Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89 Filed 05/16/23 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1193
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`LEXOS MEDIA IP, LLC,
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC.
`
`LEXOS MEDIA IP, LLC,
`
`v.
`
`TARGET CORPORATION
`
`LEXOS MEDIA IP, LLC,
`
`v.
`
`OFFICE DEPOT, LLC.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No. 2:22-CV-00169-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`Civil Action No. 2:22-CV-00175-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`Civil Action No. 2:22-CV-00273-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`PARTIES’ JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3 and the Court’s First Amended Docket Control Order (Dkt.
`
`87), Plaintiff Lexos Media, IP LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Lexos Media”) and Defendants Amazon.com,
`
`Inc., Target Corporation, and Office Depot, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby submit their
`
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement.
`
`The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 5,995,102 (the “’102 Patent”), 6,118,449 (the
`
`“’449 Patent”), and 7,975,241 (the “’241 Patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”). The ’102
`
`Patent was issued on November 30, 1999, based upon an application filed on June 25, 1997. The
`
`’499 Patent was issued on September 12, 2000, based upon a continuation application of the ’102
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURE OF JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Page 1
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 1 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89 Filed 05/16/23 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 1194
`
`
`
`Patent. The ’241 Patent was issued on July 5, 2011, based upon the same specification as in the
`
`application for the ’102 Patent. Plaintiff has asserted that Defendants have infringed Claim 72 of
`
`the ’102 Patent, Claims 1, 38, and 53 of the ’449 Patent, and Claim 35 of the ’241 Patent.
`
`Section I below identifies the terms, phrases, or clauses within the asserted claim elements
`
`of the Asserted Patents for which the Parties have agreed as to the proper construction. Section II
`
`below and Exhibits 1-3 set forth the Parties’ proposed constructions for the disputed the terms,
`
`phrases, or clauses within the claim elements of the Asserted Patents, along with the identification
`
`of supporting intrinsic and extrinsic evidence. Section III below states the Parties’ positions
`
`regarding the length of the claim construction hearing. Section IV below addresses the expert
`
`testimony that the Parties may rely on in support of their proposed claim constructions. Section V
`
`below addresses the Parties’ current position on the need for a prehearing conference.
`
`I. P.R. 4-3(a)(1): Agreed Claim Construction
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3(a)(1), the Parties have agreed to the construction of the claim
`
`terms, phrases, or clauses set forth hereto:1
`
`PROPOSED CLAIM TERM
`
`PARTIES’ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
`
`
`“modified cursor image”
`
`See ’449 Patent, Claims 1 and 38;
`’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`“promotional material”
`
`See ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`“cursor image” should be construed as set forth
`separately.
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`
`1 If the Parties reach an agreement at a later date regarding any additional claim terms, the Parties
`plan to supplement this Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement to reflect this
`agreement.
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURE OF JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Page 2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 2 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89 Filed 05/16/23 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 1195
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROPOSED CLAIM TERM
`
`PARTIES’ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
`
`
`
`“said specific image
`includes/including content
`corresponding to at least a portion of
`said information that is to be
`displayed on said display of said
`user’s terminal”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53.
`
`
`
`“specified content information”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38 and 53.
`
`“content information”
`
`See ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`“visual image”
`
`See ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`
`“an image representative of at least a portion of the
`subject or topic being displayed on the screen”
`
`Lexos Media IP, LLC v. APMEX, Inc., No.
`216CV00747JRGRSP, 2017 WL 1021366, at *5–6
`(E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2017).
`
`
`
`The term “specified content information” / “content
`information” means “information provided to a user’s
`terminal for use in the display, such as a web page.”
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`II. P.R. 4-3(b): Disputed Claim Construction
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3(a)(2), the charts identifying each party’s proposed construction
`
`of each disputed claim term, phrase, or clause, together with an identification of all intrinsic and
`
`extrinsic evidence are set forth in the exhibits attached hereto:
`
`Parties’ Joint Claim Construction Chart
`
`CHART
`
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Chart Identifying Supporting Evidence
`
`Defendants’ Claim Construction Chart Identifying Supporting Evidence
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURE OF JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`EXHIBIT(S)
`
`Exhibit 1
`
`Exhibit 2
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`Page 3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 3 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89 Filed 05/16/23 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 1196
`
`
`
`III. P.R. 4-3(a)(3): Length of Claim Construction Hearing
`
`According to the Court’s First Amended Docket Control Order (Dkt. 87) and the Court’s
`
`Notice of Hearing entered on April 26, 2023, the Claim Construction Hearing is scheduled to be
`
`held on August 9, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap.
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3(a)(3), the Parties anticipate requiring 90 minutes per side for
`
`the Claim Construction Hearing.
`
`IV. P.R. 4-3(a)(4): Witness Testimony at Claim Construction Hearing
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3(a)(4), the Parties have agreed to not rely on expert witness
`
`testimony to support their claim construction arguments and hence, do not propose to call any
`
`witnesses, including experts, to provide testimony at the Claim Construction hearing.
`
`V. Patent Rule 4-3(a)(5): Other Issues
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3(a)(5), the Parties do not believe that there are any other issues
`
`which might appropriately be taken up at a prehearing conference prior to the Claim Construction
`
`Hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURE OF JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Page 4
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 4 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89 Filed 05/16/23 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 1197
`
`
`
`Dated: May 16, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`BUETHER JOE & COUNSELORS, LLC
`
`By: /s/ Eric. W. Buether
`Eric W. Buether
`Texas State Bar No. 03316880
`Eric.Buether@BJCIPLaw.com
`Christopher M. Joe
`Texas State Bar No. 00787770
`Chris.Joe@BJCIPLaw.com
`Kenneth P. Kula
`Texas State Bar No. 24004749
`Ken.Kula@BJCIPLaw.com
`1700 Pacific Avenue
`Suite 4750
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone:
`(214) 466-1271
`Facsimile:
`(214) 635-1827
`
`
`SETHLAW PLLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Sandeep Seth
`Sandeep Seth
`Texas State Bar No. 18043000
`ss@sethlaw.com
`700 Milam Street, Suite 1300
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Telephone:
`(713) 244-5017
`Facsimile:
`(713) 244-5017
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`LEXOS MEDIA IP, LLC
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Janice L. Ta
`Janice L. Ta, Texas 24075138
`JTa@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`405 Colorado St., Suite 1700
`Austin, TX 78701
`Tel: (737) 256-6100
`Fax: (737) 256-6300
`
`Daniel T. Shvodian, California 184576
`(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`DShvodian@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`3150 Porter Drive
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Tel: (650) 838-4300
`Fax: (650) 838-4350
`
`Adam G. Hester, Wisconsin 1128794
`(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`AHester@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`33 East Main Street Suite 201
`Madison, WI 53703-3095
`Tel: (650) 838-4311
`Fax: (650) 838-4350
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
`AMAZON.COM, INC.
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Janice L. Ta
`Janice L. Ta, Texas 24075138
`JTa@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`405 Colorado St., Suite 1700
`Austin, TX 78701
`Tel: (737) 256-6100
`Fax: (737) 256-6300
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURE OF JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Page 5
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 5 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89 Filed 05/16/23 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 1198
`
`
`
`
`
`James F. Valentine, California 149269
`(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`JValentine@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`3150 Porter Drive
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1212
`Tel: (650) 838-4300
`Fax: (650) 838-4350
`
`Adam G. Hester, Wisconsin 1128794
`(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`AHester@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`33 East Main Street Suite 201
`Madison, WI 53703-3095
`Tel: (650) 838-4311
`Fax: (650) 838-4350
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
`
`K&L GATES LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Benjamin E. Weed
`Benjamin E. Weed (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`benjamin.weed@klgates.com
`Amanda C. Maxfield (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`amanda.maxfield@klgates.com
`K&L GATES LLP
`70 West Madison Street, Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60602
`Tel: (312) 372-1121
`
`GILLAM & SMITH LLP
`
`Melissa Smith (Texas Bar No. 24001351)
`Gillam & Smith LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Tel: (903) 934-8450
`Fax: (903) 934-9257
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AND
`COUNTERCLAIMANT
`TARGET CORPORATION
`
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURE OF JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Page 6
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 6 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89 Filed 05/16/23 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 1199
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(c) on this 16th day of May 2023. Any other counsel of
`
`record will be served by facsimile transmission and first class mail.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Eric W. Buether
`Eric W. Buether
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that that counsel for the Parties have met and conferred
`
`on the 9th day of May 2023 regarding the content herein, and the Parties are all in agreement with
`
`this Joint Submission.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Eric W. Buether
`Eric W. Buether
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3 DISCLOSURE OF JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Page 7
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 7 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-1 Filed 05/16/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1200
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`“corresponding to” as used in the phrase
`“cursor image data corresponding to a/said
`specific image”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53.
`
`
`
`“cursor display code”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`
`“cursor display instruction”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53; ’241 Patent, Claim
`35.
`
`
`
`“associated with”
`
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`“computer code for modifying the
`display of the cursor image”
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`“an instruction operable to modify the
`display, in conjunction with other
`information, of a cursor image”
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 8 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-1 Filed 05/16/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1201
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`“cursor image” and “initial cursor
`image”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 27, 53; ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`“the appearance of the cursor on a
`user’s screen before the cursor image is
`modified into the specific image”
`
`(Plaintiff contends that the terms
`“cursor image” and “initial cursor
`image” should be construed together
`and to mean the same thing.)
`
`“cursor image” – “a movable image on a
`display screen whose position is controlled
`through a user interface and that indicates
`the location that will be affected by input
`from the user interface”
`
`(Defendants contend that “cursor image”
`should be construed as a standalone term.
`Defendant’s propose a plain and ordinary
`meaning for the terms “initial cursor image”
`and “said cursor image.” No construction of
`those terms is needed beyond the
`construction of “cursor image.”)
`
`“data identifying the appearance of the
`modified cursor image”
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`“cursor image data”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`“initial cursor image” and “said
`initial cursor image”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; ‘449 Patent,
`Claim 53.
`
`
`As set forth above, Plaintiff contends
`that the terms “cursor image” and
`“initial cursor image” should be
`construed together and to mean the
`same thing.
`
`
`“cursor image” should be construed as set
`forth separately.
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning for “initial
`cursor image” and “said initial cursor
`image.” No construction needed beyond
`the construction of “cursor image.”
`
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 9 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-1 Filed 05/16/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1202
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`“changing (change) or replacing
`(replace) the form, shape or appearance
`of a cursor image”
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`“modifying [an initial cursor image]”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claim 53.
`
`“transforming [said initial cursor
`image]”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claim 53.
`
`“modify [said cursor image]”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`“modifying [a cursor image]”
`
`See ’449 Patent, Claims 1 and 35;
`’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 10 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-1 Filed 05/16/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1203
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`“modified cursor image, which is static and
`representative of at least a portion of the
`subject or topic being displayed on the
`screen”
`
`
`
`“one or more pieces of computer
`equipment and the software running on
`the equipment used to provide services
`for one or more other computers or
`computing devices”
`
`
` a
`
` “modified cursor image,” and not the
`“cursor image” or the “initial cursor
`image”
`
`
`
`“moves according to a movement”
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`“server” (computer or system)
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53; ’241 Patent, Claim
`35.
`
`
`“specific image”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`
`
`“tracks a movement”
`
`See ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 11 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-2 Filed 05/16/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1204
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`PLAINTIFF’S P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`“corresponding to” as used in the phrase
`“cursor image data corresponding to a/said
`specific image”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53.
`
`
`
`“associated with”
`
`
`
`Supporting Intrinsic Evidence1
`
`
`KeyMe, LLC v. Hillman Grp., Inc., No. CV
`19-1539-LPS, 2021 WL 243252, at *7 (D.
`Del. Jan. 25, 2021) (“At the hearing, Hillman
`also agreed that “corresponds to” is
`synonymous with “is associated with”).
`
`‘102 Patent, 3:4-14;
`‘102 Patent, 17:62 to 18:3.
`
`
`
`“cursor display code”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`
`
`“computer code for modifying the
`display of the cursor image”
`
`
`
``102 Patent, Abstract;
``102 Patent, Figure 5;
``102 Patent, 8:52-57.
`
`
`
`1 All references to the Asserted Patents are related to the ‘102 Patent unless otherwise noted.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 12 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-2 Filed 05/16/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1205
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic Evidence1
`
`
`“cursor display instruction”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53; `241 Patent, Claim
`35.
`
`
`“cursor image” and “initial cursor
`image”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53; `241 Patent, Claim
`35.
`
`
`
`“cursor image data”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`
`
`“an instruction operable to modify the
`display, in conjunction with other
`information, of a cursor image”
`
`
`
``102 Patent, Abstract;
``102 Patent, Fig. 4;
``102 Patent, 8:52-62;
``102 Patent, 10:23-41.
`
`
`
`“the appearance of the cursor on a
`user’s screen before the cursor image is
`modified into the specific image”
`
`(Plaintiff contends that the terms
`“cursor image” and “initial cursor
`image” should be construed together
`and to mean the same thing.)
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`
`
`Lexos Media IP, LLC v. APMEX, Inc., No.
`216CV00747JRGRSP, 2017 WL 1021366,
`at *2–4 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2017).
`
``102 Patent, Abstract.
`‘102 Patent, 3: 4-15.
``102 Patent, 7:5-15.
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 13 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-2 Filed 05/16/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1206
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic Evidence1
`
`
`“changing (change) or replacing
`(replace) the form, shape or appearance
`of a cursor image”
`
`
`
``102 Patent, Abstract;
``102 Patent, Figs. 7-9;
``102 Patent, 4:4-12;
``102 Patent, 3:51-57;
``102 Patent, 9:15-20;
``102 Patent, 9:10:37-41;
``102 Patent, 11:34-37;
``102 Patent, 11:49-61.
`
`
`“modifying [an initial cursor image]”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claim 53.
`
`“transforming [said initial cursor
`image]”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claim 53.
`
`“modify [said cursor image]”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`“modifying [a cursor image]”
`
`See `449 Patent, Claims 1 and 35;
``241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 14 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-2 Filed 05/16/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1207
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`Supporting Intrinsic Evidence1
`
`
`SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 2:13-
`CV-0937-JRG, 2015 WL 1906016, at *13
`(E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2015).
`
``102 Patent, Figure 2.
`
`
`Lexos Media IP, LLC v. APMEX, Inc., No.
`216CV00747JRGRSP, 2017 WL 1021366,
`at *2 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2017).
`
``102 Patent, Abstract.
``102 Patent, 2:58-62;
``102 Patent, 3:4-10;
``102 Patent, 3:48-50;
``102 Patent, 3:62 to 4:3;
``102 Patent, 7:7-9.
`
`
``102 Patent, 9:39-65
``102 Patent, 16:14-20.
`
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Plaintiff’s Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`
`“one or more pieces of computer
`equipment and the software running on
`the equipment used to provide services
`for one or more other computers or
`computing devices”
`
`
` a
`
` “modified cursor image,” and not the
`“cursor image” or the “initial cursor
`image”
`
`
`
`
`“server” (computer or system)
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53; ‘241 Patent, Claim
`35.
`
`
`“specific image”
`
`See `102 Patent, Claim 72; `449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`
`
`“tracks a movement”
`
`See `241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`
`
`“moves according to a movement”
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 15 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1208
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`“corresponding to” as used in the phrase
`“cursor image data corresponding to a/said
`specific image”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, 53.
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at 2:63-3:3.
`
`’102 patent at 3:57-4:12.
`
`’102 patent at 4:46-49.
`
`’102 patent at 6:54-61.
`
`’102 patent at 8:57-59.
`
`’102 patent File History, Dec. 14,
`1998 Response to Office Action at 5,
`7.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 1
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 16 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 1209
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`“cursor display code”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at Fig. 5.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at 8:52-67.
`
`’102 patent at 9:1-30.
`
`’102 patent File History, Apr. 8,
`1999 Response to Office Action at 2-
`4, 7, 10.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 2
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 17 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 1210
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`“cursor display instruction”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53; ’241 Patent, Claim
`35.
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`construction required.
`
`
` No
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at Fig. 4.
`
`’102 patent at 4:31-40.
`
`’102 patent at 8:59-67.
`
`’102 patent at 9:1-30.
`
`’102 patent at 11:18-30.
`
`’102 patent File History, Apr. 8,
`1999 Response to Office Action at 2-
`4, 7, 10.
`’241 patent File History, Apr. 1,
`2010 Response to Office Action at
`22-25.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 3
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 18 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 1211
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`“cursor image”
`
`’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 27, 53; ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`“a movable image on a display screen
`whose position is controlled through a
`user interface and that indicates the
`location that will be affected by input
`from the user interface”
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at 3:26-4:3.
`
`’102 patent at 7:5-15.
`
`’102 patent at 7:49-55.
`
`’102 patent at 8:28-37.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`Extrinsic evidence:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IBM Dictionary of computing
`(1994) at p. 159.
`IEEE Dictionary of Standard
`Electrical Terms (1996) at 244.
` Webster’s New World Dictionary
`of Computer Terms (1994) at 140.
` Encyclopedia Macintosh (1990) - at
`723.
` Business Dictionary of Computers,
`(1993) at p. 79.
` A Dictionary of Computing, 4th
`Edition, (1997) at pp. 114-15.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 4
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 19 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 1212
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`“cursor image data”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`
`
`“data identifying the appearance of the
`modified cursor image”
`
`
`
`“initial cursor image” and “said
`initial cursor image”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claim 53.
`
`
`
`“cursor image” should be construed as
`set forth separately.
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning for “initial
`cursor image” and “said initial cursor
`image.” No construction needed
`beyond the construction of “cursor
`image.”
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at 7:7-9.
`
`’102 patent at 8:18-23.
`
`’102 patent at 8:43-67.
`
`’102 patent at 9:1-20.
`
`’102 patent at Fig. 3.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Fig. 7.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at 3:51-4:3.
`
`’102 patent at 13:38-41.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 5
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 20 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 1213
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at 2:44-47.
`
`’102 patent at 2:58-62.
`
`’102 patent at 2:63-3:3.
`
`’102 patent at 3:51-4:3.
`
`’102 patent at 11:18-30.
`
`’102 patent at 13:38-41.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`
`“modifying [an initial cursor image]”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claim 53.
`
`“transforming [said initial cursor
`image]”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claim 53.
`
`“modify [said cursor image]”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`“modifying [a cursor image]”
`
`See ’449 Patent, Claims 1 and 35;
`’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 6
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 21 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 1214
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`“server” (computer or system)
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53; ’241 Patent, Claim
`35.
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Figs. 1 and 2.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at 4:4-24.
`
`’102 patent at 5:38-41.
`
`’102 patent at 7:1-7.
`
`’102 patent at 8:4-8.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 7
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 22 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 1215
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`“specific image”
`
`See ’102 Patent, Claim 72; ’449 Patent,
`Claims 1, 38, and 53.
`
`
`
`“modified cursor image, which is
`static and representative of at least a
`portion of the subject or topic being
`displayed on the screen”
`
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at Abstract.
`
`’102 patent at 2:40-43.
`
`’102 patent at 2:58-62.
`
`’102 patent at 6:35-46.
`
`’102 patent at 8:54-61.
`
`’102 patent at 11:53-55.
`
`’102 patent at claim 57.
`
`’449 patent at claims 18, 44, 65-66,
`84-85.
`’102 patent File History, Dec. 14,
`1998 Response to Office Action at
`35-37.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 8
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 23 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00169-JRG Document 89-3 Filed 05/16/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 1216
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`Disputed Claim Term/ Phrase/ Clause
`for Claim Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Claim Construction
`
`Supporting Intrinsic and Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`
`“tracks a movement”
`
`See ’241 Patent, Claim 35.
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning. No
`construction required.
`
`
`
`
`
`Intrinsic evidence:
`
`
` Claims containing the limitation.
`
`’102 patent at 9:60-62.
`
`’102 patent at 16:14-20.
`
`’102 patent at Fig. 4, lines 221-223.
`
`’241 patent File History, Feb. 18,
`2011 Examiner’s Amendment at 2-5.
` Corresponding portions of the other
`specifications.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-3(a)(2) CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`IDENTIFYING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 9
`
`Ebay Exhibit 1008, Page 24 of 24
`Ebay, Inc. v. Lexos Media IP, LLC
`IPR2024-00336
`
`