`corresponding to
`the group;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`[b] participating in
`the group, wherein
`participating in the
`group includes
`sending first
`location
`information to a
`first server and
`receiving second
`
`structure.
`
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`Algorithm set forth in ’838
`Patent, Figs 1-10; 2:54-
`3:11; 3:12-24; 4:66-5:4;
`5:5-5:16; 6:6-6:16; 7:44-
`7:62; 9:6-9:18;
`9:40-9:55; 13:14-37;13:46-
`13:50; 13:51-13:60; ’838
`File History, Application
`14/299,978, Claims, 2014-
`10-31.
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge Defendants’
`contention that this term
`should be governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. AGIS
`contends that the claim
`term provides sufficient
`
`corresponding structure
`disclosed. To the extent
`any structure is disclosed,
`it is a general purpose PDA
`or cell phone for
`implementing an
`undisclosed algorithm to
`perform the functionality
`described at Figures 2-5,
`10:38-11:10; 3:43-4:8.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: No sufficient
`corresponding structure
`disclosed. To the extent
`any structure is disclosed,
`it is a general purpose PDA
`or cell phone for
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 12 of 118 PageID #: 11087
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`device, the second
`location information
`comprising one or
`more locations of
`one or more
`respective second
`devices included in
`the group;
`
`presenting, via an
`interactive display
`of the first device, a
`first interactive,
`georeferenced map
`and a first set of one
`or more user-
`selectable symbols
`corresponding to a
`first set of one or
`more of the second
`devices, wherein the
`first set of symbols
`are positioned on
`the first
`georeferenced map
`at respective
`positions
`corresponding to
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`location
`information from
`the first server, the
`first location
`information
`comprising a
`location of the first
`device, the second
`location
`information
`comprising one or
`more locations of
`one or more
`respective second
`devices included in
`the group;
`
`
`* * *
`
`[c] presenting, via
`an interactive
`display of the first
`device, a first
`interactive,
`georeferenced map
`and a first set of
`one or more user-
`selectable symbols
`
`structure.
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`Algorithm set forth in ’838
`Patent, Figs 1-10; 2:54-
`3:11; 3:12-24; 4:66-5:4;
`5:5-5:16; 6:6-6:16; 7:44-
`7:62; 9:6-9:18;
`9:40-9:55; 13:14-37;13:46-
`13:50; 13:51-13:60; ’838
`File History, Application
`14/299,978, Claims, 2014-
`10-31.
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge Defendants’
`contention that this term
`should be governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. AGIS
`contends that the claim
`term provides sufficient
`
`implementing an
`undisclosed algorithm to
`perform the functionality
`described at Figures 8, 9,
`13:14-37; 14:5-19.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: none disclosed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 13 of 118 PageID #: 11088
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`the locations of the
`first set of second
`devices, and
`wherein first
`georeferenced map
`data relate positions
`on the first
`georeferenced map
`to spatial
`coordinates;
`
`sending, to a second
`server, a request for
`second
`georeferenced map
`data different from
`the first
`georeferenced map
`data;
`
`receiving, from the
`second server, the
`second
`georeferenced map
`data;
`
`presenting, via the
`interactive display
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`corresponding to a
`first set of one or
`more of the second
`devices, wherein
`the first set of
`symbols are
`positioned on the
`first georeferenced
`map at respective
`positions
`corresponding to
`the locations of the
`first set of second
`devices, and
`wherein first
`georeferenced map
`data relate positions
`on the first
`georeferenced map
`to spatial
`coordinates;
`
`
`* * *
`
`[d] sending, to a
`second server, a
`request for second
`georeferenced map
`
`structure.
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`’838 Patent, Figs 1-10;
`5:22-6:5; 6:6-6:15; 6:16-
`6:50; 6:51-6:67; 7:1-7:23;
`7:24-7:43; 7:44-7:62; 7:63-
`8:31; 8:35-8:55; 8:56-9:05;
`9:6-9:18; 13:51-13:60;
`13:61-14:4. ’838 File
`History, Application
`14/299,978, Claims, 2014-
`10-31.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge Defendants’
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: none disclosed.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 14 of 118 PageID #: 11089
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`of the first device, a
`second
`georeferenced map
`and a second set of
`one or more user-
`selectable symbols
`corresponding to a
`second set of one or
`more of the second
`devices, wherein the
`second set of
`symbols are
`positioned on the
`second
`georeferenced map
`at respective
`positions
`corresponding to
`the locations of the
`second set of second
`devices, and
`wherein the second
`georeferenced map
`data relate positions
`on the second
`georeferenced map
`to spatial
`coordinates; and
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`data different from
`the first
`georeferenced map
`data;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`[e] receiving, from
`the second server,
`the second
`georeferenced map
`
`contention that this term
`should be governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. AGIS
`contends that the claim
`term provides sufficient
`structure.
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`’838 Patent, Figs 1-10;
`5:22-6:5; 6:6-6:15; 6:16-
`6:50; 6:51-6:67; 7:1-7:23;
`7:24-7:43; 7:44-7:62; 7:63-
`8:31; 8:35-8:55; 8:56-9:05;
`9:6-9:18; 13:51-13:60;
`13:61-14:4. ’838 File
`History, Application
`14/299,978, Claims, 2014-
`10-31.
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: none disclosed.
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 15 of 118 PageID #: 11090
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`
`identifying user
`interaction with the
`interactive display
`selecting one or
`more of the second
`set of user-selectable
`symbols
`corresponding to
`one or more of the
`second devices and
`positioned on the
`second
`georeferenced map
`and user interaction
`with the display
`specifying an action
`and, based thereon,
`sending third data
`to the selected one
`or more second
`devices via the first
`server.
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`data;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`[f] presenting, via
`the interactive
`display of the first
`device, a second
`
`Defendants’ contention
`that this term should be
`governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112, ¶ 6. AGIS contends
`that the claim term
`provides sufficient
`structure.
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`’838 Patent, Figs 1-10;
`5:22-6:5;
`6:6-6:15; 6:16-6:50; 6:51-
`6:67; 7:1-7:23; 7:24-7:43;
`7:44-7:62; 7:63-8:31; 8:35-
`8:55; 8:56-9:05; 9:6-9:18;
`13:51-13:60; 13:61-14:4.
`’838 File History,
`Application 14/299,978,
`Claims, 2014-10-31.
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge Defendants’
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: none disclosed.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 16 of 118 PageID #: 11091
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`
`georeferenced map
`and a second set of
`one or more user-
`selectable symbols
`corresponding to a
`second set of one or
`more of the second
`devices, wherein
`the second set of
`symbols are
`positioned on the
`second
`georeferenced map
`at respective
`positions
`corresponding to
`the locations of the
`second set of
`second devices, and
`wherein the second
`georeferenced map
`data relate positions
`on the second
`georeferenced map
`to spatial
`coordinates; and
`
`
`* * *
`
`contention that this term
`should be governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. AGIS
`contends that the claim
`term provides sufficient
`structure.
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`’838 Patent, Figs 1-10;
`5:22-6:5;
`6:6-6:15; 6:16-6:50; 6:51-
`6:67; 7:1-7:23; 7:24-7:43;
`7:44-7:62; 7:63-8:31; 8:35-
`8:55; 8:56-9:05; 9:6-9:18;
`13:51-13:60; 13:61-14:4.
`’838 File History,
`Application 14/299,978,
`Claims, 2014-10-31.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`* * *
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 17 of 118 PageID #: 11092
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`
`
`[g] identifying user
`interaction with the
`interactive display
`selecting one or
`more of the second
`set of user-
`selectable symbols
`corresponding to
`one or more of the
`second devices and
`positioned on the
`second
`georeferenced map
`and user interaction
`with the display
`specifying an action
`and, based thereon,
`sending third data
`to the selected one
`or more second
`devices via the first
`server.”
`
`(’838 Claim 54)
`“a first device
`programmed to
`perform operations
`
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge Defendants’
`contention that this term
`should be governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. AGIS
`contends that the claim
`term provides sufficient
`structure.
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`Algorithm set forth in ’838
`Patent, Figs 1-10; 5:22-6:5;
`6:6-6:15; 6:16-6:50;
`6:51-6:67; 7:1-7:23; 7:24-
`7:43; 7:44-7:62; 7:63-8:31;
`8:35-8:55; 8:56-9:05; 9:6-
`9:18; 13:51-13:60; 13:61-
`14:4; ’838 File History,
`Application 14/299,978,
`Claims, 2014-10-31.
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`
`17
`
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: No sufficient
`corresponding structure
`disclosed. To the extent
`any structure is disclosed,
`it is a general purpose PDA
`or cell phone for
`implementing an
`undisclosed algorithm to
`perform the functionality
`described at 8:56-9:18.
`
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(f); functions
`underlined in claim term
`
`
`
`’251 Patent, Claim 24
`
`A system comprising:
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 18 of 118 PageID #: 11093
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`comprising:
`
`[a] receiving a
`message from a
`second device,
`wherein the
`message relates to
`joining a group;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`[b] based on
`receiving the
`message from the
`second device,
`
`challenge Defendants’
`contention that this term
`should be governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. AGIS
`contends that the claim
`term provides sufficient
`structure.
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`’251 Patent, Figs 1-10; 5:7-
`12; 5:13-24; 6:14-23; 7:9-
`31; 8:4-39; 8:40-42; 10:18-
`34; 10:35-45; 10:46-60;
`10:61-11:18; 12:1-11;
`12:12-14; 12:42-55; 13:21-
`44. ’251 File History,
`Application
`14/633,804, Claims, 2015-
`02-27.
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge Defendants’
`
`18
`
`column.
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: none disclosed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`Indefinite under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(b).
`
`Structure: none disclosed.
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`
` a
`
` first device
`programmed to
`perform operations
`comprising:
`
`
`receiving a
`message from a
`second device,
`wherein the
`message relates to
`joining a group;
`
`based on receiving
`the message from
`the second device,
`participating in
`the group, wherein
`participating in
`the group includes
`sending first
`location
`information to a
`server and
`receiving second
`location
`information from
`the server, the first
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 19 of 118 PageID #: 11094
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`location
`information
`comprising a
`location of the first
`device, the second
`location
`information
`comprising a
`plurality of
`locations of a
`respective
`plurality of second
`devices included in
`the group;
`
`presenting, via an
`interactive display
`of the first device,
`a first interactive,
`georeferenced map
`and a plurality of
`user-selectable
`symbols
`corresponding to
`the plurality of
`second devices,
`wherein the
`symbols are
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`participating in the
`group, wherein
`participating in the
`group includes
`sending first
`location
`information to a
`server and
`receiving second
`location
`information from
`the server, the first
`location
`information
`comprising a
`location of the first
`device, the second
`location
`information
`comprising a
`plurality of
`locations of a
`respective plurality
`of second devices
`included in the
`group;
`
`
`* * *
`
`contention that this term
`should be governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. AGIS
`contends that the claim
`term provides sufficient
`structure.
`
`In the alternative, AGIS
`identifies the following
`structure:
`’251 Patent, Figs 1-10;
`2:57-3:14;
`3:15-27; 3:45-4:14; 5:13-
`21; 8:43-63; 9:14-26; 9:48-
`63; 10:61-11:18; 13:21-44;
`13:53-57; 13:58-67; 14:1-
`11; 14:12-26; 14:27-51.
`’251 File History,
`Application 14/633,804,
`Claims, 2015-02-27.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`* * *
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 194-1 Filed 08/27/18 Page 20 of 118 PageID #: 11095
`
`Claim Language
`(Disputed and
`Agreed Term(s) For
`Construction In
`Bold)
`positioned on the
`first georeferenced
`map at respective
`positions
`corresponding to
`the locations of the
`second devices,
`and wherein the
`first georeferenced
`map includes data
`relating positions
`on the first
`georeferenced map
`to spatial
`coordinates;
`sending, from the
`first device to the
`server, a request
`for a second
`georeferenced map
`different from the
`first georeferenced
`map, wherein the
`request specifies a
`map location;
`receiving, from the
`server, the second
`georeferenced
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s Construction
`
`Defendants’ Construction Court’s Construction
`
`
`[c] presenting, via
`an interactive
`display of the first
`device, a first
`interactive,
`georeferenced map
`and a plurality of
`user-selectable
`symbols
`corresponding to
`the plurality of
`second devices,
`wherein the
`symbols are
`positioned on the
`first georeferenced
`map at respective
`positions
`corresponding to
`the locations of the
`second devices, and
`wherein the first
`georeferenced map
`includes data
`relating positions
`on the first
`georeferenced map
`
`
`Plain Meaning
`
`AGIS reserves its right to
`challenge Defendants’
`contention that