throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARKOFFICE
`
`In re U.S. Patent Number: 7,374,758
`
`(Application No. 11/016,503)
`
`For: Modified Chimeric Polypeptides with
`Improved Pharmacokinetic Properties
`and Methodsof Using Thereof
`
`Inventors: Papadopoulos, Davis and Yancopoulos
`
`Issued: May20, 2008
`Assignee: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals,Inc.
`
`RECEIVED
`
`DEC 2.2.rNSION
`EXT
`PATOPLA
`
`Office of Patent Legal Administration (via hand delivery)
`Room MDW 7D55
`600 DulanyStreet (Madison Building)
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF PATENT TERM UNDER35 U.S.C. §156
`
`Dear Sir,
`
`Applicant, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., hereby submits this application
`for extension of the term of United States Letters Patent No. 7,374,758 (the “’758
`patent”) under35 U.S.C. §156 and 37 C.F.R §1.740.
`
`Applicant representsthatit is the assigneeofthe entire interest in and to the
`‘758 patentby virtue of assignmentofall rights of inventors Nicholas J. Papadopoulos,
`Samuel Davis and George D. Yancopoulos (Papadopoulosetai.) to Regeneron
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as recordedin the U.S. Patent and TrademarkOffice on
`December17, 2004, Reel 016103, Frame 0015 (a copyof whichis attached in
`AttachmentA).
`
`85/69/2612 CKHLOK
`@1 FC:1457
`
`@8G@8089 188658
`1128.88 DA
`
`11016583
`
`CELLTRION - EXHIBIT 1024
`CELLTRION- EXHIBIT 1024
`0001
`0001
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,et al.
`Application Under35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 2
`
`This application is based on the approval by the United States Food and Drug
`Administration (“FDA”) of a Biologics License Application (BLA No. BL 125387/0) on
`November18, 2011, for EYLEA ™ (afliberceptintravitreal injection, also known as
`aflibercept IVT, aflibercept ophthalmicinjection and aflibercept ophthalmic solution).
`
`1.
`
`Identification of the Approved Product under 37 C.F.R . §1.740 (a)(1)
`
`The nameof the approved product is EYLEA™. The nameofthe active
`ingredient of EYLEA™ is aflibercept, also knownas VEGF trap, VEGF-trap, VEGF Trap-
`Eye and VEGF-TRAPrirz. Afliberceptis a fusion protein consisting of (a) a vascular
`endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor componenthaving immunoglobulin-like
`(Ig) domainsconsisting of an Ig domain2 of a first VEGF receptor that is human Flt1
`and an Ig domain 3 of a second VEGF receptorthat is human Fik1; and (b) an Fc
`portion of human IgG1.
`
`2.
`
`Federal Statute Governing Regulatory Approvalof the Approved Product
`under37 C.F.R. §1.740(a)(2)
`
`The approved product was subject to regulatory review under,inter alia, the
`Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. , including 42 U.S.C. §262(a)) and the
`Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355 et seq.).
`
`3.
`
`Date of Approval for Commercial Marketing under37 C.F.R . §1.740 (a)(3)
`
`.
`
`EYLEA™ wasapproved for commercial marketing or use under §351 of the
`Public Health Service Act on November18, 2011.
`
`4.
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`Identification of Active Ingredient and Certifications Related to
`Commercial Marketing of Approved Product under37 C.F.R. §1.740(a)(4)
`
`Theactive ingredient of EYLEA™is aflibercept, which is a recombinant
`fusion protein consisting of a VEGF receptor componenthaving Ig domains
`consisting of an Ig domain 2 of human Fit1 and an Ig domain 3 of human
`FIk1, fused to the Fc domain of human |gG1.
`
`Applicantcertifies that aflibercept has not been approved for commercial
`marketingor use underthe Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the
`Public Health Service Act or the Virus-Serum-Toxin Actprior to the
`approval granted on November18, 2011 to the present Applicant.
`
`0002
`0002
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 3
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`Aflibercept has been approvedfor the treatmentof patients with
`neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration. See EYLEA™ product
`label, provided as AttachmentB.
`
`EYLEA™, whoseactive ingredientis aflibercept, was approvedfor
`commercial marketing pursuant to § 351 of the Public Health Service Act
`(42 U.S.C. §262) under Regeneron’s existing Departmentof Health and
`HumanServices (DHHS) U.S. License No. 1760. See EYLEA™ approvalletter,
`provided as AttachmentC.
`
`Statement Regarding Timeliness of Submission of Patent Term Extension
`Request[§ 1.740(a)(5)]
`
`Applicant certifies that this application for patent term extension is being
`submitted within the sixty (60) day period permitted for submission specified
`in 35 U.S.C. § 156(d)(1), (as amended on September16, 2011), and 37 C.F.R. §
`1.720(f). The amended provisions of the America Invents Actstate that the
`date on which a productreceives permissionis the next business dayif
`permissionis “transmitted after 4:30 P.M., Eastern Time, on a business day
`....” Permission was transmitted at 5:47 P.M., Eastern Time,on Friday,
`November18, 2011, a business day. The next business day is Monday,
`November21, 2011. Accordingly, the last date on whichthis application may
`be submitted is January 19, 2012.
`
`Complete Identification of the Patent for Which Extension Is Being Sought
`[§ 1.740(a)(6)]
`
`The complete identification of the patent for which an extensionis being
`soughtis as follows:
`
`(a) Namesofthe inventors:
`
`Nicholas J. Papadopoulos, Samuel Davis and
`George D. Yancopoulos
`
`(b) Patent Number:
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758 (the “758
`patent”)
`
`(c) Date of Issue:
`
`May20, 2008
`
`(d) Date of Expiration:
`
`January 17, 2021
`
`0003
`0003
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 4
`
`7.
`
`Copy of the Patent for Which an Extension is Being Sought[§ 1.740(a)(7)]
`
`A copy of the 758 patentis provided as AttachmentD to the present
`application.
`
`8.
`
`Copiesof Disclaimers, Certificates of Correction, Receipt of Maintenance
`Fee Payment, or ReexaminationCertificate [§ 1.740(a)(8)]
`
`The’758 patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer, a copy of whichis
`(a)
`attached in AttachmentE.
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
` Nocertificate of correction has been issued for the ’758 patent.
`
`The first maintenancefee for the ’758 patent was paid on November14,
`2011 (See AttachmentF).
`
`The’758 patent has not been the subject of a reexamination
`proceeding.
`
`9.
`
`Statement Regarding Patent Claims Relative to Approved Product
`[§ 1.740(a)(9)]
`
`The statements below are madesolely to comply with the requirements of37
`CF R. § 1.740 (a)(9). Applicant notes that, as the M.P.E.P. acknowledges, § 1.740 (a)(9)
`does not require an applicant to show whetheror howthelisted claims would be
`infringed, and that this question cannot be answered withoutspecific knowledge
`concerning acts performed by third parties. As such, these comments are not an
`assertion or an admission ofApplicant as to the scope ofthe listed claims, or whether or
`how anyofthe listed claims would be infringed, literally or under the doctrine of
`equivalents, by the manufacture,use, sale, offerfor sale or the importation ofany
`product.
`
`Atleast the following claims of the ’758 patent claim a methodof using
`(a)
`the approved product: claims 1 and 2.
`
`(b)
`
`Pursuant to M.P.E.P. § 2753 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.740(a)(9), the following
`explanation is provided which showshowtheabove-listed claimsof the
`‘758 patent claim a methodofusing the approved product.
`
`(1)_Description ofthe approved product
`
`0004
`0004
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 5
`
`The approved productis described as follows in the approved
`label for EYLEA™, a copy of which is provided as AttachmentB.
`
`EYLEA™(aflibercept ophthalmic solution) is a recombinant
`fusion protein consisting of portions of human VEGF receptors 1 and 2
`extracellular domains fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1 and
`specially purified and formulated as an iso-osmotic solution for
`intravitreal administration. Aflibercept is a dimeric glycoprotein with a
`protein molecular weight of 97 kilodaltons (kDa) andis glycosylated,
`with the glycosylation constituting an additional 15% ofthetotal
`molecular mass, resulting in a total molecular weight of 115 kDa.
`Aflibercept is produced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) K1 cells by
`recombinant DNAtechnology.
`
`EYLEA™is a sterile, clear, and colorless to pale yellow,iso-
`osmotic solution.It is supplied as a preservative-free, sterile, aqueous
`solution in a single-use,sterile, pre-filled, glass syringe or single-use,
`glass vial designed to deliver 0.05 mL (50 microliters) of EYLEA™ (40
`mg/mL) with 10 mM sodium phosphate, 40 mM sodium chloride,
`0.03% polysorbate 20, and 5% sucrose, pH 6.2.
`
`Afliberceptis also described in Holashetal. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci.
`USA, August 20, 2002, Vol. 99, No. 17, pp. 11393-11398 (“Holash,”
`Attachment G) as VEGF-Traprirz, which has the Ig domain 2 of VEGF
`receptor 1 (VEGFR1; also knownasFit-1) fused to the Ig domain 3 of
`VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2; also knownas FIk-1), whichin turn is fused
`to the constant region (Fc) of human IgG1. See paragraph bridging
`pages 11393 and 11394 and Figure 1A. Moreover,Holashetal.
`demonstratethataflibercept is a VEGF antagonistthat binds to and
`inhibits the biologic activity of human vascular endothelial growth
`factor (VEGF)in variousin vitro and in vivo assay systems.
`
`(2)
`
`Explanation Regarding Claims 1 and 2 Relative to Aflibercept
`
`As explained below,a methodfor using aflibercept, the active
`ingredient of the approved product, is covered by claims 1 and2.
`
`Claims 1 and 2 read as follows:
`
`A methodofinhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor
`1.
`(VEGF)activity ina mammal, comprising:
`administering a pharmaceutical composition to the
`mammal, wherein the pharmaceutical composition comprises
`(a) a VEGF antagonist, and
`
`0005
`0005
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 6
`
`(b) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier
`wherein the VEGF antagonist comprises a dimeric fusion
`polypeptide comprising twofusion polypeptides, each fusion
`polypeptide comprising:
`(i) a VEGF receptor componentconsisting of an
`immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domain 2 of a first VEGF receptor
`human FIt1 and Ig domain 3 of a second VEGF receptor human
`Flk1 or humanFlt4; and
`(ii) a multimerizing component, wherein VEGF activity is
`inhibited.
`
`2.
`
`The methodof claim 1, wherein the mammalis a human.
`
`Comparison of aflibercept to Claim 1
`
`Aflibercept inhibits the activation of VEGF receptors by binding
`to VEGF andthus, is a VEGF antagonistas defined by claim 1. See
`section 12.1 of EYLEA™ label, provided as AttachmentB, and as shown
`further, below. As noted above,alfibercept is a dimeric glycoprotein
`comprising recombinantfusion polypeptides, each of which consists of
`humanVEGF receptors1 and 2 extracellular domainsfused to the Fc
`portion of human [gG1. See section 11 of EYLEA™label. Aflibercept
`includes an Ig domain 2 from VEGFR1 fused to an Ig domain 3 from
`VEGFR2 as described in Holash (See AttachmentG, paragraphbridging
`pages 11393 and 11394 and Figure 1A). The 758 patentrefers to
`VEGFR-1 as FIt1 in column 25, line 57 and refers to VEGFR-2 as FIk1 in
`column 26, line 12. In addition, Holash discloses that VEGFR-1 is also
`knownasFlt-1 and VEGFR-2 is also knownasFIk-1. See Figure 1A of
`Holash. Thus,aflibercept has a VEGF receptor componentconsisting of
`an Ig domain 2 of a first VEGF receptor human Fit-1 and an Ig domain 3
`of a second VEGF receptor humanFlk-1 as defined in claim 1.
`
`Holash further describes VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 on page 11393,in
`the second paragraph,as being “highly related transmembranetyrosine
`kinases that use their ectodomains to bind VEGF.” The disclosureof the
`Flt1 and Flk1 componentsin the approved product and the construction
`of the expression vector used in makingthe active ingredientin the
`approved productis discussed in the ’758 patent in Example 20, column
`29, lines 41-56. The aminoacid sequenceofboth the Flt1 and Flk1
`components of the approved productare disclosed in Figures 24A-24C.
`Flt1 Ig domain 2 spans aminoacid residues 27 through 129 and Flk1 Ig
`domain 3 spans aminoacid residues 130 through 231 of the fusion
`protein.
`
`0006
`0006
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 7
`
`Aflibercept comprises the Fc domain of human IgG1 fused to the
`extracellular domains from the VEGF receptors. See section 11 of
`EYLEA™label, provided as Attachment B. A “multimerizing
`component’ofthe fusion protein of claim 1 can comprise an
`immunoglobulin domain, such as the Fc domain ofIgG. See col. 5, lines
`42-46 andcol. 7, lines 25-30 of the ‘758 patent. Thus,aflibercept also
`includes a multimerizing componentas definedin claim 1. The
`multimerizing componentofthe fusion protein, the Fc region of human
`IgG, is referenced throughout the ’758 patent. The disclosure of the Fc
`multimerizing componentin the actual product is discussed in Example
`20, column 29,lines 41-56, and its amino acid sequenceis disclosed in
`Figures 24A-24C, from aminoacid residue 232 through 458.
`
`As described in Section 11 of the EYLEA™ label (AttachmentB),
`EYLEA™, the approved product, is a pharmaceutical composition
`comprising aflibercept(i.e. VEGF antagonist) and an iso-osmotic
`aqueoussolution(i.e. pharmaceutically acceptable carrier). As
`explained above,aflibercept is a dimeric protein comprising two fusion
`polypeptides, each of which comprises a VEGF receptor component
`consisting of an Ig domain 2 of a first VEGF receptor human Fit1 and Ig
`domain 3 of a second VEGF receptor human FIk1 and a multimerizing
`component. Thus, the approved productis a pharmaceutical
`composition administered to a mammal according to the method of
`claim 1.
`
`Aflibercept thus meetsall of the limitations of claim 1.
`
`Aflibercept inhibits VEGFactivity, as shownin various Examples
`throughoutthe ’758 patent.
`For example, aflibercept was able to block the ability of VEGF to
`activate its receptorin vitro. This was shownbythe ability of
`aflibercept to block VEGF-induced VEGFR2 phosphorylation when
`added at a 1.5 fold molar excess when compared with added VEGF (See
`the ’758 patent, Example 23, column 31,lines 21-67 and column 32,
`lines 1-10. See also Figure 25A-C and Figure 26A-B).
`Aflibercept wasalso effective in blocking VEGF-inducedcell
`proliferation in cells engineered to express a chimeric VEGFR2receptor,
`which mediatesa strongcell proliferation response to VEGFin vitro
`(See the ’758 patent, Example 24, column 32, lines 12-51 and also
`Figure 27).
`Furthermore,aflibercept wasalso effective in inhibition of tumor
`growthin mice (See the '758 patent, Example 30, column 36,lines 48-
`67 and column 37,lines 1-8 and also Figure 40).
`Theeffect of aflibercept was also studied in the female
`
`0007
`0007
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,et al.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 8
`
`reproductive system using twodifferent readoutsto assess the effect of
`aflibercept on VEGF activity in rats. These are described in Example 31
`of the ’758 patent, column 38,lines 24-67.
`In this study, pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin (PMSG) was
`injected subcutaneously to induce ovulation in pre-pubertal female rats.
`This results in a surge of estradiol after two days, which in turn causes
`an induction of VEGF in the uterus. This induction results in
`hyperpermeability of the uterus and anincreasein uterine wet weight 6
`hours later. The study was doneto determineif aflibercept could block
`the effect of VEGF on uterine wet weight. The results demonstrated that
`injection of aflibercept resulted in about a 50% reductionin uterine wet
`weight. These results are shownin Figure 41.
`The other assay measuredtheeffect of aflibercept on VEGF-
`induced bloodvessel] formation in the corpus luteum. This allowsfor
`secretion of progesteroneinto the blood stream in order to prepare the
`uterus for implantation. If aflibercept was effective at blocking VEGF
`activity in this model, then the animals receiving aflibercept should
`show a reductionin progesteronein the blood stream.Injection of
`aflibercept at 25 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg at one hourafter injection of PMSG
`resulted in complete inhibition of progesterone induction at day 4 (See
`Figure 42A-42B).
`
`Comparison of aflibercept to Claim 2
`
`According to the EYLEA™label, provided as AttachmentB, the
`approved productis intended for the treatment of human patients. In
`addition, the ’758 patent, at column6,lines 43-48,lines 52-54 andlines
`60-61, discloses several embodiments in whichaflibercept can be used
`in humans. For example, lines 43-48 described a methodof decreasing
`or inhibiting plasma leakage in a mammal comprising administering the
`fusion polypeptide described, including embodiments wherein the
`mammalis a human. Lines 52-54 describe a preferred embodiment
`being a method of blocking blood vessel growth in a human comprising
`administering the fusion polypeptide of the invention. Lines 60-61 note
`that preferred embodimentsof the methodsare wherein the mammalis
`a human.
`
`Aflibercept thus meetsall of the limitations of claim 2.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Because aflibercept meetsall of the limitations of claims 1 and 2
`of the '758 patent, and becauseafliberceptis the active ingredient of
`EYLEA™, claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758 cover a method of
`
`0008
`0008
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`using the approved product.
`
`Page 9
`
`0009
`0009
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 10
`
`Relevant Dates Under35 U.S.C. § 156 for Determination of Applicable
`10.
`Regulatory Review Period [§ 1.740(a)(10)]
`
`(a)
`
`Patent Issue Date
`
`The ’758 patent issued on May 20, 2008.
`
`(b)
`
`IND Effective Date [35 U.S.C. § 156(g)(1)(B)(i); 37 CF.R. § 1. 740(a)(10)(V)(A)]
`
`The date that an exemption under§ 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug and
`Cosmetic Act becameeffective(i.e., the date that an investigational new drug
`application ("IND") becameeffective) for EYLEA™ (referred to in the IND-
`receipt letter as “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Fc Protein (human,
`recombinant, CHO cells, Regeneron)”) was June 15, 2005. The application date
`for this IND was May 13, 2005. The IND was assigned number BB-IND #
`12462. A copyofthe letter from the FDAreflecting the IND’s number,date of
`submission and date of receipt is provided in Attachment H.
`
`(¢)
`
`BLA Submission Date [35 U.S.C § 156(g)(1)(B)()); 37 CFR.
`§ 1.740(a)(10)(i)(B)]
`
`The BLA was submitted on February 17, 2011 and received by the FDA on
`February 18, 2011, as shownin Attachment J. The BLA was assigned number
`BL 125387/0.
`
`(d)
`
`BLA Issue Date [35 US.C § 156(g)(I)(B)(ii); 37 CER. § 1. 740(a)(10)(i)(C)]
`
`The FDA approved biologic license application 125387/0 authorizing the
`marketing of EYLEA™ on November18, 2011. EYLEA™ was approved under
`Departmentof Health and HumanServices (DHHS) U.S. License No. 1760. A
`copy of the approvalletter from the FDAis provided as AttachmentC.
`
`0010
`0010
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,et al.
`Application Under35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 11
`
`11. Summary ofSignificant Events During Regulatory Review Period
`[§1.740(a)(11)]
`
`Pursuantto 37 C.F.R. § 1.740(a)(11), the following providesa brief description
`of the activities of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., before the FDAin relation to the
`regulatory review of EYLEA™. The brief description lists the significant events that
`occurred during the regulatory review period for the approved product. In several
`instances, communicationsto or from the FDA are referenced. Pursuantto 37 C.F.R. §
`I. 740(a)(11), 21 C.F.R. § 60.20(a), and M.P.E.P. § 2753, copies of such communications
`are not providedin this application, but can be obtained from records maintained by
`the FDA.
`
`On May 13, 2005 Regeneron submitted to FDA aninvestigational new drug
`application for a recombinantfusion protein (originally vascular endothelial growth
`factor Fc protein, now aflibercept) consisting of (a) a vascular endothelial growth
`factor (VEGF) receptor componenthaving immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains
`consisting of an lg domain 2 of a first VEGF receptorthat is human FIlt1 and an Ig
`domain 3 of a second VEGFreceptorthat is human FIk1; and (b) an Fc portion of
`human IgG1. The fusion protein was developed as a potential new therapeutic for
`intravitreal administration for treating (wet) age-related macular degeneration.
`
`On June 15, 2005, BB-IND #12462 becameeffective via a communication
`mailed to Regeneron on May24, 2005, (see Attachment H). According to the
`FDA,initiation of trials could begin 30 days after May 16, 2005.
`
`From approximately July 2005 until approximately June 2008,a series ofU.S.
`Phase | and II clinical trials were conducted. In addition, an extensiontrial is ongoing
`as of the date ofthis application.
`
`Between approximately July 2007 and July 2011, PhaseIII clinical trials
`were conducted. In addition, an extensiontrial is ongoing as of the dateof this
`application.
`
`On June 1, 2009, representatives of Regeneron and CBERparticipated ina
`Type C meeting to seek agency agreementon the pharmacology/toxicology program
`for aflibercept.
`
`On September15, 2009, representatives of Regeneron and CBERparticipated
`in a Type C meeting to review the status and developmentof pre-filled syringes as the
`intended container-closure device to support commercialization of aflibercept.
`
`On September8, 2010, representatives of Regeneron and CBER participated in
`a Type B pre-BLA submission meeting to discuss and reviewclinical results of trials
`conductedpriorto thatdate.
`
`0011
`0011
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 12
`
`On September27, 2010, representatives of Regeneron and CBER participated
`in a Type B pre-BLA submission meeting to discuss information and requirementsfor
`the chemical, manufacturing and control (CMC) chapterof the BLA.
`
`On April 15, 2011, FDA grantedpriority reviewfor aflibercept for AMD.
`
`On November18, 2011, FDA approved BLA No.BL 125387/0, issuing
`marketing authorization for EYLEA™. (See AttachmentC.)
`
`0012
`0012
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 13
`
`12. Statement ConcerningEligibility for and Duration of Extension Sought Under
`35 U.S.C. § 156 [37 C.F.R § 1.740(a)(12)]
`
`(a) In the opinion of the Applicant, U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758 is eligible for an
`extension under § 156 because:
`
`(i) one or moreclaimsof the ’758 patent claim a method of using the approved
`product;
`
`(ii) the term of the ’758 patent has not been previously extended on the basis
`of § 156;
`
`(iii) the 758 patent has not expired;
`
`(iv) no other patent has been extended pursuant to § 156 on the basis of the
`regulatory review process associated with the approved product, EYLEA™;
`
`(v) thereis an eligible period of regulatory review by which the patent may be
`extended pursuantto § 156;
`
`(vi) the applicant for marketing approval exercised due diligence within the
`meaning of § 156(d)(3) during the period of regulatory review;
`
`(vii) the present application has been submitted within the 60-day period
`following the approval date of the approved product, pursuantto § 156(c); and
`
`(viii) this application otherwise complies with all requirements of 35 U.S.C.
`§ 156 and applicable rules and procedures.
`
`(b) The period by which the term of the ’758 patent is requested by Applicant to be
`extended is 775 days.
`
`(c) The requested period of extension of term for the ’758 patent corresponds to the
`regulatory review periodthatis eligible for extension pursuant to §156, based on the
`facts and circumstancesof the regulatory review associated with the approved
`product EYLEA™, The period was determinedasfollows.
`
`(i) The relevant dates for calculating the regulatory review period, based on
`the events discussedin the section above,are the following.
`
`Exemption under FDCA § 505(i) becameeffective June 15, 2005 (30 daysafter
`FDAreceipt of the IND on May 16, 2005)
`
`Patent was granted May 20, 2008
`
`0013
`0013
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under 35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 14
`
`Biologics License Application (BLA) under PHSA § 351 wasfiled February 17,
`2011
`
`BLA wasapproved November18, 2011
`
`(ii) The ’758 patent was granted during the period specified in
`§156(g)(1)(B)(i) (i.e, the period from the date of the grant of the exemption under
`§ 505(i) of the FDCA until the date of submission of the BLA). Pursuant to § 156(b)
`and (c)(2 ), the calculated regulatory review period includes a componentequalto
`half of the numberof days within that period thatare after the grant of the patent
`(1/2 of 1002, or 501 days).
`
`(iii) Because the patent was granted beforethestart of the period specified in
`§ 156(g)(1)(B)(ii) (ie, the period from the date of submission of the BLA until the
`date of approval), the regulatory review period under§ 156(b) includes a component
`equalto the total numberof daysin that period (274 days).
`
`(iv) The ’758 patentwill expire on January 17, 2021 taking into accountthe
`Terminal Disclaimer (See AttachmentE).
`
`(v) Taking into account the 501 daysspecified in (ii) above, which accounts for
`the time period betweenthedateof grant of the exemption under § 505(i) of the
`FDCA until the date of submission of the BLA), and further pursuantto § 156(b) and
`(c)(2 ), whereby the calculated regulatory review period includes a componentequal
`to half of the numberofdays within that period thatare after the grant of the patent,
`plus the 274 daysspecified in the regulatory review period under§ I56(b) and noted
`in (iii) above, which includes the numberof days from the date of submission of the
`BLA until the date of approval, the total numberof daysto be included for
`consideration of patent term extensionis believed to be 775 days.
`
`(vi) The date of approval of the approved product is November18, 2011.
`
`(vii) The date that is fourteen years from the date of approval of the approved
`product is November18, 2025.
`
`(viii) The addition of 775 days to the time of patent expiry (which includes the
`period disclaimedvia the terminal disclaimer) brings the projected patent expiry date
`to March 3, 2023. The date until the end of the fourteen-year period specified in §156
`(c)(3) is November18, 2025. Accordingly, the projected date of expiration taking into
`accountthe 775 day patent term extension does not exceed the date projected to be
`14 years beyond the date of BLA approval. As such, the period by which the patent
`maybe extendedis not limited by the fourteen-year rule of § 156(c)(3).
`
`0014
`0014
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 15
`
`(ix) The '758 patentissued afterthe effective date of Public Law No. 98-417.
`As such,the two-or three -yearlimit of 35 U.S.C. § 156(g)(6)(C) does not apply.
`
`13. Statement Pursuantto 37 C.F.R. § 1.740(a)(13)
`
`Pursuantto 37 C.F.R. § 1.740(a)(13), Applicant acknowledgesits duty to
`disclose to the Director of the PTO and to the Secretary of Health and Human Services
`any information which is material to the determination of entitlementto the
`extension sought, particularly as that duty is defined in 37 C.F.R. § 1.765. In
`furtherance of this duty, Applicant wishesto inform the Director and Secretary that
`concurrently with the present Application for Extension of Patent Term Under 35
`U.S.C. §156 Applicanthasfiled an Application for Extension of Patent Term Under 35
`U.S.C. §156 (plus two copies) in connection with U.S. Patent Nos. 7,374,757 and
`7,070,959.
`
`14. Applicable Fee [§ 1.740(a)(14)]
`
`Please deductall fees necessary pursuantto 37 C.F .R. §1.20(j) corresponding
`to the fee for a patent term extension application under 35 U.S.C. § 156 from deposit
`account no. 18-0650. Please deduct any additional fee or fees deemed necessary in
`excess of this amountfrom our deposit accountno. 18-0650.
`
`15. Nameand Addressfor Correspondence[§ 1.740(a)(15)]
`
`Please direct all inquiries, questions, and communications regardingthis
`application for term extensionto:
`
`Valeta Gregg, Ph.D., J.D.
`Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Patents
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals,Inc.
`777 Old Saw Mill River Rd.
`Tarrytown, NY 10591-6707
`Tel. 914-847-1077
`Fax 914-847-7705
`email: valeta.gregg@regeneron.com
`
`0015
`0015
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No.7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 16
`
`Twoadditional copies of this application are enclosed, in compliance with 37
`C.F.R.§ 1.740(b).
`
`Sincerely,
`
`ettQh,
`
`Attorney/Agentfor Applicant
`Registration No. 35,127
`_
`Dated: o2/ Dec cz ov
`
`0016
`0016
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`Papadopoulos,etal.
`Application Under35 U.S.C. § 156
`
`Page 17
`
`Index of Attachments
`
`AttachmentA - Copyof Assignmentof U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`
`Attachment B - Copy of EYLEA™Product Label
`
`Attachment C - Copy of EYLEA™ BLA Approvalletter from the FDA
`
`AttachmentD - CopyofU.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`
`Attachment E - Copy of Terminal Disclaimerfor U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`
`AttachmentF - Copy of Maintenance Fee Statementfor U.S. Patent No. 7,374,758
`
`AttachmentG - Copy of Holash et al. PNAS 99(17):11393-11398 (2002)
`
`Attachment H - Copy of IND-receipt letter from FDA
`
`AttachmentI - Copy of BLA Submission acknowledgementletter from FDA
`
`0017
`0017
`
`

`

`ATTACHMENT A
`
`Copy of AssignmentofU.S. Patent No.
`
`7,374,758
`
`0018
`0018
`
`

`

`
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`oO
`
`
`
`City:Tarrytown___state:_XY_Zip:_10591___
`
`2/4/02
`
`eveceree-—----=
`
`40.00
`
`
`eneron
`
`Pha
`
`is,
`
`42-30-2004
`| a =]
`
`el * MUMMUABMNOR|rereJe
`
`
`=
`aumgoaev 402914790
`
`
` Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks: Please record the attached original documents or copy therect.
`
`To the Honorable
`
`2. Name and address of receiving party(ies)
`
`4. Name of conveying party(les):
`Name: Fegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`
`Nicholas J. Papadopoulos
`Samue! Davis
`
`
` internal Address:
`George D. Yancopoulos
`
`
` Additional name(s) of conveying partyjes) attached?|_|Yes| ¥’ JNo——————_,Oo
`
`
`3. Nature of conveyance:
`
` Street Addrese: 777 Old Saw Mill River Road
`Assignment
`{_]merger
`[[] Security Agreement
`[Ichangeof Name
`
`
`eeSERENE
`
`
`[_] Other.
`
`
`
`Execution Date: February 4, 2002
`Additional name(s) & address(es) attached? ||Yes iv|No
`
`
`4. Application number(s) or patent number(s):
`if this documentis being filed together with a new application, the execution date of the application is:
`
`
` eeewesewereoesewesrereeeons
`cececaececceceeceee
`B. Patent No.(s) .
`A. Patent Application No.(s) _
`
`
` 5. Name and address of party to whom correspondence
`
`conceming documentshould be mailed:
`
`
`
`
`7. Total fee (37 CFR 3.41)........+004$
`Valeta Gregg
`
`Name:
`([] Enclosed
`
`
`
`Internal Address: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`[7] Authorized to be charged to deposit accounta
`
`
`
`
`EE
`
`
`8. Deposit account number:
`
`Street Address: 777 014 Saw Mill River Road
`
`18-0650
`
`eeNNEnERD
`
`
`
`
`City;Tatytownstate:NY_zip:_1059!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Valeta Gre
`December 17 , 2004
`
`Nameof Person Signing
`
`Seaneccet ath requires cover sheettaformation10!
`Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks, Box Assignments
`11016503
`Washington, 0.C, 20231
`
`9. Signature.
`
`DO NOT USE THIS SPACE
`
`12/29/2004 GTOMI1
`
`00000175 180650
`
`01 FCs8021
`
`49.00 BA
`
`PATENT
`REEL: 016103 FRAME: 0015
`
`0019
`0019
`
`

`

`Att. Docket No. REG 710-A-US
`
`ASSIGNMENT
`
`WHEREAS, We,Nicholas J. Papadopoulos, residing at 59 Heritage Lane, Lagrangeville,
`New York 12540, a citizen of the United States of America,Samuel Davis, residing at 332 W. 88th
`Street #B2, New York, New York 10024, a citizen of the United States of America, and George D.
`Yancopoulos, residing at 1519 Baptist Church Road, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, a
`citizen of the United States of America (HEREINAFTER CALLED “ASSIGNORS”) are
`inventor(s) of the invention(s) disclosed and/or claimed in the following patent application:
`
`USSN 10/009,852 filed December 6, 2001,
`whichis the national stage filing of PCT/US00/14142 filed June 8, 1999;
`
`WHEREAS, REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALSINC., a corporation organized and
`existing under the laws of the State of New York, with offices at 777 Old Saw Mill River Road,
`Tarrytown, New York 10591-6707, U.S.A. (HEREINAFTER called “ASSIGNEE”)is desirous of
`acquiring our entire right, title and interestin,to, and under the said applications,
`
`NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) to us in hand
`paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, ,
`We,the said ASSIGNORS,have sold, assigned, transferred and set over, and by these presents do
`hereby sell, assign,
`transfer and set over unto the said ASSIGNEE,its successors,
`legal
`representatives, and assigns, our entire right, title and interest for all countries in and to any andall
`inventions which are disclosed and claimed, and any andall inventions which are disclosed but
`not claimed in the above-described United, States applications, and in and to said United States
`Applications and all divisions, renewals, continuations, and continuations-in-part thereof, and all
`Patents of the United States which may be granted thereon andall reissues and extensions thereof;
`and all applications for industrial

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket