Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1600
`Case 2:16-cv-00741—RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1600
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741—RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1600
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 2 of 22 PageID #: 1601
`
`CLAIMS
`
`EXHIBIT C
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`1.
`
`’466 Patent claims 1,
`15, 16
`
`“installing a plurality of
`application programs at the
`server”
`
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 4; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; FIG.
`9C; 1:30-43; 1:45-57; 1:57-
`2:11; 2:52-67; 3:9-27; 3:28-36;
`3:47-50; 3:55-4:9; 4:34-38;
`6:12-17; 6:22-27; 6:32-35;
`6:57-7:13; 7:22-25; 7:28-38;
`7:67-8:5; 8:12-22; 8:33-56; 9:2-
`5; 9:15-21; 9:30-57; 10:61-64;
`11:50-60; 12:37-52; 13:26-37;
`14:17-45; 15:1-10; 15:23-27;
`15:56-16:25; 17:19-51; 18:1-
`32; 18:42-57; 19:17-33; 20:1-
`36
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG. 2;
`FIG. 3; 1:58-2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-
`23; 1:31-44; 1:45-57; 1:58-
`2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-23; 3:61-4:2;
`5:32-36; 5:57-61; 5:65-6:9;
`6:16-25; 6:46-62; 6:67-7:2;
`7:13-24;10:6-7; 7:66-8:22;
`8:35-47; 9:47-52; 9:58-65;10:6-
`7; 10:9-12; 10:47-65; 11:3-8;
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`McDaniel, George, “IBM
`Dictionary of Computing”,
`McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 344, 612
`(1994), Valerie, “Dictionary of
`Computing”, Oxford
`University Press, Inc. p. 244
`(1997) (Exhibit D)
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`1 Cites to any one of the ’466, ’578, ’766, and ’293 patents are exemplary only and should be understood as including cites to equivalent disclosure in any other
`one of these four patents. For example, the ’466 and ’293 patents have substantially identical specifications, and so do the ’578 and ’766 patents, and cites to
`either patent in each pair should be understood as including cites to equivalent disclosure in the other patent of the pair.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 3 of 22 PageID #: 1602
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`11:13-15; 11:32-12:6; 12:8-36;
`14:15-23; 14:47-55
`IPR2017-00184 at February 21,
`2017 Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response; April
`18, 2017 PTAB Decision
`Denying Institution
`•
`‘578 patent File History
`at March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook
`‘466 patent File History at May
`31, 2001 Amendment; October
`23, 2001 Amendment; March
`25, 2002 Response After Final;
`May 16, 2002 Appeal Brief
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`2003 Request for
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 4 of 22 PageID #: 1603
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`2.
`
`’578 patent claims 1,
`14, 15,17, 30, 32, 45
`
`“installing [an / a second]
`application program having a
`plurality of configurable
`preferences and a plurality of
`authorized users on a server
`coupled to the network”
`
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`‘293 patent File History at
`December 7, 2004
`Amendment; June 22, 2005
`Amendment; November 7,
`2005 Amendment
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 4; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; FIG.
`9C; 1:30-43; 1:45-57; 1:57-
`2:11; 2:52-67; 3:9-27; 3:28-36;
`3:47-50; 3:55-4:9; 4:34-38;
`6:12-17; 6:22-27; 6:32-35;
`6:57-7:13; 7:22-25; 7:28-38;
`7:67-8:5; 8:12-22; 8:33-56; 9:2-
`5; 9:15-21; 9:30-57; 10:61-64;
`11:50-60; 12:37-52; 13:26-37;
`14:17-45; 15:1-10; 15:23-27;
`15:56-16:25; 17:19-51; 18:1-
`32; 18:42-57; 19:17-33; 20:1-
`36
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG. 2;
`FIG. 3; 1:58-2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-
`23; 1:31-44; 1:45-57; 1:58-
`
`3
`
`McDaniel, George, “IBM
`Dictionary of Computing”,
`McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 344, 612
`(1994), Valerie, “Dictionary of
`Computing”, Oxford
`University Press, Inc. p. 244
`(1997) (Exhibit D)
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 5 of 22 PageID #: 1604
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-23; 3:61-4:2;
`5:32-36; 5:57-61; 5:65-6:9;
`6:16-25; 6:46-62; 6:67-7:2;
`7:13-24;10:6-7; 7:66-8:22;
`8:35-47; 9:47-52; 9:58-65;10:6-
`7; 10:9-12; 10:47-65; 11:3-8;
`11:13-15; 11:32-12:6; 12:8-36;
`14:15-23; 14:47-55
`IPR2017-00184 at February 21,
`2017 Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response; April
`18, 2017 PTAB Decision
`Denying Institution
`•
`‘578 patent File History
`at March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook
`‘466 patent File History at May
`31, 2001 Amendment; October
`23, 2001 Amendment; March
`25, 2002 Response After Final;
`May 16, 2002 Appeal Brief
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 6 of 22 PageID #: 1605
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`2003 Request for
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`‘293 patent File History at
`December 7, 2004
`Amendment; June 22, 2005
`Amendment; November 7,
`2005 Amendment
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 4; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; 1:30-43;
`1:45-57; 1:57-2:11; 2:52-67;
`3:9-27; 3:28-36; 3:47-50; 3:55-
`4:9; 4:34-38; 6:12-17; 6:22-27;
`6: 57-7:13; 7:22-25; 7:28-38;
`7:67-8:5; 8:12-22; 8:33-56; 9:2-
`5; 9:15-21; 9:30-57; 10:61-64;
`11:50-60; 12:37-52; 13:26-37;
`14:17-45; 15:1-10; 15:23-27;
`15:56-16:25
`
`5
`
`McDaniel, George, “IBM
`Dictionary of Computing”,
`McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 27,28
`(1994) (Exhibit D)
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`
`“application program(s) /
`application(s)”
`
`3.
`
`’466 patent claims 1-
`4, 8-9, 13, 15-19, 23-
`24, 28, 30-32, 36-37,
`41
`
`’578 patent claims 1,
`2, 4, 5, 7, 11-18, 20,
`21, 23, 27-33, 35, 36,
`38, 42-46
`
`’293 patent claims 1,
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 7 of 22 PageID #: 1606
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`12, 17
`
`’766 patent claims 1-
`3, 7-9, 13-15
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG. 2;
`FIG. 3; FIG. 4; 1:31-44; 1:45-
`57; 1:58-2:10; 2:24-31; 2:50-
`65; 3:5-23; 3:61-4:2; 4:9-14;
`4:21-39; 4:53:56; 5:1-7; 5:19-
`22; 5:31-37; 5:56-61; 6:16-25;
`6:67-7:2; 7:13-24; 7:65-8:22;
`8:35-47; 9:47-52; 9:58-65;10:6-
`12; 10:30-32; 10:47-65; 11:3-8;
`11:5-6; 11:13-15; 11:32-12:6;
`12:6-36; 14:15-23; 14:47-55
`IPR2017-00184 at February 21,
`2017 Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response;
`’578 patent File History at
`March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 8 of 22 PageID #: 1607
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`4.
`
`’466 patent claims 1,
`14, 15, 16, 19, 28, 41
`’578 patent claims
`15-17, 31-32, 46
`’766 patent claims 3,
`9, 15
`
`“an instance” / “an instance of
`the application program” / “an
`instance of the selected one of
`the plurality of application
`programs”
`
`2003 Request for
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 4; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; 1:30-43;
`1:45-57; 1:57-2:11; 2:52-67;
`3:9-27; 3:28-36; 3:47-50; 3:55-
`4:9; 4:34-38; 6:12-17; 6:22-27;
`6: 57-7:13; 7:22-25; 7:28-38;
`7:67-8:5; 8:12-22; 8:33-56; 9:2-
`5; 9:15-21; 9:30-57; 10:61-64;
`11:50-60; 12:37-52; 13:26-37;
`14:17-45; 15:1-10; 15:23-27;
`15:56-16:25
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG. 2;
`FIG. 3; FIG. 4; 1:31-44; 1:45-
`57; 1:58-2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-23;
`3:61-4:2; 5:31-37; 5:56-61;
`6:16-25; 6:67-7:2; 7:13-24;
`7:66-8:22; 8:35-47; 9:47-52;
`9:58-65; 9:26-30; 10:6-7; 10:9-
`12; 10:47-65; 11:3-8; 11:13-15;
`11:32-12:6; 12:8-36; 12:50-
`13:18; 13:50-62; 14:15-23;
`
`7
`
`Cravens, Richard. “Netscape
`Enterprise Server 3 Book.”
`Ventana Communications
`Group, p. 402 (1997) (Exhibit
`D)
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`Defendants intend to rely on
`further contemporaneous
`dictionary definitions of
`“instance” in support of their
`proposed constructions. Due to
`Uniloc changing its proposed
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 9 of 22 PageID #: 1608
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`construction for this term after
`the parties exchanged P.R. 4-2
`disclosures, Defendants’
`investigation into supporting
`extrinsic evidence is still
`ongoing.
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`14:47-55
`IPR2017-00184 at February 21,
`2017 Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response;
`’578 patent File History at
`March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`‘466 patent File History at May
`31, 2001 Amendment; October
`23, 2001 Amendment; March
`25, 2002 Response After Final;
`May 16, 2002 Appeal Brief
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`2003 Request for
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 10 of 22 PageID #: 1609
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`5.
`
`’466 patent claims 3,
`6, 10, 18, 21, 25, 31,
`34, 38
`’578 patent claims 1,
`4-5, 11-17, 20-21,
`27-32, 35-36, 42-46
`
`’766 patent claims 2,
`8, 14
`
`“application launcher program”
`/ “application launcher program
`associated with the application
`program” / “application
`launcher programs associated
`with each of the set of the
`plurality of application
`programs”
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 4; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; 1:30-43;
`1:45-57; 1:57-2:11; 2:52-67;
`3:9-27; 3:28-36; 3:47-50; 3:55-
`4:9; 4:34-38; 4:44-54; 5:14-18;
`6:12-17; 6:22-27; 6: 57-7:13;
`7:22-25; 7:28-38; 7:67-8:5;
`8:12-22; 8:33-56; 9:2-5; 9:15-
`21; 9:30-57; 10:61-64; 11:50-
`60; 12:37-52; 13:26-37; 13:46-
`50; 14:8-45; 15:1-10; 15:23-27;
`15:56-16:25
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG. 2;
`FIG. 3; FIG. 4; 1:31-44; 1:45-
`57; 1:58-2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-23;
`3:61-4:2; 5:11-15; 5:23-27;
`5:32-36; 5:53-61; 6:16-25;
`6:67-7:2; 7:13-24; 7:66-8:22;
`8:1-17; 8:35-47; 9:47-52; 9:58-
`65;10:6-7; 10:9-12; 10:47-65;
`11:3-8; 11:13-15; 11:32-12:6;
`12:8-36; 12:66-13:3; 14:15-23;
`14:47-55
`‘766 patent at 5:11-15, 23-27,
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 11 of 22 PageID #: 1610
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`53-61; 8:1-17; 12:66 – 13:3
`‘466 patent File History at May
`31, 2001 Amendment; October
`23, 2001 Amendment; March
`25, 2002 Response After Final;
`May 16, 2002 Appeal Brief
`‘578 patent File History at
`March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`2003 Request for
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 12 of 22 PageID #: 1611
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`6.
`
`’293 patent claims 1,
`12, 17
`
`“centralized network
`management server”
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`McDaniel, George, “IBM
`Dictionary of Computing”,
`McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 91, 612,
`645 (1994) (Exhibit D)
`Illingworth, Valerie,
`“Dictionary of Computing”,
`Oxford University Press, Inc.
`p. 327 (1997) (Exhibit D)
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 1;
`FIG. 8; FIG. 9A; FIG. 9B;
`1:21-23; 1:44-2:11; 3:15-21;
`3:28-36; 3:39-42; 3:47-50; 4:9-
`12; 5:23-25; 5:39-40; 5:30-32;
`5:58-6:2; 6:6-8; 6:28-35; 6:60-
`62; 7:7-1; 7:28-38; 8:33-56;
`11:14-17; 18:26-32; 19:50-65
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG 1;
`FIG. 2; FIG. 3; 1:22-24; 1:45-
`2:10; 3:11-17; 3:28-37; 5:65-
`6:9; 6:63-7:7; 7:62-65; 14:3-12
`IPR2017-00184 at February 21,
`2017 Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response;
`’578 patent File History at
`March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook
`’293 patent File History at
`December 7, 2004
`Amendment; June 22, 2005
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 13 of 22 PageID #: 1612
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`7.
`
`’293 patent claims 1,
`12, 17
`
`“registration operations”
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`Amendment; November 7,
`2005 Amendment
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 4; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; FIG.
`9C; 1:30-43; 1:45-57; 1:57-
`2:11; 2:52-67; 3:9-27; 3:28-36;
`3:47-50; 3:55-4:9; 4:34-38;
`6:12-17; 6:22-27; 6:32-35;
`6:57-7:13; 7:22-25; 7:28-38;
`7:67-8:5; 8:12-22; 8:33-56; 9:2-
`5; 9:15-21; 9:30-57; 10:61-64;
`11:50-60; 12:37-52; 13:26-37;
`14:17-45; 15:1-10; 15:23-27;
`15:56-16:25; 17:19-51; 18:1-
`32; 18:42-57; 19:17-33; 20:1-
`36
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG. 2;
`FIG. 3; 1:58-2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-
`23; 1:31-44; 1:45-57; 1:58-
`2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-23; 3:61-4:2;
`5:32-36; 5:57-61; 5:65-6:9;
`6:16-25; 6:46-62; 6:67-7:2;
`7:13-24;10:6-7; 7:66-8:22;
`8:35-47; 9:47-52; 9:58-65;10:6-
`7; 10:9-12; 10:47-65; 11:3-8;
`11:13-15; 11:32-12:6; 12:8-36;
`14:15-23; 14:47-55
`IPR2017-00184 at February 21,
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 14 of 22 PageID #: 1613
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`2017 Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response; April
`18, 2017 PTAB Decision
`Denying Institution
`‘578 patent File History at
`March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook
`‘466 patent File History at May
`31, 2001 Amendment; October
`23, 2001 Amendment; March
`25, 2002 Response After Final;
`May 16, 2002 Appeal Brief
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`2003 Request for
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 15 of 22 PageID #: 1614
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`8.
`
`’766 patent claims 3,
`9, 15
`
`“on demand server” / “target
`on-demand server”
`
`’293 patent claims 1,
`12, 17
`
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`‘293 patent File History at
`December 7, 2004
`Amendment; June 22, 2005
`Amendment; November 7,
`2005 Amendment
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 4; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; FIG.
`9C; 1:30-43; 1:45-57; 1:57-
`2:11; 2:52-67; 3:9-27; 3:28-36;
`3:47-50; 3:55-4:9; 4:34-38;
`5:32-36; 5:57-61; 6:12-17;
`6:22-27; 6:32-35; 6:57-7:13;
`7:22-25; 7:28-38; 7:67-8:5;
`8:12-22; 8:33-56; 9:2-5; 9:15-
`21; 9:30-57; 10:61-64; 11:50-
`60; 12:37-52; 13:26-37; 14:17-
`45; 15:1-10; 15:23-27; 15:56-
`16:25; 17:19-51; 18:1-32;
`19:17-33; 20:1-36
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG. 2;
`FIG. 3; 1:58-2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-
`23; 3:61-64; 5:65-6:9; 6:46-62;
`6:67-7:2; 7:10-24; 8:1-1710:6-
`7; 11:3-8; 11:55-60
`IPR2017-00184 at February 21,
`
`14
`
`McDaniel, George, “IBM
`Dictionary of Computing”,
`McGraw-Hill, Inc., p. 475, 612,
`682 (1994) (Exhibit D)
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 16 of 22 PageID #: 1615
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`2017 Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response
`’578 patent File History at
`March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook
`‘466 patent File History at May
`31, 2001 Amendment; October
`23, 2001 Amendment; March
`25, 2002 Response After Final;
`May 16, 2002 Appeal Brief
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`2003 Request for
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 17 of 22 PageID #: 1616
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`9.
`
`’578 patent claims
`15, 16, 17, 32, 46
`’466 patent claims 1,
`15, 16
`
`“provid[e]/[ing] an instance of
`the application program” /
`“providing an instance of the
`selected one of the plurality of
`application programs to the
`client for execution”
`
`Demand Handbook;
`’293 patent File History at
`December 7, 2004
`Amendment; June 22, 2005
`Amendment; November 7,
`2005 Amendment
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 4; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; 1:30-43;
`1:45-57; 1:57-2:11; 2:52-67;
`3:9-27; 3:28-36; 3:47-50; 3:55-
`4:9; 4:34-38; 6:12-17; 6:22-27;
`6: 57-7:13; 7:22-25; 7:28-38;
`7:67-8:5; 8:12-22; 8:33-56; 9:2-
`5; 9:15-21; 9:30-57; 10:61-64;
`11:4-8; 11:50-60; 12:37-52;
`12:61-67; 13:26-37; 14:17-45;
`15:1-10; 15:23-27; 15:42-55;
`15:56-16:25
`‘578 patent at Abstract; FIG. 2;
`FIG. 3; FIG. 4; 1:31-44; 1:45-
`57; 1:58-2:10; 2:50-65; 3:5-23;
`3:61-4:2; 5:32-36; 5:57-61;
`6:16-25; 6:67-7:2; 7:13-24;
`7:66-8:22; 8:35-47; 9:47-52;
`8:58-65; 9:58-65;10:6-7; 10:9-
`12; 10:47-65; 11:3-8; 11:13-15;
`11:32-12:6; 12:8-36; 14:15-23;
`
`16
`
`Cravens, Richard. “Netscape
`Enterprise Server 3 Book.”
`Ventana Communications
`Group, p. 402 (1997) (Exhibit
`D)
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`Defendants intend to rely on
`further contemporaneous
`dictionary definitions of
`“instance” in support of their
`proposed constructions. Due to
`Uniloc changing its proposed
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 18 of 22 PageID #: 1617
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`construction for this term after
`the parties exchanged P.R. 4-2
`disclosures, Defendants’
`investigation into supporting
`extrinsic evidence is still
`ongoing.
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`14:47-55
`‘578 patent File History at
`March 7, 2001 Notice of
`Allowability; June 28, 2001
`Notice of Allowability; TME
`10 Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook
`‘466 patent File History at May
`31, 2001 Amendment; October
`23, 2001 Amendment; March
`25, 2002 Response After Final;
`May 16, 2002 Appeal Brief
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`2003 Request for
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 19 of 22 PageID #: 1618
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`10.
`
`’578 patent claims 6,
`8
`
`“the initiating execution step”
`
`11.
`
`’578 patent claims
`20, 22, 24, 35, 37, 39
`
`12.
`
`‘466 Patent – 9, 10,
`24, 25, 37, 38
`
`‘766 Patent – 1, 7, 13
`
`“the computer readable
`program code means for
`executing the application
`program” / “the computer
`readable program code means
`for initiating execution” / “the
`means for executing the
`application program” / “the
`means for initiating execution”
`“license availability” / “a
`license availability for the
`selected one of the plurality of
`application programs for the
`user”
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show that this term is
`indefinite.
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show that this term is
`indefinite.
`
`‘466 patent at Abstract; FIG. 3;
`FIG. 5; FIG. 6; FIG. 7; 1:52-56,
`4:3-7; 5:8-20; Fig. 3
`‘578 patent at FIG. 4; FIG. 5;
`3:24-33; 4:2-5; 4:18-20; 5:38-
`61; 6:12-14; 6:18-27; 7:41-48;
`8:16-34; 8:58-65; 9:1-2; 9:10-
`14; 9:20-26; 9:58-67; 10:7-12;
`10:57-11:1; 11:27-38; 12:37-
`62; 12:53-13:7; 13:7-15; 13:36-
`14:4; 14:55-62; 15:11-20;
`
`Netscape Enterprise Server 3
`Book, Cravens, p. 404 (1997)
`(Exhibit D)
`
`Webster’s II New College
`Dictionary, Houghton Mifflin
`Co., P. 632 (1995) (Exhibit D)
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 20 of 22 PageID #: 1619
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`13.
`
`’466 claims 1, 2, 8,
`15, 17, and 23)
`
`“authorized user / [for which
`the] user [is (not)] authorized”
`
`’578 patent claims 1,
`7, 10, 12-17, 23, 26,
`32, 38, and 41-46
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`15:27-36; 16:43-60
`’578 patent File History at
`March 7, 2001 Interview
`Summary
`‘766 patent at 13:58
`‘466 patent File History at May
`31, 2001 Amendment
`‘766 patent File History at
`August 1, 2002 Amendment;
`January 27, 2003 Amendment
`After Final; April 22, 2003
`Brief on Appeal; September 29,
`2003 Request for
`Reconsideration; TME 10
`Software Distribution User’s
`Guide; IBM Network Station
`Manager for Windows NT
`Server 4.0; WorkSpace On-
`Demand Handbook;
`’466 patent at FIG. 6 and 7;
`10:57-11:3; 12:37-14:4; 15:10-
`16:12; 16:43-60.
`’578 patent at FIG. 2, 3, 4, and
`5; 8:21-9:4; 9:52-10:46.
`
`19
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`IBM Visualage for Java (1998)
`(Exhibit D)
`
`IBM United States Software
`Announcement
`209-408 (2009) (Exhibit D)
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 21 of 22 PageID #: 1620
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`“user set”
`
`14.
`
`’578 patent claims 1,
`2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 14-
`18, 20, 22, 24, 26,
`30-33, 35, 37, 39, 41,
`42, 45 and 46
`
`’578 patent at FIG. 2, 3, 4, and
`5; 8:21-11:22; 14:13-38.
`
`20
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`Defendants (other than
`Kaspersky) intend to rely on
`further contemporaneous
`dictionary definitions of
`“authorized user” in support of
`their proposed constructions.
`Defendants’ investigation into
`supporting extrinsic evidence is
`still ongoing.
`IBM Visualage for Java (1998)
`(Exhibit D)
`
`IBM United States Software
`Announcement
`209-408 (2009) (Exhibit D)
`
`Defendants may rely upon
`expert testimony (1) to show
`the skill level of a person of
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 148-3 Filed 04/20/17 Page 22 of 22 PageID #: 1621
`
`CLAIMS
`
`TERMS AND PHRASES
`
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT FOR
`DEFENDANTS PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION1
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`PROPOSED
`CONSTRUCTION
`ordinary skill in the art; and (2)
`to show how a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would
`have understood the claim term
`in light of the specification and
`prosecution history
`
`Defendants (other than
`Kaspersky) intend to rely on
`further contemporaneous
`dictionary definitions of “user
`set” in support of their
`proposed constructions.
`Defendants’ investigation into
`supporting extrinsic evidence is
`still ongoing.
`
`21
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
