throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELA WARE
`
`TQ DELTA, LLC,
`
`V.
`
`2WIRE, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. I 3-cv-1835-RGA
`
`Jury Verdict
`
`Nokia of America Corporation
`IPR2022-00665, Ex. 1023
`
`CommScope, Inc.
`IPR2023-00066, Ex. 1023
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`I.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,836,381 (THE '381 PATENT)
`
`I.
`
`Has TQ Delta proven by a preponderance of the evidence that 2Wire infringed
`co1Tected claim 5 of the '381 patent by making, selling, and/or offering to sell its
`product model nos. 503 I NV, 5168NV, 5168N, and 5268AC
`(BCM6368/BCM63 l 68 chipsets)?
`
`Answer this question by checking either "Yes" or "No."
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`
`Yes ✓
`
`No
`
`II.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,844,882 (THE '882 PATENT)
`
`2.
`
`Has TQ Delta proven by a preponderance of the evidence that 2Wire infringed
`corrected claim 13 of the '882 patent by making, selling, and/or offering to sell its
`product model nos. 5031NV, 5168NV, 5168N, and 5268AC
`(BCM6368/BCM63 l 68 chipsets)?
`
`Answer this question by checking either "Yes" or "No."
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Yes J
`
`No
`
`3.
`
`Has TQ Delta proven by a preponderance of the evidence that 2Wire infringed
`corrected claim 13 of the '882 patent by making, selling, and/or offering to sell its
`product model nos. i3812V and 3801 HGV (BCM6091 chipset)?
`
`Answer this question by checking either "Yes" or "No.'' ·
`
`Checking ·'Yes" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`
`Yes ✓
`
`No
`
`2
`
`CommScope, Inc.
`IPR2023-00066, Ex. 1023
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

`III.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,276,048 (THE '048 PATENT)
`
`4.
`
`Has TQ Delta proven by a preponderance of the evidence that 2Wire infringed
`claim 1 of the '048 patent by making, selling, and/or offering to sell its product
`model nos. 503 I NV, 5 l 68NV, 5 I 68N, and 5268AC (BCM6368/BCM63168
`chipsets)?
`
`Answer this question by checking either "Yes" or "No."
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Yes ✓
`
`No
`
`5.
`
`Has TQ Delta proven by a preponderance of the evidence that 2Wire infringed
`claim I of the '048 patent by making, selling, and/or offering to sell its product
`model nos. i3812V and 3801HGV (BCM6091 chipset)?
`
`Answer this question by checking either "Yes" or "No."
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`
`Yes ✓
`
`No
`
`IV. OBVIOUSNESS
`
`6.
`
`Has 2Wire proven by clear and convincing evidence that claim 5 of the '381
`patent is invalid as obvious in view of:
`
`a.
`
`The disclosure of LB-031 as understood by a person of ordinary skill in
`the art?
`
`Checking "Yes'' below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`No ✓
`
`Yes . .
`
`~
`
`3
`
`CommScope, Inc.
`IPR2023-00066, Ex. 1023
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

`b.
`
`The disclosure of LB-03 I in combination with the disclosure of Mazzoni?
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`No ✓
`
`Yes
`
`7.
`
`Has 2Wire proven by clear and convincing evidence that claim 13 of the '882
`patent is invalid as obvious in view of:
`
`a.
`
`The disclosure ofLB-031 as understood by a person of ordinary skill in
`the art?
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`
`Yes
`
`No /
`
`b.
`
`The disclosure ofLB-031 in combination with the disclosure of Mazzoni?
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`/
`
`8.
`
`Has 2Wire proven by clear and convincing evidence that claim 1 of the '048
`patent is invalid as obvious in view of?
`
`a.
`
`T~e disclosure of LB-031 as understood by a person of ordinary skill in
`the art?
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`
`Yes
`
`No _L_
`
`4
`
`CommScope, Inc.
`IPR2023-00066, Ex. 1023
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`

`b.
`
`The disclosure ofLB-031 in combination with the disclosure of Mazzoni?
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`
`Yes
`
`No __L_
`
`V.
`
`VALIDITY OF THE CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION
`
`9.
`
`Has 2Wire proven by clear and convincing evidence that the e1Tor in claim 5 of
`the '381 patent was not clearly evident to a person of ordinary skill in the art, or
`that the correction of that error would not have been clearly evident to a person of
`ordinary skill in the art?
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`
`Yes
`
`No ✓
`
`I 0. Has 2Wire proven by clear and convincing evidence that the error in claim 13 of
`the '882 patent was not clearly evident to a person of ordinary skill in the art, or
`that the c01Tection of that error would not have been clearly evident to a person of
`ordinary skill in the art?
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates a finding for 2Wire.
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for TQ Delta.
`
`Yes
`
`No _L_
`
`5
`
`CommScope, Inc.
`IPR2023-00066, Ex. 1023
`Page 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket