`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`__________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., APPLE INC., AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-01004
`Patent 9,614,943
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`Proceeding No. IPR2022-01004
`Attorney Docket No. 39843-0128IP1
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s Scheduling Order (Paper
`
`14), Petitioner submits this Request for Oral Argument on all of the instituted
`
`unpatentability grounds regarding U.S. Patent No. 9,614,943. Petitioner requests
`
`one hour per party of oral argument time. At the oral argument, Petitioner requests
`
`(without waiving consideration of any issue not listed below) to address the
`
`following issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 1 and 5-9 are unpatentable over Byrne (EP 0 660 626 A2)
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §103;
`
`2. Whether claims 3-4 are unpatentable over Byrne and WO748 (PCT
`
`Publication No. WO 98/27748) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §103;
`
`3. Whether claim 12 is unpatentable over Byrne, Johnston (US Patent No.
`
`5,784,032), and Pillekamp (US Patent No. 5,594,737) pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. §103;
`
`4. Whether claims 13-14 are unpatentable over Byrne, Johnston, Pillekamp,
`
`and Billstrom (US Patent No. 5,590,133) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §103;
`
`5. Whether claims 1-2 and 5-9 are unpatentable over Raleigh (US Patent No.
`
`6,144,711) and Byrne pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §103;
`
`6. Whether claims 3-4 are unpatentable over Raleigh, Byrne, and WO748
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §103;
`
`1
`
`
`
`Proceeding No. IPR2022-01004
`Attorney Docket No. 39843-0128IP1
`7. Whether claims 12, 15, and 18-20 are unpatentable over Raleigh, Byrne,
`
`and Pillekamp pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §103;
`
`8. Whether claims 13-14 are unpatentable over Raleigh, Byrne, Pillekamp,
`
`and Billstrom pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §103;
`
`9. Whether claims 16-17 are unpatentable over Raleigh, Byrne, Pillekamp,
`
`and WO748 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §103;
`
`10. Any claim construction issues;
`
`11. Any procedural and/or evidentiary issues;
`
`12. Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`13. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`If the hearing is held in person, Petitioner requests the ability to use audio
`
`visual equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector
`
`and screen that connects to a laptop computer.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 26, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeremy J. Monaldo/
`Jeremy J. Monaldo, Reg. No. 58,680
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Proceeding No. IPR2022-01004
`Attorney Docket No. 39843-0128IP1
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(1) and 42.6(e)(4)(iii), the undersigned
`
`certifies that on July 26, 2023, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s
`
`Request for Oral Argument was provided by email to the Patent Owner by serving
`
`the email correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`Rex Hwang
`Todd Martin
`Steven J. Udick
`SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`633 West 5th Street, Suite 5800
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Philip J. Graves
`Greer N. Shaw
`GRAVES & SHAW LLP
`355 S. Grand Ave., Suite 2450
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`
`Email: rhwang@skiermontderby.com
`tmartin@skiermontderby.com
`sudick@skiermontderby.com
`pgraves@gravesshaw.com
`gshaw@gravesshaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Diana Bradley/
`
`Diana Bradley
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(858) 678-5667
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
