throbber
3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`Network Working Group
`Request for Comments: 790
`
`Obsoletes RFCs: 776, 770, 762, 758,
`755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349
`Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93
`
`J. Postel
`ISI
`September 1981
`
`ASSIGNED NUMBERS
`
`This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the currently
`assigned values from several series of numbers used in network protocol
`implementations. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any case
`current information can be obtained from Jon Postel. The assignment of
`numbers is also handled by Jon.
`If you are developing a protocol or
`application that will require the use of a link, socket, port, protocol,
`or network number please contact Jon to receive a number assignment.
`
`Jon Postel
`USC - Information Sciences Institute
`4676 Admiralty Way
`Marina del Rey, California 90291
`
`phone: (213) 822-1511
`
`ARPANET mail: POSTEL@ISIF
`
`Most of the protocols mentioned here are documented in the RFC series of
`notes. The more prominent and more generally used are documented in the
`Protocol Handbook [17] prepared by the Network Information Center {NIC).
`Some of the items listed are undocumented.
`In all cases the name and
`mailbox of the responsible individual is indicated.
`In the lists that
`follow, a bracketed entry, e.g., [17,iii], at the right hand margin of
`the page indicates a reference for the listed protocol, where the number
`cites the document and the "iii" cites the person.
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`1/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 1 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`Postel
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`[Page 1]
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`2/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 2 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Network Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`ASSIGNED NETWORK NUMBERS
`
`This list of network numbers is used in the internet address [33].
`The Internet Protocol {IP) uses a 32 bit address and divides that
`address into a network part and a "rest" or local address part. The
`division takes 3 forms or classes.
`
`The first type, or class a, of address has a 7-bit network number
`and a 24-bit local address. This allows 128 class a networks.
`
`3
`2
`1
`0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
`+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
`I 0 I
`NETWORK
`Local Address
`+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
`
`Class A Address
`
`The second type, or class b, of address has a 14-bit network
`number and a 16-bit local address. This allows 16,384 class b
`networks.
`
`3
`2
`1
`0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
`+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
`I 1 0 I
`NETWORK
`Local Address
`+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
`
`Class B Address
`
`The third type, or class c, of address has a 21-bit network number
`and a 8-bit local address. This allows 2,097,152 class c
`networks.
`
`3
`2
`1
`0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
`+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
`I Local Address I
`11 1 01
`NETWORK
`+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
`
`Class C Address
`
`One notation for internet host addresses commonly used divides the
`32-bit address into four 8-bit fields and specifies the value of each
`field as a decimal number with the fields separated by periods. For
`example, the internet address of ISIF is 010.020.000.052.
`
`This notation will be used in the listing of assigned network
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 2]
`
`3/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 3 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Network Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`numbers. The class a networks will have nnn.rrr.rrr.rrr, the class b
`networks will have nnn.nnn.rrr.rrr, and the class c networks will
`have nnn.nnn.nnn.rrr, where nnn represents part or all of a network
`number and rrr represents part or all of a local address or rest
`field.
