throbber
A Variable-dosing Regimen with Intravitreal
`Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular
`Degeneration: Year 2 of the PrONTO Study
`
`GEETA A. LALWANI, PHILIP J. ROSENFELD, ANNE E. FUNG, SANDER R. DUBOVY, STEPHEN MICHELS,
`WILLIAM FEUER, JANET L. DAVIS, HARRY W. FLYNN, JR, AND MARIA ESQUIABRO
`
`● PURPOSE: To assess the long-term efficacy of a variable-
`dosing regimen with ranibizumab in the Prospective Optical
`Coherence Tomography (OCT) Imaging of Patients with
`Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
`Treated with intraOcular Ranibizumab (PrONTO) Study,
`patients were followed for 2 years.
`● DESIGN: A 2-year prospective, uncontrolled, variable-
`dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab based on
`OCT.
`● METHODS: In this open-label, prospective, single-cen-
`ter, uncontrolled clinical study, AMD patients with
`neovascularization involving the central fovea and a
`central retinal thickness (CRT) of at least 300 ␮m as
`measured by OCT were enrolled to receive 3 consec-
`utive monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab
`(0.5 mg) [Lucentis; Genentech Inc, South San Fran-
`cisco, California, USA]. During the first year, retreat-
`ment with ranibizumab was performed at each monthly
`visit if any criterion was fulfilled such as an increase in
`OCT-CRT of at least 100 ␮m or a loss of 5 letters or
`more. During the second year, the retreatment criteria
`were amended to include retreatment if any qualitative
`increase in the amount of fluid was detected using
`OCT.
`● RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled and 37 com-
`pleted the 2-year study. At month 24, the mean visual
`acuity (VA) improved by 11.1 letters (P < .001) and the
`OCT-CRT decreased by 212 ␮m (P < .001). VA
`improved by 15 letters or more in 43% of patients. These
`VA and OCT outcomes were achieved with an average of
`9.9 injections over 24 months.
`● CONCLUSIONS: The PrONTO Study using an OCT-
`guided variable-dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibi-
`zumab resulted in VA outcomes comparable with the
`outcomes from the phase III clinical studies, but fewer
`
`See accompanying Editorial on page 1.
`Accepted for publication Jan 27, 2009.
`From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller
`School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
`Anne Fung is currently at the Pacific Eye Associates, California Pacific
`Medical Center, San Francisco, California. Stephen Michels is currently
`at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zürich,
`Zürich, Switzerland.
`Inquiries to Philip J. Rosenfeld, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Univer-
`sity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th Street, Miami, FL
`33136; e-mail: prosenfeld@med.miami.edu
`
`(Am J Ophthal-
`intravitreal injections were required.
`mol 2009;148:43–58. © 2009 by Elsevier Inc. All rights
`reserved.)
`
`I NHIBITION OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FAC-
`
`tor A (VEGF-A) is an effective and safe therapy for the
`treatment of neovascular age-related macular degener-
`ation (AMD).1– 6 Intravitreal injections of ranibizumab
`(Lucentis; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, Califor-
`nia, USA), a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal anti-
`body antigen-binding fragment that inhibits all the known
`biologically active forms of VEGF, were shown to improve
`mean visual acuity (VA) in eyes with neovascular AMD
`during the phase III clinical studies. In these studies,
`monthly ranibizumab injections over the course of 2 years
`were administered to eyes with minimally classic, occult,
`and predominantly classic neovascular lesions. On average,
`the VA letter scores improved and the outcomes were
`highly statistically significant.
`While the phase III trials used monthly injections, it is
`unclear at this time if monthly dosing is the best dosing
`interval. Observations made after the earlier phase I/II
`studies with intravitreal ranibizumab suggested a role for
`optical coherence tomography (OCT) in determining the
`appropriate dosing interval for each patient. These obser-
`vations came about at the completion of the phase I/II
`studies when subjects were enrolled in an open-label
`extension study that provided continued intravitreal injec-
`tions of ranibizumab performed at the discretion of the
`investigator (Heier JS, et al. IOVS 2005;46:ARVO E-Ab-
`stract 1393). Some subjects enrolled in the extension study
`immediately on completion of the phase I/II trials, whereas
`others were delayed in their enrollment for up to 1 year
`after the completion of the phase I/II trials. During this
`period before enrollment and throughout the extension
`study, OCT was used to monitor the resolution and
`recurrence of fluid in eyes as ranibizumab therapy was
`started and stopped (Rosenfeld PJ, unpublished data,
`2003). Patients in the extension trial usually were treated
`if there was evidence of recurrent leakage from choroidal
`neovascularization (CNV) as detected using fluorescein
`angiography (FA) or if there was recurrent fluid as detected
`using OCT imaging. This recurrence of leakage or fluid in
`the macula was observed either in the presence or absence
`
`0002-9394/09/$36.00
`doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.024
`
`© 2009 BY ELSEVIER INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
`
`43
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 1
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`TABLE 1. Major Eligibility Criteria for Enrollment into the
`PrONTO Study
`
`TABLE 2. Timing of the Qualitative Change Retreatment
`Amendment in Year 2 (n ⫽ 39) of the PrONTO Study
`
`Inclusion criteria
`Age 50 years or older
`Active primary or recurrent macular neovascularization
`secondary to AMD involving the central fovea in the study
`eye with evidence of disease progression
`OCT central retinal thickness ⱖ 300 ␮m
`Best-corrected visual acuity, using ETDRS charts, of 20/40
`to 20/400 (Snellen equivalent) in the study eye
`Exclusion criteria
`More than 3 prior treatments with verteporfin photodynamic
`therapy
`Previous participation in a clinical trial (for either eye)
`involving antiangiogenic drugs (pegaptanib, ranibizumab,
`anecortave acetate, protein kinase C inhibitors)
`Previous subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation in the study
`eye
`Laser photocoagulation (juxtafoveal or extrafoveal) in the
`study eye within 1 month preceding day 0
`Subfoveal fibrosis or atrophy in the study eye
`History of vitrectomy surgery in the study eye
`Aphakia or absence of the posterior capsule in the study
`eye
`History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in
`either eye
`
`AMD ⫽ age-related macular degeneration; ETDRS ⫽ Early
`Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; OCT⫽ optical coherence
`tomography; PrONTO ⫽ Prospective OCT Imaging of Patients with
`Neovascular AMD Treated with intraOcular Ranibizumab.
`
`of vision loss. It became apparent that the need for
`retreatment varied widely among the patients and that the
`need for retreatment was unpredictable. In addition, it was
`observed that OCT seemed to detect the earliest signs of
`reaccumulating fluid in the macula even before leakage
`could be detected reliably using FA.
`These observations from the patients in the extension
`study served as the basis for investigating whether a variable-
`dosing OCT-guided regimen with ranibizumab could result in
`fewer injections and similar clinical outcomes when com-
`pared with the phase III regimen that used monthly injec-
`tions. An investigator-sponsored, open-label, prospective
`clinical study was designed, known as the Prospective OCT
`Imaging of Patients with Neovascular AMD Treated with
`intraOcular Ranibizumab (PrONTO) Study. The 1-year re-
`sults have been published,7 and this article represents the full
`2-year results of the PrONTO Study at the Bascom Palmer
`Eye Institute.
`
`METHODS
`
`PrONTO WAS A 2-YEAR, OPEN-LABEL, PROSPECTIVE, SINGLE-
`center clinical study designed to investigate the efficacy,
`
`First Visit When Amendment Active
`
`No. of Patients
`
`Month 17
`Month 18
`Month 19
`Month 21
`Month 22
`Month 23
`Month 24
`Withdrew from study before amendment
`Completed study before amendment
`Total no. in study
`
`5
`5
`3
`4
`4
`8
`5
`1
`5
`40
`
`PrONTO ⫽ Prospective Optical Coherence Tomography Im-
`aging of Patients with Neovascular Age- Related Macular De-
`generation Treated with intraOcular Ranibizumab.
`
`durability, and safety of a variable-dosing regimen with
`intravitreal
`ranibizumab in patients with neovascular
`AMD. The PrONTO Study was an investigator-sponsored
`trial supported by Genentech Inc and performed after
`review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
`Informed consent was obtained from all patients before
`determination of full eligibility.
`The major efficacy endpoints were the change from
`baseline in VA and OCT measurements and the number of
`ranibizumab injections (0.5 mg) required over 2 years. At
`the start of the study, only 1 eye of a patient was
`determined to be eligible and was assigned as the study eye.
`The major eligibility criteria are shown in Table 1. The
`major inclusion criteria were the diagnosis of neovascular
`AMD with a baseline protocol VA letter score of 20 to 70
`letters using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy
`Study (ETDRS) chart at 2 m (Snellen equivalent of 20/40
`to 20/400)8 and an OCT central retinal thickness (CRT)
`of at least 300 ␮m. There were no exclusion criteria for
`preexisting cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or peripheral
`vascular conditions. Of note, all FA lesion types and lesion
`sizes were eligible for the study.
`Specifications for the digital fundus photography equip-
`ment and OCT equipment were described in the PrONTO
`year 1 report.7 Angiographic lesion classification, includ-
`ing the diagnosis of retinal angiomatosis proliferation
`(RAP), was independently assessed and was confirmed by
`3 study investigators as previously described.7 All 6 high-
`resolution (512 A scans per B-scan) OCT diagonal scans
`were used to evaluate whether fluid was present in the
`macula and whether retreatment was needed. For the
`purposes of this study, fluid in the macula was identified as
`intraretinal fluid (cysts) or subretinal fluid, and a fluid-free
`macula was defined by the absence of retinal cysts and
`subretinal fluid as determined by OCT. Fluid under the
`retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), otherwise known as a
`pigment epithelial detachment (PED), was recorded as an
`
`44
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`JULY 2009
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 2
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`TABLE 3. Visual Acuity of Eyes with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated with a Variable-Dosing Regimen of
`Ranibizumab through 24 Months
`
`Study Eyes
`
`Baseline VA Letters
`(Snellen Equivalent), n ⫽ 40
`
`Month 12 VA Letters
`(Snellen Equivalent), n ⫽ 40
`
`Month 24 VA Letters
`(Snellen Equivalent), n ⫽ 37
`
`Change in VA Letter Scores from
`Baseline to Month 24,a n ⫽ 37
`
`Mean (P value)b
`Median (P value)c
`
`56.2 (20/80 ⫹ 1)
`57 (20/80 ⫹ 2)
`
`65.5 (20/50; P ⬍ .001)
`68 (20/40 ⫺ 2; (P ⬍ .001)
`
`67.0 (20/50 ⫹ 1; P ⬍ .001)
`68.0 (20/40 ⫺ 2; P ⬍ .001)
`
`11.1 (P ⬍ .001)
`14.0 (P ⬍ .001)
`
`VA ⫽ visual acuity.
`aChange in letter scores compares the 37 patients who completed the study at month 24 with their baseline scores.
`bPaired Student t test.
`cPaired Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
`
`TABLE 4. Central Retinal Thickness of Eyes with Neovascular Age-Related Macular
`Degeneration Treated with a Variable-Dosing Regimen of Ranibizumab through Month 24
`
`Patient Study Eyes
`
`Baseline
`CRT (␮m), n ⫽ 40
`
`Month 12 CRT (␮m),
`n ⫽ 40
`
`Month 24 CRT (␮m),
`n ⫽ 37
`
`Change in CRT (␮m) from
`Baseline to Month 24,a n ⫽ 37
`
`Mean (P value)b
`Median (P value)c
`
`393.9
`384.5
`
`216.1 (P ⬍ .001)
`199.0 (P ⬍ .001)
`
`179.3 (P ⬍ .001)
`171 (P ⬍ 0.001)
`
`⫺211.7
`⫺209.0
`
`CRT ⫽ central retinal thickness.
`aChange in letter scores compares the 37 patients who completed the study at month 24 with their
`baseline scores.
`bPaired Student t test.
`cPaired Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
`
`OCT finding in the macula, but was not included in any of
`the retreatment criteria during the first year.
`Eligible patients underwent VA testing and ophthalmo-
`scopic examination at baseline, days 14, 30, 45, and 60, and
`then monthly thereafter. Fundus photography and OCT
`imaging were performed at baseline and on days 1, 2, 4, 7, 14,
`and 30 after the first 2 injections, and then monthly there-
`after. FA was performed at baseline, months 1, 2, and 3, and
`then every 3 months thereafter. All ophthalmic photogra-
`phers and the single OCT technician involved in the study
`were previously certified to participate in FDA-approved
`clinical trials at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute.
`Intravitreal injections of ranibizumab were administered
`to all patients at baseline, month 1, and month 2.
`Additional reinjections were given if any of the following
`changes were observed by the evaluating physician during
`the first year of the study: 1) VA loss of at least 5 letters
`with OCT evidence of fluid in the macula, 2) an increase
`in OCT CRT of at least 100 ␮m, 3) new macular
`hemorrhage, 4) new area of classic CNV, or 5) evidence of
`persistent fluid on OCT 1 month after the previous
`injection. All criteria were based on comparisons with the
`previous month’s examination or the last time a FA was
`performed. If any single criterion for reinjection was
`fulfilled, the intravitreal injection was performed using a
`standard protocol previously described.7
`
`During the second year, an amendment to the study
`changed the retreatment criteria to include any qualitative
`change in the appearance of the OCT images that sug-
`gested recurrent fluid in the macula. These qualitative
`changes included the appearance of retinal cysts or sub-
`retinal fluid or an enlargement of a PED. Any of these
`qualitative changes alone was sufficient to permit retreat-
`ment. Since this amendment was approved after comple-
`tion of the first year, the retreatment criteria were applied
`to patients at different time points in the study. Table 2
`shows when the retreatment amendment was applied to
`the patients during the study. It is important to note that
`the amendment was in addition to the initial criteria, not
`in place of them.
`At the completion of the study, an audit of drug
`shipments revealed that the vials in the first drug shipment
`received from Genentech Inc had a concentration of 6
`mg/ml, equivalent to a dose of 0.3 mg in a volume of 0.05
`ml. It was concluded that this lower dose, which was being
`used concurrently in the phase II and III clinical studies,
`mistakenly was shipped for use in the PrONTO Study. For
`this reason, the first 19 patients received some 0.3-mg
`doses rather than the per-protocol dose of 0.5 mg. The first
`7 patients received 3 monthly 0.3-mg doses, the next 7
`patients received 2 monthly 0.3-mg doses, and the next 5
`patients received one 0.3-mg dose at baseline. All subse-
`
`VOL. 148, NO. 1
`
`2-YEAR RESULTS OF THE PRONTO STUDY WITH RANIBIZUMAB
`
`45
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 3
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 1. Graph showing the mean and median change in
`visual acuity (VA) through 24 months of eyes with neovascular
`age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with a vari-
`able-dosing intravitreal ranibizumab regimen. Vertical lines are
`1 standard error (SE) of the means.
`
`FIGURE 2. Graph showing the mean and median change in
`optical coherence tomography (OCT) central retinal thickness
`(CRT) through 24 months of eyes with neovascular AMD
`treated with a variable-dosing intravitreal ranibizumab regimen.
`Vertical lines are 1 SE of the means.
`
`quent drug shipments and doses of drug were at the
`per-protocol concentration of 10 mg/ml, resulting in an
`intravitreal dose of 0.5 mg in 0.05 ml.
`in the
`The major 2-year outcome measurements
`PrONTO Study included ETDRS VA letter scores, OCT
`CRT measurements, the change in VA letter scores and
`OCT measurements from baseline, and the total number of
`injections received by a patient during 2 years. For pur-
`poses of analysis, a loss of VA was defined as a drop of at
`least 5 letters between baseline and the 24-month time
`point. For the mean VA letter scores and CRT measure-
`ments, the data were compared statistically with mean
`baseline values using the paired Student t test. Median
`measurements were compared with median baseline values
`using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The influence
`of baseline FA lesion types on the number of injections
`over 24 months was assessed using a one-way analysis of
`variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The associations
`between the number of injections and VA outcomes and
`the associations between the change in CRT and VA
`outcomes at different time points during the study were
`assessed using the Pearson correlation analysis and Spear-
`man nonparametric correlation analysis. Statistical signif-
`icance was defined as P ⬍ .05.
`
`RESULTS
`
`● STUDY COMPLIANCE: Patient demographics and en-
`rollment at baseline were described previously.7 Between
`August 23, 2004 and April 25, 2005, a total of 69 patients
`were screened for the study and 40 patients were enrolled.
`At baseline, the mean and median VA letter scores were
`56 (20/80⫹1) and 57 (20/80⫹2), respectively (Table 3).
`Baseline mean and median OCT 1-mm CRT measure-
`
`FIGURE 3. Bar graph showing the distribution of patients
`receiving a given number of ranibizumab injections through 24
`months according to the retreatment criteria used in the
`Prospective OCT Imaging of Patients with Neovascular AMD
`Treated with intraOcular Ranibizumab (PrONTO) Study.
`
`ments were 394 and 385 ␮m, respectively (Table 4). The
`characteristics of the neovascular lesions were described
`previously. Of note, the study included occult with no
`classic lesions (10 eyes; 25%), minimally classic lesions (23
`eyes; 57.5%), and predominantly classic lesions (7 eyes;
`17.5%) as characterized by FA. Overall, 10 (25%) of the
`40 lesions were categorized as RAP lesions.
`During the second year, 3 patients withdrew from the
`study. One patient developed a tear of the RPE with a
`submacular hemorrhage and experienced a VA loss of 36
`letters.3 Submacular surgery was performed for removal of
`the hemorrhage and the patient withdrew from the study.
`The second patient was unable to travel attributable to
`complications after hip surgery and withdrew at month 20.
`The third patient died of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease at
`
`46
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`JULY 2009
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 4
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 4. Case 1: A 74-year-old woman with neovascular AMD diagnosed with a minimally classic lesion in her right eye. She
`received only the first 3 required ranibizumab injections and then was followed up for 24 months. Color fundus images with early-
`and late-phase fluorescein angiographic (FA) images are shown at baseline, month 3 (1 month after the third injection), month 12,
`and month 24 without any additional injections of ranibizumab.
`
`month 18. This death was not thought to be attributable to
`ranibizumab and the death was not deemed to be a
`drug-related adverse event. Data were analyzed from pa-
`tients who completed the study (observed data set) as well
`from all the patients who were enrolled in the study by
`carrying forward their last obtained VA and OCT data
`before their withdrawal (last observation carried forward
`data set).
`
`● VISUAL ACUITY AND OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOG-
`RAPHY THROUGH 24 MONTHS: The 1-year results of the
`PrONTO Study were reported previously.7 Noteworthy
`outcomes included an improvement in VA detectable by
`
`day 14 and increases in mean and median VA scores at
`month 3 of 10.8 letters (P ⬍ .001) and 10.5 letters (P ⬍
`.001), respectively, after the first 3 monthly injections of
`ranibizumab. At month 12, the improvements in mean and
`median VA scores compared with baseline were 9.3 letters
`(P ⬍ .001) and 11 letters (P ⬍ .001), respectively (Table
`3; Figure 1).
`At month 24, the observed final mean and median VA
`scores for the remaining 37 patients compared with baseline
`improved by 11.1 letters (standard deviation [SD], 12.2;
`standard error, 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0 to 15.2;
`P ⬍ .001) and 14 letters (P ⬍ .001), respectively. Sixteen
`eyes (43%) gained at least 3 lines of vision (95% CI, 60% to
`
`VOL. 148, NO. 1
`
`2-YEAR RESULTS OF THE PRONTO STUDY WITH RANIBIZUMAB
`
`47
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 5
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 5. Case 1: OCT response from baseline through month 24 in an eye with neovascular AMD and a minimally classic lesion
`given a total of 3 injections through month 2, with no additional injections through month 24. (Left column) Vertical and (Right
`column) horizontal OCT scans, CRT measurements, and VA are shown of the left eye at baseline (526 ␮m; VA, 20/80), first
`ranibizumab injection; month 3 (188 ␮m; VA, 20/50), observed; month 6 (178 ␮m; VA, 20/25), observed; month 12 (198 ␮m;
`VA, 20/20), observed; month 24 (176 ␮m; VA, 20/16), observed.
`
`27%), with 3 eyes (8.1%) gaining at least 6 lines of vision.
`Twenty-nine (78%) of the 37 eyes completing the study
`avoided any loss of letters (95% CI, 89% to 61%). All 37 eyes
`completing the study avoided a loss of 3 lines or more of VA.
`When calculating VA outcomes using the last observation
`carried forward for all 40 patients, the mean and median VA
`scores improved by 10.0 letters (P ⬍ .001) and 11.5 letters
`(P ⬍ .001), respectively, and 39 eyes (97.5%) avoided a loss
`of 3 lines or more.
`The overall improvement in VA was associated with
`a decrease in CRT. At month 24, the observed mean
`
`and median thickness measurements decreased by 212
`␮m (P ⬍ .001) and 209 ␮m (P ⬍ .001), respectively
`(Figure 2). When the last observation was carried
`forward for all 40 patients, the mean and median OCT
`thickness measurements decreased by 222 ␮m (P ⬍
`.001) and 230 ␮m (P ⬍ .001), respectively. These
`results were very similar
`regardless of whether
`the
`observed data set or the last observation carried forward
`data set were used in the final analyses.
`These outcomes were achieved with a mean and median
`number of injections over 2 years of 9.9 (SD, 5.3) and 9.0
`
`48
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`JULY 2009
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 6
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 6. Case 2: A 68-year-old woman with AMD diagnosed with a minimally classic lesion and retinal angiomatous
`proliferation in her right eye. She received 24 injections over 24 months because of recurrent and persistent fluid in the macula after
`month 3. Color fundus images with early- and late-phase FA images are shown at baseline, month 3, month 12, and month 24.
`Additional ranibizumab injections were administered monthly except at month 3.
`
`(range, 3 to 25), respectively (Figure 3). Three eyes (8.1%)
`required only the first 3 injections over 2 years (Figures 4
`and 5), whereas 2 eyes (5.4%) required 24 or 25 injections
`over 2 years (Figures 6 and 7). No patient received
`anti–VEGF therapy in the fellow eye.
`The influence of baseline VA and lesion size in disc
`areas on the number of reinjections was assessed with
`both Pearson correlation and Spearman nonparametric
`correlation analyses. No correlation was found between
`number of reinjections and baseline acuity (Pearson, r ⫽
`0.14 and P ⫽ .39; Spearman, r ⫽ ⫺0.01 and P ⫽ .97) or
`lesion size (Pearson, r ⫽ 0.05 and P ⫽ .78; Spearman, r
`⫽ 0.07 and P ⫽ .67). When comparing baseline
`
`angiographic lesion types with the mean number of
`reinjections during follow-up, we did not observe statis-
`tical significance using a one-way parametric analysis of
`variance (P ⫽ .67). The variation in injection rate for
`different lesion types was less evident during the second
`year of the study as compared with the first year. Overall,
`occult with no classic component received 10.0 injections
`(SD, 5.7), minimally classic lesions received 9.4 injections
`(SD, 4.6), and predominantly classic lesions received 11.6
`injections (SD, 7.4). RAP lesions received 11.6 (SD, 5.9)
`injections. The tendency for RAP lesions to require more
`frequents retreatments during the first year was less appar-
`ent over the 2 years.
`
`VOL. 148, NO. 1
`
`2-YEAR RESULTS OF THE PRONTO STUDY WITH RANIBIZUMAB
`
`49
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 7
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 7. Case 2: OCT response from baseline through month 24 with a total of 24 ranibizumab injections over 24 months. (Left
`column) Vertical and (Right column) horizontal OCT scans, CRT measurements, and VA of her right eye are shown at baseline
`(345 ␮m; VA, 20/63), first ranibizumab injection; month 3 (164 ␮m; VA, 20/20), observe; month 4 (306 ␮m; VA, 20/40), fourth
`ranibizumab injection; month 5 (216 ␮m; VA, 20/32), fifth ranibizumab injection; month 12 (248 ␮m; VA, 20/25), twelfth
`ranibizumab injection; and month 24 (173 ␮m; VA, 20/25), twenty-fourth ranibizumab injection.
`
`The influence of the number of reinjections on VA
`outcomes was assessed with both Pearson parametric
`correlation and Spearman nonparametric correlation
`
`analyses. Pearson and Spearman correlations between
`the change in letter scores at month 24 and the total
`number of injections were ⫺0.12 (P ⫽ .48) and ⫺0.04
`
`50
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`JULY 2009
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 8
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 8. Case 3: A 96-year-old woman with neovascular AMD diagnosed with a minimally classic lesion and retinal angiomatous
`proliferation in the right eye. She developed a tear of the retinal pigment epithelium after the first injection. She was given seven
`intravitreal ranibizumab injections over 24 months. Color fundus images with early- and late-phase FA images are shown at baseline,
`month 3 (1 month after the third injection), month 12, and month 24. Four additional ranibizumab injections were given at month
`5, month 13, month 21, and month 22.
`
`(P ⫽ .082). No statistically significant correlation was
`found between the need for more frequent injections
`and VA outcomes.
`Correlation analyses between the change in OCT-CRT
`and VA measurements were performed at different time
`points in the study to examine the predictive value of these
`OCT measurements. Once again, Pearson parametric and
`Spearman nonparametric correlations were used in these
`analyses. As previously reported, statistically significant cor-
`relations were found between the OCT-CRT measurements and
`VA at months 2, 3, and 12.7 At month 24, no correlation was
`detected using either analytic technique (Pearson, r ⫽ 0.055 and
`
`P ⫽ .74; Spearman, r ⫽ 0.08 and P ⫽ .64). Another strategy was
`to examine the association between OCT changes at month 1
`with VA changes thereafter to determine if OCT improvements
`could serve as a predictor of future VA improvements. Statisti-
`cally significant correlations were detected when the OCT-CRT
`measurements at month 1 were correlated with the VA changes
`at month 2 (Pearson, r ⫽ 0.57 and P ⬍ .001; Spearman, r ⫽ 0.47
`and P ⫽ .002), month 3 (Pearson, r ⫽ 0.51 and P ⫽ .001;
`Spearman, r ⫽ 0.36 and P ⫽ .021), month 12 (Pearson, r ⫽ 0.37
`and P ⫽ .019; Spearman, r ⫽ 0.38 and P ⫽ .015), and month
`24 (Pearson, r ⫽ 0.41 and P ⫽ .011; Spearman, r ⫽ 0.36 and
`P ⫽ .031).
`
`VOL. 148, NO. 1
`
`2-YEAR RESULTS OF THE PRONTO STUDY WITH RANIBIZUMAB
`
`51
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 9
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 9. Case 3. OCT response to the first ranibizumab injection from baseline through day 14. (Left column) Vertical and
`(Right column) horizontal OCT scans and CRT measurements at baseline (382 ␮m), day 1 (400 ␮m), day 2 (321 ␮m), day 4 (295
`␮m), day 7 (585 ␮m), and day 14 (764 ␮m; VA, 20/25).
`
`● VISION LOSS: For the purposes of analysis, vision loss in
`the PrONTO Study was defined as a loss of at least 5 letters
`between baseline and month 24. Of 37 eyes with complete
`follow-up, 29 eyes (78%) avoided any loss of letters at 24
`months. Of the remaining 8 eyes, only 4 lost 5 letters or
`
`more. Of the 3 eyes that did not complete follow-up, only
`1 had lost 5 letters or more at the last follow-up. Only the
`patient who withdrew after a submacular hemorrhage lost
`more than 3 lines of vision. Therefore, a total of 5 eyes lost
`5 letters or more at their final follow-up visit.
`
`52
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`JULY 2009
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 10
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 10. Case 3: OCT response from baseline through month 24 for a total of 7 ranibizumab injections over 24 months. (Left
`column) Vertical and (Right column) horizontal OCT scans, CRT measurements, and VA are shown at baseline (382 ␮m; VA,
`20/50), month 1 (596 ␮m; VA, 20/200), month 2 (276 ␮m; VA, 20/125), month 3 (340 ␮m; VA, 20/160), month 12 (305 ␮m;
`VA, 20/125), and month 24 (220 ␮m; VA, 20/63).
`
`Vision loss in the PrONTO Study was attributable to
`tears of the RPE (2 eyes; Figures 8 to 10), progression of
`the underlying dry AMD (2 eyes; Figures 11 and 12),
`and formation of subfoveal fibrosis (1 eye). Both of the
`
`eyes which developed RPE tears had minimally classic
`lesions characterized as RAP with an associated PED.
`One eye developed the RPE tear after the first injection.
`The evolution of the tear is depicted in Figure 9. Vision
`
`VOL. 148, NO. 1
`
`2-YEAR RESULTS OF THE PRONTO STUDY WITH RANIBIZUMAB
`
`53
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 11
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 11. Case 4: An 89-year-old woman with AMD diagnosed with an occult-only lesion in her right eye. She achieved a
`fluid-free macula after the first 3 ranibizumab injections. She received a total of 9 intravitreal injections of ranibizumab over 24
`months. She showed continued progression of geographic atrophy. Color fundus images with early- and late-phase FA images are
`shown at baseline, month 3, month 12, and month 24.
`
`remained good until the subretinal fluid disappeared.
`Over the ensuing 2 years, the vision gradually improved
`after
`intermittent
`treatment with ranibizumab. The
`second eye with a tear of the RPE experienced an
`enlargement of
`the PED before the RPE tear and
`hemorrhage developed at the end of the first year. Prior
`to the hemorrhage at month 11,
`this patient had
`responded to therapy. After
`the initial 3 monthly
`injections, there was no evidence of fluid in the macula,
`and therefore no injection was given at month 3.
`Gradually, fluid reaccumulated in the macula with
`enlargement of a PED, but no injection was given until
`month 5 because none of the original quantitative
`
`retreatment criteria were fulfilled. At month 5, the
`patient was retreated because of a more than 100-␮m
`increase in the OCT-CRT measurement and a loss of 11
`letters. At month 6, the VA improved by 8 letters with
`complete resolution of the subretinal and intraretinal
`fluid and no injection was given. Injections were given
`again at month 7 and at month 9 because of reaccumu-
`lating fluid in the macula. At month 10, no fluid was
`detected in the retina or under
`the retina,
`so no
`injection was given even though the PED did show an
`increase in height. An increase in the height or size of
`a PED was not one of the retreatment criteria during the
`first year of the study. Shortly thereafter, before the
`
`54
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`JULY 2009
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1035
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 12
`
`Joining Petitioner: Apotex
`
`

`

`FIGURE 12. Case 4: OCT response in an eye with neovascular AMD from baseline through month 24 while receiving a total of
`9 ranibizumab injections over 24 months. (Left column) Vertical and (Right column) horizontal OCT scans, CRT measurements,
`and VA are shown at baseline (348 ␮m; VA, 20/63); month 3 (187 ␮m; VA, 20/32), observe; month 12 (191 ␮m; VA, 20/40);
`and month 24 (160 ␮m; VA, 20/100).
`
`month 11 visit, a submacular hemorrhage developed,
`approximately 7 weeks after the previous injection at
`month 9. Injections were then given at month 11 and
`month 12. At month 12, the VA letter score was 31
`(20/250) compared with a letter score of 80 (20/25) at
`the month 10 visit just before the hemorrhage. The
`patient subsequently elected to undergo submacular
`surgery during month 13 and withdrew from the study.
`Overall, this patient received 8 injections of ranibi-
`zumab over 12 months.
`Of the remaining 3 eyes with vision loss, 2 eyes had
`progression of geographic atrophy with gradual vision loss.
`These 2 eyes showed enlargement of their geographic
`atrophy at rates at or below 0.7 disc areas per year or
`1.8 mm2 per year. This rate was within the normal
`expected growth rate for geographic atrophy.9 –11 The fifth
`eye with vision loss had subretinal fibrosis which developed
`by month 3 after the 3 monthly injections and remained
`stable thereafter.
`
`● SAFETY: There were no ocular or systemic adverse events
`attributable to the injection of ranibizumab. A total of 386
`injections were performed without any episodes of endoph-
`thalmitis, uveitis, retinal detachment, retinal tear, vitreous
`hemorrhage, lens damage, cataract progression, or prolonged
`intraocular pressure elevation.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket