`v.
`LoganTree, LP (Patent Owner)
`
`Petitioner Demonstratives
`
`Case Nos. IPR2022-00037, IPR2022-00040
`U.S. Patent No. 6,059,576
`
`Before Hon. Patrick R. Scanlon, Mitchell G. Weatherly, and James A. Worth
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1042
`Apple v. Logan Tree
`IPR2022-00040
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00040 (’040) Issues
`
`1: A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine Allum, Raymond, and Conlan (’040 Ground 1)
`
`2: Allum-Raymond-Conlan (“ARC”) Renders Obvious “time stamp information” ([1d-3])
`
`3: ARC Renders Obvious “interpreting… movement data” ([20c])
`
`5
`
`10
`
`16
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00037 (’037) Issues
`
`1: A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine Ono and Hutchings (’037 Ground 1)
`
`2: Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “storing first event information” “along with first time stamp information” ([1f])
`
`3: Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “interpreting… movement data based on… a real-time clock” ([20c])
`
`23
`
`34
`
`46
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`
`
`’040 / ’037 Common Issue
`
`4: The Testimony of Patent Owner’s Declarant is Entitled to no Weight (37 C.F.R. § 42.65(a))
`
`49
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`
`
`’040 Issue 1
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to
`Combine Allum, Raymond, and Conlan
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`5
`
`
`
`Combination of Allum, Raymond, and Conlan (ARC)
`
`Allum
`
`Raymond
`
`Conlan
`
`APPLE-1009 (Raymond), portion of FIG. 7;
`’040 Pet., 15; ’040 APPLE-1003, ¶66.
`
`APPLE-1010 (Conlan), FIGS. 6 (top), 2 (bottom);
`’040 Pet., 18-20; ’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶9-11.
`
`APPLE-1008 (Allum), FIG. 2;
`’040 Pet., 6-7; ’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶55-56.
`
`APPLE-1009 (Raymond), FIG. 4;
`’040 Pet., 12-15; ’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶61-66.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`6
`
`
`
`Combination of Allum, Raymond, and Conlan (ARC)
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration (APPLE-1003)
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 67; ’040 Pet., 15-18.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 70; ’040 Pet., 15-18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 78-79 ; ’040 Pet., 21-22.
`
`7
`
`7
`
`
`
`Integration of Conlan’s Teachings Enables ARC to
`Identify/Capture User-Specified Event Information
`Allum
`Petitioner Reply
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`
`APPLE-1008, 3:55-62; ’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`Conlan
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1010, 6:38-46; ’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`
`8
`
`8
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Arguments are Uncorroborated
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`Patent Owner Response
`
`Madisetti Declaration
`
`’040 POR, 21.
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`
`Does not disclose underlying facts or data
`(to the extent any such facts or data exist)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 EX2005, ¶¶ 48-49.
`
`9
`
`
`
`’040 Issue 2
`
`Allum-Raymond-Conland Renders Obvious
`“time stamp information” [1d-3]
`
`’040 [1d-3] / ’037 [1f]: “storing first event information related to the detected first user-defined event along
`with first time stamp information reflecting a time at which the movement data causing the first
`user-defined event occurred;”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`10
`
`
`
`Allum Itself Discloses Storing Time Stamp Information
`
`Allum
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1008, 14:47-52.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 120; ’040 Pet., 32-33.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`11
`
`
`
`Allum Itself Discloses Storing Time Stamp Information
`
`Allum
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`
`
`APPLE-1008, 10:10-17.APPLE 1008 10 10 1
`
`APPLE-1008, FIG. 3.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 8-10.
`
`12
`
`12
`
`
`
`Allum’s Time Stamp Information is not Logged data
`
`Allum
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`APPLE-1008, 4:23-32.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 7.
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 11.
`
`13
`
`13
`
`
`
`Raymond’s Real-Time Clock (“RT clock”) would have Provided
`Data Synchronization and Sequencing in Allum’s system
`Raymond
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`…
`
`APPLE-1009, 10:16-36.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 70, 120; ’040 Pet., 32-33, 15-18.
`
`14
`
`14
`
`
`
`Raymond also Discloses Storing Time Stamp Information
`
`Raymond
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1009, 2:23-30.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 71, 120; ’040 Pet., 18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`15
`
`
`
`’040 Issue 3
`
`ARC Renders Obvious
`“interpreting… movement data” [20c]
`
`[20c]: “interpreting, using a microprocessor included in the portable, self-contained movement
`measuring device, said physical movement data based on user-defined operational
`parameters and a real-time clock;”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`16
`
`
`
`Allum Interprets Movement Data Based on
`User-Defined Operational Parameters
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Allum
`
`APPLE-1008, 4:18-23; see also 7:21-27.
`
`
`
`APPLE-1008, 13:16-42.APPLE 1008 13 16 42
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 115; ’040 Pet., 29.
`
`17
`
`17
`
`
`
`Raymond Discloses “interpreting” Based on a Real-Time Clock
`
`
`
`RaymondRaymond
`
`Dr. Kenny’s ’040 Declaration
`
`APPLE-1009, FIG. 4.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 126-127; ’040 Pet., 48, 16-18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`18
`
`
`
`Raymond Discloses “interpreting” Based on a Real-Time Clock
`
`
`
`RaymondRaymond
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`…
`
`APPLE-1009, 10:16-36.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 148, 70-71; ’040 Pet., 48, 16-18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`19
`
`
`
`Allum’s “interpreting” Aligns with that Described in the ’576 Patent
`
`Allum
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1008, 14:47-54.
`
`’576 Patent
`
`APPLE-1001, 5:44-47.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 147; ’040 Pet., 48.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`20
`
`
`
`Allum Discloses the “Analysis” of Movement Data
`
`Allum
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`’040 Pet. Rep, 6.
`
`APPLE-1008, FIG. 6.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`’040 Pet. Rep, 16.’040 P t R 16
`
`
`
`21
`
`21
`
`
`
`Allum Discloses the “Analysis” of Movement Data
`
`Allum
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`APPLE-1008, FIG. 3.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 Pet. Rep, 17.
`
`22
`
`22
`
`
`
`’037 Issue 1
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to
`Combine Ono and Hutchings
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`23
`
`
`
`Overview of Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, Cover Page.
`
`APPLE-1101, 3:10-11.
`
`’037 Pet., 18-22, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep, 4
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE 1101 8 59 9 12
`APPLE-1101, 8:59-9:12.
`
`24
`
`24
`
`
`
`Overview of Hutchings
`
`APPLE-1102, 10:43-51.
`APPLE 1102 10 43 51
`
`APPLE-1102, Cover Page.
`
`APPLE-1102, 3:5-8.
`
`
`
`APPLE-1102, 3:22-26.APPLE 1102 3 22 26
`
`APPLE-1102, 12:58-60.
`
`’037 Pet., 22-24, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 4-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`25
`
`
`
`The Ono-Hutchings Combination
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶62.
`
`’037 Pet., 24-26, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶71.
`
`26
`
`26
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have Implemented Ono’s Device with
`Multidimensional Accelerometers and Rotational Sensors as Suggested by Hutchings
`
`Ono
`
`Hutchings
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1101, 3:10-11.
`
`APPLE-1102, 1:60-64.
`
`APPLE-1101, 9:5-12.
`APPLE 1101 9 5 12
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:27-31.
`
`APPLE-1101, 18:28-33.
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:40-46, 2:66-3:2.
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:54-61.
`
`’037 Pet., 18-26, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶63.
`
`27
`
`27
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have Implemented Ono’s Device with
`Multidimensional Accelerometers and Rotational Sensors as Suggested by Hutchings
`
`Ono and Hutchings
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`APPLE-1101, 3:10-13.
`
`APPLE-1101, 13:34-42.
`
`APPLE-1102, 9:49-50.
`
`APPLE-1106, 8:12-18.
`
`APPLE-1014, 16:10-15.
`
`APPLE-1010, 4:22-25.
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶64.
`APPLE 1100 ¶64
`
`’037 Pet., 18-26, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`28
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings is the Predictable Result of Combining Known Elements
`
`Ono-Hutchings
`
`Hutchings’s
`measuring system
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Ono’s wrist-worn
`pedometer
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶62.
`’037 Pet., 24-26, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶65.
`29
`
`29
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Uncorroborated Expert Testimony does not Undermine Ono-Hutchings
`
`Patent Owner Response and Sur-Reply
`
`Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Attachments,
`LLC, 825 F.3d 1373, 1380-1381 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
`
`’037 POR, 19-20.
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 3.
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 3.
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 6.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`30
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Uncorroborated Expert Testimony does not Undermine Ono-Hutchings
`
`Patent Owner Response
`
`Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Attachments,
`LLC, 825 F.3d 1373, 1380-1381 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
`
`’037 POR, 19.
`
`’037 POR, 19.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 6.
`
`31
`
`31
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Uncorroborated Expert Testimony does not Undermine Ono-Hutchings
`
`Patent Owner Sur-Reply
`
`Depuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.,
`567 F.3d 1314, 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
`,
`(
`)
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 4.
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 6.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`32
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings Enhances Ono
`
`Ono
`
`Hutchings
`
`APPLE-1101, Cover Page.
`
`APPLE-1102, Cover Page.
`
`APPLE-1101, 1:11-23.
`
`APPLE-1101, 2:22-26.
`
`APPLE-1101, 3:10-11.
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:40-46.
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:66-3:2.
`
`
`
`APPLE-1102, 10:43-51.APPLE 1102 10 43 51
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`33
`
`
`
`’037 Issue 2
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious
`“storing first event information” “along with first
`time stamp information” [1f], [20f]
`
`’040 [1d-3] / ’037 [1f]: “storing first event information related to the detected first user-defined event along
`with first time stamp information reflecting a time at which the movement data causing the first user-
`defined event occurred;”
`
`[20f]: “storing, in said memory, first event information related to the detected first user-defined event along
`with first time stamp information reflecting a time at which the movement data causing the first user-
`defined event occurred.”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`34
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “storing first event information”
`
`Petition provides two independent, alternative mappings
`
`1. Ono’s microprocessor stores in RAM the user-defined operational
`parameters and the movement data used to detect the user-
`defined event, both of which are event information related to the
`detected user-defined event.
`
`2. When the user stops the step-counting mode after Ono’s
`microprocessor detects a user-defined event, the microprocessor
`stores in RAM at least the total step count, total distance-walked,
`and calorie-consumption, which are event information related to
`the detected user-defined event.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13; APPLE-1100, ¶¶91-98.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`35
`
`
`
`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores User-Defined Operational Parameters used to
`Detect, and thus Related to, the Detected User-Defined Event
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, 13:55-59.
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶91.
`
`36
`
`36
`
`
`
`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores Movement Data used to Detect,
`and thus Related to, the Detected User-Defined Event
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, 14:1-5.
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶92.
`
`37
`
`37
`
`
`
`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores User-Defined Operational Parameters and Movement
`Data used to Detect, and thus Related to, the Detected User-Defined Event
`Ono
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶93.
`
`APPLE-1101, 15:61-62.
`
`APPLE-1101, 16:2-4.
`
`APPLE-1101, 16:11-13.
`’037 Pet., 37, 45, 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`38
`
`38
`
`
`
`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores User-Defined Operational Parameters and Movement
`Data used to Detect, and thus Related to, the Detected User-Defined Event
`Petitioner Reply
`Patent Owner Sur-reply
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 10.
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 7-8.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`39
`
`
`
`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores Time Stamp Information
`
`Ono
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1101, 13:31-33.
`
`APPLE-1101, 14:65-15:3.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 16-21.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶94.
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶95.
`40
`
`40
`
`
`
`2B: Ono-Hutchings Stores New/Separate Event Information
`Related to the Already-Detected User-Defined Event
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, 16:28-35.
`
`APPLE-1101, 17:32-34.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`41
`
`41
`
`
`
`2B: Ono-Hutchings Stores New/Separate Event Information
`Related to the Already-Detected User-Defined Event
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶96.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`42
`
`
`
`2B: Ono-Hutchings Stores New/Separate Event Information
`Related to the Already-Detected User-Defined Event
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, 14:16-22.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶98.
`
`43
`
`43
`
`
`
`2B: Ono-Hutchings Stores Time Stamp Information
`
`Ono
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`
`
`APPLE-1101, 14:16-22.AAPPLE 1101 14 16 22
`
`APPLE-1101, 20:39-46.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 16-21.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶98.
`
`44
`
`44
`
`
`
`2B: Duration is “timestamp information reflecting a time”
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`APPLE-1122, 37.
`
`APPLE-1121.
`
`APPLE-1123, [0093].
`
`APPLE-1125, [0047].
`
`APPLE-1124, 5:24-6:2.
`
`45
`
`APPLE-1120.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 16-21.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`
`
`’037 Issue 3
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “interpreting…
`movement data based on … a real-time clock” [20c]
`
`[20c]: “interpreting, using a microprocessor included in the portable, self-contained movement
`measuring device, said physical movement data based on user-defined operational
`parameters and a real-time clock;”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`46
`
`46
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious
`“interpreting… movement data based on… a real-time clock” ([20c])
`Ono and Hutchings
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1101, 15:36-37.
`
`APPLE-1102, 3:18-20.
`
`APPLE-1102, 11:1-3.
`
`’037 Pet., 71-73; ’037 Pet. Rep., 22-23
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶136.
`
`47
`
`47
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Uncorroborated Argument Ignores Ono’s Express Disclosure
`
`Patent Owner Response and Sur-Reply
`
`Ono
`
`’037 POR, 30.
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 12.
`
`APPLE-1101, 9:14-31.
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’037 Pet., 58-59.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶100.
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶102.
`48
`
`48
`
`
`
`’040 and ’037 Common Issue 4
`
`The Testimony of Patent Owner’s Declarant
`is Entitled to no Weight
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`49
`
`49
`
`
`
`The Testimony of Patent Owner’s Declarant is Entitled to no Weight
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65(a)
`
`’040 Madisetti Declaration (EX2005)
`
`’040 Petitioner Reply
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 29; see also ’040 Pap. 18, 1-2; ’037 Pap. 18, 1-2.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`
`
`Madisetti’s Prior Art Discussion Consists of Conclusory Statements
`without Disclosure of Underlying Facts or Data
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65(a)
`
`’040 Madisetti Declaration (EX2005)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`’040 EX2005, ¶¶45-60’040 EX2005 ¶¶45 60
`’040 Pap. 18, 1-2; ’037 Pap. 18, 1-2.
`
`51
`
`51
`
`
`
`Madisetti Refused to Clarify his Testimony
`
`Madisetti Depo. Transcript
`
`’040 Petitioner Reply
`
`…
`
`APPLE-1040, 78:16-79:12.
`
`52
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 30.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`52
`
`
`
`Madisetti Refused to Clarify his Testimony
`
`Madisetti Depo. Transcript
`
`’040 Petitioner Reply
`
`…
`
`Madisetti’s response
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 30.
`
`APPLE-1040, 30:3-20.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`53
`
`53
`
`
`
`Madisetti Refused to Clarify his Testimony
`Madisetti Declaration (top) vs. ’576 Patent (bottom)
`
`Madisetti Depo. Transcript
`
`APPLE-1040, 52:16-53:10; ’040 Pet. Rep., 29-30.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 EX2005, 20; EX1001, FIG. 4.
`
`54
`
`54
`
`
`
`Appendix
`
`Additional Slides
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`55
`
`55
`
`
`
`Asserted Grounds
`
`IPR2022-00037 Petition (“ ’037 Pet.”)
`
`IPR2022-00040 Petition (“ ’040 Pet.”)
`
`’040 Pet., 1-2.
`
`’037 Pet., 13-14.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`56
`
`
`
`’037 Issue A1
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious
`“movement sensor” and “movement measuring device”
`[1a], [1k], [20a]
`
`[1a]: “a movement sensor capable of measuring data associated with unrestrained movement in any
`direction and generating signals indicative of said movement”
`
`’037 [1k] / ’040 [1i]: “wherein said movement sensor measures the angle and velocity of said movement.”
`
`[20a]: “attaching a portable, self-contained movement measuring device to said body part for measuring
`unrestrained movement in any direction;”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`57
`
`57
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious the “movement sensor” and
`“movement measuring device” ([1a], [1k], [20a])
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶67.
`
`Hutchings
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶70.
`
`APPLE-1101, 2:1-7.
`
`APPLE-1102, 3:22-25.
`
`APPLE-1102, 5:9-12.
`
`APPLE-1102, 8:49-51.
`
`APPLE-1102, 4:60-64.
`
`APPLE-1101, 8:60-67.
`
`APPLE-1102, 8:56-60.
`
`APPLE-1102, 12:58-60.
`
`APPLE-1101, 9:5-10.
`
`’037 Pet., 28-30; ‘037 Pet. Rep., 6-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`58
`
`58
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious the “movement sensor” and
`“movement measuring device” ([1a], [1k], [20a])
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Ono-Hutchings movement sensor
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶71; ’037 Pet., 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 6-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`59
`
`59
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “unrestrained movement” ([1a], [20a])
`
`Patent Owner Sur-Reply
`
`Petition (top) and Dr. Kenny’s Declaration (bottom)
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 5.
`
`’037 Pet., 28-29.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶68.
`
`60
`
`60
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings’s Movement Sensor “measures the angle” ([1k])
`Patent Owner Sur-Reply
`Petition
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 11.
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’037 Pet., 64.
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 8.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶106.
`
`61
`
`61
`
`
`
`Ono-Hutchings’s Movement Sensor “measures the angle” ([1k])
`Petition’s analysis of element [1a]
`Dr. Kenny’s analysis of element [1a]
`
`’037 Pet., 28-29.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶68.
`
`62
`
`62
`
`
`
`’040 Issue A2
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine
`ARC and de Remer
`
`Claims 31 and 32
`[31]: The device of claim 1, wherein said microprocessor is configured to retrieve said first time
`stamp information from said real-time clock based on the detection of the user-defined event.
`
`[32]: The device of claim 31, wherein said microprocessor is configured to retrieve said first time
`stamp information from said real-time clock based on the detection of the user-defined event.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`63
`
`63
`
`
`
`Overview of de Remer
`
`de Remer
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1013 (de Remer), 23:16-20.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶91; ’040 Pet., 63-64.
`
`APPLE-1013, 2:29-40.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`64
`
`64
`
`
`
`de Remer Discloses how to use RTC Information to
`Populate a Timestamp Field
`
`de Remer
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1013, 23:13-23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶92; ’040 Pet., 64-65.
`
`65
`
`65
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have Combined ARC and de Remer to Retrieve first time
`Stamp Information from the RTC
`
`de Remer
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`APPLE-1013, 23:13-23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 24.’040 Pet Rep 24
`
`66
`
`66
`
`
`
`’040 Issue A3
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine
`ARC and Gaudet
`
`Claims 64 and 65
`[64]: The device of claim 1, wherein said movement sensor is configured to measure a walking
`distance.
`
`[65]: The device of claim 64, wherein said device is configured to be wearable by the user, and
`said movement sensor is configured to measure said walking distance of said user.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`67
`
`67
`
`
`
`Overview of Gaudet
`
`Gaudet
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶85; ’040 Pet., 67.
`
`APPLE-1012 (Gaudet), FIG. 2.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶86; ’040 Pet., 67.
`
`68
`
`68
`
`
`
`Overview of Gaudet
`
`Gaudet
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1012 (Gaudet), FIG. 2.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶87-88; ’040 Pet., 69.
`
`69
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`69
`
`
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine ARC and Gaudet
`to Measure Walking Distance
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶89; ’040 Pet., 69-70.
`
`70
`
`70
`
`
`
`’040 Issue A4
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine
`Gesink and Raymond
`
`Independent Claim 20 (overlaps with claim 1)
`
`Dependent Claim 25: The method of claim 20 wherein said movement measuring device is
`an accelerometer.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`71
`
`71
`
`
`
`Overview of Gesink
`
`Gesink
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1014 (Gesink), FIG. 1; ’040 Pet., 72; APPLE-1003, p51.
`
`APPLE-1014, FIG. 8; ’040 Pet., 73; APPLE-1003, p52.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 95, 98, 100; ’040 Pet., 71-75.
`
`72
`
`72
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have Incorporated Raymond’s RTC and Timestamp
`into Gesink’s system
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Gesink
`
`APPLE-1014, 13:53-60.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 102; ’040 Pet., 76.
`
`APPLE-1014, 15:46-50.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 104, ’040 Pet., 77-78.
`
`73
`
`73
`
`
`
`Elapsed Time is “based on … real-time clock”
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 27.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`74
`
`74
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Mischaracterizes Raymond
`
`Raymond
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`APPLE-1009, 5:30-44.
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 26.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`75
`
`75
`
`