`
`Assigned Network Numbers
`
`Class A Networks
`
`BBN-PR
`SF-PR-1
`BBN-RCC
`SATNET
`SILL-PR
`SF-PR-2
`CHAOS
`CLARKNET
`BRAGG-PR
`ARPANET
`UCLNET
`CYCLADES
`
`Internet Address Name
`----------------
`000.rrr.rrr.rrr
`001.rrr.rrr.rrr
`002.rrr.rrr.rrr
`003.rrr.rrr.rrr
`004.rrr.rrr.rrr
`005.rrr.rrr.rrr
`006.rrr.rrr.rrr
`007.rrr.rrr.rrr
`008.rrr.rrr.rrr
`009.rrr.rrr.rrr
`010.rrr.rrr.rrr
`011.rrr.rrr.rrr
`012.rrr.rrr.rrr
`013.rrr.rrr.rrr
`TELENET
`014.rrr.rrr.rrr
`EPSS
`015.rrr.rrr.rrr
`DATAPAC
`016.rrr.rrr.rrr
`TRANSPAC
`017.rrr.rrr.rrr
`LCSNET
`018.rrr.rrr.rrr
`TYMNET
`019.rrr.rrr.rrr
`020.rrr.rrr.rrr DC-PR
`021.rrr.rrr.rrr
`EDN
`022.rrr.rrr.rrr DIALNET
`023.rrr.rrr.rrr MITRE
`024.rrr.rrr.rrr
`BBN-LOCAL
`025.rrr.rrr.rrr
`RSRE-PPSN
`026.rrr.rrr.rrr AUTODIN-II
`027.rrr.rrr.rrr
`NOSC-LCCN
`028.rrr.rrr.rrr WIDEBAND
`029.rrr.rrr.rrr
`DCN-COMSAT
`030.rrr.rrr.rrr
`DCN-UCL
`031.rrr.rrr.rrr
`BBN-SAT-TEST
`032.rrr.rrr.rrr UCL-CRl
`033.rrr.rrr.rrr UCL-CR2
`034.rrr.rrr.rrr MATNET
`035.rrr.rrr.rrr
`NULL
`
`Network
`
`References
`
`[ J BP]
`Reserved
`[DCA2]
`BBN Packet Radio Network
`[JEM]
`SF Packet Radio Network (1)
`[SGC]
`BBN RCC Network
`[DMll]
`Atlantic Satellite Network
`Ft. Sill Packet Radio Network[JEM]
`SF Packet Radio Network (2)
`[JEM]
`MIT CHAOS Network
`[MOON]
`SATNET subnet for Clarksburg[DMll]
`Ft. Bragg Packet Radio Net
`[JEM]
`ARPANET
`[17,1,VGC]
`University College London
`[PK]
`CYCLADES
`[VGC]
`Unassigned
`[ J BP]
`TELE NET
`[VGC]
`British Post Office EPSS
`[PK]
`DATAPAC
`[VGC]
`TRANSPAC
`[VGC]
`MIT LCS Network
`[43,10,DDC2]
`TYMNET
`[VGC]
`D.C. Packet Radio Network
`[VGC]
`DCEC EDN
`[ECS]
`DIALNET
`[26,16,MRC]
`MITRE Cablenet
`[44,APS]
`BBN Local Network
`[SGC]
`RSRE / PPSN
`[BD2]
`AUTODIN II
`[ECS]
`NOSC / LCCN
`[KTP]
`Wide Band Satellite Network [CJW2]
`COMSAT Dist. Comp. Network
`[DLMl]
`UCL Dist. Comp. Network
`[PK]
`BBN SATNET Test Network
`[DMll]
`UCL Cambridge Ring 1
`[PK]
`UCL Cambridge Ring 2
`[PK]
`Mobile Access Terminal Net
`[DMll]
`UCL/RSRE Null Network
`[BD2]
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 3]
`
`4/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 4 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Network Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`Stanford University Ethernet
`036.rrr.rrr.rrr
`SU-NET
`Digital Equipment Network
`DECNET
`037.rrr.rrr.rrr
`Test Digital Equipment Net
`038.rrr.rrr.rrr DECNET-TEST
`SRI Local Network
`039.rrr.rrr.rrr
`SRINET
`CISL Multics Network
`040.rrr.rrr.rrr CISLNET
`BBN Local Network Testbed
`041.rrr.rrr.rrr
`BBN-LN-TEST
`LLL-Sl-NET
`042.rrr.rrr.rrr
`SlNET
`COMSAT INTELPOST
`043.rrr.rrr.rrr
`INTEL POST
`Amature Radio Experiment
`044.rrr.rrr.rrr
`AMPRNET
`044.rrr.rrr.rrr-126.rrr.rrr.rrr Unassigned
`127.rrr.rrr.rrr
`Reserved
`
`[MRC]
`[DRL]
`[DRL]
`[GEOF]
`[CH2]
`[KTP]
`[EAK]
`[DLMl]
`Net
`[HM]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`
`Class B Networks
`
`Internet Address Name
`
`Network
`
`References
`
`128.000.rrr.rrr
`Reserved
`128.001.rrr.rrr-128.254.rrr.rrr Unassigned
`191.255.rrr.rrr
`Reserved
`
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`
`Class C Networks
`
`Internet Address Name
`
`Network
`
`References
`
`192.000.001.rrr
`Reserved
`192.000.001.rrr-223.255.254.rrr Unassigned
`223.255.255.rrr
`Reserved
`
`Other Reserved Internet Addresses
`
`Internet Address Name
`
`Network
`
`224.000.000.000-255.255.255.255 Reserved
`
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`
`References
`
`[JBP]
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 4]
`
`5/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 5 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Internet Version Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`ASSIGNED INTERNET VERSION NUMBERS
`
`In the Internet Protocol {IP) [33] there is a field to identify the
`version of the internetwork general protocol. This field is 4 bits
`in size.
`
`Assigned Internet Version Numbers
`
`Decimal Octal
`-------
`0
`1-3
`4
`5
`6-14
`15
`
`0
`1-3
`4
`5
`6-16
`17
`
`Version
`-------
`Reserved
`Unassigned
`Internet Protocol
`ST Datagram Mode
`Unassigned
`Reserved
`
`References
`----------
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[33,JBP]
`[20,JWF]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 5]
`
`6/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 6 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Internet Protocol Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`ASSIGNED INTERNET PROTOCOL NUMBERS
`
`In the Internet Protocol {IP) [33] there is a field, called Protocol,
`to identify the the next level protocol. This is an 8 bit field.
`
`Assigned Internet Protocol Numbers
`
`Octal
`
`Decimal
`-------
`0
`0
`1
`1
`2
`2
`3
`3
`4
`4
`5
`5
`6
`6
`7
`7
`10
`8
`11
`9
`12
`10
`11
`13
`14
`12
`15
`13
`16
`14
`17
`15
`20
`16
`21
`17
`22
`18
`23
`19
`24
`20
`21-62
`25-76
`77
`63
`100
`64
`101
`65
`66-68 102-104
`69
`105
`70
`106
`107
`71
`72-75 110-113
`76
`114
`77
`115
`78
`116
`79
`117
`80-254 120-376
`255
`377
`
`Protocol Numbers
`----------------
`Reserved
`ICMP
`Unassigned
`Gateway-to-Gateway
`CMCC Gateway Monitoring Message
`ST
`TCP
`UCL
`Unassigned
`Secure
`BBN RCC Monitoring
`NVP
`PUP
`Pluribus
`Telenet
`XNET
`Chaos
`User Datagram
`Multiplexing
`DCN
`TAC Monitoring
`Unassigned
`any local network
`SATNET and Backroom EXPAK
`MIT Subnet Support
`Unassigned
`SATNET Monitoring
`Unassigned
`Internet Packet Core Utility
`Unassigned
`Backroom SATNET Monitoring
`Unassigned
`WIDEBAND Monitoring
`WIDEBAND EXPAK
`Unassigned
`Reserved
`
`References
`----------
`[JBP]
`[53,JBP]
`[JBP]
`[48,49,VMS]
`[18,19,DFP]
`[20,JWF]
`[34,JBP]
`[PK]
`[JBP]
`[VGC]
`[VMS]
`[12,DC]
`[4,EAT3]
`[RDB2]
`[RDB2]
`[25,JFH2]
`[MOON]
`[42,JBP]
`[13,JBP]
`[DLMl]
`[55,RH6]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[DMll]
`[NC3]
`[JBP]
`[DMll]
`[JBP]
`[DMll]
`[JBP]
`[DMll]
`[JBP]
`[DMll]
`[DMll]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 6]
`
`7/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 7 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Port or Socket Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`ASSIGNED PORT or SOCKET NUMBERS
`
`Ports are used in the TCP [34] and sockets are used in the AHHP
`[28,17] to name the ends of logical connections which carry long term
`conversations. For the purpose of providing services to unknown
`callers a service contact socket is defined. This list specifies the
`port or socket used by the server process as its contact socket.
`In
`the AHHP an Initial Connection Procedure ICP [39,17] is used between
`the user process and the server process to make the initial contact
`and establish the long term connections leaving the contact socket
`free to handle other callers.
`In the TCP no ICP is necessary since a
`port may engage in many simultaneous connections.
`
`To the extent possible these same port assignments are used with UDP
`[42].
`
`The assigned ports/sockets use a small part of the possible
`port/socket numbers. The assigned ports/sockets have all except the
`low order eight bits cleared to zero. The low order eight bits are
`specified here.
`
`Socket Assignments:
`
`General Assignments:
`
`Decimal Octal
`-------
`0-63
`64-131
`132-223
`224-255
`
`0-77
`100-203
`204-337
`340-377
`
`Description
`-----------
`Network Wide Standard Function
`Hosts Specific Functions
`Reserved for Future Use
`Any Experimental Function
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 7]
`
`8/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 8 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Port or Socket Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`Specific Assignments:
`
`Network Standard Functions
`
`Decimal Octal
`
`Description
`
`References
`
`1
`3
`5
`7
`9
`11
`13
`15
`17
`19
`21
`23
`25
`27
`29
`31
`33
`35
`37
`39
`41
`42
`43
`45
`47
`49
`51
`53
`55
`57
`59
`61-63
`
`1
`3
`5
`7
`11
`13
`15
`17
`21
`23
`25
`27
`31
`33
`35
`37
`41
`43
`45
`47
`51
`52
`53
`55
`57
`61
`63
`65
`67
`71
`73
`75-77
`
`or TTYTST
`
`Old Telnet
`Old File Transfer
`Remote Job Entry
`Echo
`Discard
`Who is on or SYSTAT
`Date and Time
`Who is up or NETSTAT
`Short Text Message
`Character generator
`New File Transfer
`New Telnet
`SMTP
`NSW User System w/COMPASS FE
`MSG-3 ICP
`MSG-3 Authentication
`Unassigned
`IO Station Spooler
`Time Server
`Unassigned
`Graphics
`Name Server
`Whois
`Message Processing Module
`NI FTP
`RAND Network Graphics Conference
`Message Generator Control
`AUTODIN II FTP
`ISI Graphics Language
`MTP
`New MIT Host Status
`Unassigned
`
`[40,JBP]
`[27,11,24,JBP]
`[6,17,JBP]
`[35,JBP]
`[32,JBP]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[31,JBP]
`[36,JBP]
`[41,JBP]
`[54,JBP]
`[14,RHT]
`[29,RHT]
`[29,RHT]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[22,JBP]
`[JBP]
`[46,17,JBP]
`[38,JBP]
`[JAKE]
`[37,JBP]
`[50,CJB]
`[30,MO2]
`[52,DFP]
`[21,EC5]
`[3,RB6]
`[45,JBP]
`[SWG]
`[JBP]
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 8]
`
`9/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 9 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Port or Socket Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`Host Specific Functions
`
`Decimal Octal
`-------
`65
`67
`69
`69
`71
`73
`75
`77
`79
`81
`83
`85
`87
`89
`91
`93
`95
`97
`99
`101
`103
`105
`107
`109
`111
`113
`115-129
`131
`
`101
`103
`105
`105
`107
`111
`113
`115
`117
`121
`123
`125
`127
`131
`133
`135
`137
`141
`143
`145
`147
`151
`153
`155
`157
`161
`163-201
`203
`
`Description
`-----------
`Unassigned
`Datacomputer at CCA
`Unassigned
`Trivial File Transfer
`NETRJS {EBCDIC) at UCLA-CCN
`NETRJS (ASCII-68) at UCLA-CCN
`NETRJS (ASCII-63) at UCLA-CCN
`any private RJE server
`Name or Finger
`Unassigned
`MIT ML Device
`MIT ML Device
`any terminal link
`SU/MIT Telnet Gateway
`MIT Dover Spooler
`BBN RCC Accounting
`SUPDUP
`Datacomputer Status
`CADC - NIFTP via UCL
`NPL - NIFTP via UCL
`BNPL - NIFTP via UCL
`CAMBRIDGE - NIFTP via UCL
`HARWELL - NIFTP via UCL
`SWURCC - NIFTP via UCL
`ESSEX - NIFTP via UCL
`RUTHERFORD - NIFTP via UCL
`Unassigned
`Datacomputer
`
`Reserved for Future
`
`Use
`
`Decimal Octal
`-------
`132-223
`
`204-337
`
`Description
`-----------
`Reserved
`
`References
`----------
`[JBP]
`[ 8, JZS]
`[JBP]
`[47,KRS]
`[5,17,RTB]
`[5,17,RTB]
`[5,17,RTB]
`[JBP]
`[23,17,KLH]
`[JBP]
`[MOON]
`[MOON]
`[JBP]
`[MRC]
`[EBM]
`[DT]
`[15,MRC]
`[ 8, JZS]
`[PLH]
`[PLH]
`[PLH]
`[PLH]
`[PLH]
`[PLH]
`[PLH]
`[PLH]
`[JBP]
`[ 8, JZS]
`
`References
`----------
`[JBP]
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 9]
`
`10/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 10 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Port or Socket Numbers
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`Experimental Functions
`
`Decimal
`-------
`224-239
`241
`243
`245
`247
`249-255
`
`Octal
`
`Description
`-----------
`340-357 Unassigned
`361
`NCP Measurement
`Survey Measurement
`363
`LINK
`365
`367
`TIPSRV
`RSEXEC
`371-377
`
`ASSIGNED LINK NUMBERS
`
`References
`
`[JBP]
`[9,JBP]
`[ 2,AV]
`[7,RDB2]
`[RHT]
`[51,RHT]
`
`The word "link" here refers to a field in the original ARPANET
`Host/IMP interface leader. The link was originally defined as an 8
`bit field. Some time after the ARPANET Host-to-Host (AHHP) protocol
`was defined and, by now, some time ago the definition of this field
`was changed to "Message-ID" and the length to 12 bits. The name link
`now refers to the high order 8 bits of this 12 bit message-id field.
`The low order 4 bits of the message-id field are to be zero unless
`specifically specified otherwise for the particular protocol used on
`that link. The Host/IMP interface is defined in BBN report 1822 [1].
`
`Link Assignments:
`
`Decimal Octal
`-------
`0
`1
`2-71
`72-150
`151
`152
`153
`154
`155
`156-158
`159-191
`192-195
`196-255
`224-255
`248-255
`
`Description
`-----------
`AHHP Control Messages
`0
`Reserved
`1
`AHHP Regular Messages
`2-107
`110-226 Reserved
`227
`CHAOS Protocol
`230
`PARC Universal Protocol
`231
`TIP Status Reporting
`232
`TIP Accounting
`233
`Internet Protocol (regular)
`234-236
`Internet Protocol (experimental)
`237-277 Measurements
`300-303 Unassigned
`Experimental Protocols
`304-377
`NVP
`340-377
`370-377 Network Maintenance
`
`References
`----------
`[ 28, 17, JBP]
`[JBP]
`[ 28, 17, JBP]
`[JBP]
`[MOON]
`[4,EAT3]
`[JGH]
`[JGH]
`[33,JBP]
`[33,JBP]
`[9,VGC]
`[JBP]
`[JBP]
`[12,17,DC]
`[JGH]
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 10]
`
`11/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 11 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Documents
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`DOCUMENTS
`
`[1]
`
`[2]
`
`[3]
`
`[4]
`
`[5]
`
`[6]
`
`[7]
`
`[8]
`
`[9]
`
`[10]
`
`[11]
`
`[12]
`
`BBN, "Specifications for the Interconnection of a Host and an
`IMP", Report 1822, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge,
`Massachusetts, May 1978.
`
`Bhushan, A., "A Report on the Survey Project", RFC 530,
`NIC 17375, 22 June 1973.
`
`Bisbey, R., D. Hollingworth, and B. Britt, "Graphics Language
`(version 2.1)", ISI/TM-80-18, USC/Information Sciences
`Institute, July 1980.
`
`Boggs, D., J. Shoch, E. Taft, and R. Metcalfe, "PUP: An
`Internetwork Architecture", XEROX Palo Alto Research Center,
`CSL-79-10, July 1979; also in IEEE Transactions on
`Communication, Volume COM-28, Number 4, April 1980.
`
`Braden, R., "NETRJS Protocol", RFC 740, NIC 42423,
`22 November 1977. Also in [17].
`
`Bressler, B., "Remote Job Entry Protocol", RFC 407, NIC
`12112, 16 October 72. Also in [17].
`
`Bressler, R., "Inter-Entity Communication -- An Experiment",
`RFC 441, NIC 13773, 19 January 1973.
`
`CCA, "Datacomputer Version 5/4 User Manual", Computer
`Corporation of America, August 1979.
`
`Cerf, V., "NCP Statistics", RFC 388, NIC 11360,
`23 August 1972.
`
`Clark, D., "Revision of DSP Specification", Local Network Note
`9, Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT, 17 June 1977.
`
`Clements, R., "FTPSRV -- Extensions for Tenex Paged Files",
`RFC 683, NIC 32251, 3 April 1975. Also in [17].
`
`Cohen, D., "Specifications for the Network Voice Protocol
`(NVP)", NSC Note 68, 29 January 1976. Also as USC/Information
`Sciences Institute RR-75-39, March 1976, and as RFC 741,
`NIC 42444, 22 November 1977. Also in [17].
`
`[13]
`
`Cohen, D. and J. Postel, "Multiplexing Protocol", IEN 90,
`USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1979.
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 11]
`
`12/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 12 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Documents
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`[14]
`
`[15]
`
`[16]
`
`[17]
`
`[18]
`
`[19]
`
`[20]
`
`[21]
`
`[22]
`
`[23]
`
`[24]
`
`[25]
`
`[26]
`
`[27]
`
`COMPASS, "Semi-Annual Technical Report", CADD-7603-0411,
`Massachusetts Computer Associates, 4 March 1976. Also as,
`"National Software Works, Status Report No. 1",
`RADC-TR-76-276, Volume 1, September 1976. And COMPASS. "Second
`Semi-Annual Report", CADD-7608-1611, Massachusetts Computer
`Associates, 16 August 1976.
`
`Crispin, M., "SUPDUP Protocol", RFC 734, NIC 41953,
`7 October 1977. Also in [17].
`
`Crispin, M. and I. Zabala, "DIALNET Protocols", Stanford
`University Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, July 1978.
`
`Feinler, E. and J. Postel, eds., "ARPANET Protocol Handbook",
`NIC 7104, for the Defense Communications Agency by SRI
`International, Menlo Park, California, Revised January 1978.
`
`Flood Page, D., "Gateway Monitoring Protocol", IEN 131,
`February 1980.
`
`Flood Page, D., "CMCC Performance Measurement Message
`Formats", IEN 157, September 1980.
`
`Forgie, J., "ST - A Proposed Internet Stream Protocol",
`IEN 119, M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory, September 1979.
`
`Forsdick, H., and A. McKenzie, "FTP Functional Specification",
`Bolt Beranek and Newman, Report 4051, August 1979.
`
`Harrenstien, K., J. Postel, "Time Server", IEN 142,
`April 1980. Also in [17].
`
`Harrenstien, K., "Name/Finger", RFC 742, NIC 42758,
`30 December 1977. Also in [17].
`
`Harvey, B., "One More Try on the FTP", RFC 691, NIC 32700,
`6 June 1975.
`
`Haverty, J., "XNET Formats for Internet Protocol Version 4",
`IEN 158, October 1980.
`
`McCarthy, J. and L. Earnest, "DIALNET", Stanford University
`Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Undated.
`
`McKenzie, A., "File Transfer Protocol", RFC 454, NIC 14333,
`16 February 1973.
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 12]
`
`13/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 13 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Documents
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`[28] McKenzie,A., "Host/Host Protocol for the ARPA Network",
`NIC 8246, January 1972. Also in [17].
`
`[29]
`
`NSW Protocol Committee, "MSG: The Interprocess Communication
`Facility for the National Software Works", CADD-7612-2411,
`Massachusetts Computer Associates, BBN 3237, Bolt Beranek and
`Newman, Revised 24 December 1976.
`
`[30] O'Brien, M., "A Network Graphical Conferencing System", RAND
`Corporation, N-1250-ARPA, August 1979.
`
`[31]
`
`[32]
`
`[33]
`
`[34]
`
`Postel, J., "Character Generator Process", RFC 429, NIC 13281,
`12 December 1972.
`
`Postel, J., "Discard Process", RFC 348, NIC 10427,
`30 May 1972.
`
`Postel, J., ed., "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program
`Protocol Specification", RFC 791, USC/Information Sciences
`Institute, September 1981.
`
`Postel, J., ed., "Transmission Control Protocol - DARPA
`Internet Program Protocol Specification", RFC 793,
`USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
`
`[35]
`
`Postel, J., "Echo Process", RFC 347, NIC 10426, 30 May 1972.
`
`[36]
`
`[37]
`
`[38]
`
`[39]
`
`[40]
`
`[41]
`
`[42]
`
`Postel, J., "File Transfer Protocol", RFC 765, IEN 149,
`June 1980.
`
`Postel, J., "Internet Message Protocol", RFC 759, IEN 113,
`USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1980.
`
`Postel, J., "Name Server", IEN 116, USC/Information Sciences
`Institute, August 1979.
`
`Postel, J., "Official Initial Connection Protocol", NIC 7101,
`11 June 1971. Also in [17].
`
`Postel, J., "Telnet Protocol", RFC 318, NIC 9348,
`3 April 1972.
`
`Postel, J., "Telnet Protocol Specification", RFC 764, IEN 148,
`June 1980.
`
`Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", RFC 768 USC/Information
`Sciences Institute, August 1980.
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 13]
`
`14/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 14 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`Documents
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`[43]
`
`[44]
`
`[45]
`
`[46]
`
`[47]
`
`[48]
`
`[49]
`
`[50]
`
`[51]
`
`[52]
`
`[53]
`
`[54]
`
`[55]
`
`Reed, D., "Protocols for the LCS Network", Local Network Note
`3, Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT, 29 November 1976.
`
`Skelton, A., S. Holmgren, and D. Wood, "The MITRE Cablenet
`Project", IEN 96, April 1979.
`
`Sluizer, S., and J. Postel, "Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 780,
`USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1981.
`
`Sproull, R., and E. Thomas. "A Networks Graphics Protocol",
`NIC 24308, 16 August 1974. Also in [17].
`
`Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (revision 2)", RFC 783,
`MIT/LCS, June 1981.
`
`Strazisar, V., "Gateway Routing: An Implementation
`Specification", IEN 30, Bolt Berenak and Newman, April 1979.
`
`Strazisar, V., "How to Build a Gateway", IEN 109, Bolt Berenak
`and Newman, August 1979.
`
`The High Level Protocol Group, "A Network Independent File
`Transfer Protocol",
`INWG Protocol Note 86, December 1977.
`
`Thomas, R., "A Resource Sharing Executive for the ARPANET",
`AFIPS Conference Proceedings, 42:155-163, NCC, 1973.
`
`Flood Page, D., "A Simple Message Generator", IEN 172, Bolt
`Berenak and Newman, March 1981.
`
`Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol - DARPA
`Internet Program Protocol Specification", RFC 792,
`USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
`
`Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 788,
`USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.
`
`Littauer, B., "A Host Monitoring Protocol"", IEN 197, Bolt
`Berenak and Newman, September 1981.
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 14]
`
`15/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 15 of 16
`
`

`

`3/26/22, 6:02 PM
`
`RFC 790
`
`People
`
`RFC 790 - Assigned numbers
`
`September 1981
`Assigned Numbers
`
`PEOPLE
`
`BBN
`UCL
`ISI
`UCLA
`BBN
`DCEC
`ARPA
`MIT
`BBN
`MIT
`ISI
`Stanford
`RSRE
`SRI
`BBN
`LL
`MIT
`SRI
`MIT
`BBN
`BBN
`UCL
`BBN
`Honeywell
`LLL
`UCL
`DEC
`
`Don Allen
`Chris Bennett
`Richard Bisbey
`Bob Braden
`Robert Bressler
`Ed Cain
`Vint Cerf
`J. Noel Chiappa
`Steve Chipman
`David Clark
`Danny Cohen
`Mark Crispin
`Brian Davies
`Jake Feinler
`David Flood Page
`Jim Forgie
`Stu Galley
`Geoff Goodfellow
`Ken Harrenstien
`Jack Haverty
`Jim Herman
`Peter Higginson
`Robert Hinden
`Charles Hornig
`Earl Killian
`Peter Kirstein
`David Lyons
`Hank Magnuski
`SRI
`Jim Mathis
`BBN
`Dale McNeill
`COMSAT
`David Mills
`MIT
`David Moon
`MIT
`Eliot Moss
`RAND
`Michael O'Brien
`BBN
`Ken Pogran
`ISI
`Jon Postel
`CCA
`Joanne Sattely
`MITRE
`Anita Skelton
`MIT
`Karen Sollins
`Virginia Strazisar BBN
`Ed Taft
`XEROX
`Dan Tappan
`BBN
`Robert Thomas
`BBN
`Al Vezza
`MIT
`Cliff Weinstein
`LL
`
`Allen@BBND
`UKSAT@ISIE
`Bisbey@ISIB
`Braden@ISIA
`Bressler@BBNE
`cain@EDN-Unix
`Cerf@ISIA
`JNC@MIT-XX
`Chipman@BBNA
`Clark@MIT-Multics
`Cohen@ISIB
`Admin.MRC@SU-SCORE
`T45@ISIE
`Feinler@SRI-KL
`DFloodPage@BBNE
`Forgie@BBNC
`SWG@MIT-DMS
`Geoff@DARCOM-KA
`KLH@MIT-AI
`JHaverty@BBN-Unix
`Herman@BBNE
`UKSAT@ISIE
`Hinden@BBNE
`Hornig@MIT-Multics
`EAK@MIT-MC
`Kirstein@ISIA
`Lyons@DEC-2136
`
`Mathis@SRI-KL
`DMcNeill@BBNE
`Mills@ISIE
`Moon@MIT-MC
`EBM@MIT-XX
`OBrien@RAND-Unix
`Pogran@BBND
`Postel@ISIF
`JZS@CCA
`skel ton@MITRE
`Sollins@MIT-XX
`Strazisar@BBNA
`Taft.PA@PARC
`Tappan@BBNG
`Thomas@BBNA
`AV@MIT-XX
`cjw@LL-11
`
`[DCA2]
`[CJB]
`[RB6]
`[RTB]
`[RDB2]
`[ECS]
`[VGC]
`[NC3]
`[SGC]
`[DDC2]
`[DC]
`[MRC]
`[BD2]
`[JAKE]
`[DFP]
`[JWF]
`[SWG]
`[GEOF]
`[KLH]
`[JFH2]
`[JGH]
`[PLH]
`[RH6]
`[CH2]
`[EAK]
`[PK]
`[DRL]
`[HM]
`[JEM]
`[DMll]
`[DLMl]
`[MOON]
`[EBM]
`[MO2]
`[KTP]
`[JBP]
`[JZS]
`[APS]
`[KRS]
`[VMS]
`[EAT3]
`[DT]
`[RHT]
`[AV]
`[CJW2]
`
`Postel
`
`https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htrnl/rfc790
`
`[Page 15]
`
`16/16
`
`I PR2022-00833
`CommScope, Inc. Exhibit 1009
`Page 16 of 16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket