throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA237328
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`09/17/2008
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91185411
`Plaintiff
`Bart Enterprises International LTD
`Cristina Arenas-Solis
`Ferraiuoli Torres Marchand & Rovira, PSC
`221 Plaza, Suite 403221 Ponce de Leon
`San Juan, PR 00926
`UNITED STATES
`carenas@ftmrlaw.com, lbelendez@ftmrlaw.com
`Motion to Suspend for Civil Action
`Cristina Arenas-Solis
`carenas@ftmrlaw.com, lbelendez@ftmrlaw.com
`/CristinaArenasSolis/
`09/17/2008
`Motion Requesting Suspension Astrologos.pdf ( 4 pages )(106386 bytes )
`Dkt 1- Complaint.pdf ( 76 pages )(3452482 bytes )
`Dkt 36.pdf ( 55 pages )(793094 bytes )
`Dkt 45_Paintiff Counter Deffandants.pdf ( 20 pages )(1123120 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of App
`Publication in
`the Official Gazette of
`For: LOS ASTROLOGOS D? WALT%R MfiRCADO
`
`lication Serial No.
`
`77/047242
`June 24, 2008
`
`NT%RNAT ONAL LTD.
`%ART +NT%RPR S45
`Opposer
`
`Opposition No. 91185411
`
`v.
`
`ASTROMUNDO INC.
`
`Applicant
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`Attn: Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`MOTION REQUESTING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
`PENDING RESOLUTION OF FEDERAL CASE
`
`COMES
`
`NOW,
`
`'%art
`
`‘Enterprises
`
`"nternational,
`
`LTD.
`
`(hereinafter “?art”),
`
`by
`
`its undersigned attorneys,
`
`and
`
`very respectfully states and prays:
`
`1.0n
`
`July
`
`24,
`
`2008 Opposer
`
`filed its Notice
`
`of
`
`Opposition to the above referenced mark, based on the fac-
`
`that it is the rightful owner of said mark by means of an
`
`Agreement executed by Walter Mercado and
`
`3art on June 7,
`
`1995,
`
`and has not authorized Applicant
`
`to use or register
`
`it.
`
`2. Trademark Rule 2. 117 provides:
`
`

`
`“(a) Whenever it sh
`
`all
`
`come
`
`to the attentior
`
`O:
`
`the TTA3
`
`that
`
`case are engaged
`
`a par‘
`:y or‘ parties
`to a pending
`in a civil action or another
`
`3oard proceeding which may have a bearing on
`be fore
`the
`Board
`may
`the civil action
`
`case,
`
`proceedings
`termination o‘
`
`the
`
`be
`
`suspended until
`or the other
`
`3oard proceeding.”
`
`3.0n January 17, 2007,
`
`a Complaint was
`
`filed a Complaint
`
`before the United States
`
`District Court
`
`Southern
`
`Dis
`
`-ric
`
`n
`
`0.
`
`F'orida Miami
`
`Division
`
`by
`
`Walter
`
`"nternationa'
`
`Productions,
`
`Inc.
`
`et al.
`
`v.
`
`Walter Mercado Salinas, et al.,
`
`Civil No.
`
`07-20136.
`
`In this
`
`case,
`
`among other
`
`things,
`
`de
`
`fendants,
`
`which includes
`
`the Applicant
`
`in the case at
`
`bar,
`
`have
`
`alleged that
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`whereby Mercado
`
`assigned all
`
`right,
`
`title a
`
`nd
`
`interests
`
`to all
`
`o : his
`
`trademarks to Opposer is null.
`
`.lt is
`
`Opposer’s contention that
`
`the agreement
`
`is valid
`
`and enforceable.
`
`Furthermore, Walter Mercado authorized
`
`and signed a living consent for War.
`
`,o register his name,
`
`and
`
`he
`
`also granted Dart al'
`
`righ-s
`
`of
`
`ownership
`
`and
`
`authority’
`
`to any and all of
`
`-he
`
`trademark names
`
`in the
`
`United States of
`
`America and elsewhere in the world.
`
`5.0pposer respectfully submits
`
`the
`
`following documents,
`
`all pertaining to Walter
`
`"nternationa'
`
`?roductions,
`
`Inc.
`
`et. al. v. Walter Mercado Saliras, et. al., Civil No. 07-
`
`20136
`
`in
`
`the United States District Court
`
`— Southern
`
`

`
`District
`
`O:
`
`Florida,
`
`Miami Divisi
`
`OH
`
`(hereinafter,
`
`“the
`
`Case”):
`
`.Complaint —
`
`Docket Number
`
`1
`
`(Exhibit A);
`
`.Answer,
`
`A
`
`”irmaLive Defens
`
`GS
`
`and. Counterclaim
`
`Docket Number
`
`36 (?xhibit Q
`
`);
`
`'ain
`
`_,'|
`
`"s/Counter—De
`
`fende 1'1
`
`ts’
`
`Answer
`
`and
`
`”irma,ive
`
`De
`
`fenses
`
`to
`
`De
`
`fendants’
`
`Counterclaim
`
`Docket
`
`Number 45 (
`
`Exhibit C);
`
`6.As
`
`the
`
`accompanied
`
`documents
`
`evince
`
`the
`
`“Walter
`
`Mercado”
`
`trademarks,
`
`including LOS ASTROLOGOS
`
`‘-1
`-‘I
`
`WAPT?R
`
`MERCADO,
`
`is a central
`
`issue in the Case.
`
`'1
`The ownership o;
`
`the
`
`“Walter Mercado”
`
`trademark
`
`and
`
`including
`
`LOS
`
`ASTROLOGOS
`
`its
`
`deriva
`
`tives,
`
`‘-1
`-‘I WART
`
`fiR
`
`M fiRCADO, will
`
`be
`
`e "ectively determined
`
`in the Case.
`
`The trial in this case
`
`is currently scheduled
`
`for Jaruary 5,
`
`2009.
`
`7.
`
`We hereby include the
`
`Docket Sheet
`
`for the Case.
`
`In
`
`the
`
`event
`
`that
`
`the
`
`3
`TTAI wishes
`
`to
`
`examine
`
`any
`
`other
`
`pleadirgs
`
`and/or
`
`motions
`
`in
`
`the
`
`case,
`
`Opposer
`
`will
`
`immediately file it acc
`
`ordingly.
`
`WH %R%EOR%,
`
`Opposer
`
`respectfully
`
`requests
`
`that
`
`the
`
`Tradema
`
`rk Trial and Appeal
`
`Board stay this proceeding until
`
`resolution of
`
`the Florida
`
`federal case
`
`i
`
`s
`
`resolved.
`
`The
`
`case is currently in the summary judgment stage.
`
`

`
`H
`
`*'.R '.-%Y C fiRT
`
`BY that
`
`on this same date a true and exact
`
`copy 0
`
`the joregoing
`
`_otion has been sent by e—mail and by
`
`First Class Mail
`
`to:
`
`L, ill Sarno
`
`I
`
`Akerman Seterfitt,
`
`420
`
`S.
`
`Orange
`
`Ave.,
`
`Orla
`
`ndo,
`
`Florida
`
`32801
`
`(jill.riola@akerman.con).
`
`R
`
`fiSP fiCTEUPLY SU %M TT1
`
`In San Juan, Puerto Rico,
`
`this 17th day 0:
`
`September,
`
`2008.
`
`'*'.RRA UOR
`
`TORRflS MARCHAND & ROV:
`
`RA,
`
`PSC
`
`221 Plaza Suite 403
`
`221 Ponce de Leén Avenue
`
`Puerto Rico 00917
`San Juan,
`Tel: 787-766-7000; Fax:
`
`787-766-7001
`
`S/Laura Beléndez—Ferrero
`%
`«IT.
`1-.N3 «'.'.—J:' fiRR %RO
`LAURA
`1belendez@ftmrlaw. C 011":
`
`e—mail:
`
`S/Cristina Arenas—Solis
`CR ST NA ARjNAS-SOL: S
`
`e—mail:
`
`carenas@ftmrlaw.com
`
`

`
`‘Case-ft :O?—cv~2{3t3€;'3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket (31./'18/2067 Pae 1 of ?5
`
`
`
`CLARENCE MADDOX
`CLERK U.S. DIST. CT.
`
`s.o. OF FLA. — MIAMI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`MIAMI DIVISION
`
`WALTERINTERNATIONAL
`
`CASENO.
`PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Florida Corporation,
`WATERVISION, INC., a Florida Corporation,
`WALTERVISION PRODUCTIONS, INC., a
`Florida Corporation, WALTER MERCADO
`RADIO PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Florida
`
`Corporation, BART ENTERPRISES
`INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a Bahamas
`
`Corporation, and WALTER MERCADO
`ENTERPRISES CORP., a Florida
`Corporation
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`V.
`
`WALTER MERCADO SALINAS, a natural
`
`person, and ASTROMUNDO, INC., a Puerto
`Rico Corporation
`
`Defendants.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`*
`
`~
`
`"
`
`M<‘ALlLE}3_
`
`Plaintiffs, Walter International Productions, Inc. (“International Productions”),
`
`Watervision,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“WaterVision”), WalterVision Productions,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“WalterVision”),
`
`Walter Mercado Radio Productions,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Radio Productions”), Bart Enterprises
`
`International, Ltd. (“Bart Enterprises” or “Bart”) and Walter Mercado Enterprises Corp.
`
`(“Walter Enterprises”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), sue the Defendants, Walter Mercado
`
`Salinas
`
`(“Mercado”)
`
`and Astromundo,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Astromundo”)
`
`(collectively,
`
`the
`
`“Defendants”), and state as follows:
`
`Creéa6QGg7B‘nurig, P.A.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickell Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`. Cased :O?—ev~2m3€;'3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket (31./'18/2007
`
`Page 2 of ?5
`
`PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
`
`1.
`
`This action arises from a breach of contract and tortious interference with
`
`contract by the Defendants.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`2.
`
`The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because it involves a dispute between citizens of different states
`
`with an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000. Upon information and belief, the
`
`actual damages to Plaintiffs are estimated to be in excess of $1,000,000 and are
`
`increasing exponentially and on a duly basis.
`
`3.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court because most of the acts underlying this
`
`Complaint occurred within this judicial district.
`
`4.
`
`All conditions precedent to bringing this action, if any, have occurred or
`
`have been excused or waived.
`
`5.
`
`Plaintiffs have been required to retain undersigned counsel to enforce their
`
`rights through this action, and are obligated to pay their counsel a reasonable fee for those
`
`services.
`
`IDENTITY OF THE PARTIES
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff, Bart Enterprises is a Bahamian corporation with its principal
`
`place of business in Nassau, Bahamas.
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`International Productions is a Florida corporation with its
`
`principal place of business in Miami, Florida.
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiff, Watervision is a Florida corporation with its principal place of
`
`business in Miami, Florida.
`
`Gre@eEQ@g7B‘aurig, P.A.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Bricl<ellAvenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.c0m
`
`

`
`1 Case? :O?—cv~2{3t3€;'3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket (31./'18/2%?
`
`Page 3 of ?E3
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff, WalterVision is a Florida corporation with its principal place of
`
`business in Miami, Florida.
`
`10.
`
`Plaintiff, Radio Productions is a Florida corporation with its principal
`
`place of business in Miami, Florida.
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiff, Walter Enterprises is a Florida corporation with its principal
`
`place of business in Miami, Florida.
`
`12.
`
`Defendant, Mercado is a natural person residing in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
`
`Mercado travels to Florida for business on a regular basis.
`
`13.
`
`Defendant, Astromundo is a Puerto Rico corporation with its principal
`
`place of business in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
`
`CONTRACTS
`
`Agreement Between Bart Enterprises and Mercado
`
`14.
`
`On August 4, 1995, Bart Enterprises entered into an "agreement with
`
`Mercado (the “Agreement”), effective as of June 7, 1995.
`
`(A true and correct copy of the
`
`contract is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”). The Agreement was executed by Guillermo
`
`Bakula (“Mr. Bakula”) - president of Bart Enterprises — and Mercado.
`
`15.
`
`Pursuant to the Agreement, Mercado granted “to Bart the exclusive right
`
`and license
`
`to develop, produce, distribute and copyright
`
`in its own name new
`
`materials, in any language, relating to Mercado’s psychic and astrological services of
`
`whatever nature whatsoever, including but not limited to print, audiotext, audiovisual and
`
`radio programming, computer software, merchandise and advertising and promotion in
`
`connection therewith ..., through the Territory by any and all means and in any and all
`
`media...” (Exh. “A,” Section 1(b))
`
`Cre€aUB1'g7B’aurig, PA.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickell Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`' Cased :O?—cv~2{3t3€;'3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket (31./'18/2&6?
`
`Page 4 of 75
`
`16.
`
`Moreover, Mercado “irrevocably assign[ed] to Bart
`
`all rights, title and
`
`interest in and to the Mark, together with the part of the goodwill of Mercado’s business
`
`connected with and symbolized by said Mark, for use in connection with the Pre-existing
`
`Materials and the New Materials, if any.” (Exh. “A,” Section 2 (b))
`
`17.
`
`Mercado also granted “to Bart the right and license
`
`to use Mercado’s
`
`performance, name, signature, photographs, voice, picture, likeness, or other indicia of
`
`his identity (collectively ‘Name and Likeness’)
`
`in connection with the Preexisting
`
`Materials and New Materials by any means and in any and all
`
`.” (Exh. “A,” Section
`
`3(1)»
`
`18.
`
`Mercado “agree[d] to provide additional psychic and astrological services
`
`to Bart in connection with the creation of the New Materials during the Additional
`
`Services Period... Such Additional Services shall
`
`include but not limited to creating
`
`audiotext recordings for pay per call services, appearing in long fonn commercials
`
`(‘lnfomercials’), creating print, radio and television advertising and making personal
`
`appearances. ...” (Exh. “A,” Section 6 (b)(i))
`
`19.
`
`Mercado admitted that the “services to be performed by Mercado and the
`
`rights granted [pursuant
`
`to the Agreement] are special, unique, extraordinary and
`
`impossible of replacement, giving them a particular value,
`
`the loss of which cannot
`
`reasonably or adequately be compensated in damages in an action at
`
`law and that
`
`Mercado’s failure or refusal to perform his obligations hereunder would cause irreparable
`
`harm or damage. Therefore, should Mercado fail or refuse to perform such obligations,
`
`Bart shall be entitled in addition to any of its other rights and remedies Bart may have, to
`
`seek injunctive or other equitable relief.” (Exh. “A,” Section 15)
`
`4
`
`Greé9m1Tg7B1aurig, P.A.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickell Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`. Cased :O?—ev~2{3t3€;'3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket Qt./'18/EQCE?
`
`Page 5 of ?E3
`
`20.
`
`Mercado agreed to “attend and participate in all rehearsals, filming or
`
`taping and photography sessions required and will render his services [pursuant to the
`
`Agreement]
`
`in accordance with the scripts or other materials Bart shall furnish to
`
`Mercado for such purposes. Mercado agrees to render Bart’s services in a competent and
`
`artistic manner to the best of his ability, and that all Mercado’s services will be subject to
`
`Bart’s approval, direction and reasonable control at all times. Mercado will promptly
`
`comply with whatever reasonable instructions, suggestions, and recommendations Bart
`
`may give Mercado in connection with the rendition of such services.” (Exh. “A,” Section
`
`18)
`
`21.
`
`The Agreement further stated that
`
`it “... shall not be assignable by
`
`Mercado without the prior written consent of Bart. Bart has full and unrestricted right to
`
`assign this Agreement...” (Exh. “A,” Section 20 (e))
`
`22.
`
`From June 1995 through the beginning of November 2006, Mercado
`
`performed his obligations and complied with all
`
`the requirements pursuant
`
`to the
`
`Agreement without interruption.
`
`23.
`
`In mid November 2006, however, Mercado began to breach the
`
`Agreement.
`
`Assignment by Bart Enterprises to International Productions
`
`24.
`
`On February 8, 2002, pursuant to paragraph 20(e) of the Agreement, Bart
`
`Enterprises lawfully assigned the rights set forth below to International Productions
`
`(“International Productions Assignment”).
`
`(A true and correct copy of the International
`
`Productions Assignment is attached hereto as Exhibit “B.”)
`
`(Sic Exh. “A” paragraph
`
`20(e) and ‘J 21 above)
`
`Greea’5mIg7'§-aurig, P.A.
`
`| Attorneys at Law | 1221 Brickell Avenue | Miami, FL 33131 | Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 | www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`I Case-St :O?—cv~2t3t3€;'3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket (31./'18/2%?
`
`Page 6 of ?E3
`
`25.
`
`Mercado had knowledge of the International Productions Assignment and,
`
`in fact, received payments from International Productions.
`
`26.
`
`Pursuant
`
`to the International Productions Assignment,
`
`International
`
`Productions’ rights include, but are not limited to: “(l) the exploitation of the following
`
`business(es) utilizing Walter Mercado’s name, likeness and image in the United States:
`
`(i) televised daily horoscope segments on Univision and its affiliates, including Univision
`
`Puerto Rico; (ii) intemet website;
`
`(2) the exploitation of the following business(es)
`
`utilizing Walter Mercado’s name, likeness and image in Central America: (i) newspaper
`
`publication of horoscope content; (ii) IVR (integrated voice response) daily pre-recorded
`
`horoscope services.” (Exh. “B”)
`
`Assignment by Bart Enterprises to Watervision
`
`27.
`
`On March 1, 2004, pursuant to paragraph 20(e) of the Agreement, Bart
`
`Enterprises lawfully assigned the rights set forth below to Watervision (“Watervision
`
`Assignment”).
`
`(A true and correct copy of the Watervision Assignment is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit “C.”) (E Exh. “A” paragraph 20(e) and 1] 21 above)
`
`28.
`
`Mercado had knowledge of the Watervision Assignment and,
`
`in fact,
`
`received payments from Watervision.
`
`29.
`
`Pursuant to the Watervision Assignment, Watervision’s rights include, but
`
`are not limited to: “the exploitation of any and all business utilizing Walter Mercado’s
`
`name, likeness and image in Central America, including, but not limited to: (i) Psychic
`
`900 pay-per-call service;
`
`(ii) SMS (Short Messaging Service), which may include
`
`horoscopes, lucky numbers, chat, etc.; (iii) ring tones, logos and wallpapers for mobile
`
`devices;
`
`(iv)
`
`internet websites;
`
`(V)
`
`lottery and sweepstakes;
`
`(vi) DVDS;
`
`(vii) Club
`
`6
`
`creeeszmgynaurig, P.A.
`
`| Attorneys at Law | 1221 Brickell Avenue | Miami, FL 33131 | Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 | www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`' Cased :O?—cv~2{3t3E3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket {Et/'18/2067
`
`Page 7 of 75
`
`Membership Packages; (viii) prepaid Calling Cards; (ix) Televised daily horoscopes
`
`segments; (x) Audio horoscope transmission via radio; [and] (xi) Magazine publication of
`
`horoscope content, excluding newspapers.” (Exh. “C”)
`
`Assignment by Bart Enterprises to Waltervision
`
`30.
`
`On March 4, 2004, pursuant to paragraph 20(e) of the Agreement, Bart
`
`Enterprises lawfully assigned the rights set forth below to Waltervision (“Waltervision
`
`Assignment”).
`
`(A true and correct copy of the Waltervision Assignment is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit “D.”) (E Exh. “A” paragraph 20(e) and fil 21 above)
`
`31.
`
`Mercado had knowledge of the Waltervision Assignment and,
`
`in fact,
`
`received payments from Waltervision.
`
`32.
`
`Pursuant to the Waltervision Assignment, Waltervision’s rights include,
`
`but are not limited to: “the exploitation of the following business(es) utilizing Walter
`
`Mercado’s name, likeness and image in the United States, both in the Hispanic and Anglo
`
`markets:
`
`(i) SMS (short messaging service), which may include horoscopes,
`
`lucky
`
`numbers, chat, etc; (ii) prepaid calling cards; (iii) lottery and sweepstakes; (iv) Club
`
`membership packages; (v) magazine publication of horoscope content; (vi) representing
`
`products in a capacity of spokesperson (products to be previously approved, in writing,
`
`by Bart).” (Exh. “D”)
`
`Assignment by Bart Enterprises to Radio Productions
`
`33.
`
`On October 14, 2004, pursuant to paragraph 20(e) of the Agreement, Bart
`
`Enterprises lawfully assigned the rights set forth below to Radio Productions (“Radio
`
`Productions Assignment”).
`
`(A true and correct copy of the Radio Productions
`
`Crééfifllfigmhurig, P.A.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickell Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.Com
`
`

`
`I Cased :O?—cv~20t3€;'3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket (31./'18/200?
`
`Page 8 of 76
`
`Assignment is attached hereto as Exhibit “E.”) (E Exh. “A” paragraph 20(e) and II 21
`
`above)
`
`34.
`
`Mercado had knowledge of the Radio Productions Assignment and,
`
`in
`
`fact, received payments from Radio Productions.
`
`35.
`
`Pursuant to the Radio Productions Assignment, Radio Productions’ rights
`
`include, but are not limited to the “transmission of audio horoscopes via radio in the
`
`United States.” (Exh. “E”)
`
`Assignment by Bart Enterprises to Walter Enterprises
`
`36.
`
`On May 4, 2005, pursuant to paragraph 20(e) of the Agreement, Bart
`
`Enterprises lawfully assigned the rights set forth below to Walter Enterprises (“Walter
`
`Enterprises Assignment”).
`
`(A true and correct copy of the Walter Enterprises
`
`Assignment is attached hereto as Exhibit “F .”)
`
`(See Exh. “A” paragraph 20(e) and 11 21
`
`above)
`
`37.
`
`Mercado had knowledge of the Walter Enterprises Assignment and,
`
`in
`
`fact, received payments from Walter Enterprises.
`
`38.
`
`Pursuant to the Walter Enterprises Assignment, Walter Enterprises’ rights
`
`include, but are not limited to “the exploitation of the following business(es) utilizing
`
`Walter Mercado’s name,
`
`likeness and image in the United States: (i) Development,
`
`production and marketing of DVD’s containing Mercado content.” (Exh. “F”)
`
`ADDITIONAL FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS
`
`39.
`
`On November 17 and November 18, 2006, Defendant Astromundo
`
`registered all the trademarks - owned by Bart Enterprises — in its name.
`
`GreéaHmg7B1aurig, P.A.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickell Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`‘ Cased :O?—cv~2t3t3€;'3—F’AS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket (31./'18/2%?
`
`Page 9: of ?E3
`
`40.
`
`On November 18, 2006, Mercado by a unilateral power of attorney
`
`attempted to revoke all the powers granted to Mr. Bakula. (A true and correct copy of the
`
`attempted revocation is attached hereto as Exhibit “G”). He sent said letter to Mr. Bakula
`
`via certified mail on November 22, 2006 and Mr. Bakula received it on November 27,
`
`2006.
`
`41.
`
`On November 22, 2006, Astromundo sent a letter
`
`to Mr. Bakula
`
`attempting to terminate the business relationship between Mercado and the Plaintiffs.
`
`(A
`
`true and correct copy of the attempted revocation is attached hereto as Exhibit “H”)
`
`42.
`
`On November 28, 2006, Mercado sent a letter to Watervision’s client -
`
`Televisa S.A. de C.V.
`
`- soliciting copies of any contracts or documents executed by
`
`Televisa which involve Mercado’s participation.
`
`(A true and correct copy of the letter is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit “I”). Televisa S.A. de C.V. (“Televisa”) is a Mexican
`
`corporation with its principal place of business in Mexico City, Mexico.
`
`43.
`
`On November 29, 2006, Mercado sent a letter to Televisa advising it that
`
`Mercado had ceased all business relations with Mr. Bakula and any and all of his
`
`enterprises. Specifically, Mercado informed Televisa that he had officially rescinded Mr.
`
`Bakula’s power of attorney privileges and that he had no rights or title to any of the
`
`following: “(i)
`
`[Mercado’s] name and any associated trademarks;
`
`(ii)
`
`[Mercado’s]
`
`likeness; (iii) [Mercado’s] images and photographs; (iv) [Mercado’s] video or audio
`
`works and presentations and any associated copyrights; (iv) [Mercado’s] astrological
`
`scripts and text(s), including those claimed to be written by [Mercado] or on [Mercado’s]
`
`behalf; (v) books written or co-written by [Mercado] or on [Mercado’s] behalf; (vi) CDs
`
`or DVDS published and/or distributed bearing [Mercado] or [Mercado’s] likeness; (vii)
`
`9
`
`Greé&5119g7B1aurig, PA.
`
`| Attorneys at Law | 1221 Brickell Avenue | Miami, FL 33131 | Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 | www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`‘Case ‘1:O?’~cv-20136—PAS
`
`Document ‘E
`
`Entered en FLSD Docket G1/'1 8/20{37
`
`Page 10 of “ffi
`
`websites bearing [Mercado] or [Mercado’s] likeness; (viii) text messaging and cell phone
`
`streaming services bearing [Mercado]
`
`or
`
`[Mercado’s]
`
`likeness or
`
`[Mercado’s]
`
`astrological text, including those claimed to be written by [Mercado] or on [Mercado’s]
`
`behalf; (viii) any other uses of [Mercado’s] name and any of the above for the purposes
`
`of transaction business with Mr. Bakula or any of his business enterprises.” (A true and
`
`correct copy of the letter is attached hereto as Exhibit “J”).
`
`44.
`
`Further, Mercado informed Televisa that he had retained a new and
`
`exclusive agent.
`
`(_S_e_e Exh. “J”)
`
`45.
`
`On information and belief,
`
`in late November, 2006, Mercado contacted
`
`International Productions’ client
`
`- Univision - soliciting copies of any contracts or
`
`documents executed by Univision which involve Mercado’s participation and informing
`
`Univision that
`
`International Productions does not have the right
`
`to contract with
`
`Univision regarding Mercado’s name, image and likeness.
`
`46.
`
`On November 29, 2006, Mercado did not appear in Miami for the taping
`
`of the televised horoscope segments to be aired on Univision, Univision Puerto Rico, and
`
`Televisa.
`
`47.
`
`On or about November 29, 2006, Mercado delivered material taped by
`
`someone other than Bart Enterprises to be aired on Univision, Univision Puerto Rico, and
`
`Televisa.
`
`48.
`
`On November 29, 2006, Mercado failed to appear in Miami for the taping
`
`of commercials for 900 business in Mexico,
`
`the US SMS business,
`
`the US Club
`
`Memberships, and the US prepaid calling cards.
`
`10
`
`Greegmygyaurig, PA.
`
`| Attorneys at Law | 1221 Brickell Avenue | Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`'<3asei1:Q?’~cv-20136—PAS
`
`Document ‘E
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 01./‘"18/’2007
`
`Page it of 76
`
`49.
`
`Since December 6, 2006, Mercado has failed to deliver the audio
`
`horoscopes for use with the Club Membership Packages, Radio dissemination, SMS
`
`messaging transcription, and the Guatemala IVR horoscope service.
`
`50.
`
`In or about December 2006, Jorge Concepcion, former shareholder and
`
`director of some of Bakula’s corporations, and Mercado contacted Rodrigo Montenegro
`
`(“Montenegro”),
`
`the managing director of Naranya in Colombia. Montenegro had
`
`distributed Mercado’s programs in Colombia from 1997 through 2000. Bakula had been
`
`negotiating with Montenegro a new contract to continue to distribute the programs there.
`
`Concepcion and Mercado contacted Montenegro and solicited information regarding his
`
`dealings with Bakula. As a result, Bakula’s business relationship with Montenegro has
`
`been damaged.
`
`51.
`
`Further, Mercado directly contacted People en Espafiol and submitted his
`
`ad for the February 2007 issues.
`
`The ad promotes a competing SMS horoscope
`
`messaging service. (A true and correct copy of the ad is attached hereto as Exhibit “K”).
`
`52.
`
`Mercado also failed to deliver in Florida the content for People en Espafiol
`
`due on or before December 7, 2006 for the March 2007 issue of the magazine.
`
`53.
`
`Mercado failed to deliver in Florida the audio predictions for 2007 for
`
`radio dissemination.
`
`54.
`
`Mercado failed to deliver in Florida the written 2007 predictions for
`
`magazine and website publication.
`
`55.
`
`On January 1, 2007, Mercado contacted Abraham Askenazi (“Askenazi”).
`
`Askenazi is the President of Megamedia, the service bureau that handles the 1-900 pay
`
`per calls in Mexico. Mercado informed Askenazi that he was no longer represented by
`
`11
`
`Greea£mIg7‘§'aurig, P.A.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickell Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`i<3ase1:O?—cv-20136—PAS
`
`Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket CH./'18,"20{37
`
`Page 12 of
`
`Bakula because Bakula was not paying him. Mercado asked Askenazi to send any and all
`
`funds directly to Mercado.
`
`56.
`
`Mercado, by his actions and inactions, has breached and continues to
`
`breach his contractual obligations to Plaintiffs.
`
`Breach of the Agreement between Bart Enterprises and Mercado
`
`COUNT I
`
`57.
`
`Plaintiffs reallege and reincorporate as if fully set
`
`forth herein the
`
`allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 56, above.
`
`58.
`
`Pursuant to Section 1
`
`(b) of the Agreement, Mercado granted to Bart
`
`Enterprises the exclusive right and license to develop, produce, distribute and copyright
`
`in its own name materials,
`
`in any language,
`
`relating to Mercado’s psychic and
`
`astrological services.
`
`(Exh. “A,” Section 1 (b)) Mercado breached the Agreement by
`
`engaging in the conduct described in paragraphs 39 through 56 above, including, without
`
`limitations, by: (1) registering the trademarks in Astromundo’s name; (2) attempting to
`
`revoke Bart’s power of attorney privileges; and (3) attempting to assign all the rights
`
`granted to Bart Enterprises to a new and independent agent.
`
`59.
`
`Pursuant to Section 2 (b) of the Agreement, Mercado assigned to Bart
`
`Enterprises all rights, title and interest in and to the Mark.
`
`(Exh. “A,” Section 2 (b))
`
`Mercado breached the Agreement by engaging in the conduct described in paragraphs 39
`
`through 56 above, including, without limitations, by: (l) registering the trademarks in
`
`Astromundo’s name; (2) attempting to revoke Bart’s power of attorney privileges; and (3)
`
`attempting to assign all the rights granted to Bart Enterprises to a new and independent
`
`agent.
`
`12
`
`créé%'é99g7fi4aur1g,P.A.
`
`| Attorneys at Law | 1221 Brickell Avenue | Miami, FL 33131 | Tel 305.579.0500 | Fax 305.579.0717 | www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`<3ase1:O?~cv-20136—PAS
`
`Document ‘E
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket ()1./'18/’20{37
`
`Page 13 of
`
`60.
`
`Pursuant Section 3(b) of the Agreement, Mercado assigned to Bart
`
`Enterprises the right and license to use Mercado’s Name and Likeness by any means and
`
`in any and all media.
`
`(Exh. “A,” Section 3(b)) Mercado breached the Agreement by
`
`engaging in the conduct described in paragraphs 39 through 56 above, including, without
`
`limitations, by: (1) registering the trademarks in Astromundo’s name; (2) attempting to
`
`revoke Bart’s power of attorney privileges; and (3) attempting to assign all the rights
`
`granted to Bart Enterprises to a new and independent agent.
`
`61.
`
`Pursuant to Section 6 (b)(i) of the Agreement, Mercado agreed to provide
`
`psychic and astrological services to Bart including creating audiotext recordings for pay
`
`per call services, appearing in long form commercials, creating print, radio and television
`
`advertising and making personal appearances.
`
`(Exh. “A,” Section 6 (b)(i)) Mercado
`
`breached the Agreement by engaging in the conduct described in paragraphs 39 through
`
`56 above, including, without limitations, by:
`
`a.
`
`failing to appear for the tapings of the televised horoscope and
`
`commercials on November 29, 2006;
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`failing to deliver the audio horoscopes since December 6, 2006;
`
`failing to deliver the content for People en Espafzol due on or
`
`before December 7, 2006 for
`
`the March 2007 issue of the
`
`magazine;
`
`d.
`
`failing to deliver
`
`the audio predictions
`
`for 2007 for
`
`radio
`
`dissemination; and
`
`e.
`
`failing to deliver the written 2007 predictions for magazine and
`
`website publication.
`
`13
`
`Gré urig, P.A.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickell Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`Case.1:Q?~cv—20t36—PAS
`
`Document ‘E
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket ()1./'18/’aO{37
`
`Page 14 of 76
`
`62.
`
`Pursuant to Section 11 (b) of the Agreement, Mercado agreed to take such
`
`steps as Bart reasonably requests to cooperate with any necessary legal action in case any
`
`third party uses or threatens to use Mercado’s name, signature, photograph, voice,
`
`picture,
`
`likeness, or other indicia of his identity or the name, signature, photograph,
`
`voice, picture, likeness.
`
`(Exh. “A,” Section 11 (b)) Mercado breached the Agreement by
`
`engaging in the conduct described in paragraphs 39 through 56 above, including, without
`
`limitations, by: (1) allowing a third party to use his name; (2) retaining a new and
`
`independent agent to act on his behalf; and (3) failing to take reasonable steps requested
`
`by Bart to cure the breach.
`
`63.
`
`Pursuant to Section 18 of the Agreement, Mercado agreed to “attend and
`
`participate in all rehearsals, filming or taping and photography sessions required and will
`
`render his services [provided for in the Agreement] in accordance with the scripts or
`
`other materials Bart shall furnish to Mercado for such purposes. Mercado agrees to
`
`render Bart’s services in a competent and artistic manner to the best of his ability, and
`
`that all Mercado’s services will be subject to Bart’s approval, direction and reasonable
`
`control at all
`
`times. Mercado will promptly comply with whatever
`
`reasonable
`
`instructions, suggestions, and recommendations Bart may give Mercado in connection
`
`with the rendition of such services.”
`
`(Exh. “A,” Section 18) Mercado breached the
`
`Agreement by engaging in the conduct described in paragraphs 39 through 56 above,
`
`including, without limitations, by:
`
`a.
`
`failing to appear for the taping of the televised horoscope and
`
`commercials on November 29, 2006;
`
`b.
`
`failing to deliver the audio horoscopes since December 6, 2006;
`
`14
`
`Greéwmgmaurig, PA.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickel|Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`Case .1:O?’~cv-20136—PAS
`
`Document ‘E
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 01/'1 8/4007
`
`Page 15 of 7%
`
`c.
`
`failing to deliver
`
`the audio predictions
`
`for 2007 for
`
`radio
`
`dissemination; and
`
`d.
`
`failing to comply with Bart’s instructions and recommendations in
`
`connection with the rendition of the services listed in paragraph 56
`
`(3) - (C)-
`
`64.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Mercado’s breach of contract,
`
`Plaintiffs have suffered and continue to suffer injury and substantial monetary damages
`
`for which they are entitled to be compensated.
`
`Action for Tortious Interference with Contract Against Mercado
`
`COUNT II
`
`65.
`
`Plaintiffs reallege and reincorporate as if fully set
`
`forth herein the
`
`allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 56, above.
`
`66.
`
`Defendant, Mercado
`
`has
`
`tortiously interfered with Watervision’s
`
`contractual relationship with Televisa by, among other things:
`
`a.
`
`contacting Televisa and informing it that Mr. Bakula no longer
`
`represents Mercado;
`
`b.
`
`contacting Televisa and informing it that Mr. Bakula had no rights
`
`or title to any of the following: (i) Mercado’s name, any associated
`
`trademarks, likeness, images and photographs; (ii) video or audio
`
`works
`
`and
`
`presentations
`
`and
`
`any
`
`associated
`
`copyrights,
`
`astrological scripts and text(s); (iii) books written or co-written by
`
`Mercado or on Mercado’s behalf; (iv) CDs or DVDs published
`
`and/or distributed bearing Mercado or Mercado’s likeness;
`
`(V)
`
`websites bearing Mercado or Mercado’s
`15
`
`likeness;
`
`(vi)
`
`text
`
`Greegbtmgzfiaurig, P.A.
`
`I Attorneys at Law I 1221 Brickell Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 I Tel 305.579.0500 I Fax 305.579.0717 I www.gtlaw.com
`
`

`
`'<3ase'1:Q?’~cv-20136—PAS

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket