throbber
36. (currently amended) The mobile phone system device of claim 30,
`
`wherein the computer instructions are configured to enable the mobile
`
`phone system device:
`
`(1) to enable a graphical user interface for accessing first, second,
`
`third and fourth gadgets for news, stock market information, weather and
`
`social media, respectively, each gadget comprising an area containing at
`
`least a portion of dynamically generated data related to that gadget,
`
`wherein the user interface:
`
`(a) arranges the gadgets in a layout that is larger than
`
`said display, whereby some of the gadgets are in said display and others of
`
`the gadgets are out of said display;
`
`(b) expands one of the gadgets in said display to show
`
`more data therein by shifting other gadgets; and
`
`(c) [[pans]] scrolls the layout within said display to bring
`
`some of the gadgets into said display and/or to move some of the gadgets
`
`out of said display, in response to (i) the object user's thumb or finger
`
`touching one of the gadgets on said display, and then (ii) the object user's
`
`thumb or finger gliding along said display away from the touched location;
`
`and
`
`(2) to detect an object the user's thumb or finger touching with
`
`hard pressure an on-screen element from a group consisting of a gadget,
`
`a letter, a key, a button or an icon and then to activate the on-screen
`
`element, thereby resulting in (a) enlarging the on-screen element, (b)
`
`displaying a callout balloon with a copy of the on-screen element inside, or
`
`(c) a combination thereof.
`
`37. (currently amended) A mobile phone system device, comprising:
`
`a top surface comprising a touch sensitive display, the top surfuce
`
`containing no movable button;
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-10-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1179 of 1315
`
`

`

`a processor;
`
`a transceiver for sending and receiving wireless signals over a
`
`communications network;
`
`a solid-state memory storing computer instructions configured to
`
`enable the mobile phone system device to register input to said display
`
`from contact between (1) a user's thumb or finger, and (2) said display,
`
`and to provide a user interface, the user interface comprising at least two
`
`states, namely: (a) a tap-present state, wherein a plurality of tap(cid:173)
`
`activatable icons for activating a plurality of corresponding pre-designated
`
`applications, functions, services, services or settings or tasks are present,
`
`each of the plurality of pre-designated applications, functions, services,
`
`services or settings or tasks being configured to be activated in response
`
`to a tap on its corresponding icon, and wherein the tap-activatable icons
`
`are not enclosed by a window frame, and (b) a tap-absent state, wherein
`
`no tap-activatable icons are present, the tap-absent state configured to be
`
`transitioned to the tap-present state in response to a .f.i-Fs-t multi-step user
`
`gesture comprising: the object the user's thumb or finger (i) touching f!
`
`graphic located in an edge area of said display, and then (ii) gliding on said
`
`display away from the edge area, wherein neither the direction nor the final
`
`destination of the gliding determines the content or format of such content
`
`presented on said display as a result of the transition to the tap-present
`
`state, and wherein the graphic does not move to a different location on said
`
`display after the transition; and
`
`a housing surrounding said display and enclosing said processor,
`
`said transceiver, and said solid-state memory.
`
`38. (currently amended) The mobile phone system device of claim 37,
`
`wherein the computer instructions are further configured to enable the
`
`mobile phone system device to run a plurality of applications, the
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-11-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1180 of 1315
`
`

`

`applications comprising a phone, chat or SMS, a calculator, a camera, an
`
`alarm, a clock, a music player, and email, the plurality of applications
`
`comprising: (a) a first application wherein a touch keyboard presented on
`
`said display enables a user to edit or save text in the first application, (b)
`
`a second application providing options for editing, deleting and sending a
`
`picture on said display, (c) a third application and a fourth application
`
`capable of running simultaneously, the third application capable of being
`
`presented on top of the fourth application on said display, and (d) a fifth
`
`application and a sixth application capable of running simultaneously, the
`
`fifth application being a music player, and the sixth application being email,
`
`chat or SMS, and (e) a seventh application providing at least two
`
`communication options
`
`for given
`
`text,
`
`the communication options
`
`comprising two or more of call, email, and chat or SMS.
`
`39. (currently amended) The mobile phone system device of claim 38,
`
`wherein the instructions are configured to enable the mobile phone system
`
`device: (a) to scroll content on said display in response to the object user's
`
`thumb or finger touching a first location on said display and gliding up or
`
`down on said display from the first location, wherein the first location may
`
`be anywhere within said display, (b) to move an application, a function, a
`
`service or a setting one step forward or backward or to close or remove an
`
`application, a function, a service or a setting on said display in response to
`
`the object user's thumb or finger touching a second location on said display
`
`and gliding to the right or to the left from the second location, wherein the
`
`first and second locations second location may be anywhere within said
`
`display, and (c) to activate a function in response to a second multi-step
`
`user gesture comprising the object user's thumb or finger touching an area
`
`corresponding to a demarcated representation of an icon representing the
`
`function followed by gliding away from the area on said display, wherein
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-12-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1181 of 1315
`
`

`

`the demarcated representation
`
`icon represents only [[the]] a single
`
`function and does not relocate or replicate during the second multi-step
`
`user gesture, and the function is not activated differently based on a
`
`direction or final destination of the gliding neither the direction nor the final
`
`destination of the gliding determines the particular function activated or the
`
`content presented on said display as a result of activation of the function.
`
`40. (currently amended) The mobile phone system device of claim 39,
`
`wherein the computer instructions are configured to enable the mobile
`
`phone system device:
`
`(a) to enable a graphical user interface for accessing first, second,
`
`third and fourth gadgets for news, stock market information, weather and
`
`social media, respectively, each gadget comprising an area containing at
`
`least a portion of dynamically generated data related to that gadget,
`
`wherein the user interface:
`
`(i) arranges the gadgets in a layout that is larger than
`
`said display, whereby some of the gadgets are in said display and others of
`
`the gadgets are out of said display;
`
`(ii) expands one of the gadgets in said display to show
`
`more data therein by shifting other gadgets; and
`
`(iii) [[pans]] scrolls the layout within said display to bring
`
`some of the gadgets into said display and/or to move some of the gadgets
`
`out of said display, in response to the object user's thumb or finger touching
`
`one of the gadgets on said display, and then the object user's thumb or
`
`finger gliding along said display away from the touched location; and
`
`(b) to detect an object the user's thumb or finger hard-pressing
`
`an on-screen element from a group consisting of a gadget, a letter, a key,
`
`a button or an icon, and then to activate the on-screen element, thereby
`
`resulting in (i) enlarging the on-screen element, (ii) displaying a callout
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-13-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1182 of 1315
`
`

`

`balloon with a copy of the on-screen element inside, or (iii) a combination
`
`thereof.
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-14-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1183 of 1315
`
`

`

`Please add the following new claims.
`
`41. (new)
`
`The portable hand held wireless computer device of claim
`
`22, wherein upon transition from the tap-absent to the tap-present state
`
`the icons are presented on substantially the entirety of said display
`
`regardless of the direction or final destination of the gliding.
`
`42. (new)
`
`The portable wireless computer system of claim 41,
`
`wherein the graphic is not relocated or replicated during the multi-step user
`
`gesture.
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-15-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1184 of 1315
`
`

`

`REMARKS
`
`Applicant,s
`
`representative
`
`has
`
`carefully
`
`studied
`
`the
`
`outstanding Office Action. The present amendment is intended to place
`
`the application in condition for allowance and is believed to overcome all of
`
`the rejections made by the Office Action. Favorable reconsideration and
`
`allowance of the application are respectfully requested.
`
`Applicant has amended claims 21, 22 and 24 - 40 without
`
`acquiescence to the Office Acton,s reasons for rejection, and without
`
`disclaiming the right to pursue the subject matter of these claims prior to
`
`amendment. Applicant has cancelled claim 23 without acquiescence to the
`
`Office Action,s reasons for rejection, and without disclaimer of the ability
`
`to pursue the subject matter of this claim in a continuation, divisional or
`
`other application. Applicant has added new claims 41 and 42. No new
`
`matter has been introduced, and support for the claim amendments and
`
`the new claims is provided below. Claims 21, 22 and 24 - 42 are
`
`presented for examination.
`
`For ease of reference in Applicant's responses below, Applicant
`
`is numbering the various objections and rejections in the Office Action.
`
`Priority
`
`At Paragraphs 5 - 7, the Office Action indicates that the priority
`
`claim to US Serial No. 10/315250 does not comply with 35 U.S.C §120,
`
`since the disclosure of the 10/315250 application fails to supply adequate
`
`support
`
`(1)
`
`for the limitation "a fourth application and a fifth application
`
`capable of running simultaneously, the fourth application being a
`
`music player, and the fifth application being email, chat or SMSu or
`
`analogous variants in dependent claims 22, 33 and 38;
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-16-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1185 of 1315
`
`

`

`(2)
`
`for the limitation "(a) a tap-present state, wherein a plurality of
`
`tap-activatable icons ... are present ... and (b) a tap-absent state,
`
`wherein no tap-activatable icons are present, the tap-absent state
`
`configured to be transitioned to the tap-present state in response to
`
`a multi-step user gesture comprising the object: (i) touching an edge
`
`area of said display, and then (ii) gliding on said display away from
`
`the edge area" or analogous variants in dependent claims 22 and 31,
`
`and independent claim 37; and
`
`(3)
`
`for the limitation "(a) to enable a graphical user interface for
`
`accessing ... each gadget comprising an area containing at least a
`
`portion of dynamically generated data related to that gadget, wherein
`
`the user interface: (i) arranges the gadgets in a layout that is larger
`
`than said display, whereby some of the gadgets are in said display
`
`and others of the gadgets are out of said display; (ii) expands one of
`
`the gadgets in said display beyond an edge of said display to show
`
`more data therein by shifting other gadgets" or analogous variants in
`
`dependent claims 29, 36 and 40.
`
`Response to Priority
`
`(1)
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that the limitation "a fourth
`
`application and a fifth application capable of running simultaneously, the
`
`fourth application being a music player, and the fifth application being
`
`email, chat or SMS", is supported in the 10/315250 application, at least by
`
`page 1, lines 7 - 9 ("The computer unit is adapted to run several
`
`applications simultaneously") and page 2, lines 19 - 21 ("which computer
`
`unit is adapted to run several applications simultaneously") taken in
`
`conjunction with FIGS. 6, 8 and 9, showing the computer unit of the present
`
`invention adapted to run music player applications ("MP3 PLAYER" in FIG.
`
`6 and "MUSIC" in FIG. 9) and email, chat and SMS applications ("E-MAIL",
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-17-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1186 of 1315
`
`

`

`"CHAT" and "SMS" in FIG. 6). FIG. 6 and part of FIG. 9 are reproduced
`
`below with the relevant applications highlighted. Applicant respectfully
`
`submits that a person skilled in the art at the time of the invention would
`
`understand from the statements at pages 1 and 2 that music and
`
`communication applications would run simultaneously as they do not utilize
`
`the same hardware resources, as music applications utilize audio hardware
`
`and communication applications utilize text on the display.
`
`(2)
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that the limitation "(a) a tap-
`
`present state, wherein a plurality of tap-activatable icons ... are present ...
`
`and (b) a tap-absent state, wherein no tap-activatable icons are present,
`
`the tap-absent state configured to be transitioned to the tap-present state
`
`in response to a multi-step user gesture comprising the object: (i) touching
`
`an edge area of said display, and then (ii) gliding on said display away from
`
`the edge area" is supported in the 10/315250 application, at least by page
`
`2, line 25 - page 3, line 4, and page 5, line 24 - page 6, line 13, taken in
`
`conjunction with FIGS. 1 - 4, as indicated in TABLE I below.
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-18-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1187 of 1315
`
`

`

`lication
`TABLE I: Su ort for claim limitations in 10/315250 a
`Limitation
`FIG.
`S ecification Text
`a tap-present state,
`wherein tap(cid:173)
`activatable icons ... are
`present ...
`
`a tap-absent state,
`wherein no tap(cid:173)
`activatable icons are
`present
`
`page 6, lines 7 - 11
`("no application is
`currently active on the
`computer unit")
`
`Ail) .. \"
`
`·~ ·•·•· .. -. ............................. .,. ... ,, . . ~-. ',
`4
`
`7
`
`:
`
`/'-.., ...
`
`page 5, lines 24 - 27
`
`~~1==-
`
`.. :
`
`:~
`
`.c:.,.
`:◄ 2
`3
`. •-------,--+
`'§
`
`the tap-absent state
`configured to be
`transitioned to the
`tap-present state in
`response to a multi(cid:173)
`step user gesture
`comprising a user's
`thumb or finger: (i)
`touching a graphic
`located in an edge
`area of said display,
`and then (ii) gliding on
`said display away from
`theed e area
`
`Y'}
`1'~-..--~,.
`f"lfl, ~,
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. §112
`
`At Paragraphs 14 and 15, the Office Action rejects claims 25 -
`
`28, 30 - 36, 39 and 40 under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. §112, second paragraph,
`
`as being indefinite. Specifically,
`
`( 4)
`
`the
`
`limitation "in response to a multi-step user gesture
`
`comprising
`
`the object
`
`touching said display at a
`
`location
`
`corresponding to a demarcated representation of the
`
`function
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-19-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1188 of 1315
`
`

`

`followed by the object gliding away from the location along said
`
`display, wherein . .. the representation represents only the function"
`
`or analogous variants in dependent claim 25, independent claim 30
`
`and dependent claim 39 is indefinite; and
`
`(5)
`
`the
`
`limitation "wherein
`
`...
`
`the
`
`function
`
`is not activated
`
`differently based on a direction or final destination of the gliding" or
`
`analogous variants in dependent claims 25, independent claim 30
`
`and dependent 39 is indefinite.
`
`Applicant has amended the claims.
`
`At Paragraphs 18 - 23, the Office Action rejects claims 21 - 40
`
`under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. §112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with
`
`the written description requirement. Specifically,
`
`(6)
`
`the limitation "a top surface comprising a touch sensitive
`
`display, the top surface containing no movable button" or analogous
`
`variants in independent claims 21, 30 and 37 fails to comply with
`
`the written description requirement since a negative limitation must
`
`have a basis in the original disclosure and mere absence of a positive
`
`recitation (such as a movable button on a top surface) is not basis
`
`for an exclusion;
`
`(7)
`
`the limitation "a tap-absent state, wherein no tap-activatable
`
`icons are present" in dependent claims 23 and 31, and independent
`
`claim 37 fails to comply with the written description requirement
`
`since a negative limitation must have a basis in the original disclosure
`
`and mere absence of a positive recitation is not basis for an exclusion;
`
`(8)
`
`the
`
`limitation "in response to a multi-step user gesture
`
`comprising
`
`the object
`
`touching said display at a
`
`location
`
`corresponding to a demarcated representation of the
`
`function
`
`followed by the object gliding away from the location along said
`
`display, wherein ... the representation represents only the function"
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-20-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1189 of 1315
`
`

`

`or variants thereof in dependent claims 25, independent claim 30,
`
`and dependent claim 39 fails to comply with the written description
`
`requirement;
`
`(9)
`
`the
`
`limitation "wherein
`
`...
`
`the
`
`function
`
`is not activated
`
`differently based on a direction or final destination of the gliding" in
`
`dependent claim 25, independent claim 30 and dependent claim 39
`
`fails to comply with the written description requirement;
`
`(10)
`
`the limitation "wherein the first and second locations may be
`
`anywhere within said display" in the context of the limitation "(a) to
`
`enable the portable wireless computer system to scroll content on
`
`said display in response to the object touching a first location on said
`
`display and gliding up or down on said display from the first location,
`
`and (b) to enable the portable wireless computer system to move an
`
`application, a function, a service or a setting one step forward or
`
`backward or to close or remove an application, a function, a service
`
`or a setting on said display in response to the object touching a
`
`second location on said display and gliding to the right or to the left
`
`from the second location" or analogous variants, fails to comply with
`
`the written description requirement; and
`
`(11)
`
`the limitation "wherein the first application is not an address
`
`book, and wherein the text saved in the first application is configured
`
`for use as an address, a telephone number, or a message in phone
`
`call, email, chat or SMS" in independent claim 34 fails to comply with
`
`the written description requirement since a negative limitation must
`
`have a basis in the original disclosure and mere absence of a positive
`
`recitation is not basis for an exclusion.
`
`Applicant has amended the claims. Further, in order to advance the
`
`prosecution, Applicant has removed the phrase "the top surface containing
`
`no movable button", without acquiescence to the Office Action's reasons
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-21-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1190 of 1315
`
`

`

`for rejection. Regarding claim 23, Applicant has cancelled this claim
`
`without acquiescence to the Office Action's reasons for rejection, and
`
`respectfully submits that rejection is this claim is thus rendered moot.
`
`Response to Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. §112
`
`The Office Action cites MPEP 2173.05[i] regarding negative
`
`limitations. MPEP 2173.05[i] indicates that
`Any negative limitation ... must have basis in the original disclosure .
`... The mere absence of a positive recitation is not basis for an
`exclusion.
`
`Applicant notes that MPEP 2173.05[i] does not indicate that drawings are
`
`not considered positive recitations. The Office Action at Paragraph 83
`
`indicates that "... any depictions in the figures ... can be viewed as
`
`coincidental". Applicant respectfully disagrees.
`
`Indeed, the 10/315250 application refers to each of the
`
`drawings as being "a schematic". FIG. 1 is described as being "a schematic
`
`and highly simplified view". FIGS. 2 - 13 are not described as being
`
`simplified. As such, all aspects of FIGS. 2 - 13 should be considered as a
`
`basis for the claimed negative limitations. In fact, FIGS. 3, 5 and 13 are
`
`replicas of Neonode's mobile phone screen, as may be seen from the
`
`images below.
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-22-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1191 of 1315
`
`

`

`,l.
`::a,::::
`
`Screen shots of the Neonode mobile phone
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-23-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1192 of 1315
`
`

`

`(4)
`
`Applicant has amended dependent claim 25, independent claim
`
`30 and dependent claim 39 to recite "in response to a multi-step user
`
`gesture comprising the user's thumb or finger touching said display at
`
`a location corresponding to an icon representing the function followed
`
`by the user's thumb or finger gliding away from the location along said
`
`display, wherein ... the icon represents only a single function".
`
`(5)
`
`Applicant has amended dependent claim 25, independent claim
`
`30 and dependent claim 39 to recite "wherein ... neither the direction
`
`nor the final destination of the gliding determines the particular
`
`function activated or the content presented on the display as a
`
`result of activation of the function".
`
`(7)
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that the limitation "a tap-absent
`
`state, wherein no tap-activatable icons are present" in dependent claims
`
`23 and 31, and independent claim 37, has a basis in the original disclosure,
`
`as explained hereinbelow. On page 4, lines 10 - 14, the specification states
`
`that the subject invention provides a user-friendly interface "regarding
`
`general application set-up functions, text input functions, and file and task
`
`management", i.e., all phone tasks. The description, at least at page 2,
`
`line 15 - page 3, line 30, provides a comprehensive description of how the
`
`three predefined functions activated by swipe gestures from the menu area
`
`to the display area, enable all phone functions to be performed. Thus, when
`
`there is no active application, as stated at page 3, lines 1 and 2, and on
`
`page 6, line 8, one skilled in the art at the time of the invention would
`
`understand that there are no tap-activatable icons on the display, as in this
`
`state all functions are accessed via one of the three predefined functions.
`
`Moreover, in light of the description that explicitly mentions a state when
`
`no application is active, one skilled in the art would understand that FIG.
`
`1, showing the phone display without any tap-activatable icons, illustrates
`
`the phone display when no application is active.
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-24-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1193 of 1315
`
`

`

`(8)
`
`Applicant has amended dependent claim 25, independent claim
`
`30 and dependent claim 39 to recite "in response to a multi-step user
`
`gesture comprising the user's thumb or finger touching said display at a
`
`location corresponding to an icon representing the function followed by
`
`the user's thumb or finger gliding away from the location along said
`
`display, wherein ... the icon represents only a single function". Support
`
`for these features is provided in TABLE II below.
`
`(9)
`
`Applicant has amended dependent claim 25, independent claim
`
`30 and dependent claim 39 to recite "wherein ... neither the direction
`
`nor the final destination of the gliding determines the particular
`
`function activated or the content presented on the display as a
`
`result of activation of the function". Support for these features is
`
`provided in TABLE II below.
`
`the icon represents only a sing le
`function
`
`TABLE II: Support for claim limitations in 10/315250 application
`Support
`Limitation
`page 2, lines 21 - 24
`an icon representing the function
`page 5, lines 19 - 22
`page 8, lines 21 - 25
`page 2, lines 21 - 24
`page 5, lines 19 - 22
`paqe 8, lines 21 - 25
`FIGS. 3, 5 and 6
`Each touch-and-glide gesture
`beginning at a representation of a
`function opens the corresponding
`function, as shown in FIGS. 3, 5
`and 6. Neither the direction nor
`the final destination of the gliding
`determines the particular function
`activated or the content presented
`on the display as a result of
`activation of the function.
`
`neither the direction nor the final
`destination of the gliding
`determines the particular function
`activated or the content presented
`on the display as a result of
`activation of the function
`
`(10)
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that the limitation "wherein the
`
`first and second locations may be anywhere within said display" is
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-25-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1194 of 1315
`
`

`

`supported in the 10/315250 application, at least by page 7, line 27 - page
`
`8, line 20, by page 4, lines 3 - 7, and by FIGS. 8 - 12, as indicated in
`
`TABLE III below.
`
`TABLE III: Sup1 1ort for claim limitations in 10/315250 application
`Limitation
`Specification Text
`FIGS.
`page 7, line 27 -
`wherein the first
`location may be
`page 8, line 14,
`anywhere within
`taken in
`said display
`conjunction with
`page 4, lines 3 - 7
`
`Fig .. R
`
`wherein the
`second location
`may be anywhere
`within said display
`
`FIGS. 8 and 9
`illustrate the list
`occupying the
`entire display and
`the scroll gestures
`being performed on
`the list. One skilled
`in the art at the
`time of the
`invention would
`understand that the
`scroll gestures may
`begin anywhere
`within said display.
`page 8, lines 17 -
`20 taken in
`conjunction with
`page 4, lines 3 - 7
`
`FIGS. 11 and 12
`illustrate the
`forward and
`backward gestures
`without any specific
`displayed controls.
`One skilled in the
`a rt at the time of
`the invention would
`understand that
`this gesture may
`begin anywhere
`within said display.
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-26-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1195 of 1315
`
`

`

`Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. §103
`
`(12)
`
`At Paragraph 25 - 33, the Office Action rejects claims 21 and
`
`22 as being unpatentable over
`
`the
`
`IBM Simon Personal
`
`Communicator ("Simon") as evidenced by "Simon Says 'Here's How'
`
`- User's Manual",
`
`IBM Corp., Part Number 83G9872 ("Simon
`
`Manual") and O'Malley, "Simonizing the PDA", Byte.com, Internet
`
`Archive Wayback Machine ("O'Malley"), in view of Frank et al., US
`
`Patent No. 5,651,107 ("Frank") and Schultz et al., US Publication No.
`
`2004/0203350 Al ("Schultz").
`
`(13)
`
`At Paragraphs 34 - 41, the Office Action rejects claims 23, 24,
`
`37 and 38 as being unpatentable over Simon in view of Frank and
`
`Schultz, and in further view of a certified translation of Hisatomi et
`
`al., JP Patent Publication No. 2002-055750 A ("Hisatomi"). Regarding
`
`claim 23, Applicant has cancelled this claim without acquiescence to
`
`the Office Action's reasons for rejection, and respectfully submits that
`
`rejection of this claim is thus rendered moot.
`
`(14)
`
`At Paragraphs 42 - 51, the Office Action rejects claims 25, 26
`
`and 28 as being unpatentable over Simon in view of Frank and
`
`Schultz, and in further view of Gough et al., US Patent No. 5,603,053
`
`("Gough") and Hisatomi.
`
`(15)
`
`At Paragraphs 52 - 66, the Office Action rejects claim 27, 30 -
`
`35 and 39 as being unpatentable over Simon, Frank, Shultz, Gough
`
`and Hisatomi, and in further view of Nakagawa et al., US Patent No.
`
`6,128,014 1 ("Nakagawa") and Amro et al., US Patent No. 6,278,443
`
`("Amro").
`
`(16)
`
`At Paragraphs 67 - 77, the Office Action rejects claim 29 as
`
`being unpatentable over Simon, in view of Simon in view of Frank
`
`1 Applicant understands that the Office Action intends to cite Nakagawa et al., US
`6,128,014, instead of Freeman, US 5,289,168.
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-27-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1196 of 1315
`
`

`

`and Schultz, and in further view of Hughes et al., US Publication No.
`
`2009/0192849 Al ("Hughes"), as evidenced by Hughes et al., US
`
`Patent Application No. 61/020,702 ("Hughes Parent"), Ording, US
`
`Publication No. 2008/168404 Al ("Ording") and Schwesig et al., US
`
`Publication No. 2008/0303799 Al ("Schwesig").
`
`(17)
`
`At Paragraphs 78 - 80, the Office Action rejects claims 36 and
`
`40 as being unpatentable over Simon in view of Frank, Schultz,
`
`Gough, Hisatomi, Nakagawa and Amro, and
`
`in further view of
`
`Hughes, Ording and Schwesig.
`
`Brief Discussion of Applied References
`
`The references of Simon Manual, O'Malley, Schultz, Frank,
`
`Gough, Nakagawa, Hughes, Hughes Parent, Ording and Schwesig were
`
`discussed in Applicant's response filed on 3 December 2020.
`
`Hisatomi describes a pen-based touch screen with menus that
`
`the user pulls out from the sides of the screen by dragging a graphic border
`
`of the screen towards the interior of the screen (Hisatomi/ paragraphs
`
`[0018] -
`
`[0025]; FIG. 5 - 7).
`
`Amro describes a touch screen with mouse pad functionality
`
`for moving a cursor on the screen (Amro/ col. 4, line 36 - col. 5, line 13).
`
`Brief Discussion of Additional Reference Cited
`
`The Office Action cites an additional reference, not relied upon;
`
`namely, Singh et al., US Patent No. 6,400,376.
`
`Singh describes panning a virtual page on a screen of a hand(cid:173)
`
`held device in response to movement of the device, as sensed by
`
`accelerometers (Singh/ col. 4, line 43 - col. 5, line 54).
`
`Goertz et al.
`Application No. 16/796,880
`
`-28-
`
`Examiner: Pack, Conrad R.
`Art Unit: 2174
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1043
`GOOGLE v. NEONODE
`IPR2021-01041
`
`Page 1197 of 1315
`
`

`

`Response to Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. §103
`
`The rejections of the claims under 35 U.S.C. §103 will now be
`
`addressed specifically.
`
`Claims 21, 22, 24 - 29, 41 and 42
`
`Claim 21
`
`Independent claim 21
`
`for a portable handheld wireless
`
`computer device, as amended, incudes the features of
`
`"the display having a maximum width of such length as to
`
`enable a user to hold the device in one hand and simultaneously provide
`
`input to the device by touching the display and gliding on the display
`
`away from the touched location by a distance of up to the maximum
`
`width using the thumb of the same hand",
`
`"computer instructions configured to .. . cause the portable
`
`handheld wireless computer device to present a selected application on
`
`top of another application previously presented in said display",
`
`"computer instructions configured to ... enable the portable
`
`wireless computer system to present a user interface, the user interface
`
`comprising at least two states, namely: (a) a tap-present state, wherein
`
`tap-activatable icons for activating a plurality of corresponding pre(cid:173)
`
`designated applications, functions, services or settings are present, each
`
`of the plurality of pre-designated applications, functions, services or
`
`settings configured to be activated in response to a tap on its corresponding
`
`icon ... and (b) a tap-absent state, wherein no tap-activatable icons are
`
`present, the tap-absent state configured to be transitioned to the tap(cid:173)
`
`present state in response to a multi-step user gesture comprising a user's
`
`thumb or finger: (i) touching a graphic located in an edge area of said
`
`display, and then (ii) glid

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket