`571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper 32
`
`
`Entered: April 3, 2023
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ASSA ABLOY AB, ASSA ABLOY INC., ASSA ABLOY
`RESIDENTIAL GROUP, INC., AUGUST HOME, INC., HID GLOBAL
`CORPORATION, and ASSA ABLOY GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before SCOTT A. DANIELS, BARRY L. GROSSMAN, and
`AMBER L. HAGY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting the Joint Request for a Revised Scheduling Order
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 A copy of this Order will be entered in each case. The parties are not
`authorized to use this combined caption.
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`
`
`This is in response to the March 30, 2023, email from counsel for
`
`Petitioner concerning a Joint Notice of Stipulation to Adjust and Consolidate
`
`Schedules of Related Proceedings, filed in each of IPR2022-01006; 01045;
`
`and 01089. See, e.g., Paper 29 in IPR2022-01006; see also Ex. 3008 in
`
`IPR2022-01006 (copy of March 30, 2023 email). The Board appreciates
`
`each party’s cooperation and efforts to coordinate the schedules in the three
`
`related IPR proceedings.
`
`As stated in the Scheduling Orders in these cases,
`
`The parties may stipulate different dates for DUE DATES
`1, 5, and 6, as well as the portion of DUE DATE 2 related to
`Petitioner’s reply (earlier or later, but no later than DUE DATE
`3 for Patent Owner’s sur-reply) and the portion of DUE DATE 3
`related to Patent Owner’s sur-reply (earlier or later, but no later
`than DUE DATE 7). The parties may not stipulate to a different
`date for the portion of DUE DATE 2 related to Petitioner’s
`opposition to a motion to amend, or for the portion of DUE
`DATE 3 related to Patent Owner’s reply to an opposition to a
`motion to amend (or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)
`without prior authorization from the Board.
`
`See, e.g., IPR2022-01006, Paper 24 at 8–9.
`
`The proposed revised schedule appears to comply with all
`
`requirements for the Schedule changes the parties are authorized to make
`
`without Board approval. Nonetheless, by way of this Order, and to avoid
`
`any confusion, the Board approves the revised coordinated schedule for
`
`IPR2022-01006; 01045; and 01089, as proposed in exemplary Paper 29 in
`
`IPR2022-01006.
`
`
`
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Dion Bregman
`Andrew Devkar
`James Kritsas
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`dion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`andrew.devkar@morganlewis.com
`james.kritsas@morganlewis.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Andrew Ryan
`CANTOR COLBURN LLP
`ryan@cantorcolburn.com
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
