throbber
Apple Inc. (Petitioner)
`v.
`LoganTree, LP (Patent Owner)
`
`Petitioner Demonstratives
`
`Case Nos. IPR2022-00037, IPR2022-00040
`U.S. Patent No. 6,059,576
`
`Before Hon. Patrick R. Scanlon, Mitchell G. Weatherly, and James A. Worth
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1042
`Apple v. Logan Tree
`IPR2022-00040
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00040 (’040) Issues
`
`1: A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine Allum, Raymond, and Conlan (’040 Ground 1)
`
`2: Allum-Raymond-Conlan (“ARC”) Renders Obvious “time stamp information” ([1d-3])
`
`3: ARC Renders Obvious “interpreting… movement data” ([20c])
`
`5
`
`10
`
`16
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00037 (’037) Issues
`
`1: A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine Ono and Hutchings (’037 Ground 1)
`
`2: Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “storing first event information” “along with first time stamp information” ([1f])
`
`3: Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “interpreting… movement data based on… a real-time clock” ([20c])
`
`23
`
`34
`
`46
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`

`

`’040 / ’037 Common Issue
`
`4: The Testimony of Patent Owner’s Declarant is Entitled to no Weight (37 C.F.R. § 42.65(a))
`
`49
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`

`

`’040 Issue 1
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to
`Combine Allum, Raymond, and Conlan
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`5
`
`

`

`Combination of Allum, Raymond, and Conlan (ARC)
`
`Allum
`
`Raymond
`
`Conlan
`
`APPLE-1009 (Raymond), portion of FIG. 7;
`’040 Pet., 15; ’040 APPLE-1003, ¶66.
`
`APPLE-1010 (Conlan), FIGS. 6 (top), 2 (bottom);
`’040 Pet., 18-20; ’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶9-11.
`
`APPLE-1008 (Allum), FIG. 2;
`’040 Pet., 6-7; ’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶55-56.
`
`APPLE-1009 (Raymond), FIG. 4;
`’040 Pet., 12-15; ’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶61-66.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`6
`
`

`

`Combination of Allum, Raymond, and Conlan (ARC)
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration (APPLE-1003)
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 67; ’040 Pet., 15-18.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 70; ’040 Pet., 15-18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 78-79 ; ’040 Pet., 21-22.
`
`7
`
`7
`
`

`

`Integration of Conlan’s Teachings Enables ARC to
`Identify/Capture User-Specified Event Information
`Allum
`Petitioner Reply
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`
`APPLE-1008, 3:55-62; ’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`Conlan
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1010, 6:38-46; ’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`
`8
`
`8
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Arguments are Uncorroborated
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`Patent Owner Response
`
`Madisetti Declaration
`
`’040 POR, 21.
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 3.
`
`Does not disclose underlying facts or data
`(to the extent any such facts or data exist)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 EX2005, ¶¶ 48-49.
`
`9
`
`

`

`’040 Issue 2
`
`Allum-Raymond-Conland Renders Obvious
`“time stamp information” [1d-3]
`
`’040 [1d-3] / ’037 [1f]: “storing first event information related to the detected first user-defined event along
`with first time stamp information reflecting a time at which the movement data causing the first
`user-defined event occurred;”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`

`Allum Itself Discloses Storing Time Stamp Information
`
`Allum
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1008, 14:47-52.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 120; ’040 Pet., 32-33.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`

`Allum Itself Discloses Storing Time Stamp Information
`
`Allum
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`
`
`APPLE-1008, 10:10-17.APPLE 1008 10 10 1
`
`APPLE-1008, FIG. 3.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 8-10.
`
`12
`
`12
`
`

`

`Allum’s Time Stamp Information is not Logged data
`
`Allum
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`APPLE-1008, 4:23-32.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 7.
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 11.
`
`13
`
`13
`
`

`

`Raymond’s Real-Time Clock (“RT clock”) would have Provided
`Data Synchronization and Sequencing in Allum’s system
`Raymond
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`…
`
`APPLE-1009, 10:16-36.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 70, 120; ’040 Pet., 32-33, 15-18.
`
`14
`
`14
`
`

`

`Raymond also Discloses Storing Time Stamp Information
`
`Raymond
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1009, 2:23-30.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 71, 120; ’040 Pet., 18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`15
`
`

`

`’040 Issue 3
`
`ARC Renders Obvious
`“interpreting… movement data” [20c]
`
`[20c]: “interpreting, using a microprocessor included in the portable, self-contained movement
`measuring device, said physical movement data based on user-defined operational
`parameters and a real-time clock;”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`16
`
`

`

`Allum Interprets Movement Data Based on
`User-Defined Operational Parameters
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Allum
`
`APPLE-1008, 4:18-23; see also 7:21-27.
`
`
`
`APPLE-1008, 13:16-42.APPLE 1008 13 16 42
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 115; ’040 Pet., 29.
`
`17
`
`17
`
`

`

`Raymond Discloses “interpreting” Based on a Real-Time Clock
`
`
`
`RaymondRaymond
`
`Dr. Kenny’s ’040 Declaration
`
`APPLE-1009, FIG. 4.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 126-127; ’040 Pet., 48, 16-18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`18
`
`

`

`Raymond Discloses “interpreting” Based on a Real-Time Clock
`
`
`
`RaymondRaymond
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`…
`
`APPLE-1009, 10:16-36.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 148, 70-71; ’040 Pet., 48, 16-18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`19
`
`

`

`Allum’s “interpreting” Aligns with that Described in the ’576 Patent
`
`Allum
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1008, 14:47-54.
`
`’576 Patent
`
`APPLE-1001, 5:44-47.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 147; ’040 Pet., 48.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`20
`
`

`

`Allum Discloses the “Analysis” of Movement Data
`
`Allum
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`’040 Pet. Rep, 6.
`
`APPLE-1008, FIG. 6.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`’040 Pet. Rep, 16.’040 P t R 16
`
`
`
`21
`
`21
`
`

`

`Allum Discloses the “Analysis” of Movement Data
`
`Allum
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`APPLE-1008, FIG. 3.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 Pet. Rep, 17.
`
`22
`
`22
`
`

`

`’037 Issue 1
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to
`Combine Ono and Hutchings
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`23
`
`

`

`Overview of Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, Cover Page.
`
`APPLE-1101, 3:10-11.
`
`’037 Pet., 18-22, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep, 4
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE 1101 8 59 9 12
`APPLE-1101, 8:59-9:12.
`
`24
`
`24
`
`

`

`Overview of Hutchings
`
`APPLE-1102, 10:43-51.
`APPLE 1102 10 43 51
`
`APPLE-1102, Cover Page.
`
`APPLE-1102, 3:5-8.
`
`
`
`APPLE-1102, 3:22-26.APPLE 1102 3 22 26
`
`APPLE-1102, 12:58-60.
`
`’037 Pet., 22-24, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 4-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`25
`
`

`

`The Ono-Hutchings Combination
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶62.
`
`’037 Pet., 24-26, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶71.
`
`26
`
`26
`
`

`

`A POSITA would have Implemented Ono’s Device with
`Multidimensional Accelerometers and Rotational Sensors as Suggested by Hutchings
`
`Ono
`
`Hutchings
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1101, 3:10-11.
`
`APPLE-1102, 1:60-64.
`
`APPLE-1101, 9:5-12.
`APPLE 1101 9 5 12
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:27-31.
`
`APPLE-1101, 18:28-33.
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:40-46, 2:66-3:2.
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:54-61.
`
`’037 Pet., 18-26, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶63.
`
`27
`
`27
`
`

`

`A POSITA would have Implemented Ono’s Device with
`Multidimensional Accelerometers and Rotational Sensors as Suggested by Hutchings
`
`Ono and Hutchings
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`APPLE-1101, 3:10-13.
`
`APPLE-1101, 13:34-42.
`
`APPLE-1102, 9:49-50.
`
`APPLE-1106, 8:12-18.
`
`APPLE-1014, 16:10-15.
`
`APPLE-1010, 4:22-25.
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶64.
`APPLE 1100 ¶64
`
`’037 Pet., 18-26, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`28
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings is the Predictable Result of Combining Known Elements
`
`Ono-Hutchings
`
`Hutchings’s
`measuring system
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Ono’s wrist-worn
`pedometer
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶62.
`’037 Pet., 24-26, 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶65.
`29
`
`29
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Uncorroborated Expert Testimony does not Undermine Ono-Hutchings
`
`Patent Owner Response and Sur-Reply
`
`Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Attachments,
`LLC, 825 F.3d 1373, 1380-1381 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
`
`’037 POR, 19-20.
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 3.
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 3.
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 6.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`30
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Uncorroborated Expert Testimony does not Undermine Ono-Hutchings
`
`Patent Owner Response
`
`Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Attachments,
`LLC, 825 F.3d 1373, 1380-1381 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
`
`’037 POR, 19.
`
`’037 POR, 19.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 6.
`
`31
`
`31
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Uncorroborated Expert Testimony does not Undermine Ono-Hutchings
`
`Patent Owner Sur-Reply
`
`Depuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.,
`567 F.3d 1314, 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
`,
`(
`)
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 4.
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 6.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`32
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings Enhances Ono
`
`Ono
`
`Hutchings
`
`APPLE-1101, Cover Page.
`
`APPLE-1102, Cover Page.
`
`APPLE-1101, 1:11-23.
`
`APPLE-1101, 2:22-26.
`
`APPLE-1101, 3:10-11.
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:40-46.
`
`APPLE-1102, 2:66-3:2.
`
`
`
`APPLE-1102, 10:43-51.APPLE 1102 10 43 51
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 3-8
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`33
`
`

`

`’037 Issue 2
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious
`“storing first event information” “along with first
`time stamp information” [1f], [20f]
`
`’040 [1d-3] / ’037 [1f]: “storing first event information related to the detected first user-defined event along
`with first time stamp information reflecting a time at which the movement data causing the first user-
`defined event occurred;”
`
`[20f]: “storing, in said memory, first event information related to the detected first user-defined event along
`with first time stamp information reflecting a time at which the movement data causing the first user-
`defined event occurred.”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`34
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “storing first event information”
`
`Petition provides two independent, alternative mappings
`
`1. Ono’s microprocessor stores in RAM the user-defined operational
`parameters and the movement data used to detect the user-
`defined event, both of which are event information related to the
`detected user-defined event.
`
`2. When the user stops the step-counting mode after Ono’s
`microprocessor detects a user-defined event, the microprocessor
`stores in RAM at least the total step count, total distance-walked,
`and calorie-consumption, which are event information related to
`the detected user-defined event.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13; APPLE-1100, ¶¶91-98.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`35
`
`

`

`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores User-Defined Operational Parameters used to
`Detect, and thus Related to, the Detected User-Defined Event
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, 13:55-59.
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶91.
`
`36
`
`36
`
`

`

`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores Movement Data used to Detect,
`and thus Related to, the Detected User-Defined Event
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, 14:1-5.
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶92.
`
`37
`
`37
`
`

`

`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores User-Defined Operational Parameters and Movement
`Data used to Detect, and thus Related to, the Detected User-Defined Event
`Ono
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶93.
`
`APPLE-1101, 15:61-62.
`
`APPLE-1101, 16:2-4.
`
`APPLE-1101, 16:11-13.
`’037 Pet., 37, 45, 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`38
`
`38
`
`

`

`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores User-Defined Operational Parameters and Movement
`Data used to Detect, and thus Related to, the Detected User-Defined Event
`Petitioner Reply
`Patent Owner Sur-reply
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 10.
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 7-8.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`39
`
`

`

`2A: Ono-Hutchings Stores Time Stamp Information
`
`Ono
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1101, 13:31-33.
`
`APPLE-1101, 14:65-15:3.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 16-21.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶94.
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶95.
`40
`
`40
`
`

`

`2B: Ono-Hutchings Stores New/Separate Event Information
`Related to the Already-Detected User-Defined Event
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, 16:28-35.
`
`APPLE-1101, 17:32-34.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`41
`
`41
`
`

`

`2B: Ono-Hutchings Stores New/Separate Event Information
`Related to the Already-Detected User-Defined Event
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶96.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`42
`
`

`

`2B: Ono-Hutchings Stores New/Separate Event Information
`Related to the Already-Detected User-Defined Event
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1101, 14:16-22.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 9-13.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶98.
`
`43
`
`43
`
`

`

`2B: Ono-Hutchings Stores Time Stamp Information
`
`Ono
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`
`
`APPLE-1101, 14:16-22.AAPPLE 1101 14 16 22
`
`APPLE-1101, 20:39-46.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 16-21.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶98.
`
`44
`
`44
`
`

`

`2B: Duration is “timestamp information reflecting a time”
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`APPLE-1122, 37.
`
`APPLE-1121.
`
`APPLE-1123, [0093].
`
`APPLE-1125, [0047].
`
`APPLE-1124, 5:24-6:2.
`
`45
`
`APPLE-1120.
`
`’037 Pet., 47-57; ’037 Pet. Rep., 16-21.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`

`

`’037 Issue 3
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “interpreting…
`movement data based on … a real-time clock” [20c]
`
`[20c]: “interpreting, using a microprocessor included in the portable, self-contained movement
`measuring device, said physical movement data based on user-defined operational
`parameters and a real-time clock;”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`46
`
`46
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious
`“interpreting… movement data based on… a real-time clock” ([20c])
`Ono and Hutchings
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1101, 15:36-37.
`
`APPLE-1102, 3:18-20.
`
`APPLE-1102, 11:1-3.
`
`’037 Pet., 71-73; ’037 Pet. Rep., 22-23
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶136.
`
`47
`
`47
`
`

`

`Patent Owner’s Uncorroborated Argument Ignores Ono’s Express Disclosure
`
`Patent Owner Response and Sur-Reply
`
`Ono
`
`’037 POR, 30.
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 12.
`
`APPLE-1101, 9:14-31.
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’037 Pet., 58-59.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶100.
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶102.
`48
`
`48
`
`

`

`’040 and ’037 Common Issue 4
`
`The Testimony of Patent Owner’s Declarant
`is Entitled to no Weight
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`49
`
`49
`
`

`

`The Testimony of Patent Owner’s Declarant is Entitled to no Weight
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65(a)
`
`’040 Madisetti Declaration (EX2005)
`
`’040 Petitioner Reply
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 29; see also ’040 Pap. 18, 1-2; ’037 Pap. 18, 1-2.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`

`

`Madisetti’s Prior Art Discussion Consists of Conclusory Statements
`without Disclosure of Underlying Facts or Data
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65(a)
`
`’040 Madisetti Declaration (EX2005)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`’040 EX2005, ¶¶45-60’040 EX2005 ¶¶45 60
`’040 Pap. 18, 1-2; ’037 Pap. 18, 1-2.
`
`51
`
`51
`
`

`

`Madisetti Refused to Clarify his Testimony
`
`Madisetti Depo. Transcript
`
`’040 Petitioner Reply
`
`…
`
`APPLE-1040, 78:16-79:12.
`
`52
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 30.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`52
`
`

`

`Madisetti Refused to Clarify his Testimony
`
`Madisetti Depo. Transcript
`
`’040 Petitioner Reply
`
`…
`
`Madisetti’s response
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 30.
`
`APPLE-1040, 30:3-20.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`53
`
`53
`
`

`

`Madisetti Refused to Clarify his Testimony
`Madisetti Declaration (top) vs. ’576 Patent (bottom)
`
`Madisetti Depo. Transcript
`
`APPLE-1040, 52:16-53:10; ’040 Pet. Rep., 29-30.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 EX2005, 20; EX1001, FIG. 4.
`
`54
`
`54
`
`

`

`Appendix
`
`Additional Slides
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`55
`
`55
`
`

`

`Asserted Grounds
`
`IPR2022-00037 Petition (“ ’037 Pet.”)
`
`IPR2022-00040 Petition (“ ’040 Pet.”)
`
`’040 Pet., 1-2.
`
`’037 Pet., 13-14.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`56
`
`

`

`’037 Issue A1
`
`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious
`“movement sensor” and “movement measuring device”
`[1a], [1k], [20a]
`
`[1a]: “a movement sensor capable of measuring data associated with unrestrained movement in any
`direction and generating signals indicative of said movement”
`
`’037 [1k] / ’040 [1i]: “wherein said movement sensor measures the angle and velocity of said movement.”
`
`[20a]: “attaching a portable, self-contained movement measuring device to said body part for measuring
`unrestrained movement in any direction;”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`57
`
`57
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious the “movement sensor” and
`“movement measuring device” ([1a], [1k], [20a])
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Ono
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶67.
`
`Hutchings
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶70.
`
`APPLE-1101, 2:1-7.
`
`APPLE-1102, 3:22-25.
`
`APPLE-1102, 5:9-12.
`
`APPLE-1102, 8:49-51.
`
`APPLE-1102, 4:60-64.
`
`APPLE-1101, 8:60-67.
`
`APPLE-1102, 8:56-60.
`
`APPLE-1102, 12:58-60.
`
`APPLE-1101, 9:5-10.
`
`’037 Pet., 28-30; ‘037 Pet. Rep., 6-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`58
`
`58
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious the “movement sensor” and
`“movement measuring device” ([1a], [1k], [20a])
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Ono-Hutchings movement sensor
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶71; ’037 Pet., 28-30; ’037 Pet. Rep., 6-8.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`59
`
`59
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings Renders Obvious “unrestrained movement” ([1a], [20a])
`
`Patent Owner Sur-Reply
`
`Petition (top) and Dr. Kenny’s Declaration (bottom)
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 5.
`
`’037 Pet., 28-29.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶68.
`
`60
`
`60
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings’s Movement Sensor “measures the angle” ([1k])
`Patent Owner Sur-Reply
`Petition
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`’037 PO Sur-reply, 11.
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’037 Pet., 64.
`
`’037 Pet. Rep., 8.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶106.
`
`61
`
`61
`
`

`

`Ono-Hutchings’s Movement Sensor “measures the angle” ([1k])
`Petition’s analysis of element [1a]
`Dr. Kenny’s analysis of element [1a]
`
`’037 Pet., 28-29.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1100, ¶68.
`
`62
`
`62
`
`

`

`’040 Issue A2
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine
`ARC and de Remer
`
`Claims 31 and 32
`[31]: The device of claim 1, wherein said microprocessor is configured to retrieve said first time
`stamp information from said real-time clock based on the detection of the user-defined event.
`
`[32]: The device of claim 31, wherein said microprocessor is configured to retrieve said first time
`stamp information from said real-time clock based on the detection of the user-defined event.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`63
`
`63
`
`

`

`Overview of de Remer
`
`de Remer
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1013 (de Remer), 23:16-20.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶91; ’040 Pet., 63-64.
`
`APPLE-1013, 2:29-40.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`64
`
`64
`
`

`

`de Remer Discloses how to use RTC Information to
`Populate a Timestamp Field
`
`de Remer
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1013, 23:13-23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶92; ’040 Pet., 64-65.
`
`65
`
`65
`
`

`

`A POSITA would have Combined ARC and de Remer to Retrieve first time
`Stamp Information from the RTC
`
`de Remer
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`APPLE-1013, 23:13-23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 24.’040 Pet Rep 24
`
`66
`
`66
`
`

`

`’040 Issue A3
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine
`ARC and Gaudet
`
`Claims 64 and 65
`[64]: The device of claim 1, wherein said movement sensor is configured to measure a walking
`distance.
`
`[65]: The device of claim 64, wherein said device is configured to be wearable by the user, and
`said movement sensor is configured to measure said walking distance of said user.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`67
`
`67
`
`

`

`Overview of Gaudet
`
`Gaudet
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶85; ’040 Pet., 67.
`
`APPLE-1012 (Gaudet), FIG. 2.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶86; ’040 Pet., 67.
`
`68
`
`68
`
`

`

`Overview of Gaudet
`
`Gaudet
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1012 (Gaudet), FIG. 2.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶87-88; ’040 Pet., 69.
`
`69
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`69
`
`

`

`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine ARC and Gaudet
`to Measure Walking Distance
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶89; ’040 Pet., 69-70.
`
`70
`
`70
`
`

`

`’040 Issue A4
`
`A POSITA Would have been Motivated to Combine
`Gesink and Raymond
`
`Independent Claim 20 (overlaps with claim 1)
`
`Dependent Claim 25: The method of claim 20 wherein said movement measuring device is
`an accelerometer.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`71
`
`71
`
`

`

`Overview of Gesink
`
`Gesink
`
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1014 (Gesink), FIG. 1; ’040 Pet., 72; APPLE-1003, p51.
`
`APPLE-1014, FIG. 8; ’040 Pet., 73; APPLE-1003, p52.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 95, 98, 100; ’040 Pet., 71-75.
`
`72
`
`72
`
`

`

`A POSITA would have Incorporated Raymond’s RTC and Timestamp
`into Gesink’s system
`Dr. Kenny’s Declaration
`
`Gesink
`
`APPLE-1014, 13:53-60.
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 102; ’040 Pet., 76.
`
`APPLE-1014, 15:46-50.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`’040 APPLE-1003, ¶ 104, ’040 Pet., 77-78.
`
`73
`
`73
`
`

`

`Elapsed Time is “based on … real-time clock”
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 27.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`74
`
`74
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Mischaracterizes Raymond
`
`Raymond
`
`Petitioner Reply
`
`APPLE-1009, 5:30-44.
`
`’040 Pet. Rep., 26.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`75
`
`75
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket