PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`From the
` INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`To:
`
`PCT
`
`see form PCTASA/220
`
`_ WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`(PCT Rule 43bis.1)
`
`
`Date of mailing
`
` (day/monthyear) see form PCTASA210 (second sheet)
`
`: Applicant's or agent's file reference
`‘FOR FURTHER ACTION
`see form PCTASA/220
`See paragraph 2 below
`: Internationa! application No.
`Internationalfiling date (dayfmonthyean
`Priority date (day/monith/year)
`27.03.2009
`
`PCT/US2009.038599 01.04.2008
`International Patent Classification (IPC) or both national classification and IPC
`INV. GOG6F 116
`
`
`Applicant
`AQUENT, LLC
`
`1.
`
`This opinion contains indications relating to the following items:
`
`Bd Box No.|
`1 Box No.II
`O Box No.Ill
`11 Box No. IV
`&) ‘Box No. V
`
`Basis of the opinion
`Priority
`Non-establishmentofopinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability
`Lack of unity of invention
`Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis.1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial
`applicability;.citations and explanations supporting such statement
`Certain documentscited
`,
`C) Bex No. VI
`O Box No. VII Certain defects in the international application
`O Box No. VIII Certain observations on the international application
`FURTHER ACTION
`
`2.
`
`If a demand for international preliminary examination is made, this opinion will usually be considered to be a
`written opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority ("IPEA") except that this does not apply where
`the applicant chooses an Authority other than this one to be the IPEA and the chosen IPEA hasnotifed the
`International Bureau under Rule 66.1bis(b) that written opinions of this international Searching Authority
`will not be so considered.
`
`_
`
`If this opinion is, as provided above, considered to be a written opinion of the IPEA, the applicantis invited to
`submit to the IPEA a written reply together, where appropriate, with amendments, before the expiration of 3 months
`from the date of mailing of Form PCTASA/220 or before the expiration of 22 months from thepriority date,
`whicheverexpireslater.
`
`For further options, see Form PCTASA220.
`
`3.
`
`For further details, see notes to Form PCTASA220.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Name and mailing address of the ISA:
`
`Dd)
`
`European Patent Office
`
`P.B. 5818 Patentlaan 2
`
`Date of completion of
`this opinion
`e fo!
`
`PCTISARIO
`
`:
`
`Authorized Officer
`
`Arranz, José
`
`
`
`Telephone No. +31 70 340-4870
`
`
`NL-2280 HV Rijswijk - Pays Bas
`Tel. +31 70 340 - 2040
`Fax: +31. 70 340 - 3016
`
`
`ssett Peete“e
`<
`S,
`3
`
`?
`
`i
`
`&
`%,
`“eam sayy"
`
`Form PCTASA237 (Cover Sheet) (April 2005)
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005 - PageoA of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4549
`
`

`

`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`International application No.
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY PCT/JS2009038599
`
`Box No.| Basis.of the opinion
`
`1. With regard to the language,this opinion has been established on the basis of:
`
`{1
`
`the international application in the languagein whichit wasfiled
`
`C1
`
`atranstation ofthe international application into, which is the languageof a translation furnished for the
`purposesof international search (Rules 12.3(a) and 23.1 (b)).
`2.0 This opinion has been established taking into accountthe rectification of an obvious mistake authorized
`by or notified to this Authority under Rule 91 (Rule 43bis.1(a))
`
`3. With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosedin the international application and
`necessary to the claimed invention, this opinion has been established on the basis of:
`
`a. type of material:
`
`O asequencelisting
`O) table(s) related to the sequencelisting
`
`b. format of material:
`Ol
`on paper
`|
`
`O_
`
`in electronic form
`
`c. time offilingfurnishing:
`contained in the international application as filed.
`
`C1
`
`[1
`
`filed together with the international! application in electronic form.
`
`furnished subsequently to this Authority for the purposes of search.
`
`4. In addition, in the case that more than one version or copy of a sequencelisting and/ortable relating thereto
`has beenfiled or furnished, the required statements that the information in the subsequent or additional
`copies is identical to that in the application as filed or does not go beyond the application asfiled, as
`appropriate, were furnished.
`
`5. Additional comments:
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4550
`
`

`

`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`International application No.
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY. PCT/JNS2009,/038599
`
`Box No.V Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis.1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step or
`industrial applicability; citations and explanations supporting such statement
`
`-_
`
`1. Statement
`
`Novelty (N)
`
`Yes: Claims
`No: Claims
`
`6.7,14-24
`1-5,8-13,25,26
`
`Inventive step (IS)
`
`Industria! applicability (IA)
`
`Yes: Claims
`No:
`Claims
`
`Yes: Claims
`No:
`Claims
`
`. 1-26
`
`1-26
`
`rn. Citations and explanations
`
`see separate sheet
`
`
`
`Form PCTASA/237 (April 2007)
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005- Page458)8h of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4551
`
`

`

`WRITTENOPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING
`AUTHORITY (SEPARATE SHEET)
`
`Re Item V.
`
`International application No.
`PCT/US2009/038599
`
`1. Reference is madeto the following documents:
`|
`D1: DE 199 52 486 A1 (SCHWEIZER JOACHIM [DE]; RUETTIGER MAXIMILIAN
`[DE]; JAENICKE VOLKMAR [D) 3 May 2001 (2001-05-03)
`De: US 2007/182663 A1 (BIECH GRANTS [CA]) 9 August 2007 (2007-08-09)
`. D3: EP-A-0 588 210 (HITACHI LTD [JP]) 23 March 1994 (1994-03-23)
`
`20
`
`INDEPENDENT CLAIMS 1,25
`
`2.1 The present application does not meetthe criteria of Article 33(1) PCT, because the
`subject-matter of claim 1 is not new in the sense of Article 33(2) PCT.
`Document D1 discloses (the references in parentheses applying to this document):
`
`a portable computer configurable betweenplurality of display modesincluding a
`laptop mode and an easel mode(Col.1, line 56 - Col.2, line 24), the portable
`computer comprising:
`
`a display componentincluding a display screen configured to display content (Fig.1);
`
`a base (Fig.1); and
`a hinge assembly configured to rotatably couple the display componentto the base
`(Col.1, line 56 - Col.2, line 24);
`wherein the hinge assembly is configured to permit rotation of the display component
`about a single axis to configure the portable computer between the laptop mode and
`the easel mode (Col.1, line 56 - Col.2, line 24).
`
`Consequently, D1 discloses all the features of claim 1.
`
`2.2 Acorresponding objection as raised in §2.1 applies, mutatis mutandis, to claim 25.
`
`3
`
`DEPENDENTCLAIMS 2-24, 26
`Dependentclaims 2-24, 26 do not contain any features which, in combination with
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Separate Sheet) (Sheet 1) (EPO-April 2005)
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005- PageoR, of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4552
`
`

`

`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING
`AUTHORITY (SEPARATE SHEET)
`
`.
`
`International application No.
`-__ PCT/US2009/038599
`
`the features of any claim to which they refer, meet the requirements of the PCT in
`respect of novelty and/or inventive step,see documents D1-D3 and the
`_ corresponding passagescited in the search report.
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Separate Sheet) (Sheet 2) (EPO-April 2005)
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005 - PagegoR3 of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4553
`
`

`

`‘
`
`PCT/US2009/039117
`
`PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`From the INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`.
`
`GRADY MATTHEW H
`
`PCT
`
`LOWRIE, LANDO & ANASTASI, LLP ONE MAIN
`STREET, ELEVENTH FLOOR CAMBRIDGE MA 02142
`USA
`
`NOTIFICATION OF TRANSMITTAL OF
`THE INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT AND
`THE WRITTEN OPINION OF THE INTERNATIONAL
`SEARCHING AUTHORITY, OR THE DECLARATION
`
`(PCT Rule 44.1)
`
`Date of mailing
`(day/month/year) 28 SEPTEMBER2009 (28.09.2009)
`
`Applicant's or agent's file reference
`ER ACTI
`A2029-7004WO CTION|Sceparagraphs1 and 4 belowFOR FURTH
`
`
`International application No.
`Internationalfiling date
`(day/month/year)
`PCT/US2009/039117
`01 APRIL 2009 (01.04.2009)
`Applicant
`
`
`AQUENT,LLCetal
`
`1. XI The applicant is hereby notified that the international search report and the written opinion ofthe International Searching
`Authority have been established and are transmitted herewith.
`
`
`Filing of amendments and statement under Article 19:
`The applicantis entitled, if he so wishes, to amendtheclaimsofthe international application (see Rule 46):
`When? Thetime limit for filing such amendments is normally two months from the date of transmittal of the
`
`
`international search report.
`Where? Directly to the International Bureau of WIPO, 34 chemin des Colombettes
`1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, Facsimile No.: +41 22 338 82 70
`
`For more detailed instructions, see the notes on the accompanying sheet.
`
`
`The applicantis hereby notified that no international search report will be established and that the declaration under
`Article 17(2)(a) to that effect and the written opinion of the International Searching Authority are transmitted herewith.
`
`
`
`With regard to any protest against paymentof(an) additional fee(s) under Rule 40.2, the applicant is notified that:
`the protest together with the decision thereon has been transmitted to the International Bureau together with the
`applicant's request to forward the texts of both the protest and the decision thereon to the designated Offices.
` [J no decision has been madeyet on the protest; the applicantwill be notified as soon as a decision is made.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 4. Reminders
`
`Shortly after the expiration of 18 months from the priority date, the international application will be published by the International
`Bureau. If the applicant wishes to avoid or postpone publication, a notice of withdrawal of the international application, or of the
`
`
`priority claim, must reach the International Bureau as provided in Rules 90dis.1 and 90dis.3, respectively, before the completion of
`
`
`the technical preparations for international publication.
`
`
`
`The applicant may submit comments on an informalbasis on the written opinion of the International Searching Authority to the
`
`
`International Bureau. The International Bureau will send a copy of such commentsto all designated Offices unless an international
`preliminary examination report has beenoris to be established. These comments would also be made available to the public but not
`
`
`before the expiration of 30 months from thepriority date.
`
`Within 19 monthsfrom thepriority date, but only in respect of some designated Offices, a demand for international preliminary
`
`
`examination must befiled if the applicant wishes to postpone the entry into the national phase until 30 monthsfrom thepriority
`
`date (in some Offices even later); otherwise, the applicant must, within 20 months from thepriority date, perform the prescribed
`acts for entry into the national phase before those designated Offices.
`
`
`
` See the Annex to Form PCT/IB/301 and, for details about the applicable time limits, Office by Office, see the PCTApplicant's
`Guide, National Chapters.
`
` Nameand mailing address of the ISA/KR
`Authorized officer
`
`
`Korean Intellectual Property Office
`COMMISSIONER
`
`
`Government Complex-Daejeon, 139 Seonsa-ro,
`Seo-gu, Daejeon 302-701, Republic of Korea
`
`
`
`Facsimile No. 82-42-472-7140
`passes
`Telephone No. 82-42-481-5207
`
`
`Form PCT/ISA/220 (July2009)
`HPInc. S€xttertet SORRYase
`
`In respect of other designated Offices, the time limit of 30 months(or later) will apply even if no demandis filed within 19 months.
`
`a
`
`SrSonos
`
`
`
`of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4554
`
`

`

`
`
`NOTES TO FORM PCT/ISA/220
`
`These Notes are intended to give the basic instructions concerningthefiling of amendments under Article 19. The
`Notes are based on the requirements of the Patent Cooperation Treaty, the Regulations and the Administrative Instructions
`underthat Treaty. In case of discrepancy between these Notes and those requirements, the latter are applicable. For more
`detailed information, see also the PCT Applicant's Guide.
`
`In these Notes, "Article", "Rule" and "Section"refer to the provisions of the PCT, the PCT Regulations and the PCT
`Administrative Instructions, respectively.
`
`INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING AMENDMENTS UNDER ARTICLE19
`
`The applicanthas, after having received the international search report and the written opinion of the International
`Searching Authority, one opportunity to amendthe claimsof the international application. It should however be emphasized
`that, sinceall parts of the international application (claims, description and drawings) may be amendedduring the
`international preliminary examination procedure, there is usually no needto file amendmentsof the claims underArticle 19
`except where, e.g. the applicant wants the latter to be published for the purposes of provisional protection or has another
`reason for amendingthe claims before international publication. Furthermore, it should be emphasized that provisional
`protection is available in some States only (see PCT Applicant's Guide, Annex B).
`
`Theattention of the applicant is drawnto the fact that ammendments to the claims under Article 19 are not allowed where
`the International Searching Authority has declared, under Article 17(2), that no international search report would be established
`(see PCT Applicant's Guide, paragraph 296).
`
`Whatpartsof the international application may be amended ?
`UnderArticle 19, only the claims may be amended.
`
`During the international phase, the claims may also be amended(or further amended) under Article 34 before the
`International Preliminary Examining Authority. The description and drawings may only be amended under
`Article 34 before the International Preliminary Examining Authority.
`
`Upon entry into the nationalphase, all parts of the international application may be amended underArticle 28or,
`where applicable, Article 41.
`
`When ? Within 2 months from the date of transmittal of the international search report or 16 months from thepriority date,
`whichevertimelimit expires later. It should be noted, however, that the amendments will be considered as having
`been received on time if they are received by the International Bureauafter the expiration of the applicable time
`limit but before the completion ofthe technical preparations for international publication (Rule 46.1).
`
`Wherenotto file the amendments ?
`The amendments may only befiled with the International Bureau and not with the receiving Office or the
`International Searching Authority (Rule 46.2).
`
`Where a demandfor international preliminary examination has been/is filed, see below.
`
`How? Either by cancelling one or more entire claims, by adding one or more new claims or by amendingthe text of
`one or moreof the claimsas filed.
`
`A replacement sheet or sheets containing a completeset of claims in replacementofall the claims previously filed
`must be submitted.
`
`Where a claim is cancelled, no renumbering ofthe other claims is required. In all cases where claims are renumbered,
`they must be renumbered consecutively .in Arabic numerals (Section 205(a)).
`
`The amendments must be made in the language in which the international application is to be published.
`
`What documents must/may accompany the amendments ?
`Letter (Section 205(b)):
`The amendments must be submitted witha letter.
`
`Theletter will not be published with the international application and the amended claims. It should not be
`confused with the "Statement under Article 19(1)" (see below,under "Statement under Article 19(1)").
`Theletter must be in English or French,at the choice of the applicant. However, if the language of the
`international application is English, the letter must be in English;
`if the language of the international
`application is French, the letter must be in French.
`
`Notes to Form PCT/ISA/220 (first sheet) (July 2009)
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page4585; of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4555
`
`

`

`
`
`NOTES TO FORM PCT/ISA/220 (continued)
`
`Theletter must indicate the differences between the claims as filed and the claims as amended.It must, in
`particular, indicate, in connection with each claim appearing in the international application (it being understood
`that identical indications concerning several claims may be grouped), whether
`(i) the claim is unchanged;
`(ii) the claim is cancelled;
`(iii) the claim is new;
`(iv) the claim replaces one or more claimsasfiled;
`(v) the claim is the result of the division of a claim as filed.
`The following examplesillustrate the manner in which amendments must be explained in the accompanying
`letter:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`[Whereoriginally there were 48 claims and after amendment of someclaimsthere are 51]:
`"Claims 1 to 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37 to 48 replaced by amended claims bearing the same numbers;
`claims 30, 33 and 36 unchanged; new claims 49 to 51 added."
`[Where originally there were 15 claims and after amendmentofall claims there are 11]:
`"Claims 1 to 15 replaced by amendedclaims1 to 11."
`[Whereoriginally there were 14 claims and the amendments consist in cancelling some claims andin adding
`new claims]:
`"Claims 1 to 6 and 14 unchanged;claims 7 to 13 cancelled; new claims 15, 16 and 17 added." or
`"Claims 7 to 13 cancelled; new claims 15, 16 and 17 added; all other claims unchanged."
`[Where various kinds of amendments are made]:
`"Claims 1 - 10 unchanged;claims 11 to 13, 18 and 19 cancelled; claims 14, 15 and 16 replaced by amended
`claim 14; claim 17 subdivided into amended claims 15, 16 and 17; new claims 20 and 21 added."
`
`"Statement under Article 19(1)" (Rule 46.4)
`The amendments may be accompanied bya statement explaining the amendmentsand indicating any impact
`that such amendments might have on the description and the drawings (which cannot be amended under
`Article 19(1)).
`The statementwill be published with the international application and the amendedclaims.
`It must be in the language in which the international application is to be published.
`It mustbe brief, not exceeding 500 wordsif in English orif translated into English.
`It should not be confused with and doesnot replace the letter indicating the differences between the claims
`as filed and as amended.
`It must be filed on a separate sheet and must be indentified as such by a heading,
`preferably by using the words "Statement under Article 19(1)."
`
`It may not contain any disparaging comments on theinternational search report or the relevanceofcitations
`contained in that report. Referenceto citations, relevant to a given claim, contained in the international search
`report may be madeonly in connection with an amendmentofthat claim.
`
`Consequenceif a demandfor international preliminary examination has already beenfiled
`If, at the timeof filing any amendments and any accompanying statement, under Article 19, a demand for
`international preliminary examination has already been submitted,the applicant must preferably,at the time of
`filing the amendments (and any statement) with the International Bureau, alsofile with the International
`Preliminary Examining Authority a copy of such amendments(and of any statement) and, where required, a
`translation of such amendmentsfor the proceduer before that Authority (see Rules 55.3(a) and 62.2,first sentence).
`Forfurther information, see the Notes to the demand form (PCT/IPEA/401).
`
`If a demandfor international preliminary examination is made, the written opinion of the International Searching
`Authority will, except in certain cases where the International Preliminary Examining Authority did not act as
`International Searching Authority and where it has notified the International Bureau under Rule 66.1is(b), be
`considered to be a written opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority. If a demand is made, the
`applicant may submit to the International Preliminary Examining Authority a reply to the written opinion together,
`where appropriate, with amendments before the expiration of 3 months from the date of mailing of Form
`PCT/ISA/220 or before the expiration of 22 monthsfrom the priority date, whichever expireslater (Rule 43bis.1(c)).
`
`Consequence with regard to translation of the international application for entry inte the national phase
`The applicant's attention is drawn to the fact that, upon entry into the national phase,a translation of the claims as
`amended under Article 19 may have to be furnished to the designated/elected Offices, instead of, or in additionto ,
`the translation of the claimsas filed.
`
`Forfurther details on the requirements of each designated/elected Office, see the PCT Applicant's Guide,
`National Chapters.
`
`
`
`
`Notes to Form PCT/ISA/220 (second sheet) (July 2009) Exhibit 1005-PHP | A556 .
`
`nese
`PRES 25 of 1059
`
`
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4556
`
`

`

`Fax: +1 703 388 1064
`
`Inquiries related to PCT International Search Report or Written Opinion prepared by KIPO as an
`International Searching Authority can be answered not only by KIPO butalso through IPKC (Intellectual
`Property Korea Center), located in Vienna, VA, which functions as a PCT Help Desk for PCT applicants.
`
`Homepage: http://www. ipkcenter.com
`Email: ipxc@ipkcenter.com
`Phone: +1 703 388 1066
`
`Notes to Form PCT/ISA/220 (third sheet) July 2009)
`
`_
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005 - PMSSIN. of 1059
`
`* Attention
`
`Copies of the documents cited in the international search report can be searched in the following Korean Intellectual
`Property Office English website for three months from the date of mailing of the international search report.
`
`http://www.kipo.go.kr/en/ => Patent Search => PCT-Service
`
`ID: PCTinternational application number
`PW: 83TTEPYF
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4557
`
`

`

`_
`
`"
`
`,
`
`PCT/US2009/039117
`
`From the
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
`
`To:
`
`GRADY MATTHEW H
`
`PC T
`
`LOWRIE, LANDO & ANASTASI, LLP ONE MAIN
`STREET, ELEVENTH FLOOR CAMBRIDGE MA 02142
`USA
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`(day/month/year) 28 SEPTEMBER2009 (28.09.2009)
`
`(PCT Rule 43bis.1)
`
`Date of mailing
`
`Applicant's or agent's file reference
`
`FOR FURTHER ACTION
`
`A2029-7004WO
`
`Internationalfiling date (day/month/vear)
`International application No.
`01 APRIL 2009 (01.04.2009)
`PCT/US2009/039117
`International Patent Classification (IPC) or both nationalclassification and IPC
`
`See paragraph 2 below
`
`Priority date(day/month/year)
`01 APRIL 2008(01.04.2008)
`
`G06F 3/048(2006.0L)i, GO6F 3/14(2006.01)i
`
`Applicant
`
`AQUENT, LLC etal
`
`. For further details, see notes to Form PCT/AISA/220.
`
`1. This opinion containsindicationsrelating to the following items:
`[DX] BoxNo.1
`Basis ofthe opinion
`
`[| Box No. II Priority
`Box No. III
`Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability
`[] Box No.IV Lack of unity of invention
`Box No.V_Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis. 1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability;
`citations and explanations supporting such statement
`Certain documents cited
`
`Box No. VI
`
`LJ
`[|
`
`Box No. VII Certain defects in the international application
`
`Box No. VII Certain observations on the international application
`
`. FURTHER ACTION
`
`If a demandfor international preliminary examination is made, this opinion will be considered to be a written opinion ofthe
`International Preliminary Examining Authority ("IPEA") except that this does not apply where the applicant chooses an Authority
`other than this one to be the IPEA and the chosen IPEA has notified the International Bureau under Rule 66.1 bis(b) that written
`opinionsof this International Searching Authority will not be so considered.
`
`If this opinion is, as provided above, considered to be a written opinion of the IPEA,the applicantis invited to submitto the
`IPEA a written reply together, where appropriate, with amendments,before the expiration of 3 months from thedate of mailing
`of Form PCT/ISA/220or before the expiration of 22 months from thepriority date, whichever expireslater.
`Forfurther options, see Form PCT/AISA/220.
`
`
`
`
`Name and mailing address ofthe ISA/KR
`Date of completion of this opinion|Authorized officer
`
`Korean Intellectual Property Office
` 28 SEPTEMBER2009 (28.09.2009)|JEONG, Jae Woo
`Government Complex-Daejeon, 139
`
`
`Seonsa-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon 302
`-701, Republic of Korea
`
`
`
`Facsimile No. 82-42-472-7140
` Telephone No.82-42-481-5718
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (cover sheet) (April 2007)
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005- Paseae of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4558
`
`

`

`a,
`
`type of material
`a sequencelisting
`[] table(s) related to the sequencelisting
`
`b. format of material
`[] on paper
`[] in electronic form
`
`c. time of filing/furnishing
`contained in the international applicationas filed.
`[| filed together with the international application in electronic form.
`[| furnished subsequently to this Authority for the purposes of search.
`
`4, [] In addition, in the case that more than one version or copy ofa sequence listing and/or table relating thereto has been
`filed or furnished, the required statements that the information in the subsequentor additioanl copies is identical to that
`in the applicationas filed or does not go beyond the application as filed, as appropriate, were furnished.
`
`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`
`International application No.
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`PCT/US2009/039117
`
`Box No. I Basis of this opinion
`
`1. With regard to the language,this opinion has been established on the basis of :
`
`XI the international application in the language in which it wasfiled
`, whichis the language of a
`CI a translation ofthe international application into
`translation furnished for the purposes ofinternational search (Rules 12.3(a) and 23.1(b))
`2. L] This opinion has been established taking into accountthe rectification of an obvious mistake authorized byor notified
`to this Authority under Rule 91 (Rule 43dis.1(a))
`
`. With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, this opinion has been
`established onthe basisof:
`
`5. Additional comments:
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. D(April 2007)
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - P
`
`newex
`
`45
`
`BS AE of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4559
`
`

`

`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`International application No.
`PCT/US2009/039117 |
`
`Box No. III Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability
`
`The questions whether the claimed invention appears to be novel, to involve an inventive step (to be non obvious), or to be
`industrially applicable have not been examined in respect of:
`[] the entire international application
`x claims Nos.
`99
`
`because:
`[| the said international application, or the said claims Nos.
`relate to the following subject matter which does not require an international search (specify):
`
`the description, claims or drawings (indicate particular elements below) or said claims Nos._99
`are so unclear that no meaningful opinion could be formed (specify):
`
`In claim 99, what the description of "as described above"points is so unclear that the technical feature of claim 99 is not
`clarified.
`
`the claims, or said claims Nos.
`by the description that no meaningful opinion could be formed (specify):
`
`are so inadequately supported
`
`[| See Supplemental Box for further details.
`
`x no international search report has been established for said claims Nos. 99
`[| a meaningful opinion could not be formed without the sequencelisting; the applicant did not, within the prescribed timelimit:
`furnish a sequencelisting on paper complying with the standard provided for in Annex C of the Administrative
`Istructions, and such listing was not available to the International Searching Authority in a form and manneracceptable
`toit.
`
`furnish a sequencelisting in electronic form complying with the standard provided for in Annex C of the Administrative
`Istructions, and such listing was not available to the International Searching Authority in a form and manneracceptable
`toit.
`
`pay the required late furnishing fee for the furnishing of a sequencelisting in response to an invitation under Rule
`13ter.1(a) or (b).
`
`[| a meaningful opinion could not be formed withoutthe tables related to the sequencelistings; the applicant did not, within the
`prescribed time limit, furnish such tables in electronic form complying with the technical requirements providedfor in Annex
`C-bis ofthe Administrative Instructions, and such tables were not available to the International Searching Authority in a form
`and manneracceptabletoit.
`[| the tables related to the nucleotide and/or aminoacid sequencelisting,if in electronic form only, do not comply with
`the technical requirements provided for in Annex C-bis of the Administrative Instructions.
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. IH) (April 2007)
`7
`i
`it 1
`- P.
`4
`,
`
`
`
`HP Inc.-Exhibit 1005 age 458 £1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4560
`
`

`

`citations and explanations supporting such statement
`
`
` International application No.
` WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`PCT/US2009/039117
`
`
` Box No. V Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis.1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability;
`
` 1. Statement
`
`
`
`
`Novelty (N)
`Claims
`1 - 98, 100 - 123
` Claims
`
`None
`
` 1 - 98, 100 - 123
`
`
`YES
`Inventive step (IS)
`Claims
` Claims
`None
`NO
`
`
`
`Industrial applicabilityTA)
`Claims
`1 - 98, 100 - 123
`YES
`Claims
`None
`NO
`
` 2. Citations and explanations:
`
`
`
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. V) (April 2007)
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005- PRSI0 of 1059
`
` Reference is madeto the following documentscited in the ISR.
`
`D1 : US 2005-210399 Ai 22.09.2005
`
`
`
`D1 discloses, in a computing device, a method which comprises dividing contentinto regions,
`displaying a plurality of the regions together in a reducedsize, detecting a requestto display a
`
`
`
`selected oneof the regions, and displaying the selected regionin a size that is expandedrelative
`to the reducedsize.
`
` 1. Novelty and Inventive step
` Claim 1
`
`
`Claim 1 of the present invention relates to a graphical user interface (GUI) displayed on a
`computer system responsive to computer focus and execution, which comprisesa first visual
`representation configured to display digital content, a focus visual representation configured to
`
`
`displaythe first visual representation in a focused state, an execution componentconfigured to
`execute a first
`transformation from the first visual representation into the focus visual
`representation responsive to computer focus onthefirst visual representation, a mapping from
`
`
`at least one of thefirst visual representation and the focus visual representation to a first view
`including the digital content, and the execution componentfurther configured to execute the
`
`
`mappingin responseto execution of at least one ofthe first and focus visual representation.
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the present invention and documentD1 thatis the closest prior art to the present
`invention, relate to the same subject matter of the GUI for focusing visual representation of
`
`
`selected image on display screen. However, D1 does not disclose the mapping in response to
`
`
`execution of at least one of the first and focus visual representation. which is the key technical
`feature of claim 1. Therefore, the invention of claim 1
`is considered to be novel under PCT
`
`
`Article 33(2).
`
`
`
`Moreover,
`the technical feature of claim 1, mapping from at least one of the first visual
`representation and the focus visual representation to a first view including the digital content,is
`
`
`
`not obvious to a person skilled in the art and is not suggestedin anyofthe prior arts. Therefore,
`the invention of claim 1
`is considered to fulfill the requirement of inventive step under PCT
`
`
`Article 33(3).
`
` (Continued on Supplemental Sheet)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4561
`
`

`

`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`
`International application No.
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`PCT/US2009/039117
`
`In claim 99, what the description of "as described above” points is so unclear that the technicalfeature of claim 99 is notclarified.
`
`Box No. VIII Certain observations on the international application
`
`The following observationson the clarity of the claims, description, and drawings or on the question whetherthe claimsare fully
`supported by the description, are made:
`
`Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. VIII) (April 2007)
`
`HPInc. - Exhibit 1005- PRBS
`
`of 1059
`
`HP Inc. - Exhibit 1005 - Page 4562
`
`

`

`WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
`
`
`
`International application No.
`
`PCT/US2009/039117
`
`In case the spacein any of the preceding boxesis not sufficient.
`Continuation of:
`
`Box No. V
`
`
`
`
`
` Claims 40, 41, and 42
`
`
`Claims 40, 41, and 42 of the present invention relate a method for presenting a graphical user
`interface on a computer system display, a computer system for presenting streamlined
`
`interaction with digital content, and a customized user interface for a computer system,
`
`
`respectively, which a