throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I 1111111111111111 11111 111111111111111 1111111111 1111111111 111111111111111111
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US009509440B2
`
`(IO) Patent No.:
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`c12) United States Patent
`
`(45)Date of Patent:
`
`Hammarwall et al.
`Nov. 29, 2016
`
`(54)METHOD A ND RADIO NODE FOR
`ENABLING USE OF HIGH ORDER
`MODULATION IN A RADIO
`
`COMMUNICATION WITH A USER
`EQUIPMENT
`
`(56)
`
`
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`
`
`2015/0358111 Al* 12/2015 Marinier ............... H04L 1/0003
`
`370/329
`
`(71) Applicant: Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson
`
`
`
`
`(publ), Stockholm (SE)
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`CN
`
`
`
`(72) Inventors: David Hammarwall, Vallentuna (SE);
`WO
`WO
`Meng Wang, Solna (SE)
`
`102624481 A 8/2012
`
`
`
`2013123961 Al 8/2013
`
`
`2014109915 Al 7/2014
`
`
`(73) Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
`
`
`
`(publ), Stockholm (SE)
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Panasonic, "Discussion on 256QAM for Downlink in Small Cell
`
`
`
`
`Deployments", 3GPP TSG-RAN WGl Meeting 72bis, Apr. 15,
`( *) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`
`
`
`2013, pp. 1-6, Rl-131328, Chicago, US.
`
`
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 56 days.
`(Continued)
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 14/390,904
`
`(22)PCT Filed:Jun.26, 2014
`
`
`
`(86) PCT No.: PCT/SE2014/050803
`
`Primary Examiner - Diane Lo
`
`
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm - Coats & Bennett,
`P.L.L.C.
`
`§ 371 (c)(l),
`(2) Date: Oct. 6, 2014
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`
`
`(87) PCT Pub. No.: WO2015/020587
`
`PCT Pub. Date: Feb. 12, 2015
`
`(65)
`
`
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`
`
`US 2015/0381310 Al Dec. 31, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`
`
`9, 2013.
`
`(51)Int. Cl.
`H04L 1100
`
`(2006.01)
`(2009.01)
`
`A method and radio node (500) for enabling higher-order
`
`
`
`
`modulation in a radio communication with a first UE (502).
`
`
`
`A first table configuration comprises at least one of a first
`
`
`Modulation and Coding Scheme, MCS, table and a first
`
`
`Channel Quality Indicator, CQI, table which tables support
`
`
`
`a certain maximum modulation order. When the radio node
`
`
`
`
`(500)detects that a modulation order higher than the maxi­
`
`
`
`mum modulation order of the first table configuration is
`
`
`
`potentially possible to use in the radio communication, the
`(60) Provisional application No. 61/863,935, filed on Aug.
`
`
`
`radio node (500) instructs the first UE (502) to apply a
`
`
`
`second table configuration which comprises at least one of
`a second MCS table and a second CQI table which second
`
`
`
`tables support the higher modulation order. At least one
`
`
`entry for at least one modulation order in the tables of the
`
`
`first table configuration is maintained in the tables of the
`H04W 72108
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`
`
`second table configuration as a fall-back in case it is desir­
`CPC ........... H04L 110005 (2013.01); H04L 110003
`
`
`
`
`
`
`able to use the at least one modulation order of the first table
`
`(2013.01); H04L 110009 (2013.01);
`
`configu ration when the second table configuration is
`
`
`
`
`applied. Thereby, a higher data rate can be achieved in the
`radio communication.
`
`(Continued)
`
`( 58)Field of Classification Search
`None
`
`
`
`
`
`
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`
`
`28 Claims, 7 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`IO:ilndn ModulaU, · •• ilndo�
`IMCS
`Q m
`lrns
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 1
`
`

`

`US 9,509,440 B2
`Page 2
`
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`CPC ........... H04LI/00II (2013.01); H04L I/0016
`(2013.01); H04L I/0025 (2013.01); H04L
`I/0026 (2013.01); H04W 72/082 (2013.01)
`References Cited
`
`(56)
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Huawei, et al., “Standard Impacts to Support Higher Order Modu
`lation”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting 73, May 20, 2013, pp. 1-2,
`R1-131853, Fukuoka, JP.
`
`HTC, “On Small Cell Enhancement for improved Spectral Effi
`ciency”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #72, Jan. 28, 2013, pp. 1-4,
`R1-130311, St. Julians, Malta.
`Intel Corporation, “CQI/MCS/TBS Tables for 256QAM and Rel
`evant Signaling”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #76, Feb. 10,
`2014, pp. 1-8, R1-14.0118, Prague, Czech Republic.
`3rd Generation Partnership Project, “LTE: Evolved Universal Ter
`restrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical layer procedures (3GPP
`TS 36.213 version 11.2.0 Release 11), Technical Specification,
`ETSI TS 136 213 V1.1.2.0, Apr. 1, 2013, pp. 1-175, ETSI, France.
`* cited by examiner
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 29, 2016
`
`Sheet 1 of 7
`
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`100
`
`MCS
`
`CQI
`
`O 2
`
`MCS
`
`coin O.
`
`UE 1
`
`Fig. 1 (Prior art)
`
`
`
`|
`
`|
`
`||
`
`||
`
`||
`
`||
`
`MCS Index Modulation Order TBS Index
`MCS
`Qm
`TBs
`0
`2
`0
`1
`2
`1
`2
`2
`2
`3
`2
`3
`4
`2
`4
`5
`2
`5
`6
`2
`6
`7
`2
`7
`8
`2
`8
`9
`2
`9
`10
`4
`9
`11
`4
`10
`12
`4
`11
`13
`4
`12
`14
`4
`13
`15
`4
`14
`16
`4
`15
`17
`6
`15
`18
`6
`16
`19
`6
`17
`20
`6
`18
`21
`6
`19
`22
`6
`20
`23
`6
`21
`24
`6
`22
`25
`6
`23
`26
`6
`24
`27
`6
`25
`28
`6
`26
`29
`2
`30
`4
`reserved
`31
`6
`
`Fig. 2
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 29, 2016
`
`Sheet 2 of 7
`
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`
`
`a
`
`6
`8
`9
`
`QPSK
`16QAM
`16QAM
`
`12
`
`64QAM |
`
`area
`
`602
`490
`616
`
`666
`
`| 1.1758
`19141
`2.4063
`
`3.9023
`
`Fig. 3
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 29, 2016
`
`Sheet 3 of 7
`
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`400
`
`Detecting that higher modulation order
`is possible to use for first UE
`
`Instruct first UE to apply second table configuration
`Supporting higher modulation order
`
`Fig. 4
`
`402
`
`
`
`Communication
`Circuit
`
`MCS
`
`502
`
`Fig. 5
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 5
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 29, 2016
`
`Sheet 4 of 7
`
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`600
`
`Receive instruction to apply second table
`configuration Supporting higher modulation order
`
`602
`
`Apply Second table configuration
`in radio communication
`
`Fig. 6
`
`
`
`Communication
`Circuit
`
`702
`
`Instruction
`
`MCS
`
`CQI
`
`Processor
`
`700a.
`
`700b
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 6
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 29, 2016
`
`Sheet S of 7
`
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`MCS Index Modulation Order TBS Index
`MCs
`Qm
`TBS
`
`i
`t
`t
`H H H
`
`
`
`|
`
`||
`5
`e
`||
`7-1
`8-2
`||
`9-3
`404 |
`145 ||
`426
`43-7
`||
`448 I
`459
`46- 10
`||
`47 11 ||
`48- 12
`||
`49 13
`||
`2014 ||
`24, 15
`22 16
`||
`23-17
`|
`24–18
`25- 19
`||
`26-20
`||
`27-21
`||
`28-22
`||
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`29
`30
`31
`
`||
`||
`||
`
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`8
`8
`8
`8
`8
`8
`2
`4
`6
`
`|
`|
`|
`|
`
`||
`||
`||
`||
`||
`||
`
`5
`5.
`e
`7
`8
`9
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`New index
`New index
`|| New index
`|| New index
`|| New index
`New index
`reserved
`
`||
`||
`||
`||
`|
`||
`||
`||
`||
`||
`||
`
`Fig. 8
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 7
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 29, 2016
`
`Sheet 6 of 7
`
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`
`
`CQl index
`
`Code rate x 1024 officiency
`
`QPSK
`QPSK
`QPSK
`QPSK
`
`4
`5
`
`428
`
`64QAM
`
`78
`420
`193
`308
`449
`
`67
`666
`
`0.2344
`0.3770
`0-6046
`0.870
`
`14766
`
`3.9023
`4.5234
`5.1 152
`5.5547
`
`Fig. 9
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 8
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Nov. 29, 2016
`
`Sheet 7 Of 7
`
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`2984 || 3112
`. . . . . 2984
`. .
`. . .
`400s 400s 400s
`
`12960 13536
`15264 15264
`
`13536
`
`15264
`
`
`
`TBS
`o
`
`16 || 2 | so I 88
`24
`sé
`ss
`144
`32
`72
`44
`476
`40
`104
`176
`20s
`
`76
`
`256
`
`H 328
`392 H
`680 HCH
`
`136
`
`144
`
`296
`
`328
`
`456
`
`504
`
`616
`
`...
`
`208 I 440 | 680
`224
`488
`744
`280
`600
`904
`336
`696
`1064
`
`904 . . .
`1000
`1224
`1416
`
`17568
`
`992 16992
`1908O
`22 152 22 152
`
`: O 8 O
`24496 E. 2 7 3 7 6
`
`22 152
`
`24496 25.456
`28336 28336
`30576 31704 31704
`32856 340O8 34008
`
`3516O 3560 3560
`
`3 9 2 3 2
`3 9 2 3 2
`42368 4386 4386
`
`440
`488
`520
`552
`584
`
`904
`1000
`1064
`1128
`1192
`
`1384
`1480
`1608
`1736
`1800
`
`46888 46888 46888
`51024 5 1024 5 1024
`...
`1864
`55056 55056 55056
`1992 . . . .
`2152 . . . . . . 59256 59256 59256
`2280 . . . . . . 61664 61664 63776
`2408 . . . . . . 66592 66592 66592
`
`2
`22
`
`NV
`NV
`
`NV
`NV
`
`NV
`NV
`
`NV
`NV
`
`. . . . NV
`...
`. . . . . NV
`
`NV
`NV
`
`NV
`NV
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 9
`
`

`

`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`1.
`METHOD AND RADIO NODE FOR
`ENABLING USE OF HIGH ORDER
`MODULATION IN A RADIO
`COMMUNICATION WITH A USER
`EQUIPMENT
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`
`The present disclosure relates generally to a radio node of
`a cellular network, a User Equipment, UE and methods
`therein, for enabling use of a high order modulation when
`communicating radio signals.
`
`10
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`15
`
`In this field, the term “User Equipment, UE is commonly
`used and will be used in this disclosure to represent any
`wireless terminal or device capable of radio communication
`with a cellular network including receiving downlink signals
`transmitted from a serving radio node and sending uplink
`signals to the radio node. For example, the term User
`Equipment, UE could be exchanged by the term "wireless
`device'. Further, the term “radio node', also commonly
`referred to as a base station, e-nodeB, eNB, etc., represents
`any node of a cellular network that can communicate uplink
`and downlink radio signals with UEs. The radio nodes
`described here may, without limitation, include so-called
`macro nodes and low power nodes such as micro, pico,
`femto, Wifi and relay nodes, to mention some customary
`examples. Throughout this disclosure, the term “eNB' is
`often used but can be exchanged by the term radio node.
`Link adaptation in systems according to Long Term
`Evolution, LTE, is based on adaptive modulation and cod
`ing, which controls data rate by adaptively adjusting the
`modulation scheme and/or channel coding rate according to
`the radio-link conditions. In this procedure, the Modulation
`and Coding Scheme, MCS, adopted for Physical Downlink
`Shared Channel, PDSCH, transmission must be indicated in
`downlink MCS signaling by the serving radio node to the
`UE. By uplink signaling, the UE informs the radio node
`about corresponding radio-link, i.e. channel, conditions
`through Channel Quality Indicator, COI signaling, including
`sending CQI reports to the radio node.
`This is generally illustrated in FIG. 1 in which a radio
`node 100 of a cellular network is serving two UEs denoted
`UE1 and UE2. In this example, UE1 and UE2 both report
`quality measurements made on the channel used by sending
`CQI reports to the radio node 100 which selects a suitable
`MCS for each UE based on their CQI reporting and signals
`the selected MCS to the UEs, respectively. Link adaptation
`is made in this way for individual UEs on a dynamic basis
`since the radio-link conditions may change rapidly. The
`selection of a suitable MCS can thus be made individually
`for each UE.
`In current LTE systems, the set of available modulation
`schemes for both downlink and uplink includes Quadrature
`Phase-Shift Keying, QPSK, 16 Quadrature Amplitude
`Modulation, QAM, and 64QAM, corresponding to two, four
`and six bits carried per modulation symbol, respectively. In
`this field, the number of bits carried per modulation symbol
`is usually referred to as the modulation order, Q.
`In brief, the serving radio node selects a suitable MCS
`based on CQI reporting from the UE and signals the selected
`MCS to the UE with reference to a predefined MCS index
`table which is known to the UE. The MCS index table maps
`MCS indices to modulation order and a Transport Block
`Size, TBS, index. Further, the UE determines a COI value
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`based on signal measurements and the CQI is signaled from
`the UE to the radio node with reference to a likewise
`predefined CQI index table which maps CQI indices to
`modulation forms and code rates. In this description, the
`term “modulation form' is used for short to indicate a
`modulation format, method or scheme.
`In LTE, especially for scenarios with good channel con
`ditions where the Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio,
`SINR, is high, e.g. in small-cell environments where the UE
`is close to its serving radio node, a straightforward means to
`provide higher data rate for the UE with given transmission
`bandwidth is to use higher-order modulation that allows for
`more bits of information to be carried per modulation
`symbol, as compared to the modulation schemes mentioned
`above where the highest possible data rate is provided by
`64QAM carrying six bits per modulation symbol. However,
`it is a problem that the control signaling schemes, methods,
`formats or protocols of today do not support any modulation
`with higher order than six bits per symbol, as in 64OAM. It
`is also a problem that additional control signaling would be
`required between the UE and the serving radio node if higher
`data rate is to be achieved by using higher-order modulation.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`It is an object of embodiments described herein to address
`at least some of the problems and issues outlined above. It
`is possible to achieve this object and others by using a radio
`node, a UE and methods therein as defined in the attached
`independent claims.
`According to one aspect, a method is performed by a radio
`node of a cellular network. The radio node is operable to
`apply a first table configuration in radio communications
`with User Equipments, UEs, the first table configuration
`comprising at least one of a first Modulation and Coding
`Scheme, MCS, table and a first Channel Quality Indicator,
`CQI, table wherein the at least one of the first MCS table and
`the first CQI table support a certain maximum modulation
`order.
`In this method, the radio node detects that a higher
`modulation order which is higher than the maximum modu
`lation order of the first table configuration is potentially
`possible to use in a radio communication between the radio
`node and a first UE. The radio node then instructs the first
`UE to apply a second table configuration in the radio
`communication. The second table configuration comprises
`at least one of a second MCS table and a second CQI table
`wherein the at least one of the second MCS table and the
`second CQI table support the higher modulation order.
`Furthermore, at least one entry for at least one modulation
`order in the at least one of the first MCS table and the first
`CQI table is maintained in the at least one of the second
`MCS table and the second CQI table as a fall-back in case
`it is desirable to use the at least one modulation order in the
`at least one of the first MCS table and the first CQI table
`when the second table configuration is applied.
`According to another aspect, a radio node of a cellular
`network is operable to apply a first table configuration in
`radio communications with User Equipments, UEs, the first
`table configuration comprising at least one of a first Modu
`lation and Coding Scheme, MCS, table and a first Channel
`Quality Indicator, COI, table wherein the at least one of the
`first MCS table and the first CQI table support a certain
`maximum modulation order. The radio node comprises a
`logic unit configured to detect that a higher modulation order
`which is higher than the maximum modulation order of the
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 10
`
`

`

`
`
`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
`
`first table configuration is potentially possible to use in a
`
`
`
`
`The above methods and nodes may be configured and
`
`
`
`
`
`radio communication between the radio node and a first UE.
`
`
`
`
`
`implemented according to different optional embodiments to
`
`
`The radio node also comprises an instructing unit config­
`
`
`accomplish further features and benefits, to be described
`
`
`ured to instruct the first UE to apply a second table con­
`below.
`
`
`figuration in the radio communication, the second table 5
`
`
`configuration comprising at least one of a second MCS table
`
`
`
`
`and a second CQI table wherein the at least one of the second
`The solution will now be described in more detail by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MCS table and the second CQI table support the higher
`
`
`
`means of exemplary embodiments and with reference to the
`
`
`modulation order. At least one entry for at least one modu­
`
`
`accompanying drawings, in which:
`
`
`lation order in the at least one of the first MCS table and the 10
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 1 is a communication scenario illustrating how link
`
`
`
`first CQI table is maintained in the at least one of the second
`
`
`
`adaptation can be achieved, according to the prior art.
`
`
`
`MCS table and the second CQI table as a fall-back in case
`
`FIG. 2 is a table used for MCS sign aling from a radio node
`
`
`
`it is desirable to use the at least one modulation order in the
`
`
`to a UE, according to a first table configu ration.
`
`
`
`
`at least one of the first MCS table and the first CQI table
`
`
`FIG. 3 is a table used for CQI sign aling from a UE to a
`15
`
`when the second table configuration is applied.
`
`
`radio node, according to the first table configuration.
`
`
`
`
`According to another aspect, a method is performed by a
`
`
`
`FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a procedure in a radio
`User Equipment, UE, being operable to apply a first table
`
`
`
`
`
`node, according to some possible embodiments.
`configuration in a radio communication with a radio node of
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an example of how
`
`
`
`
`a cellular network. The first table configuration comprises at
`
`
`20 a radio node may be configu red and operate, according to
`
`
`
`
`least one of a first Modulation and Coding Scheme, MCS,
`
`further possible embodiments.
`
`
`table and a first Channel Quality Indicator, CQI, table
`FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a procedure in a UE,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the at least one of the first MCS table and the first
`
`
`according to some possible embodiments.
`
`
`
`
`CQI table support a certain maximum modulation order. In
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an example of how
`
`
`
`this method, the UE receives an instruction from the radio
`
`
`
`25 a UE may be configured and operate, according to further
`
`
`
`in the radio node to apply a second table configu ration
`
`possible embodiments.
`
`
`communication, the second table configuration comprising
`
`
`FIG. 8 is an example of a modified table used for MCS
`
`at least one of a second MCS table and a second CQI table
`
`
`
`signaling from a radio node to a UE, according to according
`
`
`wherein the at least one of the second MCS table and the
`to a second table configuration.
`
`
`
`
`second CQI table support a higher modulation order which 30
`
`
`FIG. 9 is an example of a modified table used for CQI
`is higher than the maximum modulation order of the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`signaling from a UE to a radio node, according to the second
`
`second table applies the table configu ration. The UE further
`
`
`table configuration.
`configuration in the radio communication with the radio
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 10 is an example of a modified table used for
`node.
`
`
`
`mapping a Transport Block Size, TBS, index to a data rate,
`
`According to another aspect, a User Equipment, UE, is
`
`
`
`
`
`35 according to further possible embodiments.
`in a radio operable to apply a first table configu ration
`
`
`
`
`
`communication with a radio node of a cellular network, the
`
`
`
`first table configuration comprising at least one of a first
`Modulation and Coding Scheme, MCS, table and a first In this solution it has been recognized that the above­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`can Channel Quality Indicator, CQI, table wherein the at least 40 described control sign aling for MCS and CQI indication
`
`
`
`
`
`one of the first MCS table and the first CQI table support a be re-designed in order to adopt higher-order modulation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`certain maximum modulation order. The UE comprises a schemes in LTE systems. In particular, the MCS and CQI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`such can be modified used for such signaling an index tables communication unit which is configu red to receive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`instruction from the radio node to apply a second table that the current maximum modulation order can be increased
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this disclosure, configuration in the radio communication, the second table 45 without requiring any extra sign aling bits. In
`
`
`
`
`
`configuration comprising at least one of a second MCS table the term higher-order modulation may refer to modulation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and a second CQI table wherein the at least one of the second schemes that are higher than 64QAM, such as e.g. 256QAM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MCS table and the second CQI table support a higher allowing eight bits per symbol, or even higher modulation of
`
`
`
`modulation order which is higher than the maximum modu­512QAM, and so forth.
`is initially a first table configuration Briefly described, The UE also 50 lation order of the first table configu ration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprises a logic unit which is configured to apply the applied in radio communication between a radio node and a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprises a first MCS table second table configuration in the radio communication with UE. The first table configu ration
`the radio node.
`
`
`and/or a first CQI table which tables support a certain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`When using any of the above methods and nodes, it is maximum modulation order, e.g. 6. An example of the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`possible to achieve a higher data rate in the radio commu­55 MCS table is shown in FIG. 2 and an example of the first
`
`
`
`
`
`nication between the radio node and the UE by using the CQI table is shown in FIG. 3. The first MCS table and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`higher modulation order of the second table configuration, first CQI table are thus predefined and known to the UE, for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e.g. when the radio or channel conditions are favorable,example the tables currently used in LTE for signaling
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`instead of being limited to the maximum modulation orderbetween radio nodes and UEs for enabling link adaptation as
`
`of the first table configu ration.
`
`
`
`
`60 described above although other MCS and CQI tables are
`
`
`
`
`A computer program is also provided
`
`
`also possible comprising instruc­ to use in the first table configuration. In these
`
`tions which, when executed
`
`
`examples on at least one processor, cause it can be seen that the maximum modulation order
`
`
`
`
`the at least one processor
`
`
`
`supported to carry out either of the above by the first MCS table and the first CQI table is
`
`methods. A carrier is also provided which contains the above
`
`
`
`
`
`Qm =6 which corresponds to 64QAM.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`computer program, wherein the carrier is one of an elec-65 When detecting that a higher modulation order which is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`order of the first table than the maximum modulation higher computer read­tronic signal, optical signal, radio sign al, or
`
`able storage medium.
`
`
`
`
`above possible to use in the configu ration is potentially
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 11
`
`

`

`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`10
`
`15
`
`35
`
`45
`
`5
`communication, e.g. based on COI reports from the UE, the
`radio node instructs the UE to apply a second table con
`figuration that Supports the higher modulation order. The
`second table configuration comprises a second MCS table
`and/or a second CQI table having additional entries that
`Support the higher modulation order. Examples of how Such
`tables of the second table configuration can be configured
`will be described in more detail later below. In this solution,
`at least one entry for at least one modulation order is
`maintained, i.e. kept, from the table(s) of the first table
`configuration as a fall-back in case it would become desir
`able or even necessary to use the least one modulation order
`of the first table configuration when the second table con
`figuration is applied, such as when the radio conditions get
`worse and only the least one modulation order of the first
`table configuration, e.g. the lowest modulation order, is
`possible to use for keeping the radio connection.
`It will now be described how link adaptation can be
`achieved in general according to LTE.
`For downlink data transmission in LTE, the radio node
`typically selects the MCS depending on the CQI feedback
`transmitted by the UE in the uplink, as illustrated in FIG. 1.
`The CQI feedback indicates the present channel condition
`and possible data rate, or more specifically a modulation and
`coding scheme MCS, that can be supported by the downlink
`25
`channel given the present channel condition and UE
`receiver.
`The LTE specifications are designed to provide signaling
`between the radio node and the UE. In the downlink, the
`information about the MCS adopted for PDSCH transmis
`sion is indicated by a five-bit field in the Downlink Control
`Information, DCI, transmitted from the radio node to the
`UE. This MCS field corresponds to the MCS index table
`shown in FIG. 2. In this table, there is room for 32 combi
`nations or entries, where 29 entries are used to signal an
`adopted MCS, each entry corresponding to a modulation
`order and a Transport Block Size, TBS, while 3 entries are
`reserved, e.g., to Support adaptive retransmissions. All pos
`sible TBS can be described by a TBS table mapping a TBS
`index. Its, and an allocation bandwidth into the corre
`40
`sponding transport block size (in bits).
`In the uplink, the UE reports CQI to assist the serving
`radio node to select the appropriate MCS to apply for
`downlink transmissions. Typically, the CQIs are derived
`from measurements made by the UE on downlink reference
`signals transmitted by the serving radio node. For example,
`the reported CQI may represent the highest MCS that is
`supported for a PDSCH transmission, e.g. with a transport
`block error rate probability not exceeding 10%. The CQI is
`signaled from the UE to the radio node with reference to a
`predefined CQI index table, as shown in FIG. 3. A 4-bit CQI
`value corresponds to a particular MCS out of 16 combina
`tions corresponding to COI index 0-15 in the CQI index
`table. It should be noted that the CQI table is parameterized
`in terms of coding rate, as opposed to transport block size.
`Thus, the selected and signaled CQI indicates the highest
`modulation and coding rate at which the block error rate
`measured at UE does not exceed 10%. Based on the CQI
`feedback from the UE and other information, the radio node
`is able to select a proper MCS index from the MCS table and
`notify the UE accordingly by MCS signaling.
`Current LTE systems support three modulation schemes
`for both downlink and uplink: QPSK, 16QAM and 64QAM.
`Accordingly, the MCS index table, the CQI index table and
`the corresponding fields for indication in DCI are designed
`for these three modulation schemes. However, higher-order
`modulation schemes are not supported in current LTE speci
`
`30
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`fications. In order to Support higher-order modulation, i.e.
`higher than the above schemes QPSK, 16QAM and
`64QAM, UEs must support an additional MCS/COI table
`that also includes specific entries for new modulation
`schemes. The modification of MCS/COI table may require
`re-designing the DCI format and possibly also the Uplink
`Control Information, UCI, format.
`Typically, the additional MCS/CQI tables are used in
`scenarios with high Signal-to-Noise Ratio, SNR, or SINR
`which allow for higher-order modulation to be used thanks
`to the high signal quality. In scenarios with relatively low
`SNR or SINR, on the other hand, the current MCS/CQI
`tables supporting QPSK, 16QAM and 64OAM are useful to
`achieve link robustness. Hence, a solution has been devised
`with flexibility to adopt appropriate MCS/COI tables based
`on channel conditions as follows.
`As mentioned above, current LTE systems only Support
`modulation up to 64QAM, while it may be desirable to use
`higher-order modulation, e.g. 256QAM, to increase the data
`rate when the signal quality allows. To Support higher-order
`modulation, adaptations and/or extensions to the current
`control signaling in terms of the MCS index table, the CQI
`index table and the corresponding fields in DCI/UCI are
`required. This can be solved by the embodiments described
`herein.
`In this disclosure, an alternative design of an MCS index
`table and/or of a COI index table supporting higher-order
`modulation is described which can be used for LTE systems,
`which can be supported in addition to basic MCS and CQI
`tables such as the current design of the MCS index table and
`the CQI index table shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, respec
`tively.
`In the current LTE specification, the MCS and CQI tables
`Support modulation schemes up to 64QAM, e.g. as illus
`trated in FIGS. 2 and 3. The proposed new MCS and CQI
`index tables are able to Support modulation higher than
`64QAM, without necessarily extending the number of bits in
`the DCI/UCI formats, or the number of entries in the MCS
`table and in the CQI table, respectively. In this solution, it is
`possible to select higher-order modulation schemes e.g. in
`the high-SINR scenarios or generally when a performance
`related parameter, Such as SINR, of signals communicated
`between a radio node and a UE is above a certain threshold.
`In the new MCS/COI tables, new entries for higher-order
`modulation are added and designed to provide Sufficient
`resolution to cover the high-SINR region. Meanwhile, a
`large part of the existing entries in current MCS and/or CQI
`tables may be preserved. The current MCS and/or CQI
`tables may be comprised in a first table configuration while
`the new MCS and/or CQI tables supporting a higher-order
`modulation may be comprised in a second table configura
`tion. This has the advantage that the number of new MCS/
`CQI formats a UE and a radio node has to implement may
`be minimized. In other words, the UE and the radio node
`need to support only one extra MCS table and/or CQI table
`of the second table configuration in order to enable the
`higher-order modulation.
`In a possible embodiment, at least one MCS entry, e.g. the
`lowest MCS entry with MCS index 0, in the MCS table
`and/or at least one CQI entry, e.g. the lowest COI entry for
`the lowest coding rate of the lowest modulation order with
`CQI index 1, in the CQI table is preserved or maintained
`from the basic MCS and/or CQI table, to ensure proper
`communication between the radio node and the UE under
`poor channel or radio conditions. Thus, a fallback is pro
`vided in case it is only possible or desirable to use a
`modulation order lower than the higher modulation order,
`
`IPR2022-00457
`Apple EX1001 Page 12
`
`

`

`US 9,509,440 B2
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`7
`e.g. the lowest modulation order, when the second table
`configuration is applied. This provides flexibility and robust
`ness in case of changing channel or radio conditions, and
`provides a robust format to, for example, signal control
`plane data, and/or to reconfigure the UE to assume the basic
`MCS and/or CQI table suitable for poor/normal channel or
`radio conditions. By employing embodiments described
`herein, the link adaption in LTE systems may be enhanced
`to support higher-order modulation schemes, which can
`significantly improve the spectral efficiency e.g. in high
`SINR scenarios, while maintaining robustness in case of
`worsening radio conditions.
`It should be noted that although terminology from 3GPP
`LTE is used in this disclosure to describe various exempli
`fying embodiments, this should not be seen as limiting the
`Scope of usage to only the aforementioned system. Other
`wireless systems, including WCDMA, WiMAX, and Ultra
`Mobile Broadband, UMB, may also benefit from exploiting
`embodiments described herein.
`It should also be noted that terminology Such as radio
`node should be considered non-limiting and in general
`“radio node' could be considered as device 1 and “UE'
`could be considered as device 2 and these two devices may
`communicate with each other over Some radio channel in the
`manner described herein.
`In the following, the solution will be explained in more
`detail by some exemplary embodiments. It should be noted
`that these embodiments are not mutually exclusive. Com
`ponents from one embodiment may be utilized in another
`embodiment wherever appropriate.
`The MCS index table and CQI index table used in current
`LTE specification are shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, respec
`tively. A possible design of alternative MCS and CQI index
`tables will now be described as well as the mechanism by
`which the radio node and the UE can switch between the
`proposed new MCS/CQI tables of the second table configu
`ration and the MCS/COI tables of the first table configura
`tion. It should be noted that the solution is not limited to the
`specific examples of MCS/CQI tables described herein and
`that any MCS/COI tables may be used in accordance with
`the embodiments described herein.
`An example of a procedure, performed by a radio node of
`a cellular network when the solution is employed, will now
`be described with reference to the flow chart in FIG. 4. Some
`possible but non-limiting embodiments will also be
`45
`described which may be used for the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket