Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1231
`Case 2:l5—cv—0l274—JRG—RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 9 Page|D #: 1231
` 
`
`  
`
`EXHIBIT B 
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
` 
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 1232
`Defendants’ P.R. 4-3 Disclosures
`
`
`
`ASSERTED
`CLAIM
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 1, 5, 6,
`10, 14, 23, 44,
`57, 64, 86, 88,
`92, 97
`
`CLAIM TERM
`
`“interface”
`
`P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES FOR U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,489,786 AND 8,155,342
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT1
`CONSTRUCTION
`“a microcontroller that is a
`functionally and structurally
`separate component from the car
`stereo, which integrates an after-
`market device with a car stereo”
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`court’s claim construction
`opinion and order, court
`transcripts, and all extrinsic
`evidence cited by parties in the
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`litigations.2
`
`
`
`’786 patent at 1:5-12, 1:36-39,
`1:60-64, 2:28-32, 3:1-5, 4:26-32,
`4:47-56, 5:1-5, 5:15-19, 5:38-55,
`FIGS. 1, 2A-2H, 3A-3D; 9/5/2006
`Response to Office Action, at page
`23 (BLITZSAFE-0010207);
`9/6/2007 Response to Office
`Action, at pages 2-31
`(BLITZSAFE-0010515-
`BLITZSAFE-0010544); 2/20/2008
`Office Action at pages 5-6
`(BLITZSAFE-0010561-
`BLITZSAFE-0010562); U.S.
`Patent Application 11/071,667.
`
`’786 patent at 1:60-64, 2:22-29,
`4:64-67; ’342 patent at 2:18-23,
`2:58-67, 9:17-20; 9/5/2006
`Response to Office Action at pages
`21-23 (BLITZSAFE-0010205-
`BLITZSAFE-0010207); 2/14/2007
`Response to Office Action at pages
`26-31 (BLITZSAFE-0010299-
`BLITZSAFE-0010304); 6/28/2007
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 1, 44,
`57, 90, 92
`
`’342 Patent,
`Claims 53, 77,
`97
`
`“format incompatible
`with the [after-market
`audio device,
`portable device,
`video device,
`portable audio
`device, MP3 player]”
`
`Honda’s Proposed Construction:
`For “format incompatible with
`the [after-market audio device,
`portable device, video device,
`portable audio device, MP3
`player]”: “format alien to and
`inoperable with the [after-market
`audio device, portable device,
`video device, portable audio
`
`
`1 Defendants’ citations to the intrinsic evidence below are exemplary in nature. Defendants reserve the right to rely on other portions of the intrinsic record, including the
`disclosures of, or statements made or prior art cited during prosecution of, the ‘786 patent or ‘342 patent, should they become relevant, based upon arguments made by Plaintiff or
`otherwise.
`
`2 References in this Exhibit to extrinsic evidence cited by the parties in the Ford and Dice Electronics litigation include, but are not limited to, any and all extrinsic evidence
`identified in Docket Entries 87, 89, 90, 93, 99, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, and 108, and all exhibits thereto, from Marlowe Patent Holdings LLC v. Ford Motor Co., Case No. 3:11-
`cv-07044-PGS-DEA (D.N.J.); and in Docket Entries 139, 143, 149, 150, 151, 155, 156, 158, 221, and 222, and all exhibits thereto, from Marlowe Patent Holdings LLC v. Dice
`Electronics, LLC et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-01199-PGS-DEA (D.N.J.).
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 1233
`
`P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES FOR U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,489,786 AND 8,155,342
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT1
`CONSTRUCTION
`device, MP3 player]”
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`Response to Office Action at pages
`26-37(BLITZSAFE-0010428-
`BLITZSAFE-0010439); 9/6/2007
`Response to Office Action at page
`36 (BLITZSAFE-0010549);
`1/29/2012 Response to Office
`Action at pages 36-40
`(BLITZSAFE-0012199-
`BLITZSAFE-0012203).
`
`’342 patent at 34:63-35:1; FIG. 24.
`
`
`Defendants may rely on expert
`testimony to establish that the
`’342 patent fails to disclosure
`sufficient structure for this term
`under § 112, ¶¶ 2 and 6, or
`failing to sufficiently provide a
`written description of the
`invention and/or enable a
`
`ASSERTED
`CLAIM
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 1, 60
`
`’342 Patent,
`Claims 54, 70,
`78, 120
`
`CLAIM TERM
`
`“format incompatible
`with the [car stereo /
`car audio/video
`system]”
`
`“integration
`subsystem”
`
`’342 Patent,
`Claims 49, 50,
`53–57, 66, 70,
`73, 74, 77–80,
`94, 97, 99, 102,
`103, 106, 113,
`120
`
`For “format incompatible with
`the [car stereo / car audio/video
`system]”: “format alien to and
`inoperable with an existing [car
`stereo or car audio/video
`system]”
`
`Hyundai, Kia, Nissan, Toyota,
`and Volkswagen’s Proposed
`Construction (for both claim
`terms):
`“a format that the OEM or
`factory-installed car stereo was
`not designed to use when
`communicating with an after-
`market device”
`Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan,
`and Toyota’s Proposed
`Construction:
`
`Indefinite. This is a functional
`claim limitation subject to § 112,
`¶ 6.
`
`Function:3
`
`
`3 The functions performed by the integration subsystem in claims 49 and 73 are: (1a) obtaining, using a wireless communication link, information about an audio file stored (claim
`49) or received (claim 73) on the portable device; (2a) transmitting the information to the car audio/video system for subsequent display; (3a) instructing the portable device to
`play the audio file in response to a user selecting the audio file; and (4a) receiving audio generated by the portable device over the wireless communication link.
`
`The functions of the integration subsystem in claim 97 are: (1b) channeling audio generated by the portable device to the car audio/video system using a wireless communication
`link; (2b) receiving a control command from a user in a format incompatible with the portable device; (3b) processing the control command into a format compatible with the
`portable device; and (4b) dispatching the formatted command to the portable device.
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 1234
`
`ASSERTED
`CLAIM
`
`CLAIM TERM
`
`P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES FOR U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,489,786 AND 8,155,342
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT1
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`person of ordinary skill in the
`art to make and use the
`invention.
`
`
`Structure: “a microprocessor
`programmed to perform the
`method of FIG. 24”
`
`The specification fails to
`disclose a sufficient algorithm or
`other structure that performs this
`function; thus, the claims are
`invalid under § 112, ¶ 2.
`Alternatively, the claims are
`invalid under § 112, ¶ 1 for
`failing to sufficiently provide a
`written description of the
`invention and/or enable a person
`of ordinary skill in the art to
`make and use the invention.
`
`“a continuous signal indicating
`an audio device is present”
`
`
`“device presence
`signal”
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 6, 57,
`86, 92
`
`’342 Patent,
`Claims 56, 106
`
`’786 patent at 1:60-64, 2:29-35,
`4:47-56, 12:15-36, 13:12-19, 13:59-
`66, 14:48-52, 15:35-42, 16:12-15,
`16:57-60; 20:5-10; 20:19-35, FIGS.
`2A-2H; ’342 patent at 2:18-23,
`2:67-3:6, 8:63-9:7, 16:50-62,
`17:46-54, 20:9-15, 20:57-63, 21:39-
`45, 25:49-54, 25:63-26:11, FIG.
`4A-4C; U.S. Patent Application
`11/071,667.
`
`
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`court’s claim construction
`opinion and order, court
`transcripts, and all extrinsic
`evidence cited by parties in
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`litigations.
`
`
`The functions of the integration subsystem recited in claim 120 are: (1c) channeling audio generated by the portable device to the car audio/video system using a wireless
`communication link; (2c) receiving data from the portable device in a format incompatible with the car audio/video system; (3c) processing the data into a format compatible with
`the car audio/video system; and (4c) transmitting the processed data to the car audio/video system.
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 1235
`
`ASSERTED
`CLAIM
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 1, 14
`
`CLAIM TERM
`
`“auxiliary input
`source”
`
`P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES FOR U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,489,786 AND 8,155,342
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT1
`CONSTRUCTION
`“a device that outputs audio by
`headphone jack or other
`connector”
`
`
`’786 patent at 2:22-29, 2:60-67,
`6:44-7:61; FIGS. 2D, 2E, 2F, 2G.
`
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 1, 7, 8,
`44, 57, 60, 86,
`90, 91, 92
`
`“pre-programmed”
`
`“programmed prior to its use in
`the normal course”
`
`
`“external”
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 1, 57, 86
`and 92
`
`’342 Patent,
`Claims 49, 73,
`97, 120
`
`“an after-market device that is
`outside and alien to the
`environment of an OEM or after-
`market stereo system”
`
`
`4
`
`’786 patent at 10:1-12, 11:47-56;
`2/20/2008 Office Action at pages 3-
`5, 10-11 (BLITZSAFE-0010559-
`BLITZSAFE-0010561,
`BLITZSAFE-0010566-
`BLITZSAFE-0010567); 4/21/2008
`Response to Office Action at pages
`29-32 (BLITZSAFE-0010646-
`0010649); 7/31/2008 Notice of
`Allowability at pages 2-3
`(BLITZSAFE-0010979-0010980);
`US2002/0084910 (Owen);
`US6,175,789 (Beckert).
`
`’786 patent at 1:5-12, 1:16-20,
`1:33-35, 1:45-54, 2:32-35, 2:50-52,
`4:26-32, 4:59-67, 6:66-7:3, 8:22-27,
`12:32-39, 15:35-67, 16:15-45,
`16:60-17:27, FIGS. 1 and 2; ’342
`patent at 1:18-28, 1:32-36, 1:51-53,
`1:67-2:6, 2:11-15, 3:3-6, 3:21-24,
`7:62-64, 8:38-46, 9:10-20, 11:26-
`30, 12:49-54, 16:58-61, 20:9-44,
`20:57-21:26, 21:39-22:6, FIGS. 1,
`2, 17; 9/5/2006 Response to Office
`Action at page 21, 23
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`court’s claim construction
`opinion and order, court
`transcripts, and all extrinsic
`evidence cited by parties in
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`litigations.
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`court’s claim construction
`opinion and order, court
`transcripts, and all extrinsic
`evidence cited by parties in
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`litigations.
`
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`court’s claim construction
`opinion and order, court
`transcripts, and all extrinsic
`evidence cited by parties in
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`litigations.
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 1236
`
`ASSERTED
`CLAIM
`
`CLAIM TERM
`
`P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES FOR U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,489,786 AND 8,155,342
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT1
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`(BLITZSAFE-0010205,
`BLITZSAFE-0010207); 2/14/2007
`Response to Office Action at pages
`26-31 (BLITZSAFE-0010299-
`BLITZSAFE-0010304); 6/28/2007
`Response to Office Action at pages
`26-37 (BLITZSAFE-0010428-
`BLITZSAFE-0010439); 9/6/2007
`Response to Office Action, at pages
`29-31 (BLITZSAFE-0010542-
`BLITZSAFE-0010544).
`
`’786 patent at 2:50-52, 20:58-61,
`20:64-21:24, FIGS. 7a, 7b, claims
`93-96; ’342 patent at 3:21-24, 5:7-
`13; 26:35-27:9, FIGS. 7a, b.
`
`
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`court’s claim construction
`opinion and order, court
`transcripts, and all extrinsic
`evidence cited by parties in
`Ford and Dice Electronics
`litigations.
`
`“portable”
`
`“capable of being moved about”
`
`
`“car stereo”
`
`“All presently existing car
`stereos and radios, such as
`physical devices that are present
`at any location within a vehicle,
`
`5
`
`’786 patent at 5:1-14, 2:21-29.
`
`
`All extrinsic evidence cited by
`parties in the Ford and Dice
`Electronics litigations.
`
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 44, 57,
`92, 94, 97
`
`’342 Patent,
`Claims 49, 52–
`54, 56, 57, 62–
`64, 66, 70, 71,
`73, 76–78, 80,
`94, 95, 97, 100,
`101, 103, 106,
`109–111, 113,
`115, 120
`
`
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 1, 2, 6,
`13, 14, 44, 57,
`58, 60, 63, 86,
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 1237
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`ASSERTED
`CLAIM
`90–92
`
`CLAIM TERM
`
`“car audio/video
`system”
`
`’342 Patent,
`Claims 49–51,
`53, 54, 56, 66,
`70, 73–75, 77,
`78, 94, 97, 99,
`106, 113, 120
`
`P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES FOR U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,489,786 AND 8,155,342
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT1
`CONSTRUCTION
`in addition to software and/or
`graphically-or display-driven
`receivers. An example of such a
`receiver is a software-driven
`receiver that operates on a
`universal LCD panel within a
`vehicle and is operable by a user
`via a graphical user interface
`displayed on the universal LCD
`panel. Further, any future
`receiver, whether a hardwired or
`a software/graphical receiver
`operable on one or more
`displays, is considered within the
`definition of the terms ‘car
`stereo’ and ‘car radio.’”
`“All presently existing car audio
`and video systems, such as
`physical devices that are present
`at any location within a vehicle,
`in addition to software and/or
`graphically-or display-driven
`receivers. An example of such a
`receiver is a software-driven
`receiver that operates on a
`universal LCD panel within a
`vehicle and is operable by a user
`via a graphical user interface
`displayed on the universal LCD
`panel. Further, any future
`receiver, whether a hardwired or
`a software/graphical receiver
`operable on one or more
`
`‘342 patent at 1:30-41, 8:38-46,
`9:21-38, 33:57-62; FIGS. 18-24.
`
`6
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 1238
`
`CLAIM TERM
`
`P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES FOR U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,489,786 AND 8,155,342
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT1
`CONSTRUCTION
`displays, is considered within the
`definition of the terms ‘car
`audio/video systems.’”
`“video information” Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan,
`and Toyota’s Proposed
`Construction: “moving visual
`images”
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US2003/0086699 (Benyamin) at
`[0026]; US2005/0172001 (Zaner) at
`[0047], [0048]; US2004/026336
`(Patsiokas) (cited by applicant) at
`[0176];
`US2002/0084910 (Owens); US
`6330337 (Nicholson);
`20010044664 (Mueller)
`’786 patent at 5:38-45, 6:1-11,
`6:25-33, 6:44-65, 7:23-30, 8:31-45,
`9:22-44, 10:34-48, 11:19-29, 15:12-
`23, FIGs. 2a, 2b, 2c, 2e, 3a, 3b, 3c,
`3d; 9/5/2006 Response to Office
`Action at page 23 (BLITZSAFE-
`0010207); 9/6/2007 Response to
`Office Action at pages 2-31
`(BLITZSAFE-0010515-
`BLITZSAFE-0010544).
`’786 patent at 6:44-65, 15:12-23;
`9/5/2006 Response to Office Action
`at page 22-30 (BLITZSAFE-
`0010206-BLITZSAFE-0010214;
`2/14/2007 Response to Office
`Action at page 30 (BLITZSAFE-
`0010303).
`’786 patent at 12:26-36; ’342 patent
`at 16:52-62, 17:46-54, 18:28-38,
`19:15-26, 21:39-50.
`
`
`ASSERTED
`CLAIM
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 10, 86
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claim 1
`
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claim 1, 2, 4, 5,
`57, 58, 86, 97
`
`“connector
`electrically
`connectable to”
`
`“connector capable of being
`physically and electrically
`connected and disconnected”
`
`“electrical connector”
`
`’786 Patent
`Claims 1, 57, 86
`
`“connectable”
`
`“able to be disconnected and
`connected”
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 6
`
`“maintaining … in a
`state responsive”
`
`’342 Patent,
`
`“maintain … in a
`
`“preventing the car stereo from
`shutting off, entering a sleep
`mode, or otherwise being
`unresponsive to signals and/or
`data from an external source”
`
`7
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 88-2 Filed 04/01/16 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 1239
`
`CLAIM TERM
`
`P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURES FOR U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,489,786 AND 8,155,342
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT1
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`EXTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`WEBSTER’S THIRD NEW
`INTERNATIONAL
`DICTIONARY (Merriam-
`Webster, Inc. 2002) at 945
`(“generate” … 2: to come into
`existence : ORIGINATE,
`ARISE”).
`
`
`ASSERTED
`CLAIM
`Claims 56, 106
`
`’342 Patent,
`Claims 49, 73
`
`state responsive”
`
`“generated . . . for
`playing on the car
`audio/video system”
`
`Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan,
`and Toyota’s Proposed
`Construction: "originates from
`the portable device during
`playback"
`
`
`
`’786 Patent,
`Claims 2, 58
`
`“Original Equipment
`Manufacturer
`(OEM)”
`
`“factory installed”
`
`’786 patent at 1:6-12, 1:21-35,
`2:22-29.
`
`
`
`
`8