LegalMetric Time to Trial Report
`Eastern District of Texas
`Patent Cases
`September 2009 to September 2020
`
`This report contains confidential and proprietary information of LegalMetric, Inc. Use of this information by
`anyone other than the purchaser or, if the purchaser is a law firm, the purchaser's client, or disclosure of this
`information to persons other than the purchaser or, if the purchaser is a law firm, the purchaser's client, without
`the consent of LegalMetric, Inc. is prohibited.
`
`The information contained in this report is obtained from the official docket records of the federal courts. No
`attempt has been made to correct that data. For example, cases may be misclassified in the official docket
`records. In addition, cases are classified only by the primary cause of action. Cases having multiple causes of
`action are analyzed only under the primary cause of action identitied on the official court docket.
`
`LegalMetric, Inc. is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and is not engaged in the practice of law. No
`attorney-client relationship exists between LegalMetric, Inc. and any user of its products. LegalMetric provides
`statistical and analytical information to anyone who desires to purchase that information. Any purchaser of
`LegalMetric products who wants legal advice should hire an attorney.
`
`SAMSUNG 1034
`
`1
`
`

`

`Overview:
`The dockets of patent cases of Eastern District of Texas were examined to identify cases from
`September 2009 to September 2020 in which a trial occurred, whether or not that trial resulted in a
`verdict. Trials in cases where settlement or mistrial occurred during the trial are, therefore, included in
`these figures. The time from case filing to the start of trial was then computed. The results are shown
`below.
`
`Average
`Months from Case Filing to Trial
`27.9
`
`Number of Trials
`5
`
`27.1
`
`27.0
`
`38.0
`
`43.6
`
`13.6
`
`26.4
`
`24.1
`
`26.1
`
`27.0
`
`26.2
`
`30.7
`
`83.5
`
`19.2
`
`33.4
`
`36.7
`
`5
`
`30
`
`9
`
`6
`
`2
`
`67
`
`4
`
`6
`
`2
`
`13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`14
`
`18
`
`9
`
`Median
`Months from Case Filing to Trial
`24.1
`
`Number of Trials
`5
`
`25.7
`
`25.6
`
`38.5
`
`46.0
`
`13.6
`
`20.9
`
`24.1
`
`5
`
`30
`
`9
`
`6
`
`2
`
`67
`
`4
`
`Bryson
`Clark
`Davis
`Everingham
`Folsom
`Giblin
`Gilstrap
`Love
`Mazzant
`Mitchell
`Payne
`Rader
`Schell
`Schneider
`Schroeder
`Ward
`
`Bryson
`Clark
`Davis
`Everingham
`Folsom
`Giblin
`Gilstrap
`Love
`
`2
`
`

`

`Median
`Months from Case Filing to Trial
`23.8
`
`Number of Trials
`6
`
`27.0
`
`20.1
`
`30.7
`
`83.5
`
`22.2
`
`28.4
`
`36.1
`
`2
`
`13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`14
`
`18
`
`9
`
`Mazzant
`Mitchell
`Payne
`Rader
`Schell
`Schneider
`Schroeder
`Ward
`
`Average Time to Trial, by Year:
`The average time from case filing to start of trial by calendar year is shown below.
`
`Average Time to Trial, by Year
`
`2,009
`
`2,010
`
`2,011
`
`2,012
`
`2,013
`
`2,015
`
`2,016
`
`2,017
`
`2,018
`
`2,019
`
`2,020
`
`2,014
`
`Year
`
`Total
`Bench
`
`Total
`
`28.7
`
`28.7
`
`33.7
`
`37.6
`
`67.7
`
`14.4
`
`28.5
`
`21.9
`
`40.3
`
`21.5
`
`35.7
`
`Total
`2010
`2011
`2012
`2013
`2014
`2015
`2016
`2017
`2018
`
`45
`
`40
`
`35
`
`30
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`Months from Case Filing
`
`3
`
`

`

`Bench
`Jury
`
`2020
`Total
`2009
`2010
`2011
`2012
`2013
`2014
`2015
`2016
`2017
`2018
`2019
`2020
`
`Total
`
`17.5
`
`28.7
`
`27.5
`
`32.9
`
`31.8
`
`39.6
`
`23.5
`
`29.9
`
`31.0
`
`24.8
`
`29.3
`
`22.4
`
`20.9
`
`19.3
`
`4
`
`

`

`txed
`Case Name
`GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL
`OY
`GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL
`OY
`Innovation Sciences, LLC v.
`Amazon.Com, Inc.,
`Optis Wireless Technology,
`LLC et al v. Apple Inc.
`Optis Wireless Technology,
`LLC et al v. Apple Inc.
`United Services Automobile
`Association v. Wells Fargo
`Bank, N.A.
`Implicit, LLC v. NETSCOUT
`Systems, Inc.
`Fractus, S.A. v. T-Mobile
`US, Inc. et al
`PPS DATA, LLC v. Jack
`Henry & Associates,
`Inc.
`Plastronics Socket Partners,
`Ltd. et al v Dong Weon
`Hwang et al
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC
`v. Great West Casualty
`Company
`Core Wireless Licensing
`S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics,
`Inc. et al
`Arterbury et al v. Odessa
`Separator, Inc.
`Intellectual Ventures I LLC v.
`T Mobile USA, Inc. et al
`Weatherford Technology
`Holdings, LLC et al v. Tesco
`Corporation et al
`Papst Licensing GmbH
`& Co., KG v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., LTD, et al
`GeoDynamics, Incorporated
`v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc.
`Optis Wireless Technology,
`LLC et al v. Huawei Device
`(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
`Optis Wireless Technology,
`LLC et al v. Huawei Device
`(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
`Nanology Alpha LLC v.
`WITec Wissenschaftliche
`Instrumente und
`Technologie GmbH
` Maxell, Ltd. v. ZTE
`Corporation et al
`KAIST IP US LLC v.
`Samsung Electronics Co.,
`LTD., et al
`Network-1 Technologies,
`Inc. v. Hewlett Packard
`Company
`
`Time to Trial (months) Case Number
` 18.4
`2:19cv00071
`
`Start of Trial Date
`9/10/2020
`
` 18.4
`
` 25.7
`
` 17.5
`
` 17.2
`
` 16.7
`
` 21.1
`
` 2.3
`
` 19.9
`
` 17.6
`
` 8.5
`
` 53.0
`
` 26.9
`
` 17.9
`
` 18.3
`
` 3.0
`
` 17.2
`
` 18.5
`
` 18.3
`
` 26.1
`
` 19.0
`
` 18.4
`
` 63.9
`
`2:19cv00070
`
`4:18cv00474
`
`2:19cv00066
`
`2:19cv00066
`
`2:18cv00366
`
`2:18cv00053
`
`2:19cv00255
`
`2:18cv00007
`
`9/10/2020
`
`8/24/2020
`
`8/11/2020
`
`8/3/2020
`
`1/6/2020
`
`12/9/2019
`
`10/3/2019
`
`9/9/2019
`
`2:18cv00014
`
`7/8/2019
`
`6:18cv00299
`
`3/8/2019
`
`2:14cv00912
`
`2/25/2019
`
`5:16cv00183
`
`2:17cv00577
`
`2:17cv00456
`
`2/25/2019
`
`2/4/2019
`
`12/3/2018
`
`6:18cv00388
`
`10/31/2018
`
`2:17cv00371
`
`2:17cv00123
`
`10/4/2018
`
`8/27/2018
`
`2:17cv00123
`
`8/20/2018
`
`6:16cv00445
`
`7/23/2018
`
`5:16cv00179
`
`2:16cv01314
`
`6/18/2018
`
`6/11/2018
`
`6:13cv00072
`
`5/15/2018
`
`5
`
`

`

`txed
`Case Name
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC
`v. FedEx Corporation et al
`Salazar v. HTC Corporation
`VirnetX Inc. et al v. Apple
`Inc.
`ProStrakan, Inc. et al v.
`Actavis Laboratories UT,
`Inc. et al
`Ericsson Inc. et al v. TCL
`Communication Technology
`Holdings, LTD. et al
`Tinnus Enterprises, LLC et
`al v. Telebrands Corporation
`Packet Intelligence LLC v.
`Sandvine Corporation et al
`Network-1 Technologies,
`Inc. v. Hewlett Packard
`Company
`Packet Intelligence LLC v.
`NetScout Systems, Inc. et al
`Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin
`International, Inc. et al
`Tech Pharmacy Services,
`LLC v. Alixa Rx LLC et al
`Allergan, Inc. v. Teva
`Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
`et al
`Elbit Systems Land and C4I
`Ltd. et al v. Hughes Network
`Systems, LLC et al
`Evicam International, Inc. v.
`Enforcement Video, LLC
`Eidos Display, LLC et al v.
`AU Optronics Corporation et
`al
`Biscotti Inc. v. Microsoft
`Corp.
`Realtime Data LLC v.
`Riverbed Technology, Inc. et
`al
`Realtime Data LLC v. Actian
`Corporation et al
`GeoDynamics, Incorporated
`v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc.
`ERFINDERGEMEINSCHAF
`T UROPEP GbR v. Eli Lilly
`and Company et al
`GeoDynamics, Incorporated
`v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc.
`Saint Lawrence
`Communications LLC v.
`Motorola Mobility LLC
`Whirlpool Corporation v.
`TST Water, LLC
`Alfonso Cioffi et al v.
`Google, LLC
`3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v.
`The City of Fort Worth,
`Texas
`
`Time to Trial (months) Case Number
` 20.4
`2:16cv00980
`
`Start of Trial Date
`5/14/2018
`
` 19.0
` 64.8
`
` 24.6
`
` 34.9
`
` 21.7
`
` 20.6
`
` 57.6
`
` 18.9
`
` 18.1
`
` 21.8
`
` 24.1
`
` 30.3
`
` 19.5
`
` 74.1
`
` 42.3
`
` 24.5
`
` 24.5
`
` 18.9
`
` 21.6
`
` 18.1
`
` 24.3
`
` 17.7
`
` 48.0
`
` 29.1
`
`2:16cv01096
`6:12cv00855
`
`2:16cv00044
`
`5/7/2018
`4/2/2018
`
`2/1/2018
`
`2:15cv00011
`
`12/4/2017
`
`6:16cv00033
`
`2:16cv00147
`
`6:13cv00072
`
`2:16cv00230
`
`2:16cv00190
`
`4:15cv00766
`
`2:15cv01455
`
`11/15/2017
`
`11/6/2017
`
`11/6/2017
`
`10/10/2017
`
`9/5/2017
`
`8/28/2017
`
`8/28/2017
`
`2:15cv00037
`
`7/31/2017
`
`4:16cv00105
`
`6:11cv00201
`
`2:13cv01015
`
`6:15cv00468
`
`6:15cv00463
`
`2:15cv01546
`
`2:15cv01202
`
`2:15cv01546
`
`2:15cv00351
`
`2:15cv01528
`
`2:13cv00103
`
`6:14cv00725
`
`7/10/2017
`
`6/26/2017
`
`6/5/2017
`
`5/24/2017
`
`5/22/2017
`
`4/20/2017
`
`4/17/2017
`
`3/27/2017
`
`3/20/2017
`
`3/7/2017
`
`2/6/2017
`
`1/30/2017
`
`6
`
`

`

`txed
`Case Name
`Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al
`v. Dell Inc. et al
`Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith &
`Nephew, Inc. et al
`PerdiemCo, LLC. v.
`Industrack LLC
`Barry v. Medtronic Inc.
`Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
`et al
`Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al
`v. Alcatel-Lucent S.A. et al
`Mobile Telecommunications
`Technologies, LLC v. HTC
`America, Inc.
`Core Wireless Licensing
`S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics,
`Inc. et al
`Core Wireless Licensing
`S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics,
`Inc. et al
`Cellular Communications
`Equipment LLC v. Apple Inc.
`et al
`Flexuspine, Inc. v. Globus
`Medical, Inc.
`Mars, Inc. v. TruRX LLC et
`al
`GENBAND US LLC v.
`Metaswitch Networks Corp.
`et al
`Core Wireless Licensing
`S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics,
`Inc. et al
`Metaswitch Networks Ltd v.
`GENBAND US LLC et al
`Equistar Chemicals, LP et al
`v. Westlake Chemical
`Corporation
`Gonzalez v. New Life
`Ventures, Inc.
`Imperium IP Holdings
`(Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
`VirnetX Inc. et al v. Apple
`Inc.
`Motio, Inc. v. BSP Software
`LLC
`Better Mouse Company,
`LLC v. Steelseries ApS et al
`GENBAND US LLC v.
`Metaswitch Networks Corp.
`et al
`Adaptix, Inc. v.
`Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et
`al
`ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.
`v. Apple, Inc.
`
`Time to Trial (months) Case Number
` 18.1
`6:15cv00639
`
`Start of Trial Date
`1/3/2017
`
` 17.6
`
` 17.7
`
` 32.5
` 54.4
`
` 19.0
`
` 34.4
`
` 23.6
`
` 23.6
`
` 29.0
`
` 17.2
`
` 33.8
`
` 26.2
`
` 17.8
`
` 20.1
`
` 25.1
`
` 16.5
`
` 19.8
`
` 38.6
`
` 39.3
`
` 22.2
`
` 23.7
`
` 46.9
`
` 22.8
`
`2:15cv01047
`
`2:15cv00727
`
`1:14cv00104
`2:12cv00207
`
`6:15cv00163
`
`2:13cv00948
`
`12/5/2016
`
`11/4/2016
`
`11/3/2016
`10/25/2016
`
`10/3/2016
`
`9/19/2016
`
`2:14cv00911
`
`9/12/2016
`
`2:14cv00912
`
`9/12/2016
`
`6:14cv00251
`
`9/6/2016
`
`6:15cv00201
`
`6:13cv00526
`
`2:14cv00033
`
`8/15/2016
`
`5/2/2016
`
`3/29/2016
`
`2:14cv00911
`
`3/21/2016
`
`2:14cv00744
`
`6:14cv00068
`
`2:14cv00907
`
`4:14cv00371
`
`6:12cv00855
`
`4:12cv00647
`
`2:14cv00198
`
`2:14cv00033
`
`3/11/2016
`
`3/7/2016
`
`2/8/2016
`
`2/1/2016
`
`1/25/2016
`
`1/19/2016
`
`1/11/2016
`
`1/11/2016
`
`6:12cv00022
`
`12/10/2015
`
`2:13cv01112
`
`11/12/2015
`
`7
`
`

`

`txed
`Case Name
` Promethean Insulation
`Technology LLC v. Sealed
`Air Corporation et al
`SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google
`Inc. et al
`ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.
`v. Apple, Inc.
`NobelBiz, Inc. v. Global
`Connect, L.L.C.
`EVM Systems, LLC v. Rex
`Medical, L.P. et al
`DataQuill Limited v. ZTE
`Corporation et al
`Freeny et al v. Murphy Oil
`Corporation et al
`Nichia Corporation v.
`Everlight Electronics Co.,
`Ltd. et al
`Georgetown Rail Equipment
`Company v. Holland L.P.
`Core Wireless Licensing
`S.a.r.l. v. Apple, Inc.
`ams Sensors USA Inc. v.
`Intersil Corporation
`Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc et
`al v. Watson Laboratories
`Inc
`Smartflash LLC et al v.
`Apple Inc, et al
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP v.
`Samsung Electronics Co.
`LTD., et al
`Droplets, Inc. v. eBay, Inc. et
`al
`Mobile Telecommunications
`Technologies, LLC v.
`Samsung
`Telecommunications
`America, LLC
`Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v.
`Electronic Arts, Inc.
`Mobile Telecommunications
`Technologies, LLC v. Apple,
`Inc.
`Raytheon Company v. Indigo
`Systems Corporation et al
`Personal Audio, LLC v. CBS
`Corporation
`U.S. Ethernet Innovations,
`LLC v. Texas Instruments
`Incorporated et al
`EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC
`v. Landis+Gyr Inc. et al
`Bianco MD vs Globus
`Medical Inc
`U.S. Ethernet Innovations,
`LLC v. Texas Instruments
`Incorporated et al
`
`Time to Trial (months) Case Number
` 22.2
`2:13cv01113
`
`Start of Trial Date
`10/26/2015
`
` 20.9
`
` 20.9
`
` 41.2
`
` 29.8
`
` 21.9
`
` 20.1
`
` 19.9
`
` 23.2
`
` 36.3
`
` 75.2
`
` 23.9
`
` 20.6
`
` 22.9
`
` 40.1
`
` 20.4
`
` 20.4
`
` 19.3
`
` 91.9
`
` 16.9
`
` 33.0
`
` 35.5
`
` 25.8
`
` 30.7
`
`2:14cv00011
`
`2:13cv01112
`
`6:12cv00244
`
`6:13cv00184
`
`2:13cv00634
`
`2:13cv00791
`
`2:13cv00702
`
`6:13cv00366
`
`6:12cv00100
`
`4:08cv00451
`
`2:13cv00192
`
`6:13cv00447
`
`2:13cv00213
`
`10/7/2015
`
`9/14/2015
`
`9/8/2015
`
`8/17/2015
`
`6/15/2015
`
`6/8/2015
`
`5/11/2015
`
`4/8/2015
`
`3/9/2015
`
`3/3/2015
`
`2/26/2015
`
`2/16/2015
`
`2/9/2015
`
`2:11cv00401
`
`2:13cv00259
`
`1/13/2015
`
`12/15/2014
`
`6:13cv00259
`
`2:13cv00258
`
`4:07cv00109
`
`2:13cv00270
`
`6:11cv00491
`
`6:11cv00317
`
`2:12cv00147
`
`6:11cv00491
`
`12/1/2014
`
`11/10/2014
`
`10/28/2014
`
`9/8/2014
`
`6/16/2014
`
`6/2/2014
`
`5/13/2014
`
`4/7/2014
`
`8
`
`

`

`txed
`Case Name
`SimpleAir, Inc. v. Microsoft
`Corporation et al
`SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google
`Inc. et al
`Stragent, LLC et al v. Intel
`Corporation
`Commonwealth Scientific
`and Industrial Research
`Organisation v. Cisco
`Systems, Inc.
`Beneficial Innovations, Inc.
`v. Advance Publications, Inc.
`et al
`Bianco MD vs Globus
`Medical Inc
`SimpleAir, Inc. v. Microsoft
`Corporation et al
`Cassidian Communications,
`Inc. v. microDATA GIS, Inc.
`Cassidian Communications,
`Inc. v. microDATA GIS, Inc.
`L.C. Eldridge Sales Co., Ltd.
`et al v. Azen Manufacturing
`Pte., Ltd. et al
`TQP Development LLC vs v.
`1-800-Flowers.com Inc et al
`Personalized Media
`Communications, L.L.C. v.
`Zynga, Inc.
`WI-LAN Inc. v. HTC
`Corporation et al
`Lake Cherokee Hard Drive
`Technologies, L.L.C. v. Bass
`Computers, Inc. et al
`SynQor, Inc. et al v. Artesyn
`Technologies, Inc. et al
`Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc
`WI-LAN Inc. v. HTC
`Corporation, et al
`WI-LAN Inc. v.
`Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
`Alexsam, Inc. v. The Gap,
`Inc. et al
`KKG LLC v. Reynolds
`Consumer Products, Inc., et
`al
`Alexsam, Inc. v. Barnes
`& Noble, Inc. et al
`Ericsson Inc. et al v. D-Link
`Corporation et al
`OPTi Inc. v. Silicon
`Integrated Systems Corp. et
`al
`Alexsam, Inc. v. The Gap,
`Inc. et al
`Alexsam, Inc. v. Barnes
`& Noble, Inc. et al
`Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy
`Stores, L.P. et al
`
`Time to Trial (months) Case Number
` 30.0
`2:11cv00416
`
`Start of Trial Date
`3/17/2014
`
` 7.2
`
` 31.0
`
` 31.1
`
` 33.1
`
` 21.8
`
` 28.0
`
` 20.8
`
` 20.7
`
` 24.5
`
` 30.5
`
` 21.1
`
` 32.4
`
` 37.4
`
` 21.8
`
` 22.6
` 3.7
`
` 33.1
`
` 5.7
`
` 29.0
`
` 5.0
`
` 32.6
`
` 33.9
`
` 4.3
`
` 4.3
`
` 3.8
`
`2:13cv00587
`
`6:11cv00421
`
`6:11cv00343
`
`3/17/2014
`
`3/10/2014
`
`2/3/2014
`
`2:11cv00229
`
`1/21/2014
`
`2:12cv00147
`
`2:11cv00416
`
`2:12cv00162
`
`2:12cv00162
`
`6:11cv00599
`
`2:11cv00248
`
`2:12cv00068
`
`2:11cv00068
`
`2:10cv00216
`
`2:11cv00444
`
`6:11cv00441
`6:13cv00252
`
`6:10cv00521
`
`2:13cv00004
`
`2:11cv00012
`
`2:13cv00003
`
`6:10cv00473
`
`2:10cv00279
`
`2:13cv00004
`
`2:13cv00003
`
`2:13cv00002
`
`1/14/2014
`
`1/13/2014
`
`12/20/2013
`
`12/16/2013
`
`11/18/2013
`
`11/18/2013
`
`11/12/2013
`
`10/15/2013
`
`8/12/2013
`
`7/30/2013
`
`7/15/2013
`7/8/2013
`
`7/8/2013
`
`6/24/2013
`
`6/12/2013
`
`6/3/2013
`
`6/3/2013
`
`5/28/2013
`
`5/13/2013
`
`5/13/2013
`
`4/29/2013
`
`9
`
`

`

`txed
`Case Name
`OPTi Inc. v. Silicon
`Integrated Systems Corp. et
`al
`Alexsam, Inc. v. J.C. Penney
`Company, Inc. et al
`Hitachi Consumer
`Electronics Co. Ltd. et al v.
`Top Victory Electronics
`(Taiwan) Co LTD et al
`Alexsam Inc v. IDT
`Corporation
`Oasis Research, LLC v.
`Adrive, LLC et al
`VirnetX Inc., et al v. Apple
`Inc.
`REALTIME DATA, LLC
`D/B/A/ IXO, v. T-Mobile,
`USA Inc
`Patent Harbor, LLC v.
`Audiovox Corporation et al
`VirnetX Inc., et al v. Apple
`Inc.
`DDR Holdings, LLC v.
`Hotels.com et al
`First American CoreLogic,
`Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc. et al
`Ambato Media, LLC v.
`Clarion Co., Ltd et al
`Versata Software, Inc. et al
`v. Internet Brands, Inc. f/k/a
`CarsDirect.com et al
`SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix
`Systems, Inc. et al
`Cardsoft, Inc. et al v.
`Verifone Holdings, Inc. et al
`Pact XPP Technologies, AG
`v. Xilinx, Inc., et al
`Golden Hour Data Systems,
`Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc. et al
`CEATS, Inc. v. Continental
`Airlines, Inc.
`Internet Machines LLC v.
`ALIENWARE
`CORPORATION et al
`Eolas Technologies
`Incorporated v. Adobe
`Systems Incorporated et al
`Soverain Software LLC v.
`J.C. Penney Corporation,
`Inc. et al
`Alexsam, Inc. v. Shell Oil
`Company et al
`Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. v.
`Amazon.com, Inc. et al
`Tyco Healthcare Group LP
`et al v. Applied Medical
`Resources Corp
`Bright Response LLC v.
`Google Inc et al
`
`Time to Trial (months) Case Number
` 33.0
`2:10cv00279
`
`Start of Trial Date
`4/29/2013
`
` 3.8
`
` 32.6
`
` 19.0
`
` 30.5
`
` 30.8
`
` 28.4
`
` 28.6
`
` 26.6
`
` 80.2
`
` 29.3
`
` 34.8
`
` 46.2
`
` 50.0
`
` 51.0
`
` 52.5
`
` 67.7
`
` 23.2
`
` 24.6
`
` 28.0
`
` 28.6
`
` 45.0
`
` 24.5
`
` 23.0
`
` 47.4
`
`2:13cv00005
`
`2:10cv00260
`
`2:11cv00362
`
`4:10cv00435
`
`6:10cv00417
`
`6:10cv00493
`
`6:10cv00361
`
`6:10cv00417
`
`2:06cv00042
`
`2:10cv00132
`
`2:09cv00242
`
`2:08cv00313
`
`2:08cv00158
`
`2:08cv00098
`
`2:07cv00563
`
`2:06cv00381
`
`6:10cv00120
`
`6:10cv00023
`
`4/29/2013
`
`4/8/2013
`
`4/1/2013
`
`3/14/2013
`
`3/4/2013
`
`2/4/2013
`
`12/6/2012
`
`10/29/2012
`
`10/8/2012
`
`9/24/2012
`
`7/9/2012
`
`6/13/2012
`
`6/12/2012
`
`6/4/2012
`
`5/14/2012
`
`5/11/2012
`
`3/12/2012
`
`2/21/2012
`
`6:09cv00446
`
`2/6/2012
`
`6:09cv00274
`
`11/14/2011
`
`2:08cv00015
`
`6:09cv00422
`
`9:09cv00176
`
`10/18/2011
`
`10/11/2011
`
`9/28/2011
`
`2:07cv00371
`
`8/8/2011
`
`10
`
`

`

`txed
`Case Name
`Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc
`Convolve, Inc. v. Dell Inc. et
`al
`Personal Audio, LLC v.
`Apple, Inc. et al
`Colorquick, LLC v. Vistaprint
`Limited et al
`Clear With Computers, LLC
`v. Hyundai Motor America,
`Inc.
`Mondis Technology Ltd v.
`LG Electronics, Inc. et al
`Key Energy Services, Inc. v.
`C.C. Forbes, LLC et al
`Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
`Versata Software, Inc. et al
`v. SAP America, Inc. et al
`Bedrock Computer
`Technologies, LLC v.
`Softlayer Technologies, Inc.
`et al
`Bedrock Computer
`Technologies, LLC v.
`Softlayer Technologies, Inc.
`et al
`Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco
`Systems, Inc.
`Cheetah Omni LLC v.
`Verizon Communications,
`Inc. et al
`ACQIS LLC v. International
`Business Machines Corp
`Alexsam, Inc. v. IDT,
`Corporation
`LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Asus
`Computer International et al
`Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v.
`Johnson & Johnson et
`al
`SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn
`Technologies, Inc. et al
`Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC
`v. BMW North America, LLC
`et al
`Datatreasury Corporation v.
`Wells Fargo &
`Company et al
`Pozen Inc. v. Par
`Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple,
`Inc.
`Shurflo LLC v. ITT
`Corporation et al
`Ameranth, Inc. v. Menusoft
`Systems Corporation et al
`Bright Response LLC v.
`Google Inc et al
`
`Time to Trial (months) Case Number
` 27.8
`2:09cv00097
` 37.0
`2:08cv00244
`
`Start of Trial Date
`8/2/2011
`7/19/2011
`
` 23.9
`
` 23.0
`
` 19.8
`
` 41.4
`
` 32.8
`
` 24.4
`
` 48.6
`
` 22.3
`
` 21.8
`
` 43.9
`
` 21.1
`
` 22.4
`
` 40.6
`
` 53.0
`
` 39.5
`
` 37.0
`
` 25.7
`
` 55.6
`
` 22.9
`
` 30.5
`
` 30.8
`
` 38.5
`
` 35.2
`
`9:09cv00111
`
`6:09cv00323
`
`6:09cv00479
`
`2:07cv00565
`
`2:08cv00346
`
`6:09cv00203
`
`2:07cv00153
`
`6:09cv00269
`
`6/23/2011
`
`6/20/2011
`
`6/14/2011
`
`6/13/2011
`
`6/6/2011
`
`5/17/2011
`
`5/9/2011
`
`4/27/2011
`
`6:09cv00269
`
`4/11/2011
`
`2:07cv00341
`
`6:09cv00260
`
`6:09cv00148
`
`2:07cv00420
`
`2:06cv00348
`
`2:07cv00451
`
`2:07cv00497
`
`9:08cv00164
`
`4/5/2011
`
`3/14/2011
`
`2/14/2011
`
`2/8/2011
`
`1/31/2011
`
`1/24/2011
`
`12/13/2010
`
`10/18/2010
`
`2:06cv00072
`
`10/12/2010
`
`6:08cv00437
`
`6:08cv00088
`
`6:08cv00059
`
`2:07cv00271
`
`2:07cv00371
`
`10/12/2010
`
`9/27/2010
`
`9/20/2010
`
`9/13/2010
`
`8/2/2010
`
`11
`
`

`

`txed
`Case Name
`Network-1 Security
`Solutions, Inc. v. Cisco
`Systems, Inc. et al
`Input/Output, Inc. et al v.
`Sercel, Inc.
`Tyco Healthcare Group LP
`et al v. E-Z-EM, Inc.
`ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al
`v. Diamond Innovations Inc
`Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco
`Systems, Inc.
`IP Innovation, LLC. et al v.
`Red Hat Inc. et al
`Soverain Software LLC v.
`CDW Corporation et al
`Clearvalue, Inc. et al v. Pearl
`River Polymers, Inc. et al
`Datatreasury Corporation v.
`Wells Fargo &
`Company et al
`VirnetX, Inc. v. Microsoft
`Corporation
`Tyco Healthcare Group LP
`et al v. Applied Medical
`Resources Corp
`Colucci v. Callaway Golf
`Company
`OPTi Inc. v. Advanced Micro
`Devices, Inc.,
`Smith & Nephew, Inc.
`v. Arthrex, Inc.
`Function Media, L.L.C. v.
`Google, Inc. et al
`REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a
`IXO v. PACKETEER, INC. et
`al
`Southwest Efuel Network,
`L.L.C. v. Transaction
`Tracking Technologies, Inc.
`Retractable Technologies,
`Inc. v. Occupational &
`Medical Innovations, Ltd.
`Fiber Systems International,
`Inc. v. Applied Optical
`Systems, Inc.
`Retractable Technologies,
`Inc. v. Becton Dickinson and
`Company
`Cummins-Allison Corp v.
`Shinwoo Information &
`Telecommunications Co.,
`Ltd. et al
`
`Time to Trial (months) Case Number
` 29.1
`6:08cv00030
`
`Start of Trial Date
`7/12/2010
`
` 44.6
`
` 35.6
`
` 21.6
`
` 33.1
`
` 30.7
`
` 29.8
`
` 63.2
`
` 48.7
`
` 36.7
`
` 4.2
`
` 19.7
`
` 39.1
`
` 30.1
`
` 30.6
`
` 20.8
`
` 29.6
`
` 20.4
`
` 36.1
`
` 28.5
`
` 25.1
`
`5:06cv00236
`
`2:07cv00262
`
`6:08cv00325
`
`2:07cv00341
`
`2:07cv00447
`
`6:07cv00511
`
`6:06cv00197
`
`2:06cv00072
`
`6:07cv00080
`
`9:09cv00176
`
`6:08cv00288
`
`2:06cv00477
`
`2:07cv00335
`
`2:07cv00279
`
`6:08cv00144
`
`7/8/2010
`
`6/7/2010
`
`6/3/2010
`
`5/11/2010
`
`4/30/2010
`
`4/26/2010
`
`4/12/2010
`
`3/16/2010
`
`3/8/2010
`
`3/5/2010
`
`3/1/2010
`
`2/16/2010
`
`2/8/2010
`
`1/19/2010
`
`1/12/2010
`
`2:07cv00311
`
`1/11/2010
`
`6:08cv00120
`
`12/14/2009
`
`2:06cv00473
`
`11/16/2009
`
`2:07cv00250
`
`10/30/2009
`
`9:07cv00196
`
`9/28/2009
`
`12
`
`