throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA872929
`
`Filing date:
`
`01/24/2018
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91238747
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Attachments
`
`Plaintiff
`Dennis F. Gross
`
`Christine M. Baker
`Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`UNITED STATES
`Email: IPDocketingBos@mintz.com, cbaker@mintz.com, ahan@mintz.com
`
`Motion to Amend Pleading/Amended Pleading
`
`Christine M. Baker
`
`cbaker@mintz.com, ahan@Mintz.com, mmims@mintz.com
`
`/cmbaker/
`
`01/24/2018
`
`AmendedNoticeofOppositionforFERULACPEEL.pdf(135796 bytes )
`Opposition Exhibits A-C.PDF(2203041 bytes )
`OppositionExhibitsD-I.pdf(1836916 bytes )
`OppositionExhibitsJ-M.pdf(2157588 bytes )
`ExhibitN.pdf(1971898 bytes )
`OppositionExhibitsO-Q.pdf(449353 bytes )
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket: 049966-407-059
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the Matter of Application Serial No. 87/202675
`
`for FERULAC PEEL
`
`Published in the Official Gazette on September 5, 2017
`
`Dennis F. Gross
`
`Opposer,
`
`v.
`
`Sesderma S.L.
`
`Applicant.
`
`APPLICATION NO. 87/202675
`
`OPPOSITION NO.: 91238747
`
`AMENDED NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`Sir/Madam:
`
`Dennis F. Gross ("Opposer"), a United States citizen, with a business address at 444
`
`Madison Avenue, Suite 500 New York, NY 10022 believes he will be damaged by the registration
`
`of U.S. Application Serial No. 87/202675 for the mark FERULAC PEEL for the following goods:
`
`Non-medicated exfoliating preparations for skin; Skin care preparations, namely,
`
`chemical peels for skin; all of the foregoing containing ferulic acid, in International
`
`Class 3; and
`
`

`

`Medicated skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; all of the foregoing
`
`containing ferulic acid, in International Class 5,
`
`which was filed by Sesderma, S.L. ("Applicant") and published for opposition in the Official
`
`Gazette on September 5, 2017 and hereby opposes the same.
`
`Pursuant to Trademark Act Sections 1, 2 and 45 and Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) and
`
`predicated upon the following grounds, Opposer alleges the following:
`
`1. Opposer is the creator of the award winning and global skin care brand DR DENNIS
`
`GROSS®. For several years, Opposer has been engaged in the manufacture and sale of
`
`skin care peels containing ferulic acid.
`
`2. Opposer has regularly appeared on television shows such as Dr. OZ, The Today Show,
`
`The Doctors, CBS: The Early Show and on CNN to discuss skin health and has been
`
`lauded for his innovative approach to skin care and skin care peels containing ferulic acid
`
`by major magazines, including but not limited to, Vogue, Elle, Harper's Bazaar, and The
`
`New York Times Magazine.
`
`3. Opposer owns Registration No. 5,283,495 for the mark FERULIC + RETINOL WRINKLE
`
`RECOVERY PEEL for non-medicated skin care preparations containing ferulic acid and
`
`retinol. As the attached Registration Certificate indicates, the Trademark Office required
`
`2
`
`

`

`Opposer to disclaim the terms FERULIC and PEEL apart from Opposer's mark
`
`FERULIC + RETINOL WRINKLE RECOVERY PEEL. See Exhibit A.
`
`4. Upon information and belief, the Applicant is a limited liability company organized under
`
`the laws of Spain with an address of Massamagrell, 3 — Rafelbutiol, Poligono Industrial
`
`Rafelbunol, Valencia, Spain E-46138.
`
`5. On information and belief, Applicant is involved in the manufacture and sale of skin care
`
`products, including a ferulic peel.
`
`6. On information and belief, Applicant sells a ferulic peel and uses the term ferulac peel in
`
`connection with its ferulic peel.
`
`7. On information and belief, Applicant is one of Opposer's competitors in the United States in
`
`the skin care product market.
`
`8. Applicant filed an application to register the mark FERULAC PEEL for non-medicated
`
`exfoliating preparations for skin; skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin;
`
`all of the foregoing containing ferulic acid, in Class 003 and for medicated skin care
`
`preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; all of the foregoing containing ferulic acid,
`
`in Class 005 on October 13, 2016 and the application was assigned Serial No. 87/202675.
`
`See Exhibit B.
`
`3
`
`

`

`9. In an Office Action dated December 17, 2016, the Examining Attorney denied
`
`registration of the mark FERULAC PEEL on that ground that it merely describes a
`
`feature, ingredient, characteristic, purpose, function and/or use of Applicant's goods
`
`under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) and appears to be generic in connection with the
`
`identified goods and, therefore, incapable of functioning as a source-identifier for
`
`applicant's goods. See Exhibit C.
`
`10. In the refusal dated December 17, 2016, the Examining Attorney states that the term
`
`"ferulac" is the phonetic equivalent of "ferulic" and that, according to The American
`
`Heritage Dictionary of the English Language Dictionary, the word "PEEL" is "a
`
`chemical peel," which is the removal of skin blemishes or wrinkles by applying a caustic
`
`chemical, such as an acid, that produces a mild, superficial burn. The Examining
`
`Attorney concludes that the wording FERULAC PEEL merely describes an ingredient,
`
`quality, characteristic, or feature of applicant's goods, namely, the applicant's goods
`
`comprise chemical peels or treatments for the removal of problematic skin with ferulic
`
`acid as an ingredient. See Exhibit C.
`
`11. In the Applicant's response to the Section 2(e)(1) refusal dated May 23, 2017, the
`
`applicant acknowledges that FERULAC PEEL is a slight and intentional misspelling of
`
`the generic term FERULIC PEEL and that the Applicant intentionally misspells generic
`
`terms which are active ingredients in its products. See Exhibit D.
`
`4
`
`

`

`12. In its response dated May 23, 2017, Applicant states that a search on Google.com for
`
`FERULAC did not pick up the misspelling of FERULIC and suggest the correct spelling.
`
`See Exhibit D.
`
`13. On information and belief, a search on Google.com for "what is ferulac acid" uncovered
`
`the misspelling of FERULAC and suggested "what is ferulic acid." The search uncovered
`
`over 924,000 records with this term pertaining to skin care and skin care products. These
`
`results indicate that FERULAC is a misspelling of a generic term that is widely used as
`
`the name of an active ingredient in skin care preparations, which include chemical peels
`
`for skin. See Exhibit E.
`
`14. In Applicant's response dated May 23, 2017, Applicant states that consumers will be able
`
`to identify the difference between Applicant's distinctive mark(s) and the generic terms
`
`for the ingredients therein. On information and belief beauty and medical spas, who are
`
`sophisticated consumers, refer to ferulic acid as "ferulac acid" and offer skin peels that
`
`include "ferulac acid" as an ingredient, and use "ferulac peel" in a generic manner. Even
`
`sophisticated consumers perceive "ferulac peel" as generic wording for a chemical peel
`
`containing ferulic acid. See Exhibit F.
`
`15. In an Office Action dated June 16, 2017, the Examining Attorney required a disclaimer of
`
`the generic wording PEEL. See Exhibit G.
`
`16. On June 28, 2017, the Applicant filed a response to the Office Action dated June 16,
`
`2017 disclaiming the word PEEL and claiming that the mark FERULAC PEEL has
`
`5
`
`

`

`become distinctive of the Applicant's goods under Trademark Act Section 2(t) based on
`
`Applicant's alleged use of FERULAC PEEL for at least (5) five years. See Exhibit H.
`
`17. The Applicant has attempted to register the mark FERULAC on two previous occasions.
`
`On January 26, 2009 and December 22, 2015, Applicant filed applications to register the
`
`mark FERULAC for cosmetics in Class 003 and pharmaceuticals for skin care and
`
`treatment in Class 005 and cosmetics; beauty serums; facial beauty serum; non-medicated
`
`skin care preparation namely, body and facial mist; beauty ampoules; moisturizing
`
`creams; facial creams; skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin in Class
`
`003, which were assigned Serial No. 79/071102 and 86/857290. See Exhibits I and J.
`
`18. In Office Actions dated August 28, 2009 and March 11, 2016 for Applicant's
`
`Applications, Serial Nos. Serial No. 79/071102 and 86/857290, the assigned Examining
`
`Attorneys denied registration of the proposed mark FERULAC on the ground that it is the
`
`equivalent and novel spelling of the word "ferulic" and merely describes a feature,
`
`ingredient, characteristic, purpose, and/or function of Applicant's goods, namely, ferulic
`
`acid. In support of the refusal, the Examining Attorneys attached to the Office Actions a
`
`definition of "ferulic acid" from the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, a Wikipedia
`
`entry for ferulic acid discussing its use in cosmetics and skin care, article abstracts from
`
`PubMed.com that discuss the cosmetic uses of ferulic acid and the use of ferulic acid in
`
`skin care, internet evidence and links establishing that the wording "FERULIC" means
`
`"Pertaining to, or derived from, asafetida (Ferula asafoetida); as, ferulic acid," and
`
`screenshots from Applicant's website, located at www.sesdermausa.com, that Applicant
`
`offers cosmetics and skin care products containing ferulic acid. See Exhibits K and L.
`
`6
`
`

`

`19. On October 11, 2016, the Office issued a Notice of Abandonment abandoning
`
`Applicant's Application Serial No. 86/857290 due to Applicant's failure to file a
`
`response to the refusal dated March 11, 2016. See Exhibit M.
`
`20. In a Final Office Action dated March 23, 2010 for Application Serial No. 79/071102, the
`
`Examining Attorney denied registration of the mark FERULAC on the ground that it is a
`
`novel spelling of the word FERULIC, which is a type of acid that is a common ingredient
`
`in products for treating the skin and cosmetics used for anti-aging purposes. In support of
`
`the refusal, the Examining Attorney attached to the Final Office Action articles from
`
`LASplash.com, BulkActives.com and TruthInAging.com indicating that the prevailing
`
`opinion is that ferulic acid is an important active ingredient in products for wrinkle and
`
`age spot reduction. The Examinng Attorney stated that "Consumers who are seeking
`
`products for this purpose are likely to know this and will be looking for labels that
`
`identify this ingredient. Consumers will see FERULAC and think that the mark identifies
`
`the ingredient ferulic acid." See Exhibit N.
`
`21. On April 22, 2011, the Office issued a Notice of Abandonment abandoning Applicant's
`
`Application Serial No. 79/071102 due to Applicant's failure to file a response to the Final
`
`Office Action dated March 23, 2010. See Exhibit O.
`
`7
`
`

`

`COUNT ONE: GENERICNESS
`
`22. Opposer realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations in all other
`
`paragraphs contained herein.
`
`23. On information and belief, FERULAC is the phonetic equivalent of the word FERULIC
`
`and refers to a type of acid that is found in plant cell wall components and is the main
`
`ingredient in the Applicant's peels, as evidenced by Applicant's description of goods.
`
`Ferulic acid is a favorite ingredient of dermatologists and skin care companies and is used
`
`in many skin care products including the Opposer's FERULIC + RETINOL WRINKLE
`
`RECOVERY PEEL. See Exhibit P.
`
`24. On information and belief, the term "Ferulic" is commonly used in connection with skin
`
`care products. Because of this, consumers will immediately perceive FERULAC PEEL
`
`as an intentional misspelling of the generic term FERULIC PEEL or simply believe that
`
`FERULAC PEEL is a FERULIC PEEL.
`
`25. On information and belief, the wording FERULIC PEEL and FERULIC PEELS are
`
`generic terms that are widely used in connection with skin care products and the skin care
`
`industry. See the attached Google search results, identified as Exhibit Q, for the wording
`
`FERULIC PEEL and FERULIC PEELS which uncovered over 484,000 and 350,000
`
`results respectively and mention ferulic peels by Opposer and other well know skin care
`
`companies.
`
`8
`
`

`

`26. On information and belief, the term FERULAC PEEL is a generic term incapable of
`
`functioning as a trademark because it is a slight misspelling of the term FERULIC PEEL,
`
`which is a standard term in the skin care industry designating a type of skin care peel that
`
`includes ferulic acid. The term FERULAC PEEL cannot be exclusively appropriated by
`
`Applicant as a trademark for a ferulic peel because it is incapable of identifying
`
`Applicant as a source of origin.
`
`27. FERULAC PEEL is a slight and intentional misspelling of the generic term FERULIC
`
`PEEL, which is the common commercial name for the Applicant's goods, namely, peels
`
`containing ferulic acid as an ingredient.
`
`28. Registration for the mark FERULAC PEEL on the Principal Register will inhibit the
`
`Opposer and Applicant's competitors from using the wording FERULIC PEEL and
`
`FERULIC PEELS to describe peels containing ferulic acid and using the words
`
`FERULIC and PEEL or PEELS in marks for skin care peels. In essence, a registration for
`
`the mark FERULAC PEEL will give the Applicant a monopoly over the generic term
`
`FERULIC PEEL for skin peels and skin care preparations and enable the Applicant to
`
`bring harassing infringement suits and oppositions.
`
`29. Opposer will be damaged by Applicant's registration of FERULAC PEEL as the prima
`
`facie effect of such registration will interfere with use by Opposer and others in the skin
`
`care industry in the exercise of their right to use the term FERULIC PEEL and FERULIC
`
`9
`
`

`

`PEELS in connection with (a) skin care peels comprising ferulic acid. Registration of
`
`FERULAC PEEL will inhibit the Opposer's right to compete with the Applicant.
`
`30. In view of the generic nature of the term FERULAC PEEL and the widespread use of its
`
`correct spelling, FERULIC PEEL, by third parties, the Applicant is not entitled to
`
`registration of the term FERULAC PEEL.
`
`COUNT TWO: DESCRIPTIVENESS
`
`31. Opposer realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations in all other
`
`paragraphs contained herein.
`
`32. Applicant's alleged mark FERULAC PEEL is also merely descriptive within the meaning
`
`of Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) because it merely describes an ingredient, quality,
`
`characteristic or feature of Applicant's goods.
`
`33. FERULAC PEEL, for non-medicated exfoliating preparations for skin; skin care
`
`preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; all of the foregoing containing ferulic acid
`
`and medicated skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; all of the
`
`foregoing containing ferulic acid, is not entitled to registration on the Principal Register
`
`because it is merely descriptive under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1).
`
`10
`
`

`

`COUNT THREE: MARK HAS NOT ACQUIRED DISTINCTIVENESS
`
`34. Opposer realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations in all other
`
`paragraphs contained herein.
`
`35. The Applicant has not established and is unable to establish that FERULAC PEEL has
`
`become distinctive of Applicant's goods. Applicant also will not be able to establish that
`
`FERULAC PEEL has acquired secondary meaning as a source of origin.
`
`36. The term FERULAC PEEL has not acquired distinctiveness as a trademark for the
`
`Applicant's proposed goods and is therefore not entitled to registration on the Principal
`
`Register under Trademark Act Section 2(f).
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer believes that he will be damaged by the registration of U.S.
`
`Application Serial No. 87/202675 for the mark FERULAC PEEL and, therefore, respectfully
`
`requests that this opposition be sustained in favor of Opposer.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Christine M. Baker, Esq.
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS
`GLOVSKY and POPEO, PC
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`(617) 542-6000
`(617) 542-2241
`
`Attorneys for Opposer,
`Dennis F. Gross
`
`By:
`
`11
`
`Dated: January 24, 2018
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF OPPOSITION has
`been served on Applicant's counsel of record by mailing said copy on January 24, 2018 via First
`Class Mail to: Christian Sanchelima, Esq., Sanchelima & Associates, P.A., 235 SW Le Jeune
`Road, Miami, FL 33134 and via email to: chris coanchelima.com; tm@sanchelima.com;
`legal@sanchelima.com; jesus@sanchelima.corn
`
`hristine M Baker
`
`12
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`tatess of auterft,
`
`niteb
`
`tate5 Jatent aith `Qrabentarli office
`
`ft-
`
`0-1
`
`WRINKLE
`FERULIC +
`RECOVERY P.F,EL
`
`Reg. No. 5,283,495
`
`Registered Sep. 12, 2017
`
`Int. Cl.: 3
`
`Trademark
`
`Principal Register
`
`Dennis F, Gross (UNITED STATES INDIVIDUAL)
`444 Madison Avenue, Suite 802
`New York, NY 10022
`CLASS 3: Non-medicated skin care preparation containing ferulic acid and retinol; skin care
`preparations, namely, skin peels containing ferulic acid and retinol
`
`FIRST USE I 1-28-2015; IN COMMERCE 11-30-2015
`THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIM TO ANY
`PARTICULAR FONT STYLE, SIZE OR COLOR
`No claim is made to the exclusive right to use the following apart from the mark as shown:
`"FERULIC + RETINOL", "WRINKLE" AND "PEEL"
`
`SER. NO. 86-852,803, FILED 12-17-2015
`MARIA VICTORIA SUAREZ, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`isT
`
`Perfoeninic) the flinClions agld Duitet of the
`Undo Sectotafy of Conintoo! For
`Intellectual Property And Director of the
`United StilltiS Patent and Trademark Office
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT B
`EXHIBIT B
`
`EXHIBIT B
`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons arc required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
`
`Serial Number: 87202675
`
`Filing Date: 10/13/2016
`
`The table below presents the data as entered.
`
`SERIAL NUMBER
`
`MARK INFORMATION
`
`*MARK
`
`STANDARD CHARACTERS
`
`USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE
`
`87202675
`
`FERULAC PEEL
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`LITERAL ELEMENT
`
`FERULAC PEEL
`
`MARK STATEMENT
`
`REGISTER
`
`APPLICANT INFORMATION
`
`*OWNER OF MARK
`
`INTERNAL ADDRESS
`
`*STREET
`
`• *CITY
`
`*COUNTRY
`
`ZIP/POSTAL CODE
`(Required for U.S. applicants)
`
`PHONE
`
`FAX
`
`EMAIL ADDRESS
`
`The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font,
`style, size, or color.
`
`Principal
`
`SESDERMA, S.L.
`
`Massamagrell, 3 - Rafelbufiol
`
`Poligono Industrial Rafelbunol
`
`Valencia
`
`Spain
`
`E-46138
`
`305-447-1617
`
`305-445-8484
`
`tm@sanchelima.com
`
`LEGAL ENTITY INFORMATION
`
`TYPE
`
`limited liability company
`
`STATE/COUNTRY WHERE LEGALLY
`ORGANIZED
`
`Spain
`
`GOODS AND/OR SERVICES AND BASIS INFORMATION
`
`INTERNATIONAL CLASS
`
`003
`
`*IDENTIFICATION
`
`FILING BASIS
`
`FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE
`
`FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE
`
`non-medicated exIbliating preparations for skin: Skin care preparations,
`namely, chemical peels for skin; all of the foregoing containing fertilac acid.
`
`SECTION 1(a)
`
`At least as early as 05/30/2010
`
`At least as early as 05/30/2010
`
`

`

`SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S)
`
`WF1CRS\ EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT 17\ 872 \ 026 \ 87202675 \xm I I \
`RFA0003.JPG
`
`SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
`
`. Image of the mark as used in commerce as found affixed to the goods.
`
`INTERNATIONAL CLASS
`
`005
`
`*IDENTIFICATION
`
`FILING BASIS
`
`medicated skin care preparations, namely chemical peels for skin; all of the
`foregoing containing ferulic acid
`
`SECTION 1(a)
`
`FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE
`
`At least as early as 05/30/2010
`
`FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE
`
`At least as early as 05/30/2010
`
`SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S)
`
`SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
`
`ATTORNEY INFORMATION
`
`' \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT 17\872\026\87202675\xmll\
`REA0004.JPG
`
`Image of the mark as used in commerce as found affixed to the goods.
`
`NAME
`
`! Christian Sanchelima, Esq.
`
`• ATTORNEY DOCKET NUMBER
`
`360453.1
`
`FIRM NAME
`
`STREET
`
`CITY
`
`STATE
`
`COUNTRY
`
`ZIP/POSTAL CODE
`
`PHONE
`
`FAX
`
`Sanchelima & Associates, P.A.
`
`! 235 SW Le Jeune Road
`
`! Miami
`
`! Florida
`
`United States
`
`! 33134
`
`! 305-447-1617
`
`, 305-445-8484
`
`EMAIL ADDRESS
`
`tm@sanchelima.com
`
`. AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL ! Yes
`
`OTHER APPOINTED ATTORNEY
`
`1 Jesus Sanchelima, Esq.
`
`- CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION
`
`NAME
`
`FIRM NAME
`
`STREET
`
`CITY
`
`.STATE
`
`COUNTRY
`
`ZIP/POSTAL CODE
`
`PIIONE
`
`FAX
`
`*EMAIL ADDRESS
`
`Christian Sanchelima, Esq.
`
`Sanchelima & Associates, P.A.
`
` 235 SW Le Jeune Road
`
`Miami
`
`Florida
`
`United States
`
`33134
`
`305-447-1617
`
`1 305-445-8484
`
`tm a anchclima.com;legal a anchelima.com; chris@sanchelima.com;
`jesus@sanchelima.com
`
`*AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL
`
`Yes
`
`

`

`FEE INFORMATION
`
`APPLICATION FILING OPTION
`
`TEAS RF
`
`NUMBER OF CLASSES
`
`FEE PER CLASS
`
`TOTAL FEE DUE
`
`*TOTAL FEE PAID
`
`SIGNATURE INFORMATION
`
`ORIGINAL PDF FILE
`
`CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
`~~~page)
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER
`
`2
`
`275
`
`550
`
`550
`
`hw 502405030-173505343 . 161004vp.Signed TM App1.360453.1 3.pdf
`
`TICRS \ EXPORT 7\IMAGEOUT17\872\026\87202675\xmll\RFA0005.JPG
`
`Gabriel Serrano
`
`Managing Member
`
`305-447-1617
`
`

`

`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`
`Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
`
`Serial Number: 87202675
`Filing Date: 10/13/2016
`
`To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
`
`MARK: FERULAC PEEL (Standard Characters, see below )
`
`The literal element of the mark consists of FERULAC PEEL.
`The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font, style, size, or color.
`
`The applicant, SESDERMA, S.L., a limited liability company legally organized under the laws of Spain, having an address of
`Massamagrell, 3 - Rafelbufiol
`Poligono Industrial Rafelbufiol
`Valencia E-46138
`Spain
`305-447-1617(phone)
`305-445-8484(fax)
`tm_i),sanchelima.com (not authorized)
`requests registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register
`established by the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. Section 1051 et seq.), as amended, for the following:
`International Class 003: non-medicated exibliating preparations for skin; Skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; all of the
`foregoing containing ferulac acid.
`In International Class 003, the mark was first used by the applicant or the applicant's related company or licensee or predecessor in interest at
`least as early as 05/30/2010, and first used in commerce at least as early as 05/30/2010, and is now in use in such commerce. The applicant is
`submitting one(or more) specimen(s) showing the mark as used in commerce on or in connection with any item in the class of listed
`goods/services, consisting of a(n) Image of the mark as used in commerce as found affixed to the goods..
`Specimen Filel
`International Class 005: medicated skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; all of the foregoing containing ferulic acid
`In International Class 005, the mark was first used by the applicant or the applicant's related company or licensee or predecessor in interest at
`least as early as 05/30/2010, and first used in commerce at least as early as 05/30/2010, and is now in use in such commerce. The applicant is
`submitting one(or more) specimen(s) showing the mark as used in commerce on or in connection with any item in the class of listed
`goods/services, consisting of a(n) Image of the mark as used in commerce as found affixed to the goods..
`Specimen Filel
`
`235 SW Le Jeune Road
`
`The applicant's current Attorney Information:
`Christian Sanchelima, Esq. and Jesus Sanchelima, Esq. of Sanchelima & Associates, P.A.
`Miami, Florida 33134
`United States
`305-447-1617(phone)
`305-445-8484(fax)
`tm@sanchelima.com (authorized)
`The attorney docket/reference number is 360453.1.
`The applicant's current Correspondence Information:
`Christian Sanchelima, Esq.
`Sanchelima & Associates, P.A.
`235 SW Le Jeune Road
`Miami, Florida 33134
`
`

`

`305-447-1617(phone)
`
`305-445-8484(fax)
`tm c_sanchelima.com;legal@sanchelima.com; chris@sanchelima.com; jestis@sanchelima.com (authorized)
`E-mail Authorization: I authorize the USPTO to send e-mail correspondence concerning the application to the applicant or applicant's attorney
`at the e-mail address provided above. I understand that a valid e-mail address must be maintained and that the applicant or the applicant's
`attorney must file the relevant subsequent application-related submissions via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). Failure to
`do so will result in an additional processing fee 01'1;50 per international class of goods/services.
`
`A fee payment in the amount of $550 has been submitted with the application, representing payment for 2 class(es).
`
`Declaration
`
`The signatory believes that: if the applicant is filing the application under 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a), the applicant is the owner of the
`trademark/service mark sought to be registered; the applicant is using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services in the
`application; the specimen(s) shows the mark as used on or in connection with the goods/services in the application; and/or if the applicant filed
`an application under 15 U.S.C. § 105I(b), § 1126(d), and/or § 1126(e), the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce; the applicant has a
`bona fide intention, and is entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services in the application. The signatory
`believes that to the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, concurrent users, have the right to use the
`mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services
`of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive. The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are
`punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the
`validity of the application or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and all
`statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
`
`Declaration Signature
`
`Signature: Not Provided Date: Not Provided
`Signatory's Name: Gabriel Serrano
`Signatory's Position: Managing Member
`RAM Sale Number: 87202675
`RAM Accounting Date: 10/14/2016
`
`Serial Number: 87202675
`Internet Transmission Date: Thu Oct 13 17:43:35 EDT 2016
`TEAS Stamp: USPTO/BAS-XX.XXX.XX.XX-20161013174335048
`119-87202675-5705e4d9f94f95b2fc50d0adf13
`fledeaf2ddab7492643ca92Md26aa0fa72a6-CC
`-4860-20161013173505343230
`
`

`

`FERULAC PEEL
`CLASSIC
`Chemical exfoliating/ Exfoliante quimico
`
`pH 4.0 - 5.0
`
`NANOTECH
`
`Step 1
`
`60 1 e 2.03 fl. oz
`sesmed derma
`
`

`

`FERL LAC PEEL
`FERULAC PEEL
`
`

`

`nocuSi n Envelope ID: 7D33A476-F16E-4166-B7D5-A07AAC17E3CD
`I raciorn rxiervice marx Applicatron, Princlpal Hogrster
`
`8/23116, 5:24 PM
`
`Declaration
`
`The signatory believes that: if the applicant is filing the application under 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a), the applicant
`is the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered; the applicant is using the mark in
`commerce on or in connection with the goods/services in the application; the specimen(s) shows the mark as
`usecl on or in connection with the goods/services in the application; and/or if the applicant filed an application
`under 15 U.S.C. § 105I(b), § 1 126(d), and/or § 1126(e), the applicant is entitled to use the mark in
`commerce; the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in
`connection with the goods/services in the application. The signatory believes that to the best of the signatory's
`knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, concurrent users, have the right to use the mark
`in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in
`connection with the goods/services of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive. The
`signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
`both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity
`of the application or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own
`knowledge are true and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
`
`Signature Section:
`
`Signature:
`Si gitatory'§1\taineTTlif liel—Serr no
`Signatory's Position: lanaging Men-ber
`Signatory's Phone Number: 305-447-1617
`
`Date Signed: ,201,6
`
`NOTE TO APPLICANT: When filed as part of the electronic form (i.e., scanned and attached as an image
`file), the signature page must include both the signature information and the boilerplate declaration language.
`Do not include the entire application, but do ensure that the boilerplate declaration language actually appears;
`a signature by itself will not be acceptable. If, due to browser limitations, the boilerplate declaration language
`appears on a previous page when printed, you must "merge" the declaration. and signature block onto a single
`page prior to signing, so that the one complete page catt_be scanned to create an acceptable image file. It is
`recommended that you copy-and-paste the entire text form into another document, manipulate the spacing
`there to move the declaration <utd signature section to a separate page, and then print this new version of the
`text form to send to the signatory.
`
`http://teas.uspto.govflorms/xs11.service?xs1=hsign&staing.LISPTO/...5195edfleba62e30b5acg4hOes4f5acd647c78808b660a636d611810436 Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT C
`EXHIBIT C
`
`EXHIBIT C
`EXHIBIT C
`
`

`

`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`SESDERMA, S.L. (tm(sanchelima.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87202675 - FERULAC PEEL - 360453.1
`
`12/17/2016 8:32:51 PM
`
`ECOM119@USPTO.GOV
`
`Attachment - 1
`Attachment - 2
`Attachment - 3
`Attachment - 4
`Attachment - 5
`Attachment - 6
`Attachment - 7
`Attachment - 8
`Attachment - 9
`Attachment - 10
`Attachment - 11
`Attachment - 12
`Attachment - 13
`Attachment - 14
`Attachment - 15
`Attachment - 16
`Attachment - 17
`Attachment - 18
`Attachment - 19
`Attachment - 20
`Attachment - 21
`Attachment - 22
`Attachment - 23
`Attachment - 24
`Attachment - 25
`Attachment - 26
`Attachment - 27
`Attachment - 28
`Attachment - 29
`Attachment - 30
`Attachment - 31
`Attachment - 32
`Attachment - 33
`Attachment - 34
`Attachment - 35
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT'S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87202675
`
`MARK: FERULAC PEEL
`
`*87202675*
`
`

`

`CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
`CI usTIAN SANCHELIMA,
`SANCHELIMA & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
`235 SW LE JEUNE ROAD
`MIAMI, FL 33134
`
`APPLICANT: SESDERMA, S.L.
`
`CORRESPONDENT'S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO :
`360453.1
`CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:
`tm@sanchelima.com
`
`CLICK HERE To RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teasiresponse forms.jso
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT'S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT'S
`COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LE FTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
`
`ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/17/2016
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to
`the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(6); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`SEARCH OF OFFICE'S DATABASE OF MARKS
`The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office's database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that
`would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
`
`SECTION 2(e)(1) REFUSAL - MERELY DESCRIPTIVE
`Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes a feature, ingredient, characteristic, purpose, function and/or use of
`applicant's goods. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); see TMEP §§1209.01(6), 1209.03 et seq.
`
`In addition to being merely descriptive, the applied-for mark appears to be generic in connection with the identified goods and, therefore,
`incapable or functioning as a source-identifier for applicant's goods. In re Gould, Paper Corp., 834 F.2d 1017, 5 USPQ2d 1110 (Fed. Cir. 1987);
`In re Pennzoil Prods. Co., 20 USPQ2d 1753 (TTAB 1991); see TMEP §§1209.01(c) et seq., 1209.02(a). Under these circumstances, neither an
`amendment to proceed under Trademark Act Section 2(f) nor an amendment to the Supplemental Register can be recommended. See TMEP
`§1209.01(c).
`
`A mark is merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket