throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper 10
`Date: May 17, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2022-00385
`Patent 9,843,215 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before, JAMESON LEE, KARL D. EASTHOM, and
`BRIAN J. McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00385
`Patent 9,843,215 B2
`
`
`On May 9, 2022, Patent Owner filed a Preliminary Response.
`Paper 8. Patent Owner asserts that the Petition should be discretionarily
`denied under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) by application of the factors set forth in
`Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., IPR2020-00019, Paper 11 at 5–6 (PTAB Mar. 20,
`2020) (precedential). Prelim. Resp. 41–53. Patent Owner also asserts that
`the Petition should be discretionarily denied under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), as a
`“follow on” petition, by application of the factors set forth in General
`Plastic Indus. Co. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha, IPR2016-01357, Paper 19
`at 16 (PTAB Sept. 6, 2017) (precedential as to § II.B.4.i). Id. at 32–41.
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file a Preliminary Reply,
`limited to eight pages, to address the discretionary denial arguments of
`Patent Owner under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), divided into two parts, one
`pertaining to factors under “Fintiv,” and the other pertaining to factors under
`“Genral Plastic,” due within one week of the day of entry of this Order;1 and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file a
`Preliminary Sur-Reply, limited to eight pages, also divided into two parts,
`one pertaining to “Fintiv” factors and the other pertaining to “General
`Plastic” factors, due within one week of the filing of Petitioner’s
`Preliminary Reply, which only responds to Petitioner’s Preliminary Reply
`on the issue of discretionary denial under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), not to advance
`additional arguments not included in the Preliminary Response.
`
`
`
`1 In particular, we would like Petitioner to inform the Board what
`relationship exists between any of Petitioner’s real parties in interest and
`Patent Owner.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00385
`Patent 9,843,215 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`John Kappos
`Cameron W. Westin
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`jkappos@omm.com
`cwestin@omm.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph E. Palys
`Phillip Citroën
`Paul M. Anderson
`Quadeer A. Ahmed
`Paul Hastings LLP
`PH-Google-Scramoge-IPR@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Bret Cooper
`Reza Mirzaie
`Russ, August & Kabat
`bcooper@raklaw.com
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`rak_scramoge@raklaw.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket