throbber
5,134,540
`[11] Patent Number:
`United States Patent
`Rutt
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Jul. 28, 1992
`
`
`[19]
`
`US005134540A
`
`[54] VARISTOR OR CAPACITOR AND METHOD
`OF MAKING SAME
`
`3,794,707 2/1974 OPNeill et ale ccescccsesceeeeeee 264/56
`3,798,762
`3/1974 Harris et al.
`». 264/61 X
`4,153,491
`5/1979 Swiss et al.
`4,289,719
`9/1981 McIntosh et al. oss 264/61
`4,598,107
`7/1986 Herronetal. ......
`. 264/63 X
`4,761,711
`8/1988 Hiremath voccrccrccsccccncn 361/321
`
`scccscccssseesseenseee 264/63
`
`Truman Rutt, Myrtle Beach, S.C.
`Inventor:
`[75]
`:
`:
`.
`[73] Assignee: AVX Corporation, New York, N.Y.
`[21] Appl. No.: 758,623
`Primary Examiner—Donald A. Griffin
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Mark T. Basseches
`[22] Filed:
`Sep. 12, 1991
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`Related U.S. Application Data
`A method of manufacturing an improved varistor or
`[62]
`Division of Ser. No. 191,123, May 6, 1988.
`capacitor, and the resultant improved varistor or capac-
`itor is described. In accordance with the method the
`[S21]
`Int. CLS oes H01G 4/10; H0O1G 7/00;
`ceramic layers of the varistor are formed by providing
`[2] US.C
`361/321,2/084,
`0S.
`CV. vecccccsesernescscsretseeneees
`;
`42;
`at least two strata separated by a boundary layer which
`264/61
`resists grain growth thereacross. The ceramic bodyis
`.
`.
`.
`[58] Field of Search............ 361/320, xeaveL+& sintered under temperature conditions sufficiently low
`that grain growth within the strata defining the ceramic
`[56]
`References Cited
`layers is restricted to the strata such that grain growth
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`across the boundary material
`is minimized. By this
`161/162
`2778-762.
`1/1957 Fist
`method the ceramic layers have a predictable numberof
`3419-759 1Mtoe Hayakawaeeees 3aon
`grain boundaries between adjacent electrodes.
`
`ccceseeesssessenenee 361/321
`3,426,250 2/1969 Kahin ou... cs
`3,496,008
`2/1970 Haskinset al. woe 117/215
`4 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`16
`
`000001
`
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`PGR2017-00010
`PGR2017-00010
`AVX CORPORATION
`AVX CORPORATION
`
`.
`
`000001
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`July 28, 1992
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,134,540
`
`OKO OO OOOoe
`
`S E
`
`
`NAB0.0.000.0.006000000lce
`XXONANAXKKKKNATL KS
`16
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(yates tnel battallar tent eel eelaanal eelteal rar eel ahd
`
`epeNicccecescececceseccse:coNmh,ONV5 PEGITTTIETION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PYOVOR 927
`
`000002
`
`000002
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`July 28, 1992
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,134,540
`
`
`
`000003
`
`000003
`
`

`

`1
`
`5,134,540
`
`VARISTOR OR CAPACITOR AND METHOD OF
`MAKING SAME
`
`This application is a division of application Ser. No.
`07/191,123 filed May 6, 1988.
`
`BACKGROUNDOF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`The present invention is directed to a varistor or
`capacitor, and more particularly to a monolithic ce-
`ramic device of the type described.
`2. General Discussion
`A ceramic varistor comprises essentially an inter-
`granular barrier layer capacitor including a monolithic
`ceramic body: having a multiplicity of electrode layers
`separated by ceramic layers. The odd numbered elec-
`trode layers, i.e. the first, third, fifth, etc., are electri-
`cally connected as are the even numbered electrode
`layers. The varistor is typically employed in shunting
`relation of an electronic circuit to be protected. It is the
`function of a varistor to provide a high resistance (and
`a degree of capacitance) when voltages impressed on
`the electronic circuit are maintained below a predeter-
`mined threshold voltage, and to provide a low resis-
`tance shunt when voltages exceed the threshold.
`Heretofore,it has been exceedingly difficult to manu-
`facture varistors having a predictable breakdown volt-
`age, and particularly varistors which are rendered con-
`ductive at low voltages, i.e. 15 volts or less. The practi-
`cal solution heretofore adopted by the industry has been
`to manufacture the varistor in a conventional manner,
`i.e. in the same manneras capacitors are conventionally
`manufactured utilizing known formulations
`com-
`pounded to function as varistors. Thereafter, the varis-
`tors produced are individually tested as to break down
`voltage and classified. It will be readily recognized that
`the individual testing or batch testing of varistors con-
`stitutes a complicating and costly step in the manufac-
`ture of varistors. A further.desirable characteristic of a
`varistor is that when the same becomes conductive as a
`result of exposure to voltages beyond a threshold volt-
`age, that the current carrying capacity ofthe varistor be
`as great as is possible. This characteristic is best realized
`where substantially the entirety of the ceramic compo-
`nents become simultaneously conductive thus provid-
`ing the greatest current path between the variouselec-
`trodes of opposite polarity. In conventional varistors,
`and even those varistors which have been classified to
`break down at a particular voltage, the break down
`does not occur uniformly, especially where the im-
`pressed voltage only slightly exceeds the threshold
`voltage. As a result, the ability of such varistors to
`function as an effective shunt is greatly reduced since
`conduction between opposed electrodes is focused at
`limited areas with remaining areas of ceramic continu-
`ing to be highly resistive.
`It has been experimentally determined that the break-
`down voltage of a varistor-ceramic formulation is a
`function of the number of grain boundaries of the ce-
`ramic grains intervening between adjacent electrode
`layers. The greater the number of boundaries between
`adjacent
`layers,
`the higher the break down voltage
`necessary to provide a conductive path. Conversely, in
`the event of a grain size such that grains of ceramic
`directly span the distance between adjacent electrodes,
`the device will exhibit break down or pass current at
`extremely low voltages. From the foregoing experimen-
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`tal findings, it will be evident that a highly undesirable
`condition results where the numberof grain boundaries
`between adjacent electrodes varies greatly across the
`expanse of the ceramic layers. In such case, the break
`down voltage will be a function of and will occur atthat
`area or those areas where there are concentrations of a
`limited number of grain boundaries. Where the break
`downis concentrated in a limited numberofareas, it
`will be readily recognized that the current carrying
`capacity is substantially lower than would be the caseif
`the break down occurred more or less uniformly
`throughoutthe entire area of the ceramic.
`Efforts have been made to provide a ceramic having
`uniform grain boundary concentrations across the
`thickness of the ceramic. These efforts have heretofore
`been relatively unsuccessful on a commercial scale.
`Such efforts have included close control of the ceramic
`particle size embodied in the “green” ceramic layers;
`processing the ceramic undercarefully controlled heat-
`ing conditions during the sintering procedure; modify-
`ing sintering times, etc. As noted, none of the above
`methods have provensatisfactory.
`A particularly acute problem arises whenit is desired
`to provide a varistor having a relatively low break
`downvoltage, i.e. in the order of 15 volts or less. The
`manufacture of such varistors to provide for break
`downat low threshold voltages and yet provide high
`current carrying capacity when the threshold voltageis
`exceeded has heretofore been very difficult.
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention may be summarized as directed
`to an improved method for manufacturing varistors and
`capacitors having predictable and readily repeatable
`break down or operating voltage characteristics. While
`it is considered that the principle utility of the instant
`inventionlies in the production ofvaristors, it would be
`understood from the ensuing description that capacitors
`of the intergranular barrier layer type having improved
`characteristics will likewise benefit from the disclosed
`technology.
`The invention is predicated in large measure on the
`discovery that ceramic grain growth is inhibited by the
`higher binder concentrations present at the upper sur-
`face of a green ceramic tape or stratum, such that when
`the tape or stratum is processed within controlled heat-
`ing parameters, ceramic grains will not grow across the
`high-binder concentration boundary. By thus construct-
`ing a green ceramic layer which is comprised of two or
`more strata each of which strata incorporates a high-
`binder concentration at its upper extremity, and by
`processing such multi-stratum layer in such mannerthat
`the grain size does not extend across the boundary be-
`tween adjacent strata,
`it is now possible to create a
`ceramic layer within the varistor wherein the numberof
`grain boundaries within the layer is a function of the
`numberofstrata, and is thus controllable in accordance
`with the number of strata of which the layer is com-
`prised.
`The layer which is comprised of a numberofstrata
`maybe fabricated by any of a numberofdifferent tech-
`niques. Specifically in addition to the tape stacking
`process briefly described above, a binder and ceramic
`formulation may be deposited as by screening or doc-
`toring on a surface and the thus formed stratum may be
`overcoated with an organic ink as by swabbing. After
`drying of the organic ink layer, a further thickness of
`resin bonded ceramic may be overcoated atop the or-
`
`000004
`
`000004
`
`

`

`5,134,540
`
`3
`ganic layer, dried, and the process repeated. In this
`instance, the thin layers of organic ink define the grain
`growth barriers which provide a predictable grain
`structure. Numerous other techniques for forming the
`layers comprising the various strata are known. These
`techniques includesilk-screening, dipping, doctor-blad-
`ing, spraying,etc.
`It is accordingly an object of the invention to provide
`a varistor or capacitor comprised of one or morelayers
`of ceramic, such layers being characterized by being
`formed ofessentially discreet strata, the said strata hav-
`ing a predictable grain growth characteristic whereby
`the grain or grains of a given stratum cannot project
`across the boundary between the next adjacent stratum.
`In this manner, there may be formed a ceramic layer
`wherein the number of grains taken in a depth-wise
`direction may be accurately controlled. A further ob-
`ject of the invention is the provision of a method of
`forming a varistor or capacitor of the type described
`and the resultant product.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Reference is now made to the accompanying draw-
`ings wherein.
`FIG.1. is a schematic sectional view through a ca-
`pacitor or varistor in accordance with the invention.
`FIG. 1A is a magnified section of the circled compo-
`nent portion of FIG. 1.
`FIG.1B is a view similar to FIG. 1A depicting the
`grain size distribution which is typical of prior art ca-
`pacitors and or varistors.
`FIG. 2 is reproduction through a ceramic section
`taken by a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
`FIG, 3 is a further reproduction of an SEM photo-
`graph through a ceramic section magnified 2400 times.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
`
`Referring now to FIG. 1, there is disclosed a sche-
`matic representation of a varistor 10 formed of a mono-
`lithic block of ceramic having internal electrodes sepa-
`rated by ceramic material. More particularly, the ce-
`ramic block or monolith includes upper and lowerseal-
`ing or encapsulating layers 11, 12 respectively integrally
`formed with a series of ceramic layers, (three being
`shownin the illustrated embodiment) the ceramic layers
`being numbered 13, 14, and 15 respectively.
`The varistor includes a pair of electrodes 16, 16 of a
`first polarity which are joined by a termination area 17.
`Electrodes 18, 18 of opposite polarity are joined by
`termination 19. The electrodes 16 are separated from
`electrodes 18 by the intervening dielectric layers 13, 14
`and 15.
`Asthusfar described, the construction of the varistor
`or capacitor is entirely conventional,
`the invention
`hereofrelating to the nature of the dielectric layers 13,
`14, and 15.
`Asis schematically shown in FIG. 1B representing a
`typical prior art dielectric ceramic layer, the layer is
`comprised of a multiplicity of ceramic grains. The
`grains intervening between the electrode layers 16, 18
`are randomly distributed in size in such manner that
`larger grains such as grain 20 may span theentire dis-
`tance between the electrodes 16, 18 there thus being no
`inter-granular boundaries between the electrodes in the
`area occupied by grain 20. In a second area a pair of
`grains 21 may span the electrodes thus defining a single
`inter-granular boundary 21A in the area between elec-
`trodes 16 and 18 in registry with grains 21. In similar
`
`4
`three
`fashion, grains 22 are dimensioned such that
`grains span the distance between the electrodes result-
`ing in a structure in which there are two grain bound-
`aries intervening between the electrodes.
`A dielectric ceramic matrix in accordance with that
`illustrated in FIG. 1B is highly disadvantageoussince as
`previously noted, the break downresistanceofthe layer
`will vary as a function of the numberofintervening
`grain boundaries between the electrodes. Thus in the
`example of FIG. 1B a break downwill occurfirst in the
`area of grain 20 before a break down would occur be-
`tween grains 21, and in turn the area between grains 21
`will become conductive before the area between grains
`22, etc. It will thus be readily recognized that a varistor
`wherein the ceramic dielectric layer is of the consis-
`tency of the prior art type shown in FIG. 1B is undesir-
`able in that the threshold voltage for break down will
`first occur in the areas of no grain boundaries or limited
`grain boundaries. Accordingly, the desired conductive
`nature of the varistor will be limited to those electrical
`current paths which register with grains such as grains
`20, and perhaps 21 and accordingly, even when the
`varistor becomes conductive, the conductive carrying
`paths will be limited to the areas of fewest intervening
`grain boundaries.
`In FIGS. 1 and 1A there is disclosed an idealized
`grain structure for the dielectric layers wherein the
`number of grain boundaries intervening between elec-
`trodes 16 and 18 are essentially equal throughout the
`entire area of the dielectric material. For purposes of
`simplicity ofillustration, the dielectric components of
`FIGS.1 and 1A aredisclosed as providing a single grain
`boundary 23 betweenthe strata defined by grains 24 and
`grains 28. As will be morefully explained hereinafter, as
`a practical matter a varistor will be formed with a pre-
`dictable numberof strata and hence a predictable num-
`ber of grain boundaries,
`the number of boundaries
`sometimes being substantially greater than the single
`grain boundarystructure illustrated.
`By wayofillustration, FIG. 2 comprises a photo
`micrograph through a section of ceramic formed in
`accordancewith the invention.In the illustrated photo-
`graph, the layer 30 is comprised offive distinct strata
`30A, 30B, 30C, 30D, and 30E wherebythe layer 30
`exhibits four grain boundary areas 31A, 31B, 31C, and
`31D. In the photo micrograph of FIG.2 there are illus-
`trated void areas 32, 33 intervening between layer 30
`and adjacent layers 34 and 35. These intervening areas
`can be subsequently be filled with electroding material,
`typically molten lead, in a known mannerin accordance
`with one or more of the following U.S. Pat. Nos.
`3,965,522; 3,679,950. Alternatively,
`the areas 32, 33
`between layers 34 and 30 and 35 and 30 may,prior to
`conversion of the green ceramic to a sintered ceramic
`monolith be provided, as by screening orthe like, with
`an electrode forming ink in the mannerset forth, by way
`of example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. Re 26,421 of Jul. 2,-1968
`and 4,347,650 of Sep. 7, 1982.
`It is to be understood that the manner of forming a
`varistor or capacitor from the once formed green ce-
`ramic layers 30 is conventional and well known to the
`art, the present invention being directed to the concept
`of and manner of formation of layers 30 which will,
`following sintering, provide a predictable and regular
`numberof grain boundaries between intervening elec-
`trode layers.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`000005
`
`000005
`
`

`

`5
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF
`MANUFACTURING METHODS
`
`5,134,540
`
`6
`compressed strata with the psuedo ink formulation
`emerging at opposite sides of the individually cut struc-
`tures in the manner described.
`The cut preform structure was heated for a period of
`3 hrs at 370° C. to decompose and remove binder and
`dispersants from the ceramic formulation and from the
`pseudoink. A slow heating rate (12 hrs to reach temper-
`ature) was used to slowly decompose the binder with-
`out disruption of the structure. The resultant structures
`were then fired at 1400° C. for one hourto sinter the
`ceramic.
`FIG. 2 of the instant application shows the grain
`structure of the resultant ceramic monolith. Asis appar-
`ent from the enlargement, each layer 30 of the monolith
`was comprised of five strata each stratum being com-
`posed essentially of a single ceramic grain extending
`throughoutthe entire depth of the stratum,the grains of
`each stratum terminating at a boundary defined by the
`next adjacent stratum. Grain size is shown to be substan-
`tially constant,
`the structure of each layer including
`four grain boundaries between the void areas 32,33.
`This structure and varistors manufactured in accor-
`dance with the invention were heated between 1000° to
`1100° centigrade in the presence of Bi203 in order to
`effect deposits of such substance in the grain bound-
`aries, The purpose of such procedure is to facilitate
`observance of the grain structure by an SEM,thebis-
`muth also functioning to enhance the varistor proper-
`ties. The heating was done before end termination.
`EXAMPLEII
`
`A varistor ceramic slurry formulation was formed
`using 65 parts by weight of ceramic powder comprised
`essentially of zinc oxide containing one or more small
`additions chosen from thelist of Bi, Co, Mn, Ti, Cr, Si,
`Al, K. This mixture was milled in water with 35% by
`weight waterutilizing the dispersant and percentage of
`dispersant as set forth in Example 1. Milling of the mix-
`ture was effected for a period of 18 hours in the manner
`set forth in Example 1. Relative to the weight of ce-
`ramic, 18 parts by weight of Rohm and Haas HA-12 and
`2 parts by weight of Rohm and Haas HA-16 binders
`were added, the resultant slurry having a viscosity of
`about 20-30 cps. Films were formed of the resultant
`slurry.as previously described, the dried films having a
`thickness of approximately 0.72 mils. The films were
`employed to define strata in the manner previously
`described. In this instance, the varistors were formed by
`screening between adjacent stacked layers areas ofplat-
`inum electrode paste in accordance with a. procedure
`set forth by way of example in U.S. Pat. No. Re. 26,421.
`The ceramic layers defining the varistors were formed
`of three strata and four strata respectively. The stacked
`green varistors were then heated to remove binder and
`dispersants as in Example 1. They werethereafterfired
`at 1180 degrees centrigrade for four hours and treated
`as described in Example 1. In the specific constructions
`cited, the finished varistor body made with three strate
`had the following dimensions: 0.118 in. distance be-
`tween terminated ends; 0.059 in. width; 0.033 in. thick-
`ness. The Thickness of each of the layers 30 of the
`. preform was approximately 0.0019 in., the specific pre-
`form including 5 operative layers (15 total strata), and 3
`electrodes of each polarity. The finished varistor body
`made with four strata per layer had essentially the same
`dimensions with the thickness of each ofthe layers 30 of
`the preform being approximately 0.0021 in. thick. It also
`had 3 electrodes of each polarity.
`
`0a
`
`Central to the method oftheinstant invention is the
`concept of forming each of the respective green dielec-
`tric layers of the varistor of a series of strata each stra-
`tum of which is provided at its major surfaces with a
`boundary forming material which functions to inhibit
`grain growth of the ceramic across the boundary during
`the sintering. A further aspect of the method is carrying
`out a sintering procedure at a temperature sufficiently
`low, and for time period sufficiently short that the ce-
`ramic grains do not grow across the respective bound-
`aries between the strata. It is, for example, possible’
`—_ 5
`utilizing.a green ceramic structure in accordance with
`the invention to produce a monolithic ceramic structure _
`having the random grain growth diagrammatically il-
`lustrated in FIG. 1B by sintering under temperatures
`sufficiently high that the grains will eventually break
`down the resistance of the barriers and become ran-
`domly sized. Thus, to achieve the desired results of the
`inventionit is necessary, in addition to providing barrier
`effects at the major surfaces of the strata to process the
`green ceramic preform in a manner which will preserve
`the barrier effect. Since skilled workers in the art of
`ceramic capacitor fabrication are well aware of the
`interplay of time, temperature, and formulation factors
`in relation to grain size, the skilled worker familiarized
`with the instant disclosure will be readily able to derive
`fabricating parameters which will assure the effective
`functioning of the barriers.
`EXAMPLE1: VARISTOR STRUCTURE
`FABRICATION
`
`20
`
`25
`
`A water slurry was made by milling 65% by weight
`zinc oxide with 35% by weight water. A small addition
`of dispersant (approximately 0.5% to 1.0% by weight of
`Rohm and Haas T-901) was added to reduce viscosity.
`The slurry was milled for approximately five hoursin a
`vibro-energy mill made by SWECO CORPORATION.
`The milling operation was effected using } inch zirconia
`milling media. Milling was continued for approximately
`five hours following which 20% by weight of a com-
`mercially available acrylic latex binder was added
`(Rohm and Haas HA-12) to form the mixture into a thin
`paint. The paint was applied to a stainless steel belt
`coated with a thin lethechin coating to facilitate release
`of the film after drying, the film being formedto a thick-
`ness of approximately one mil after drying. During the
`drying procedure a degree of segregation of the latex
`binder was observed, the binder being concentrated at
`the top drying surface of the film. The degree of con-
`centration of the binder was found to be a function of
`drying time,
`longer drying times favoring increased
`surface concentrations of binder.
`The dried film was cut into rectangular pieces and
`stacked in groups of five. Increments of groupsoffive
`were stacked to form a structure, the physical formation
`of the green ceramic preform being effected in accor-
`dance with the procedures outlined in the previously
`cited U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,965,552 and 3,679,950. The pre-
`form was then consolidated by bonding of the stacks
`under heat and pressure. Bonding was effected by sub-
`jecting the preform under pressure of between 1500 to
`2500 psi and temperature of 113 degrees centigrade.
`The individual unit structures were then cut from the
`stack. In accordance with such patents a so called
`pseudoink is applied between intervening layers of the
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`000006
`
`000006
`
`

`

`7
`A numberofvaristors fabricated in the manner de-
`fined were tested as to capacitance and percent dissipa-
`tion factor, using a 1 volt RMS, 1 Khztest signal. The
`units fabricated with three strata had an average capaci-
`tance of 3.94 nf, and 8.65% DF. The units fabricated
`with four strata had an average capacitance of 3.49 nf,
`and 7.30% DF.
`Breakdown voltage will be defined as the voltage
`impressed uponthe units for a current of 1 ma. The units
`utilizing three strata layers had an average breakdown
`voltages of 7.43 volts. The units with four strata layers
`had an average breakdown of8.28 volts.
`Asa control, varistors were fabricated from the for-
`mulation set forth in the instant example, thesole differ-
`ence in fabrication techniques being that each of the
`ceramic bodies of the control varistors was fabricated
`by employing as the ceramic layers 30 a single sheet of
`the processed ceramic having a thickness approximately
`equal to the combined thickness defined by layers 30
`which were comprised of the three strata. The dried
`tape thickness was approximately 2.2 mils. Control
`varistors were formed from the control ceramic sheets
`in exactly the same manneras described in respect of
`the varistors manufactured from the multi-stratum lay-
`ers,. The control varistors were tested as to capacitance
`and percent dissipation factor as describe. the average
`capacitance was 4.68 nf, and 20.1% DF. The average
`breakdown voltage was 3.74 volts.
`For a limited voltage-current range, the current (ID
`througha varistor is proportional to the applied voltage
`(V), raised to some poweralpha (a). That is, I~Va. A
`large value for alpha is desirable, since then the device
`conducts a large current with a very small rise in volt-
`age over breakdown,providing an effective shunt to
`protect other circuit elements. Over a limited current
`range, an effective alpha can be defined as
`
`aeff =
`
`Aln()
`Aln(¥y)
`

`
`In the following tests current pulses of short duration
`were applied to the varistors and the voltage measured.
`The current pulses were short in duration to prevent
`appreciable heating of the units. Following are the ef-
`fective values of alpha for the three stratum, four stra-
`tum, constructions and the controlvaristors, calculated
`for different current ranges.
`
`VARISTOR
`Control
`
`EFFECTIVE
`CURRENT RANGE USED
`ALPHA
`TO CALCULATEA In (1D)
`11.7
`0.5 to 1.0 amp
`4.8
`0.5 to 10.0 amp
`3.2
`0.5 to 18.8 amp
`19.8
`0.5 to 1.0 amp
`8.6
`0.5 to 10.0 amp
`47
`0.5 to 18.8 amp
`Four Stratum
`34.0
`0.5 to 1.0 amp
`10.3
`0.5 to 10.0 amp
`
`0.5 to 18.8 5.8
`
`Three Stratum
`
`Thebetter properties of the stratum constructed units
`relative to the control units can be understood in terms
`of the microstructures. A reproduction through a ce-
`ramic section of the three stratum constructed varistor
`taken by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) may be
`compared with a ceramic section of the control varistor
`taken by SEM.
`The control varistor has some large grains and re-
`gions of few grain boundaries which allow 1 ma of
`
`000007
`
`5,134,540
`
`8
`current to flow at a low voltage. The stratum con-
`structed units have a more uniform grain structure
`whichresults in a higher effective alpha overall current
`rangestested.
`With the multi-stratum construction it was easy to
`change the breakdownvoltage by changing the number
`of strata and grains. Changing the breakdown voltage
`of the control construction would involve more diffi-
`cult, less directly definable, process changes to modify
`average grain size.
`
`EXAMPLEIII
`
`20
`
`A zinc oxide varistor formula in accordance with
`Example 2 was prepared as thin sheets approximately
`0.8 mils thick. The ceramic layers defining three and
`four stratum varistors were formed in the mannerprevi-
`ously described in Example 1. The varistor monoliths
`were processed to form varistors by injecting Jead into
`the various void areas remaining following votalization
`of the pseudo ink and were terminated in the mannerset
`forth in the above referenced U.S.patents.
`The resultant varistors were tested against a control
`following the testing proceduresset forth in accordance
`with Example II. Varistors in which the layers of ce-
`ramic were fabricated by multiple sub-layers or strata
`were again found to be markedly superior in each of the
`test particulars as compared to a control batch formed
`in identical manner by wherein the layers of green ce-
`ramic were defined by a thicker single film the total
`thickness of which approximately equaled the plurality
`of stacked films.
`Fractured samples of the ceramic bodies of the con-
`trol varistors and those manufactured in accordance
`with the process of the instant application were sub-
`jected to SEM inspection. In the examples fabricated in
`accordance with the disclosure of the instant applica-
`tion, grain growth within the layers was foundto corre-
`spond closely to the configurationsofthe strata defining
`40 the layer, and hence a predictable number of grain
`boundaries between electrode areas was found to exist,
`An inspection of the control sample evinced a wide
`variation of grain sizes and the numberof grain bound-
`aries between electrode adjacent areas.
`The four stratum construction had a predictably
`higher breakdown voltage than the three stratum con-
`struction, and again gave an easier method of control-
`ling breakdownvoltage than the control construction.
`EXAMPLEIV
`
`.
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`In this example a zinc oxidevaristor formulain accor-
`dance with Example II was prepared as thin sheets
`approximately 0.70 mils thick. The films were prepared
`in accordance with Example II, with an exception in
`binderlevels. Only 15 parts by weight total of binders
`were added.
`Multi-stratum layers were constructed from the thin
`films in two ways. In the first method the as formed
`sheets were slacked and laminated.
`In the second
`method a very thin layer of Rohm and Haas HA-16
`binder was applied to one surface of each tape and dried
`before stacking and lamination. The binder was applied
`by a cotton swabusing 90 parts by weight water with 10
`parts by weight of the HA-16 binder. The binderitself
`contained approximately 46 weight percent of latex
`organic. The laminated strata of both methods were
`then fired, and thermally treated as in Example II.
`
`000007
`
`

`

`9
`SEManalysis showed that the swabbed on binder
`acted as an effective grain growth barrier. The as cast
`tape did not have sufficient binder segregation to limit
`grain growth to within the tape strata.
`EXAMPLE V
`
`In this example samples of the thin films prepared in
`Example IV were used. As discussed in Example IV,
`the as cast film did not have sufficient binder segrega-
`tion to limit grain growth to within the tape strata.
`Stratum were constructed from the thin films by stack-
`ing and laminating. Before stacking and laminating one
`surface of each film was sprayed using an airless paint
`sprayer with a mixture of 90 parts water with 10 parts
`Lanthanum Carbonate. The laminated multi-strata were
`then fired and thermally treated as in Example II.
`SEManalysis showed that the thin coating of Lantha-
`num Carbonate acted as an effective grain growth bar-
`rier.
`
`EXAMPLEVI
`
`In this example a ceramic slurry formulation was
`prepared in accordance with Example IJ. The slurry
`was not cast as previously described. Multi-stratum
`layers were constructed by spraying thin ceramic films
`with an airless paint sprayer. Each film was dried and
`then the top surface coated with an organic film as
`described in Example IV before spraying the next thin
`ceramic film. A glass plate was used as a substrate for
`supporting the multi-stratum layer during build up. The
`build up was removed,fired and treated as in Example
`I.
`
`SEM analysis showed that grain growth was essen-
`tially limited to within the multi-strata sprayed films.
`In addition to the tape stacking and spraying tech-
`niques foundto be effective in producing ceramic layers
`having predictable grain sizes and hence predictable
`numbersof grain boundaries, similar results are achiev-
`able using doctor techniques, screening techniques,
`roller spreading techniques, etc. While at present, the
`tape stacking technique is considered to be the “best
`mode” of forming the multi-stratum layers, the inven-
`tion is not to be construed as limited to any specific
`technique or techniques, since numerous meansof form-
`ing multi-stratum layers with intervening grain growth
`barriers are possible. Rather,
`the invention is to be
`broadly construed to encompass the generic concept of
`providing ceramic layers wherein the numberof grain
`boundaries within the layer are controlled withinstatis-
`tically predicatable limits through the use of barriers
`formed at the major surfaces of the strata forming the
`ceramic layer. The examples have used organic resins
`for bonding of ceramic in the ceramic stratum during
`buildup of the structure. This should not be construed as
`being essential. This is demonstrated by the structures
`being in a binderless state after the binder burnout oper-
`ation but before sintering. It is anticipated that even
`material deposition techniques such as sputtering, or
`CVDcould be used to produce stratum layers of high
`green density bonded by thin layers of low green den-
`sity or other barriers at the stratum interfaces, and
`which could then be fired to produce the desired grain
`structures. The method is of course dependant on pro-
`cessing the green ceramic bodies in such a mannerthat
`grain growth across the adjacent strata does not de-
`velop,
`it being understood that notwithstanding the
`barriers, processing at unduly high temperatures or for
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`5,134,540
`
`10
`overly extended periods will induce such trans-barrier
`growth.
`While the present in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket