throbber

`
`TitleGas Conversion Systems Reclaim Fuel for Industry
`
`NASA Technology
`
`T o understand the connection between the
`
`development of Martian power systems and tech-
`nology that can pull oil from old wells or capture
`gases released during drilling, it helps to think of atoms—
`particularly carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen atoms—like
`Tinkertoys. Different configurations have sometimes
`drastically different properties, particularly when an ele-
`ment is added or removed, and rearranging them is just a
`matter of using the right chemical reactions.
`Take this conversation with Robert Zubrin, founder
`and president of Pioneer Astronautics and Pioneer
`Energy, on the subject of making rocket propellant on
`Mars: “It can be done by combining hydrogen, perhaps
`from Earth, with Martian carbon dioxide—the atmo-
`sphere is 95 percent CO2—to produce methane and
`water. You can electrolyze the water and make oxygen,
`recycle the hydrogen off the electrolysis, and doing that
`will yield a lot of methane and oxygen, which is a good
`combination for rocket fuel. With that, you can return
`home to Earth,” he explains.
`“Later on, we did some work where we would be able
`to make methanol and oxygen on Mars, and then we did
`a system where we decomposed methanol and water into
`hydrogen and carbon dioxide to produce lifting gas for
`research balloons,” he continues, speaking as if it were as
`simple as making a little windmill from sticks and spools.
`Zubrin has what might be called a restless intellect.
`President of the Mars Society and a primary developer
`of an oft-referenced plan to put humans on Mars called
`Mars Direct, he has been championing colonization of
`the Red Planet—and working on the systems to make
`it happen—since the mid-1990s. Among the 10 books
`he’s published, though, are also a satirical science fiction
`novel lampooning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and
`a five-act play portraying Benedict Arnold’s betrayal of
`the revolutionary army. He devised a three-player version
`of chess when he was 20 and patented it. And in 2010,
`
`Zubrin appeared in a viral Symphony of Science music
`video along with Carl Sagan and other famous science
`popularizers.
`In the course of its work, Pioneer Astronautics has
`won about 60 Small Business Innovation Research
`(SBIR) contracts, most of them with NASA. They have
`totaled more than $12.5 million, which Zubrin has used
`for projects as diverse as a Mars hopper vehicle that uses
`carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as the engine pro-
`pellant, a magnetic sail that would propel a spacecraft
`by using a magnetic field to deflect plasma winds, and
`a precision-landing parachute system designed for Mars’
`thin atmosphere.
`Some of the earliest contracts, dating to the mid- to
`late 1990s, were with Johnson Space Center and focused
`on creating rocket fuel on the surface of Mars through
`molecular mixing and matching. These followed work he
`had done as a NASA contractor with Lockheed Martin
`and Martin Marietta Astronautics Company, developing
`advanced space exploration strategies.
`“He started with Lockheed Martin and helped build
`one of the first prototypes for how to collect carbon diox-
`ide from the Mars atmosphere and turn it into oxygen
`and methane,” says Gerald Sanders, In-Situ Resource
`Utilization (ISRU) chief engineer with the Propulsion
`and Power Division at Johnson Space Center. He adds
`that Zubrin then went on to experiment with other
`chemical processes with Pioneer Astronautics, such as
`ways to make oxygen from carbon dioxide using a reverse
`water-gas shift process with water electrolysis—using
`electricity to separate water’s hydrogen and oxygen atoms.
`“A lot of his work, like the name of his company, was
`very pioneering, trying different things out that may be
`interesting to NASA for exploration,” Sanders says.
`He notes that much of this experimentation applies
`not just to his line of work—finding ways to collect and
`put to use the molecules available on Mars or the moon—
`but also to life support and power systems, the backbone
`of any space exploration mission.
`
`
`
`104 Energy and Environment 104 Energy and Environment
`
`Sanders’ group is still working out the logistics of
`tying all these systems together. Now that it’s known
`that there is water in the soil on Mars, he says, the best
`way forward appears to be processing that water to get
`hydrogen, which can be combined with carbon dioxide
`from the atmosphere to form methane for fuel, as well
`as oxygen, which is useful for both fuel and life support.
`All this would be powered by a small nuclear power plant
`and would require a soil processing plant and carrying
`rovers to excavate soil. The added equipment would total
`about 2,000 kilograms, which is significantly less than
`the 6,500 kilograms of methane that would be brought
`from Earth to get a rocket from Mars into space without
`processing soil.
`“So there’s still a drastic increase in performance and
`return on investment,” Sanders says. “And if you go to
`the poles, where the ice concentration increases signifi-
`cantly, it just gets better.”
`Zubrin’s work on this sort of molecular alchemy
`during his early work with NASA has more recently led
`him to two projects that are likely to have a dramatic
`effect on the oil industry back here on Earth.
`“Some of these SBIRs made me realize that we could
`take a form of this technology, run it backwards, and
`
` What we’re doing for Mars has a lot of
`applicability on Earth.”
`
`— Gerald Sanders, Johnson Space Center
`
`Background: The Martian landscape, as
`imaged by Curiosity. Future spacecraft
`visitng Mars, including crewed missions,
`will likely use resources on the Red Planet
`to manufacture fuel for the trip home.
`
`
`
`Spinoff 2015Spinoff 2015
`
`CRUSOE-1013
`
`1
`
`

`

`we would have something we could use on Earth for oil
`recovery,” Zubrin says.
`In 2008, he created Pioneer Energy to put the theory
`to work.
`Technology Transfer
`
`On Mars, carbon dioxide would be combined with
`hydrogen to make methane and water, and the water
`would be electrolyzed to make oxygen and hydrogen.
`“On Earth, we’ve got methane in the form of natural
`gas, which right now is very cheap, and you can react
`it with water, which we also have a lot of, and produce
`carbon dioxide and hydrogen and then split them,”
`Zubrin explains. The hydrogen can be used to create
`carbon-free electricity, and the carbon dioxide can be
`used to pull oil out of defunct oil wells. “Basically, what
`we’re doing is running the Mars Direct field processing
`system in reverse.”
`Depending on its geology, only about 30 percent of
`the oil in a well is captured by the initial pumping. In the
`early 1900s, a technique was developed to then flood the
`well with water, which the oil floats on, and this method
`yields another 20 percent of the original oil store. Still,
`half of the oil remains in the ground. The 1980s saw
`the advent of “enhanced oil recovery” (EOR), in which
`carbon dioxide is pumped into the well, where it mixes
`with the oil, making it less viscous and pressurizing it,
`which allows another 20 percent or so of the original
`amount to be removed. In the process, the carbon dioxide
`can be sequestered.
`Only 4 percent of US oil is currently obtained this
`way, however. “The reason is that the only practical way
`to do this is with natural reservoirs of CO2 that already
`exist,” Zubrin explains, adding that there aren’t many
`places where oil wells and natural stores of carbon diox-
`ide coexist. While there has been much talk about using
`carbon dioxide expelled from power plants, he says, plant
`output is diluted, unpressurized, hard to separate, and
`probably produced far from any oil well. “It’s the wrong
`pressure, it’s the wrong mix, and it’s in the wrong place,
`and so it just doesn’t happen very much.”
`Alternatively, carbon dioxide can be piped to the site,
`but this would only be done for a large operation, and
`
`Pioneer Energy’s Mobile Alkane Gas Separator (MAGS) system separates flare gases that naturally occur at drilling sites into three
`streams: one can be captured in tanks and shipped off for sale, another powers generators that run the drilling operation, and a third
`powers MAGS itself. Pioneer sold its first MAGS unit in late 2014 to a company operating in North Dakota, where flare gases are
`most often simply burned onsite, the gases wasted.
`
`furthermore, most companies don’t want to invest in a
`carbon dioxide pipeline if the EOR method hasn’t been
`tested at the site with a pilot operation. “Right now, the
`only way they do that is to truck it in, which is enor-
`mously expensive,” Zubrin says. “And because it’s so
`expensive, the pilot doesn’t happen, and because the pilot
`doesn’t happen, the pipeline doesn’t happen, and because
`the pipeline doesn’t happen, nothing happens.”
`The Pioneer Portable Enhanced Recovery Technology
`(PERT) offers an attractive, inexpensive alternative
`capable of producing the carbon dioxide onsite from
`methane and water that are trucked in. “We’ve created
`a mobile system that can go right to the well, and you
`don’t need a pipeline,” Zubrin says. “That opens up CO2
`availability to the entire country—not just to west Texas
`and a couple other places—and to oil drillers of every size,
`including Farmer Brown’s strip well.”
`The company started testing its first full-scale model
`of the PERT in spring of 2014. By then, though, the
`company was also testing the first field unit of another,
`related system.
`
`While working on the carbon dioxide-producing
`system, Zubrin got another idea—a sort of spinoff of a
`spinoff. “Some of the subsystems involved in the research
`effort led us to an idea on how we could design a system
`that may seem unrelated but actually uses a lot of the
`same subsystems,” he says.
`During the early stages of oil drilling, long before
`carbon dioxide is necessary, large amounts of natural
`gases may be released from the earth. In the industry,
`these are known as “flare gas” because, being byproducts
`released in isolated locations that lack plants and pipelines
`for processing them, they’re often simply burned onsite
`in what are called gas flares. This has become a conten-
`tious practice, particularly in North Dakota, where there
`is much more interest in extracting oil than in capturing
`gas, which has a significantly lower market value.
`“They’re flaring it so much that North Dakota seen
`from space is now almost as bright as New York City,”
`Zubrin says. “It’s incredible. And it’s a massive waste
`of energy.”
`
`Spinoff 2015
`
`Energy and Environment 105
`
`2
`
`

`

`Title
`
`Currently, natural gases released during oil drilling operations are often simply burned off in gas flares. Pioneer Energy’s Mobile Alkane Gas Separator (MAGS) system would separate these gases into
`three streams, one to be captured in tanks and shipped off for sale, another to run a generator that would power the oil drilling rig, and one to power the MAGS system itself.
`
`Pioneer Energy’s Mobile Alkane Gas Separator
`(MAGS) system would separate these gases into three
`streams. One consists of propane, butane, and pentane,
`which can be captured in tanks and shipped off for sale.
`Methane can be used to run a generator that would
`replace the diesel generators powering the oil drilling rig.
`And ethane is used to power the MAGS system itself.
`“So that came out of the Pioneer Energy company
`work, which in turn came out of my NASA work,”
`Zubrin says.
`The first MAGS field unit was tested in the spring of
`2014, and units were sent to North Dakota later that fall.
`Benefits
`
`The advantages of the MAGS system are manifold.
`“We greatly reduce the flaring and the need for diesel
`
`fuel, and we produce liquid propane and butane for sale,”
`Zubrin says, adding that the system is also self-sufficient.
`Meanwhile, the PERT system can generate enough
`hydrogen for 1.3 megawatts of electricity while producing
`about 500,000 cubic feet of carbon dioxide per day. This
`is enough to run a small EOR operation, Zubrin says.
`For a large well, it’s sufficient for the pilot operation that
`would justify a carbon dioxide pipeline.
`“The United States has the oldest oil industry in the
`world,” he says. “There are huge numbers—thousands—
`of defunct oil wells all over the country. But more than
`half of all the oil that was ever in US wells is still there.”
`While carbon dioxide-enhanced removal isn’t feasible
`for all of them, Zubrin estimates the technology would
`allow access to an amount of oil equal to more than
`10 percent of all the oil ever drilled in the country. “In
`
`addition, of course, this technology could be used in
`other countries, so we’re also talking about significantly
`expanding the world’s oil resources.”
`“It’s obviously a different application, but the type of
`chemical processing and the type of work he’s doing, I
`could see a direct connection to the work he’s done for
`Mars ISRU,” says Sanders. “Those are the types of things
`we had been stating for years, that what we’re doing for
`Mars has a lot of applicability on Earth.”
`It just took a restless mind—one that could be said to
`be highly reactive to ideas and theories—to make those
`connections and turn those Red Planet concepts into blue
`planet realities. ❖
`
`106 Energy and Environment
`
`Spinoff 2015
`
`3
`
`

`

`So much gas is being flared off at oil
`drilling sites over the subterranean Bakken
`formation in North Dakota that at night the
`oil fields can be seen from space, shining
`nearly as brightly as any metropolis.
`
`
`
`Spinoff 2015 Spinoff 2015
`
`
`
`Energy and Environment 107Energy and Environment 107
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket