1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`BILLJCO LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`CASE: IPR2022-00129; IPR2022-00131
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,566,839
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,639,267
`_______________________
`
`Patent Owner BillJCo’s
`Hearing Presentation
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`

`

`IPR Issues
`
`2
`
`21
`
`EX1001, claim 1 (excerpted);
`claim 25 (“originator instructions”)
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Single Reference: Lutnick
`
`3
`
`EX1005
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Issue # 1: “Object”
`
`4
`
`• Lutnick fails to disclose an a self‐contained 
`object containing both information and 
`instructions
`• A POSITA would not have been motivated by 
`Lutnick to combine information and 
`instructions in a object sent to the MGD
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Petitioner’s Claim Construction
`
`5
`
`Pet. at 10; EX2008 [La Porta Dep.] at
`12:13-13:3; 19:11-23
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Lutnick Does Not Transmit Information 
`and Instruction to MGD
`
`6
`
`PO Resp. at 7
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Alleged Information & Instructions 
`Packaged Together
`
`7
`
`PO Resp. at 11
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Lutnick: No Motivation to Combine
`
`8
`
`EX1005 [Lutnick]; see also Pet. at
`24; EX1003 [La Porta] ¶ 90
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Issue #2: Lutnick Lacks a “Condition for 
`Detecting a User Action”
`
`9
`
`EX1001; see also Pet. at 25-28;
`EX1003 [La Porta] ¶¶ 93‐97 
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Theory #1: Preferences in 
`Advertising
`
`10
`
`EX1005 [0224]; see also EX1003
`[La Porta] ¶ 94; Pet. at 26
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Lutnick: user input received before
`promotion sent
`
`11
`
`EX1005 [0225]; see also
`EX2009 [Joyner Decl.] ¶ 71
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`’839 Patent: presenting information 
`after a user triggering event 
`
`12
`
`EX1001 claims 1 and 25; see also
`EX2009 [Joyner Decl.] ¶¶ 72-73
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Theory #2: Winning Outcome
`
`13
`
`• Lutnick [0250]: “a promotion may be presented to a 
`player if the player has achieved a winning 
`outcome.” La Porta ¶ 95
`• Lutnick [0184]: “execut[ing] a game program to 
`generate a random outcome, and present[ing] the 
`random outcome to the player.” Joyner Decl. ¶ 75 
`(possible response by gaming system, not user 
`action)
`
`Pet. at 27; PO Resp. at 18
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Theory #3: Coming into Range
`
`14
`
`• Lutnick [0146] sending a beacon signal when a user 
`comes within range. La Porta ¶ 96 (constitutes a 
`condition for a user action)
`• Joyner Decl. ¶ 77 (La Porta conflates condition for 
`determinating a user action with separate 
`whereabouts limitation: “determining if a location … 
`is in vicinity of another data processing system”)
`
`Pet. at 27‐28; PO Resp. 
`at 18‐19
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Theory #3: Coming into Range
`
`15
`
`EX1001
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`16
`
`’839 Patent Claims
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Claims
`
`17
`
`EX1001, claim 1
`(excerpted, color & claim
`contruction added)
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`18
`
`’839 Patent Specification
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`’839 Patent Specification
`
`19
`
`EX1001, 4:32-42; see also Institution
`Decision at 4; PO Resp. at 2-3
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`’839 Patent Specification
`
`20
`
`EX1001, 4:42-54; Institution
`Decision at 4; PO Resp. at 3
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`’839 Patent Specification
`
`21
`
`EX1001, 4:65-5:2
`
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`22
`
`EX1001, 8:56-66; see also EX1009
`[’267], 4:35-40; PO Resp. at 4
`© Copyright 2023 Saul Ewing LLP
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 8,639,267 Patent
`
`23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1001
`
`

`

`EX1001 ‐ ‘267 Patent
`
`24
`
`EX1001, 2:42‐48
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`EX1001 ‐ ‘267 Patent
`
`25
`
`EX1001, 10:28‐35
`
`EX1001, 12:56‐59
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1001, 124:6‐24
`
`

`

`‘267 Patent – Claim 1
`
`26
`
`1. A method for automatic location based exchange processing by a mobile data
`processing system, the method comprising:
`presenting a user interface to a user of the mobile data processing system,
`the user interface for configuring privilege data relating the mobile data
`processing system with a remote data processing system, the privilege data
`stored local to the mobile data processing system and searched upon receipt of
`whereabouts data received for processing by the mobile data processing system;
`receiving, for processing by the mobile data processing system, the
`whereabouts data including an originating identity of the whereabouts data;
`¶
`searching, by the mobile data processing system, the privilege data stored
`local to the mobile data processing system for a matching privilege upon the
`receiving, for processing by the mobile data processing system, the whereabouts
`data, wherein the matching privilege is configured for relating the originating
`identity of the whereabouts data with a destination identity of the
`whereabouts data to permit trigger of a privileged action for the receipt of
`whereabouts data received for processing by the mobile data processing system;
`and
`
`performing the privileged action at the mobile data processing system
`upon finding the matching privilege, after the searching, by the mobile data
`processing system, the privilege data stored local to the mobile data processing
`system.
`
`EX1001, 284: 14‐41
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Petition: Limitations Reciting Configuring Privilege Data (Haberman)
`
`27
`
`Petition at 14‐15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`28
`
`asy United States
`a2) Patent Application Publication ao) Pub. No.: US 2005/0096044 Al
`(43) Pub. Date: May5, 2005
`
`Habermanetal.
`
`SAUL EWING
`
`[0181] With specific reference to FIG. 12, a preferences
`profile from a person using a mobile device is stored in step
`1202. Various examples of preferences profiles are within
`the scope of the embodiment of the invention. In a first
`example, the stored preferences profile indicates types of
`informational content with which the person using the
`mobile device desires to be presented. In such first example,
`a type of informational content is denoted as presentable if
`it matches a type of informational content indicated in the
`preferences profile. In a second example, the stored prefer-
`ences profile indicates types of informational content with
`which the person using the mobile device does not desire to
`EX1004 ¶¶ [0025], [0176], [0181]
`be presented. In such second example, a type of informa-
`tional content is denoted as not presentable if it matches a
`type of informational content indicated in the preferences
`profile.
`
`[0025] Avsixth aspect of the Invention includes a method
`of receiving and storing within a mobile device certain
`broadcasts to the exclusion of other broadcasts. The method
`includes the steps of: storing a preferences profile from a
`person using the mobile device, wherein the preferences
`profile represents the types of informational content with
`which the person using the mobile device desires to be
`presented; receiving a plurality of broadcasts, wherein each
`broadcast includes both informational content for presenta-
`tion to a person and broadecast-identifying information; and
`for each respective broadcast that is received, screening the
`broadcast against the received preferences profile to deter-
`mine whether the respective informational content of the
`respective broadcast is to be stored within the mobile device.
`
`In method 1000 of FIG, 10, the stored preferences
`[0176]
`profile indicates types of informational content with which
`the person using the mobile device desires to be presented,
`1.€.,
`that which is preferred. Similar to email and the problem
`that has arisen from spam and the solution of creating a
`“block sender”list, a similar problem and consequent solu-
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`tion may arise in systems and methods of the present
`invention. In this regard,
`the preferences profile actually
`may indicate informational content with which the person
`using the mobile device desires not to be presented. This
`
`EX1004 44 [0025], [0176], [0181]
`
`

`

`Petition: Limitations Reciting Configuring Privilege Data (Vanluijt)
`
`29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Petition at 48‐49
`
`

`

`30
`
`as) United States
`a2) Patent Application Publication (0) Pub. No.: US 2002/0132614 Al
`Vanluijt et al.
`(43) Pub. Date:
`Sep. 19, 2002
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT — NOT EVIDENCEeoehEINE
`
`[0058] Where the message is carrying data from one or
`other of the beacons 120, 121, 122 the mobile device 130
`preferably has the ability to filter the information received
`according to pre-stored user preferences and the user is only
`alerted (i.e.
`the information will only be retained in the
`buffer and/or presented on the screen 334) if comparison of
`stored preference da
`-
`message indicate tha
`has been received.
`
`EX1006, ¶ [0058]
`
`EX1006, 4] [0058]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Claim Term: “privilege data relating the mobile data processing system 
`with a remote data processing system”
`
`31
`
`Petition at 7
`
`Petitioner Reply 
`IPR2022‐00310 at 3
`
`Petitioner Reply at 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`La Porta Deposition Excerpts
`
`32
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX2009 at 46‐47
`
`

`

`33
`
`as) United States
`a2) Patent Application Publication (0) Pub. No.: US 2002/0132614 Al
`Vanluijt et al.
`(43) Pub. Date:
`Sep. 19, 2002
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT — NOT EVIDENCEeoehEINE
`
`[0004] There are many application scenarios where the
`typical information requestwill be highly dependenton the
`location and likely to be identical or similar for many
`requesters at that location. For example, a restaurant may
`want to announce its daily menu to every passer-by. This has
`led to the proposal to add a broadcast mode to Bluetooth, so
`that a beacon at a certain location could communicate with
`potentially many mobile devices in its reach. The broadcast
`mode would solve some of the restrictions in the current
`
`definition of Bluetooth 1.1, and iveule enable a connec-
`tions, many parallel
`use
`
`EX1006, ¶ [0004]
`
`many interesting new business opportunities.
`
`Ws Opens up
`
`EX1006, 4] [0004]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`Petition: Limitations Reciting “Desination Identity” Data (Haberman)
`
`34
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Petition at 21‐23 
`
`

`

`Petition: Limitations Reciting “Desination Identity” Data (Vanluijt)
`
`35
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Petition at 53‐55
`
`