Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`€.
`
`Limitation [20b1|
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji combination discloses [20b1] and renders 1 obvious. See
`
`VI.B.1; VHLB.3.b; VOLD.3.b; EX-1011, 9311.
`
`d.
`
`Limitation [20b2|
`
`Kawai discloses [20b2]. See VILA.6; VHI.D.3.d; EX-1011, (312.
`
`é.
`
`Limitation [20b3|
`
`Shimura discloses [2063]. VLA.L; EX-1OL1, (313-314.
`
`Shimura discloses a top surface (ccc!) and alateral surface (ius), as
`
`illustrated in Figure | below. EX-1004, 411. Shimura also discloses a bottom
`
`surface (not visible in Figure | below) imcontact with a surface (¢.g., a desk) when
`
`the portable computer is in a laptop mode. See VUL.D.3.e; EX-1004, #11.
`SEREEEEESEEEEEEEEEEEESESEns
`:g
`:
`
`[Figure 1]
`
`St
`
`205 display means
`
`
`120,121 display! 120 sear
`exarmplel
`“7;
`en,
`
`1 RaelLf
`fd
`ae
`“Higsesaienaes18? dsolay
`
`
`
`control cireuit
`06 display
`
`i _everse switchs
`
`.
`
`
`
`f
`
`Limifation [20b4|
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi combination discloses [20b4] and rendersit
`
`=37-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3108
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3108
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`obvious. See VI.B.2; VULB.3.c, EX-1011, 4315.
`
`g.
`
`Limitation [20b5]
`
`Ryuuzaki discloses [20b5]. See VIILD.3.¢; EX-1011, 4316.
`
`h.
`
`Limitation [20b6|
`
`Tsuji discloses [20b6]. See VUI.D.3.8; EX-1011, 7317.
`
`i.
`
`Limitation [20b7|
`
`Ryuuzaki discloses [20b7]. VILA.5; EX-L011, {9318-319.
`
`Ryuuzaki discloses a speaker unit installed on a portable computer. EX-
`
`1008, 1:5-8. Incorporating such a well-known common component(¢.g., the
`
`speaker) in a base (101) of a portable computer would have been an obvious design
`
`choice fora POSITA. VI.D.1, EX-1011, #319.
`
`i.
`
`Limitation [20b8|
`
`Ryuuzaki discloses [20b8]. VLA.5; EX-1011, 99320-3211.
`
`Ryuuzaki discloses a volume control "provided on the lateral side edges of
`
`the first casing 2 [red in FIG. 1 below].” EX-1008, 4:52-54.
`
`-88-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3109
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3109
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`‘
`
`SHNVORERRTE
`
`Dennenenerrrrninrrrnirrnnnrninnnnnnn
`
`Incorporating such a well-known componentin a portable computer, especially
`
`whenthere is express disclosure from Ryuuzaki as to where the volume control is
`
`located, would have been obvious toa POSITA. VID 1, EX-1011, 9321,
`
`k.
`
`Limitation [20c1]
`
`Shimura discloses [20c]]. See VLA.1, VULB3.d; VOID.3.b; VIELD.3.¢;
`
`EX-1011, 7322-323
`
`Shimura discloses a dual-axis hinge assembly. EX-1004, (413-15;
`
`=89.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3110
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3110
`
`

`

`Annotated Figure 2 below (red dashed lings).
`LyerbrrorrrSESOEUR
`
`Petition for /ater Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`
`
`~
`
`.
`
`“Tercoverpore
`tii cover support shaft
`oe
`‘BB _—
`
`23 rover support part
`PY
`Toe: Riess
`
`
`
`(Figure 2}
`
`a
`
`
`aS coupling part
`eee eae yeas es
`103:ASS
`f
`
`1hAiniteaBase
`
`
`
` 120 main . UME C33
`
`
`{
`support shaft |
`| support part f
`
`OT main
`
`
`L,
`
`Limitation [20c2|
`
`Shimura discloses [20c2]. See VLA.1; VIILB.3.d, VOID.3.b, VHLD.3.¢;
`
`EX-1011, 4324
`
`m.
`
`Limitation [20d]
`
`The Shimura-Tsuy combination discloses [20d] and renders it obvious. See
`
`VIB.1; VI0.B.3.h; VHIB.7; EX-1011, 1325-326.
`
`The output of the gravity sensor (¢.g., towardor away from the hinge
`
`assembly) in the Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-Ryuuzaki Computer is "indicative of an
`
`orientation [¢.g., face up or down] of at least part of the portable computer[the
`
`cover part 102]." Table 1. Moreover, a gravity sensor is a type of accelerometer.
`
`See VULB.7; EX-1011, B26; EX-1018, 1, 4.
`
`-90-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3111
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3111
`
`

`

`n.
`
`Limitation [20e1]
`
`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji combination discloses [20e1] and renders it obvious.
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji Computer discloses the function and corresponding structure of
`
`the means-plus-function limitation “display manager" recited in [20e1], orits
`
`equivalents. See VLB.1; VIILB.3.£; VULD.9.a; EX-1011, 9327.
`
`a.
`
`Limitation [20e2]
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji combination discloses [20e2] and renders it obvious.
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji Computer discloses the function and corresponding structure of
`
`the means-plus-function limitation "display manager” recited in [20¢2], orits
`
`equivalents. See VI.B.1; VIEELD.3.a; EX-1O11, $328.
`
`a.
`
`Limitation [20e3]
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji combination discloses [20e3] and renders it obvious.
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji Computer discloses the fimetion and corresponding structure of
`
`the means-plus-function limitation "display manager" recited in [20¢3], orits
`
`equivalents. See VI.B.1; VHI.D.3.b; EX-1011, 9329.
`
`he
`
`Limitation [20e4]
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi combination discloses [20e4] and renders it
`
`obvious. The Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi Computer discloses the function and
`
`corresponding structure of the means-plus-function limitation "display manager"
`
`recited in [20e4], or its equivalents. See VL.B.2; VIILB.3.9, VIELD.9.a: EX-1011,
`
`-91-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3112
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3112
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`€.
`
`Limitation [201]
`
`Shimura and Tsuji each disclose [20f]. See VLA; VLA.2;, VUIB.7; EX-
`
`L011, €331.
`
`Accordingly, the Shimura-Tsuyi-Tonouchi-Ryuuzaki-Kawai combination
`
`renders obvious Claim 20. V1.D.2; id., 79309-3372.
`
`EK.
`
`Ground 4: Shimura in view of Tsuji, Tonouchi, Ryauzaki, Kawai,
`and Pogue rendered Claims 17-19 obvious.
`
`1.
`
`Combination of Shimura, Tsui, Tonouchi, Ryvuuzaki,
`Kawal, and Posue (hereafter "Shuomura-Tsui-Tonouchi-
`Rvuuzaki-Kawai-Pocue combination”
`
`
`
`For all the reasons set forth im V1.D.2 above, a POSITAwould have been
`
`motivated to combine Kawai with Shimura, Tsuji, Tonouchi, and Ryuuzaki. EX-
`
`LOLT, 4279-280.
`
`A POSITA would have also been motivated to combine Pogue with
`
`Shimura, Tsuji, Tonouchi, Ryauzaki, and Kawai for several reasons. fa), {4334-
`
`338.
`
`Commercially available computers at the Critical Date would have metat
`
`least the hardware requirements to run Windows XP. VLA.4; EX-1007, 558; EX-
`
`LO1S: EX-1016; EX-1017;, EX-1030; EX-1031; EX-1032: EX-1033; EX-1034,
`
`EX-1046; EX-1050. While Shimura, Tsay, Tonouchi, Ryvwuzaki, and Kawai
`
`disclose hardware components andrelated circuitry, they do not expressly disclose
`
`an operating system: Pogue expressly discloses Windows XP, one example of a
`
`9}.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3113
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3113
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`well-knownoperating system at the Critical Date. EX-1007, 1.
`
`in Windows XP, a user can access the desktop via a desktop button(¢.g.,
`
`pressing the Windows logo key+D onthe keyboard, or clicking the Show Desktop
`
`button on the desktop). /d, 95. A user can access the Start menu via a Start menu
`
`button (e.g., pressing the Windows logo key or Cirl+Ese on the keyboard, or
`
`clicking the Start menu button on the desktop).
`
`/@.,25. Tsuji provides express
`
`disclosure that "[ajny given function can programmiably be assigned to each of the
`
`R and L button switches 118 and 119." VLA4; EX-1005, 438. As such, a
`
`POSITA would have been motivated to programat least one of the R and L buttons
`
`to the desktop and/or Start menu buttons so that a user would be able to casily
`
`access the desktop and/or Start menu, respectively, in all display modes by
`
`pressing one of the programmed R and L buttons. EX-1011, 9336.
`
`There would have been motivation to combine, and a reasonable expectation
`
`of success in combining, Pogue with Shimura, Tsuji, Tonouchi, Ryuuzaki, and
`
`Kawai because prior art elements are merely combined according to known
`
`methods to yield predictable results. See RSR, 550 US. at 415-21. Pogue taught
`
`the well-known Windows XP operating system. VLA.4; id. Application ofthis
`
`teaching to Shimura, Tsuji, Tonouchi, Ryauzaki, and Kawai would have yielded a
`
`predictable portable computer with at least one of the R and L buttons of Tsui
`
`programmed to access the desktop and/or the Start menu of Pogue. EX-1011,
`
`-93.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3114
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3114
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`4337.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the POSITA would have been motivated to
`
`combine the teachings of Shimura, Tsuji, Tonouchi, Rywuzaki, and Kawai with the
`
`teachings of Pogue to arrive at the Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-Ryuuzaki-kawai-
`
`Pogue Computer using the Windows XP operating systemthat utilizes at least one
`
`of the R and L buttons programmed to access the desktop and/orthe Start menu of
`
`Pogue. Ja, (9334-338.
`
`2.
`
`Claim 17
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-Pogue combination discloses the additional
`
`limitation of this claim and renders it obvious, and the Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-
`
`Ryuuzaki-Kawai-Pogue combination renders the claim obvious. See VLC.1,
`
`VILE.1; VIDLC.2; EX-1O11, 9339-343.
`
`First, the Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-Popgue Computer discloses the means-
`
`plus-function limitation "display manager" recited im Claim 17. The Shimura-
`
`Tsuyi-Tonouchi-Pogue Computer discloses the function of the "display manager."
`
`See V.E, VLA4: VULC.2; EX-1006, Figures 2-2, 2-3.
`
`Second, the combination of Tsun’s BIOS, the modified display contro!
`
`circuit 107, and the modified electronic circuit in the Shimura-Tsuyi Computer
`
`discloses the computer operating system and/or dedicated logic circuitry of the '154
`
`Patent, which detects a current display mode (e.g., laptop mode), orients the
`
`-94.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3115
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3115
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`displayed content accordingly(e.g., normal view), detects execution of a
`
`navigation element (e.g., programmed R or L button), and transitions the displayto
`
`the home screen (e.g., desktop or Startmenu of Pogue) in the correct display
`
`orientation (¢.g., normal view) based on the detected display mode (e.g., laptop
`
`mode) and detected execution of the navigation element (¢.g., programmed R or L
`
`button), or its equivalents. V.A; EX-1011, #343.
`
`3,
`
`Claum 18
`
`The Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-Pogue combination discloses the additional
`
`limitation ofthis claim and renders it obvious, and the Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-
`
`Ryuuzaki-Kawai-Pogue combination renders the claim obvious. See VLC.1;
`
`VLE; VIDLB.3.h; VIULB.5; VULB.6.a; VULB.6.b; VOLC.2,VHLE.2; EX-L011,
`
`8344-349,
`
`First, the Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-Popgue Computer discloses the means-
`
`plus-function limitation "display manager" recited im Claim 18. The Shimura-
`
`Tsuyi-Tonouchi-Pogue Computer discloses the function of the "display manager."
`
`See V.E, VHLE.2, EX-1011, 9345.
`
`Alternatively, the Shimura-Tsup-Tonouchi-Pogue Computer discloses the
`
`function of the "display manager" because, as discussed above, when the Shimura-
`
`Tsuyi-Tonouchi Computer is in the casel mode, the displayed content is enlarged
`
`because the user is limited fo using a stylus and/orfinger (.e., a less sensitive input
`
`95.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3116
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3116
`
`

`

`Petition for fnter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`method than a touch-pad accessible in the laptop mode) to interact with the
`
`displayed content. See VI.B.1.b; VIL.B.2; VUILE.2; EX-1006, FIG. 5: EX-1011,
`
`47347. Pogue also discloses enlarging content: a user can "control both the size of
`
`ithe] desktop icons and the font usedfor their names (as shown in Figure 8-11)."
`
`EX-1007, 264.
`
`With the Shimura-Tsuji-Tonouchi-Pogue Computer in an easel mode, a
`
`POSITA would have known to enlarge the displayed content presented in the
`
`desktop and/or Start menu so that a user can more easily interact with such
`
`displayed content when the useris limited to using a stylus and/or finger. Thus,
`
`the output of the programmed R or L button mthe easel mode of the Shimura-
`
`Tsuji-Tonouchi-Ryuuzaki-Kawai-Pogue Computer displays enlarged displayed
`
`content. The enlarged version of the desktop and/or Start menu is the claimed
`
`"second home screen.” This is different from the first home screen, which includes
`
`a normal-sized version of the desktop and/or Start menu. EX-1011, 9348.
`
`Second, the Shimura-Tsuji Computer also discloses the corresponding
`
`structure for the "display manager,” or its equivalents. See V.A; VULE.2; EX-
`
`LOLL, 4349,
`
`4A.
`
`Claim 19
`
`Ryuuzaki discloses the additional limitation of this claim, and the Shimura-
`
`Tsuji-Ponouchi-Ryuuzaki-Kawai-Pogue combination renders the claim obvious.
`
`-96-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3117
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3117
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`See VLA.S; VLE.1; VILD.9.i; VULD.9j; EX-1011, 9350.
`
`-97.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3118
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3118
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`Dated: May 4, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Martin R. Bader/
`Martin R. Bader (Reg. 54,736)
`SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &
`HAMPTON LLP
`12275 EEL Camino Real, Suite 100
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 720-8900
`Fax: (858) 509-3691
`
`Counselfor Petitioner
`
`-9&8.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3119
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3119
`
`

`

`Petition for inter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`
`CERTIFICATION UNDER 37 C.E.R.§42.240
`
`i certify that the foregoing complies with the type-volume limitation of
`
`37 CLF_R. § 42.24 and contains 13,898 words based on the word countindicated by
`
`the word-processing system used to prepare the paper, and excluding those
`
`portions exempted by § 42.24(a).
`
`Date: May4, 2021
`
`‘Martin R. Bader/
`Martin R. Bader
`Registration No.: 54,736
`
`-99.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3120
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3120
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 10,289,154
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.FLR. §842.6(¢) and 42.105(a), the undersigned hereby
`certifies that the foregoing PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. 8311 ET SEQ, AND 37 C.F.R. 842.100 ET SEQ. (CLAIMS
`1-26 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 10,289,154), including all exhibits and supporting
`evidence, was served in its entirety on April 30, 2021, by electronic mail pursuant
`to written agreement, upon counsel for the Patent Owner, the WOLF
`GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC. firm, to the followme individuals and emai!
`addresses:
`
`Michael Albert, Michael.Albert@WolfGreenfield com
`Gerald Hrycyszyn, GeraldHrycyszyn@ WolfGreenfield.com
`Marie A. MckKiernan, Maric.Mckiernan(@wolfgreenfield.com
`Erie Rutt, Eric.Rutt@WolfGreenfield com
`WGS-LitlvLenovo@WolfGreenfield com
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, PLC.
`600 ATLANTIC AVENUE
`BOSTON MA 02210-2206
`
`Dated: May 4, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`(Martin R. Bader/
`Martin R. Bader (Reg. No. 54,736)
`SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &
`HAMPTON LLP
`12275 EL Camino Real, Suite 100
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel.: (858) 720-8900
`Fax: (858) 509-3691
`
`Counselfor Petitioner
`
`-100-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3121
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3121
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARE OFFICE
`
`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
`Petitioner
`
`Vv.
`
`LITL LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`IPR Case No. IPR2021-00821
`U.S. Patent No. 8,612,888
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`UNDER35 U.S.C. §311 ET SEQ. AND 37 C.ELR. §42.100 ET SEO.
`(CLAIMS 1-9, 15-22, AND 24-27 OF U.S. PATENTNO. 8,612,888)
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3122
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3122
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`Prosecution History of the '888 Patent
`
`1003
`
`JP 1994-242853 to Shimura (“Shimura”)
`
`:
`al. ("Tsuji")
`et
`No. 2005/0062715 to Tsuji
`1006US,Pub.“No.20060265390toAldrichetal.("Aldrich")
`
`U.S. Pub. No. 2004/0172451 to Biggs et al. ('Biggs")
`
`US. Pat. No. 7,970,240 to Chao et al. ("Chao")
`
`
`
` DE 1031455A1to Schweizer
`
`U.S. Pub. No. 2004/0189694 to Kurtz et al. C'Kartz")
`iioUsPaNo.1718913wOnal@aCOwhy
`ton|US,Pat,No,7,243,079toManolisetal.("Manolis")
`
`Declaration of Jean Renard Ward
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Jean Ward
`
`Claim Listing
`
`Family Diagram of Modified Shimura Computers
`
`ULS. Pub. No. US 2005/0122318 ('Tonoucin")
`
`JP 2002-25898? to Kiyoyuki
`
`Certified Enelish translation of JP 2002-258982 ("Kiyoyuki ")
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3123
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3123
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`
`
`
`Certified English translation of DE 1031455A1 C'Schweizer")
`
`Windows XP Home Edition: The Missing Manual ("Pogue")
`
`Schwartz, Organizing and Editing Your Photos with Picasa
`("Picasa")
`
`
`
`US. Pub. No. US 2009/0019383 ("Riley")
`
`Microsoft Computer Dictionary Sth Edition ("Microsoft
`Dictionary")
`
`Microsoft Windows Internals 4th Edition ("Microsoft Windows")
`
`1026
`
`Wikipedia, Windows Special Folder (Windows Special Folder")
`
`27
`
`Wikipedia, Environment Variable ("Environment Variable")
`
`1028
`
`Microsoft Digital Image Suite User's Manual ("Microsoft Digital
`Image Suite")
`
`US. Pat. No. 6,760,721 to Chasen et al. ("Chasen")
`
`
`
`erosPub.No.2006/0007503toNakamura("Nakamura")10311
`
`
`
`S. Pub. No. 2005/0110880 to Parulski et al. (’Parulski ")
`
`1032
`
`The Internet Society, HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest
`Access Authentication (HTTP Authentication")
`
`US. Pub. No. 2004/0230663 to Ackerman ("Ackerman")
`
`U.S. Pub. No. 2007/011852 to Svendsen ("Svendsen ")
`
`
`1035
`
`S. Pat.No. 5,903,723 to Becket al. ("Beck")
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3124
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3124
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`
`INTRODUCTION ooo ccccee cee eeceseeeeeesseeteeeetiseeeiseeeiiteenieeeiiteeneeeen I
`
`iL
`
`MANDATORYNOTICES UNDER 37 CER. 842.8 occ cccceeees i
`
`A.—Real Parties-In-Interest ($42.8 (DID) cccccccccseeseeeeeseeenens I
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Related Matters (842.8 (IQQY) occ cence tee ctnetennieeniees 2
`
`Lead and Backup Counsel (842.8 (DVB). cece cece cen eeeey 2
`
`D.—Service Information ($42.8 (DMA) cece rte tenritentiees 2
`
`HL
`
`IV.
`
`FEE FOR [PR (37 CER. §42 15(a) and 842.103)cee 2
`
`REQUIREMENTS FOR /PR UNDER37 CFR. 842.104oes 3
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Grounds for Standing ($42 1048)occ cccteeecteesseteetteeeened
`
`Identification of Challenged Claims ($42. 104(DIQD) oo. 3
`
`Grounds of Challenge ($42 104(DQ)) occ cect eet eetees 3
`
`PROPOSED GROUNDS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED
`INSTITUTION ON ANY DISCRETIONARYBASISooo 4
`
`Vi
`
`RELEVANTINFORMATION CONCERNINGTHE'888 PATENT oo... 6
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`DD.
`
`Overviewof the '888 Patent occ ccc ccc eset eetseeseseeersseeeeens 6
`
`Prosecution History of the '888 Patentocc eeeeneees ii
`
`Level of Ordinary Skill in the Artocc cccsecccetsceeetceeeenes 14
`
`Chatam Listaocc ccc cece ccccscescessaceseseseeeeseeesesassvetsseseeteeeeeeaeees i4
`
`VEIL
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION-—-37 C.F.R. §42.104 (D3)ee 14
`
`A.
`
`"viewselector cOMpPONENE oo occ cece cece ccecetseeceteteeeeetseeeensaeey [5
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`1.
`
`Pho} amd (26d)ccc ccc eccccesseseneeeeeesseesseeuevensaeees 15
`
`2, FT occ cee eect eee eee ene erie etree entice trit cette etiesetiuseetes 16
`
`"agpregation COMPONENTocc ccc ccesscescetsaeceesuseeeeteeeeesaeeees 17
`
`"SXSCUTON COMPPONCNO occ cece cceenceeceeseeeersaeeeetreesenneeees 19
`
`L.
`
`2.
`
`POTD] ccc cece ccee tenes ete cee sees eeeeee tees cesceeassseeeeteieeetsessseecsaeeses 19
`
`FTE coc cc ec eee ceee cece cent cece tenets tte eetieeseteeetiiesetiesetieeetesenies 20
`
`Vit.
`
`PRECISE REASONS FOR RELIEF REQUESTED oooee 22
`
`~ili-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3125
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3125
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`Summary of the Prior Art Applied in This Petition 000000. 22
`
`L.
`
`2.
`
`3,
`
`A.
`
`5,
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9,
`
`Overview OF SHimuta oo. ccs cesseeesseseesseetssesetsesenees 22
`
`Overview OF TSU ccc ccc ceccteeceseeeetetseseeststeeenieenenaee 26
`
`Overview OF Aldrich ooo ecccecssccesseeeseseesssetssesessesenees 29
`
`Overview Of BIgeS occ eect eee tet tetttteettetten 4
`
`Overview OF Cha0 ccc ccccccsceeesetsesetsestteesttesttestness dd
`
`Overview OFBute ccc ccc crteceetteeerteeeettesrteeere dS
`
`Overview OF CROb cc cccceccecsceessseetseeensesetesenesetseseie edo
`
`Overview of Manolis occ ccs ccetecetseeerteeseteeenseee dG
`
`Family Diagrain ooo ccccccccesecceteececeeeetesssaeeenseceeseeeees do
`
`Ground |: Shimura in viewof Tsay and Aldrich renders Claims
`1-4, 6-8, 15-16, and 24-27 ODVIOUS. o.oo cee ceceenee cc ceeeeeeeeeveeneeens 39
`
`L.
`
`2,
`
`3,
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6,
`
`7,
`
`g.
`
`9.
`
`Combination of Shimura and Tsuji Ghereatter "Shimura-
`Tsugi combination’) ooo ccc ccc ccc cesceeceeseentseeseneseeeeenes 39
`
`Combination of Shimura, Tsuji, and Aldrich (hereafter
`"Shimura-Tsuji-Aldrich combination") 000 eee 4S
`
`CLAM Docc cece cece ccceescecesecesseeeesesssecsssetsssesstestetseaesy AS
`
`CHAU 2 ooo cece cee eece cece cess eeesseeesseeeieeeeiteeneceenieeetieeeeneess 68
`
`CVASoci cc cece cece ccceescete neces seseesesssecserseesssesstesaeseeeesy 71
`
`CHAUocc cece ccc cece ce teense ee eese eet seeeieeetieeeneeeenieeetneeenneess 72
`
`CLAM Ooo cece cece scenes cetesecesseceesecssecsesseesssessstestetseeesy 72
`
`CHAU ooo cece cece ec eece cece eeeseeeseeeseseeeieeeeieeeeneeeenieeetieesnneess 73
`
`ClaUTE Bocce ccc cece cccescete neces seceesesssecsessetsssesetessetseaesy 74
`
`TO, ChatESccc cece eeceeeseeeeeseeesseeeseeeseseessseseiteeneeeniees 75
`
`EL. Chau 1G cece cccereccnscetrecessetsseesriessssretsenseay 78
`
`P2
`
`PS.
`
`Chat 24 cece cece ects cece seeceseeeeseesesseeteseteisestnetetesenees 79
`
`Chan28ccc cee e ccc ceeeeecae cet teensesesssentsteensesy 81
`
`PA, Chat 26 ccc cece ccee sens cee eeeceseesesaeseseetessteiseetneseteseniees 82
`
`PS.
`
`ChAM27 cece cece ect eceee ee caeeeteteetaesensstenssteenieey 83
`
`~iVv-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3126
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3126
`
`

`

`Petition for /ater Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 8,612,888
`Ground 2: Shimura in viewof Tsuji, Aldrich, and Biggs renders
`Chaim 5 ODVIOUS. 0c cece ee ccc cee cees cece eetace ee eecsaeeuseteseenieeetseesstecseeesees 90
`
`I,
`
`2,
`
`Combination of Shimura, Tsu, Aldrich, and Biges
`(hereafter "Shimura-Tsuji-Aldrich-Biges combination")......... 90
`
`CLOUT Soc cec ccc cece ccceesceee access seceasenssecsessetrsessrseessseseay 92
`
`D.
`
`Ground 3: Shimura in viewof Tsuji, Aldrich, and Chao renders
`Claims 9 and 18-19 OBVIOUS.0c ccc cesssecnsesetsesseeeneatseeess 93
`
`1.
`
`Combination of Shimura, Tsuji, Aldrich, and Chao
`(hereafter "Shimura-Tsup-Aldrich-Chao combination")....0..... 93
`
`2. CTBT cece ceccee ce eeteeeseesaseecseeeesueeesstseseentsteennieeeeees 98
`
`3,
`
`A.
`
`Chat 18 occ cece ceeteesesttetterteteetetestttettesseeeees LOO
`
`CNetLO cece cece ce cececeseeeeeeeesesessteeesenessseenteeenieeeess 103
`
`Ground4: Shimura in view of Tsuji, Aldrich, and Kurtz renders
`Claim 22 OBVIOUS... ccc cccccccctecceeeeeesseeeseenstecensteseceteeesensateensse 104
`
`L.
`
`2.
`
`Combination of Shimura, Tsay, Aldnch, and Kurtz
`(hereatter "Shimura-Tsuji-Aldrich-Kurtz combimation")....... 104
`
`CAI 22 ooo ccc cece cceec ce eeeee cube teeecceeesesecsaeereiteecitesenseeeees 105
`
`Ground 5: Shimura in view of Tsupi, Aldrich, and Choi renders
`Claim 20 OBVIOUS... ccc cccccccccecceeccseeteceueseceesesseseceeesseeescetsaeeeeies 106
`
`L.
`
`2.
`
`Combination of Shimura, Tsun, Aldrich, and Choi
`(hereafter "Shimura-Tsuji-Aldrich-Choi combination") ........ 106
`
`Chat20 ccc ccccccccersececseeeessssttsesssssetteeestsesssstsesaeres EEG
`
`Ground 6: Shimura in view of Tsay, Aldrich, Chot, and
`Manolis renders Claims 17 and 21 obvious. 000 PEP
`
`I,
`
`2.
`
`3,
`
`Combination of Shimura, Tsupi, Aldrich, Choi, and
`Manols (hereafter "Shimura-Tsupi-Aldrich-Choi-Manolis
`COMDMATIONocc cece cece eceee eens teense seessseneseeenas 1i2
`
`Chat DT ooo coc cece ce ccneeeceeeeeeseceeeseeessaeersaseecntesenseeeees 114
`
`Chapin 2c cece cece ce cene ce seeceseeecaeseetsueseneseeeeneeeenneeeees 118
`
`#V=
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3127
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3127
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`Page(s)
`
`Cisco Systenis, Inc. v. Crossroads Sys., ine.
`Case No. [PR2014-01544 (PTAB Apr. 3, 2015) (Paper 9pccc 4
`
`Comcast Cable Communs., LLC v. Promptu Svs. Corp.
`Case No. [PR2@18-00342 (PTAB July 19, 2018) (Paper 13)cic S
`
`KSR Int) Co. v. Teleflex inc.
`550 US. 398 (2007) cece ec eeesteeertenteenenee 44,47, 91,97, 105, 110,113
`
`Microsoft Corp. v. ParallelNetworks Licensing, LUC
`Case No. IPR2@15-00453 (PTAB July 13, 2013) (Paper 12) cocci ets 4
`
`Phillips v.AWHCorp.
`AUS F.3d 1303 Ped. Cir, 2005) oo cccccceccceenecetsecteseeeevaeestecetssetenseeesaees 14
`
`Pure Storage, inc. v. Realtime Data LLC
`Case No. IPR2@18-00549 (PTAB July 23, 2018) (PApOr 7) cece dD
`
`Synaptic Medical inc. v. Karl Storz-Endoscopy-America, inc.
`Case No. [PR2018-G0462 (PTAB July 16, 2098) (Paper 0) occ SD
`
`Taro Pharm. USA, inc., v.Apotex Tech., Ine., Case No. 1PR2017-
`O1446 (PTAB Nov. 28, 2007) (POPOr 7) occ ccec cet c cece e tence et eeteteeetneeeeeeeenaes 4
`
`Williamson v. Citrix Online LLC, 792 F.3d 1339 (ed. Cir. 2015) 0. 15,17, 19
`
`Statutes
`
`Pre-ATA 35 ULS.C. 8 LO2a) cece cee cere etteenneseneeeees 22, 26, 29, 34, 38, 39
`
`Pre-ATA 35 U.S.C. § LO20D) ccc cccececctsecttecteeneeenesentecteses 22, 26, 29, 34,38
`
`Pre-ATA 35 ULS.C. 8 102 Ce). cece cece cent cteceeeeeeeey 26, 29, 34, 35, 38, 39
`
`Pre-ATA 35 ULS.C. § LOB) ccc cee cect eee ce te eeteeecaeecsaeeaeeeseeeecesasenseeeseenees 3
`
`Pre-ATA 35 U.S.C. § 112, (Bee ciceecteseeeeneeteettrecteneteeneeniectas 15,17, 19
`
`BS US. 89 BEDSUG ccc cece ects sce tte e enc casccssscerenieesteetrecnenss 120
`
`-Vi-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3128
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3128
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`BS ULS.C. § S25 CD ccc cece cece tne cece ce esses ceeesuseeetsesessesenteesetsessiteecieeseeseersad
`
`Other Authorities
`
`BT CER. AZUSA) ccc cece cce cesses cece tee ceecessstenseesiesstssscstscstetseetestessteseees 2
`
`BT CPR. AD DOO occccccccccecccececccececcevececececececececeessreesecueeesevessreseveveeteevessresteeres 14, 120
`
`83 Fed. Reg. No. 197, 51340 (Oct. PL, 2018)cc cece cette ceteeneeteeeens 14
`
`MPEP. § 2ASV DA ccc scccccccetscceeveceersesssecnseceesseserveetsssentseeeniee 15,17, 19
`
`-Vil-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3129
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3129
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The 21 challenged claims are directed to a portable computer with multiple
`
`display modes and related features, all of which were well-known before the
`
`priority date. This portable computer is configurable between various display
`
`modes, including laptop and casel modes, byrotating a display component. But
`
`these modes, and portable computers configurable to transition between them,
`
`were all well-known before the priority date. Related claimed features include a
`
`plurality of selectable [/O profiles, a graphical user interface comprising a plurality
`
`of views, transitioning between the plurality of views in response to selection of an
`
`1/O profile or activation of a viewselector component, and transitioning a display
`
`to a viewof digital media content in response to executing an association between
`
`a visual representation and the digital media content. But likewise, these and other
`
`claimed features were all well-knownbefore the priority date.
`
`As explained below, eight prior art references—-Shimura, Tsuji, Aldrich,
`
`Biges, Chao, Kurtz, Choi, and Manolis-——in various combinations render obvious
`
`all 21 challenged claims. This Petition requests that the Board find unpatentable
`
`and cancel all challenged claims.
`
`TH. MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 C.PELR. 842.8
`
`A.
`
`Real Parties-In-Interest ($42.8 (b}(1))
`
`Petitioner Lenovo (United States) Inc. is a real party-in-interest. Petitioner is
`
`an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Lenovo Group Limited. Because Lenovo
`-|-
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3130
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3130
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 8,612,888
`(Beijing) Limited has been named as a defendantin the "related matter” identified
`
`pursuant to 37 CER. § 42.8(0b\(2) @e., LL LLCvy. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
`
`and Lenove (Beijing) Limited, Case No. 1:20-ev-00689 (D. Del.)), Lenovo
`
`(Beijing) Limitedis also a real party-in-interest.
`
`B.
`
`Related Matters (942.8 (b\2))
`
`The patent at issue, U.S. Patent No. 8,612,888 ("888 Patent"), is the subject
`
`of the following district court proceeding: Li7TL LLCv. Lenovo (United States) inc.
`
`and Lenovo (Beijing) Limited, Case No. 1:20-cv-00689 (D. Del.).
`
`C.
`
`Lead and Backup Counsel (§42.8 (b)(3)
`
`Petitioner appoints Martin Bader (Reg. No. 54,736) of Sheppard, Mullin,
`
`Richter & Hampton LLP as Lead Counsel, and appoints Nam Kim (Reg. No.
`
`64,160), and Mike Kim (Reg. No. 72,867), of the same firm as Back-Up Counsel.
`
`An appropriate Power of Attorneyis filed concurrently herewith.
`
`BD.
`
`Service Information ($42.8 (b}(4)
`
`Service of any documents to Counsel can be made via hand deliveryto
`
`Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, 12275 El Camino Real, Suite 1600, San
`
`Diego, California 92130. Petitioner consents to service by email at LegalTm-
`
`LNV-LTL@sheppardmullin.com.
`
`HE
`
`FEE FOR IPR G7 C.E.R, §42.15{a) and §42.103)
`
`Petitioner has paid the required fees. The Office is authorized to charge any
`
`fee deficiency, or credit any overpayment, to Deposit Account No. 50-4561.
`4a
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3131
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3131
`
`

`

`Petition for /nter Partes Review
`ULS. Patent No. 8.612.888
`TV. REQUIREMENTS FOR JPR UNDER 37 C.PFLR. §42.104
`
`A.
`
`Grounds for Standing (§42.104{a)}
`
`Petitioner certifies that the ‘888 Patent is available for IPR and that the
`
`Petitioner is not barred or estopped from requesting [PR challenging the claims of
`
`the ‘888 Patent.
`
`GB.
`
`Identification of Challenged Claims (§42.104(b)(1)}
`
`This Petition challenges the validity of claims 1-9, 15-22, and 24-27 of the
`
`'888 Patent ('Challenged Claims").
`
`C.
`
`Grounds of Challenge (§42.104(bM2))
`
`The Grounds of unpatentability presented in this Petition are as follows.
`
`Obvious over Shimura in view of Tsay,
`in further view of Aldrich
`
`1-4, 6-8, 15-16, 24-
`27
`
`and Aldrich, in further view of Cho
`
`Obvious over Shimura im viewof Tsuji
`and Aldrich, in further view of Biggs
`
`Obvious over Shimura im viewof Tsuji
`and Aldrich, in further view of Chao
`
`Obvious over Shimura in viewof Tsuji
`and Aldrich, in further view of Kurtz
`
`Obvious over Shimura in viewof Tsuji
`
`6 $103|Obvious over Shimura tn viewof Tsay, 17,21
`
`
`
`
`Aldrich, and Choi, in further view of
`Manolis
`
`The ‘888 Patent issued from U.S. Application No. 12/611,282, filed
`
`November 3, 2009, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No.
`“”
`=j=
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3132
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3132
`
`

`

`Petition for /ater Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 8,612,888
`61/041,365, filed April 1, 2008. Without conceding valid priority entitlement, for
`
`purposes of this Petition only, it is assumedthat April 1, 2008 marks the earliest
`
`effective priority date (the "Critical Date") of the '888 Patent.
`
`¥Y.
`
`PROPOSED GROUNDS SHOULD NOTBE DENIED INSTITUTION
`ON ANY DISCRETIONARYBASIS
`
`The grounds in the instant Petition rely upon prior art and argument that
`
`have never before been presented to the USPTO. While Shimura was listed as one
`
`reference in over 100 other references submitted in an Information Disclosure
`
`Statement, it was never discussed during prosecution of the '888 patentor the
`
`prosecution of any parent application. Thus, the specific arguments and supporting
`
`evidence presented in this petition——including the detailed supporting declaration
`
`of Petitioner's expert witness Jean Ward—-were never presented to, nor addressed
`
`by, the examiner of the parent applications or the examiner ofthe '888 Patent. Sze
`
`Microsoft Corp. v. Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC, Case No. [PR2015-00483 at
`
`[5 TAB July 15, 2015) (Paper 12) Gnstituting review where there was no
`
`evidence the asserted priorart, listed on a “lengthy Information Disclosure
`
`Statement initialed by the Examiner,” was ever considered by the Examiner); Cisco
`
`Systems, Inc. v. Crossroads Sys., Inc., Case No. TPR2014-01544 at 13-14 (PTAB
`
`Apr. 3, 2015) (Paper 9) (instituting review where "the Examiner did not address
`
`substantively the teachings” of asserted priorart references that had been disclosed
`
`during prosecution); Taro Pharm. U.S_A., inc., v. Apotex Tech., Inc., Case No.
`
`4.
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3133
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 3133
`
`

`

`Petition for /ater Partes Review
`U.S. Patent No. 8,612,888
`IPR2017-01446 at 18 (PTAB Nov. 28, 2017) (Paper 7) (instituting review where
`
`the prior art reference had been considered by the examiner, but newdeclaration
`
`evidence had not been previously presented to the Patent Office), SynapticMedical
`
`ine. y. Karl Storz-Endoscopy-America, inc., Case No. 1PR2018-00462 at 10
`
`(PTAB July 16, 2018) (Paper 6) Gnstituting review where "t