throbber
In The Matter Of:
`
`Motorola Mobility, Inc.
`vs.
`Apple, Inc., et al.
`                                                                            
`   ___________________________________________________
`
`JOSEPH SHAIN
`
`and
`
`THOMAS ERIKSSON
`
`March 19, 2012 
`
`   ___________________________________________________
`                                       
`
`Samsung et al. v. Neonode
`IPR2021-00145 (US 8,812,993)
`Neonode Ex. 2005
`
`

`

`Page 1
`
`Joseph Shain and Thomas Eriksson
`March 19, 2012
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
`IN THE MATTER OF )
` )
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., )
` Plaintiff, )
` )CIVIL ACTION NO:
`v. )1:10cv023580-Civ-UU
` )
`APPLE INC., )
` Defendant. )
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )
`APPLE INC., )
` Counterclaim Plaintiff )
` )
`v. )
` )
`MOTOROLA, INC. and )
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., )
` Counterclaim Defendants.)
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
` 30(b)(6) VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF NEONODE, INC.
` DESIGNEES: JOSEPH SHAIN and THOMAS ERIKSSON
` VOLUME I
` Monday, March 19, 2012
` AT: 1:32 p.m.
` Taken at:
` Neonode Technologies AB
` Linnegatan 89D
` 115 23 Stockholm
` Sweden
`
`Court Reporter:
`ANNE-MARIE STALLARD
`Accredited Real-time Reporter
`
`Merrill Corporation - Chicago
`(312) 386-2000
`www.merrillcorp.com/law
`
`77b7859f-2f5e-47cf-b77b-e569fade9eff
`
`Samsung et al. v. Neonode
`IPR2021-00145 (US 8,812,993)
`Neonode Ex. 2005 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Joseph Shain and Thomas Eriksson
`March 19, 2012
`Page 2
`
`Page 4
`
` E X H I B I T I N D E X
`
`1
`
`23
`
`No. Description Page
`4
`Exhibit 1 Document labeled ..........................11
` MOTO-APPLE-0007392648 through
`5
` 0007392651
`6
`Exhibit 2 Document labeled ..........................22
` MOTO-APPLE-0007392580 through
`7
` 0007392621
`8
`Exhibit 3 Document labeled ..........................22
` MOTO-APPLE 0007179111 through
`9
` 0007179134
`10 Exhibit 4 Document labeled Neonode ..................27
` 000001
`11
`Exhibit 5 Document labeled ..........................37
`12 MOTO-APPLE-0007392656 through
` 0007392659
`13
`Exhibit 6 Physical exhibit and ......................50
`14 slipsheet labeled Neonode
` 000014
`15
`Exhibit 7 Document labeled Neonode ..................58
`16 000003 through 000010
`17 Exhibit 8 Document labeled Neonode ..................62
` 000011 through 000013
`18
`Exhibit 9 Document labeled Neonode ..................66
`19 000002
`20 Exhibit 10 Document labeled .........................68
` MOTO-APPLE 0007513551 through
`21 0007513560
`22 Exhibit 11 Postings from various ....................77
` websites about Neonode N1 and
`23 Neonode N1m
`24 Exhibit 12 List of weblinks to ......................78
` documentation regarding
`25 Neonode N1
`
`1
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`2 Appearing for the Plaintiff:
`3
` CATHLEEN GARRIGAN, ESQ.,
` QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP,
`4
` 50 California Street, 22nd Floor
` San Francisco,
`5
` California 04111
` Telephone: 415-875-6341
`
`67
`
`Appearing for the Defendant:
`8
` JILL J. HO, ESQ.,
` WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP,
`9
` 201 Redwood Shores Parkway,
` Redwood Shores,
`10
` CA 94065-1134
` Telephone: 650-802-3163
`11
`12 Appearing for Neonode, Inc.:
`13
` STEVE KRONENGOLD, ESQ.,
` SRK KRONENGOLD LAW OFFICES
`14
` Oppenheimer 7, Rabin Science Park,
` Rehovot
`15
` Israel 76701
` Telephone: 972-8-9360998
`16
`17 VIDEOGRAPHER:
`18
` PHILLIP HILL
`19
` Videographer
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 5
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the beginning of
`videotape number 1, volume 1, this is the video
`operator speaking, Phillip Hill for Merrill Legal
`Solutions, Chicago office. Today's date is March 19,
`2012. The time on the video screen is 13:32 Swedish
`time.
` We are at the Stockholm offices of Neonode to
`take the videotaped deposition of Yossi Shain. This is
`taken in the matter of Motorola Mobility, Inc. versus
`Apple Inc. This is being heard in the United States
`District Court for the Southern District of Florida,
`case number 1:10cv023580-Civ-UU. Please will counsel
`introduce themselves and state whom they represent.
` MS. GARRIGAN: Cathleen Garrigan from Quinn
`Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan on behalf of Motorola
`Mobility Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.
` MS. HO: Jill Ho from Weil Gotshal & Manges,
`on behalf of Apple.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Steve Kronengold, SRK Law,
`on behalf of Neonode.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The court reporter today
`is Ms. Anne-Marie Stallard of Merrill Legal Solutions,
`London office. Please will the court reporter swear in
`the witness.
`
`12:39:23
`13:31:52
`13:31:55
`13:31:59
`13:32:05
`13:32:13
`13:32:14
`13:32:19
`13:32:23
`13:32:28
`13:32:30
`13:32:36
`13:32:47
`13:32:50
`13:32:53
`13:32:56
`13:33:01
`13:33:05
`13:33:08
`13:33:10
`13:33:16
`13:33:17
`13:33:24
`13:33:26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` W I T N E S S I N D E X
`
`Page 3
`
`1
`
`23
`
`Witness Page
`4
`JOSEPH SHAIN (Affirmed) ..............................6
`5
` Examination by MS. GARRIGAN .................6
`6
`THOMAS ERIKSSON (Affirmed) ..........................12
`7
` Examination by MS. GARRIGAN ................12
`8
` Examination by MS. HO ...................25
`9
` Further Examination by MS. GARRIGAN ............30
`10 Further Examination by MS. HO ...............32
`11 JOSEPH SHAIN (Recalled) .............................34
`12 Examination by MS. GARRIGAN (Continued) ..........34
`13 Examination by MS. HO ...................79
`14 Further Examination by MS. GARRIGAN ............90
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Merrill Corporation - Chicago
`(312) 386-2000
`www.merrillcorp.com/law
`
`2 (Pages 2 to 5)
`
`77b7859f-2f5e-47cf-b77b-e569fade9eff
`
`Samsung et al. v. Neonode
`IPR2021-00145 (US 8,812,993)
`Neonode Ex. 2005 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Joseph Shain and Thomas Eriksson
`March 19, 2012
`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`
`13:33:27
`13:33:38
`13:33:38
`13:33:39
`13:33:42
`13:33:45
`13:33:50
`13:33:52
`13:33:53
`13:33:54
`13:33:58
`13:34:02
`13:34:05
`13:34:08
`13:34:11
`13:34:14
`13:34:17
`13:34:19
`13:34:23
`13:34:26
`13:34:27
`13:34:29
`13:34:30
`13:34:31
`13:34:34
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`13:34:38
`13:34:40
`13:34:41
`13:34:43
`13:34:44
`13:34:46
`13:34:48
`13:34:50
`13:34:54
`13:34:57
`13:35:00
`13:35:02
`13:35:04
`13:35:08
`13:35:09
`13:35:12
`13:35:15
`13:35:19
`13:35:19
`13:35:21
`13:35:22
`13:35:27
`13:35:28
`13:35:29
`13:35:32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` JOSEPH SHAIN
`having been duly affirmed testified as follows:
`EXAMINATION BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Shain. Thank you very much
`for taking the time to meet with me today. I'm
`an attorney for Motorola and I'm going to ask you
`a series of questions today. Have you ever been
`deposed before?
` A. No.
` Q. So if I ask a question that's unclear, you
`should just let me know and I'll try to rephrase
`the question so that we can reach a mutual
`understanding of what it is. Don't speculate if you
`don't know what the answer is, and if you could just
`give clear, verbal answers, it will help our court
`reporter out today. So no nodding.
` A. Okay.
` Q. And then is there any reason why you can't
`testify accurately and truthfully today?
` A. No.
` Q. Could you please state your full name for
`the record.
` A. Joseph Shain.
` Q. And your current address?
` A. 27B Pinsker Street, Rehovot, Israel.
`
`13:35:35
`13:35:37
`13:35:38
`13:35:40
`13:35:41
`13:35:45
`13:35:47
`13:35:51
`13:35:53
`13:36:00
`13:36:06
`13:36:10
`13:36:12
`13:36:14
`13:36:16
`13:36:19
`13:36:22
`13:36:24
`13:36:28
`13:36:35
`13:36:39
`13:36:41
`13:36:47
`13:36:49
`13:36:52
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 7
` Q. Are you familiar with the company Neonode?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Are you an employee at Neonode?
` A. I am.
` Q. When did you first become an employee at
`Neonode?
` A. I first started working for Neonode
`in April 2008.
` Q. What was your title when you first joined
`Neonode in 2008?
` A. Patent Engineer.
` Q. And is that your title today?
` A. No, today I'm Vice President of Intellectual
`Property.
` Q. Between when you first joined and being
`Vice President of Intellectual Property, did you have
`any intermediate titles?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you worked at Neonode continuously
`since --
` A. Oh, possibly Intellectual Property Manager at
`one point.
` Q. Thank you, and that actually brings up another
`thing. If at any point you want to go back and clarify
`something or correct it, you should just do that; stop
`
`13:36:55
`13:37:03
`13:37:08
`13:37:14
`13:37:15
`13:37:17
`13:37:23
`13:37:26
`13:37:30
`13:37:33
`13:37:36
`13:37:38
`13:38:15
`13:38:16
`13:38:18
`13:38:22
`13:38:25
`13:38:32
`13:38:34
`13:38:40
`13:38:40
`13:38:46
`13:38:50
`13:39:16
`13:39:19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`me and we'll go back.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Have you worked at Neonode continuously since
`2008?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What are your current responsibilities as
`the Vice President of Intellectual Property?
` A. Drafting and prosecuting patent applications
`that cover the company's technological innovations, and
`trademark applications as well.
` Q. Are you familiar with the N1 phone?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Was the N1 phone developed by Neonode?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Was the N1 phone the first phone developed by
`Neonode?
` A. Yes.
` Q. When did Neonode begin working on the N1 phone?
` A. In 2001.
` Q. Who was involved in developing the N1 phone in
`2001?
` A. Thomas Eriksson and Magnus Goertz.
` Q. How long did they work on developing the N1
`phone?
` A. The phone was commercially available
`
`Page 9
`on November 1, 2004, so I would say three years. More
`than three years.
` Q. What were the goals in developing the N1 phone?
` MR. KRONENGOLD: I object to that question to
`the extent that it asks for confidential and
`proprietary information. The witness -- Yossi, you may
`answer, but it's a broad question and please do not go
`into any confidential proprietary information of
`the company as to what the goals were in developing
`the N1 phone.
` THE WITNESS: So, briefly, the goals were to
`create a phone, something novel. A touch screen phone.
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. When was the N1 phone first announced to
`the public?
` A. I believe it was announced in 2001. I was able
`to establish announcements going back to 2002.
` Q. Are you familiar with the German technology
`con- -- the German technology conference, CeBit?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Was the N1 phone shown at CeBit in 2002?
` A. I'm not sure. I believe it was. I'm not
`positive.
` Q. Do you know if the N1 phone was demonstrated at
`the March 2002 CeBit conference?
`3 (Pages 6 to 9)
`
`Merrill Corporation - Chicago
`(312) 386-2000
`www.merrillcorp.com/law
`
`77b7859f-2f5e-47cf-b77b-e569fade9eff
`
`Samsung et al. v. Neonode
`IPR2021-00145 (US 8,812,993)
`Neonode Ex. 2005 - Page 3
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`Joseph Shain and Thomas Eriksson
`March 19, 2012
`Page 10
` A. I believe it was. I -- yes, I don't know that
`for sure. I didn't look into that.
` Q. Do you know who would have attended the CeBit
`conference in 2002 on behalf of Neonode?
` A. I imagine Magnus Goertz, possibly
`Thomas Eriksson. But actually that's conjecture on
`my part.
` Q. Okay.
` A. I don't know for sure.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Again, if you don't know,
`just say "I do not know".
` THE WITNESS: Okay.
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. Do you know if an N1 phone was actually shown
`at the March 2002 CeBit conference?
` A. I don't know.
` Q. Did an N1 phone, or a prototype of the phone,
`exist in 2002?
` A. I don't know. I believe it did. I don't know.
`Certainly the end of 2002, but you asked
`about March 2002.
` Q. So by December of 2002 was there an N1 phone?
` A. There was something, because I have a picture
`of one from 2002, so I know that it exists.
` Q. Why don't we mark that as an exhibit, what
`Page 11
`
`13:47:45
`13:48:59
`13:49:00
`13:49:05
`13:49:07
`13:49:11
`13:49:14
`13:49:18
`13:49:24
`13:49:28
`13:49:30
`13:49:32
`13:49:33
`13:49:35
`13:49:42
`13:49:43
`13:49:43
`13:49:47
`13:49:50
`13:49:54
`13:49:56
`13:49:57
`13:50:01
`13:50:02
`13:50:06
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`(1:49 p.m.)
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record,
`the time is 13:49. Thank you very much.
` MS. GARRIGAN: So for the record, during
`a break counsel had a discussion about the most
`appropriate Neonode witness to answer questions about
`the 2001 to 2005 timeframe and, based on our
`discussion, Neonode has designated Mr. Thomas Eriksson
`to answer questions about the earlier timeframe, and
`I believe Apple does not have any objections to
`the substitution of witnesses.
` MS. HO: No objection.
` MS. GARRIGAN: Could we swear in the witness.
` THOMAS ERIKSSON
`having been duly affirmed testified as follows:
`EXAMINATION BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. Thank you, Mr. Eriksson.
` So going back to when Neonode was first announced
`in 2001, are you familiar with the German technology
`conference CeBit?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Was the N1 phone shown at CeBit in March 2002?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Was a -- was an actual prototype of the device
`shown?
`
`Page 13
`
`13:39:24
`13:39:27
`13:39:41
`13:39:43
`13:39:45
`13:39:52
`13:39:56
`13:39:57
`13:39:57
`13:40:09
`13:40:10
`13:40:13
`13:40:13
`13:40:14
`13:40:19
`13:40:23
`13:40:34
`13:40:37
`13:40:40
`13:40:50
`13:40:54
`13:40:55
`13:41:00
`13:41:04
`13:41:10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`13:41:13
`13:41:15
`13:41:15
`13:41:16
`13:41:17
`13:41:20
`13:41:22
`13:41:25
`13:41:29
`13:41:36
`13:41:37
`13:42:02
`13:42:11
`13:42:14
`13:42:20
`13:42:20
`13:42:22
`13:42:25
`13:42:27
`13:42:41
`13:42:42
`13:42:51
`13:42:53
`13:43:01
`13:43:17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`you're gesturing to.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Can I see it from here?
` MR. KRONENGOLD: This was produced in
`response to the subpoena.
` MS. GARRIGAN: I actually have this.
` THE WITNESS: Okay.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: And it is entitled "New
`Ultra-Mobile Smartphone Neonode N1" dated December 21,
`2002.
` MS. GARRIGAN: Can we mark exhibit 1.
` (Exhibit 1 marked for identification)
` MS. HO: I'll note for the record that this
`has a Moto-Apple Bates stamp instead of a Neonode Bates
`stamp.
` MS. GARRIGAN: Right. Mr. Kronengold gave us
`a list of links in one of his subpoena responses and so
`we went to the links and we produced them. They didn't
`actually produce documents to us.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Cathleen -- off the record.
`Cathleen and Jill.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record,
`the time is 13:42.
`(1:42 p.m.)
` (Discussion off the record.)
`
`13:50:06
`13:50:07
`13:50:13
`13:50:13
`13:50:15
`13:50:20
`13:50:21
`13:50:23
`13:50:27
`13:50:28
`13:50:29
`13:50:33
`13:50:38
`13:50:43
`13:50:45
`13:50:47
`13:50:51
`13:50:55
`13:51:01
`13:51:05
`13:51:12
`13:51:12
`13:51:12
`13:51:18
`13:51:24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. And did Neonode refer to the device as "N1" at
`that -- at that time?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Who presented the Neonode phone at the CeBit
`conference in 2002?
` A. Myself.
` Q. Did you give a demonstration of how the device
`worked at the conference?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Were people attending the conference permitted
`to try out the N1 device?
` A. Separate seatings, not publicly.
` Q. Were the separate seatings for people that were
`not Neonode employees?
` A. Typically large operators or customers.
` Q. Did the N1 phone shown at CeBit have
`the ability to lock and unlock?
` A. No, it was more of a show general of
`the concept of gesturing instead of key pressing.
` THE COURT REPORTER: Sorry, could you repeat,
`"The concept of gesturing", was it?
` THE WITNESS: A gesture-based user interface,
`that was the thing we showed.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Could you repeat
`4 (Pages 10 to 13)
`Merrill Corporation - Chicago
`(312) 386-2000
`www.merrillcorp.com/law
`
`77b7859f-2f5e-47cf-b77b-e569fade9eff
`
`Samsung et al. v. Neonode
`IPR2021-00145 (US 8,812,993)
`Neonode Ex. 2005 - Page 4
`
`

`

`Joseph Shain and Thomas Eriksson
`March 19, 2012
`Page 14
`
`Page 16
`
`the question, please?
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. Sure. Do you -- does the N1 phone have
`the capability of locking and unlocking?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did the prototype that was shown at CeBit have
`the ability to lock and unlock?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And was the unlocking functionality shown at
`the CeBit 2002 conference?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did you personally demonstrate the unlocking
`function?
` A. It was part -- it was not a big thing. It was
`part of the user interface. It was part of
`a gesture-based concept we showed, so in terms of our
`finished product, it was more a -- a concept we showed
`the public to look at the -- the acceptance of
`a gesture-based user interface.
` Q. And what was the gesture that unlocked
`the phone in 2002?
` A. The idea was to use the phone with a one-hand
`navigation, so that was the reason it was on the bottom
`side of the phone.
` Q. And when you say "bottom side", could you
`Page 15
`
`13:53:37
`13:53:39
`13:53:41
`13:53:44
`13:53:46
`13:53:47
`13:53:50
`13:53:53
`13:53:54
`13:53:56
`13:53:56
`13:53:57
`13:53:58
`13:54:01
`13:54:02
`13:54:05
`13:54:07
`13:54:10
`13:54:13
`13:54:17
`13:54:18
`13:54:19
`13:54:22
`13:54:25
`13:54:30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`it was late 2004.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: The question was, "Was
`the manual available?" Was a manual --
` MS. GARRIGAN: I'll clarify.
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. When you were showing the phone at the CeBit
`conference, was there also a manual present?
` A. No.
` Q. Did the manual exist as of 2002 for the --
` A. No.
` Q. -- N1 phone?
` A. No.
` Q. Do you know about when the manual was made for
`the N1 phone?
` A. It was made available when we launched
`the product because we had to give a manual to
`the product when we put it on the market.
` Q. At the 2002 CeBit conference did you or anyone
`from Neonode hand out any sort of literature or flyers
`about the phone?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did any of that literature describe how to use
`the phone?
` A. It described a gesture-based user interface.
` Q. Do you know -- and I understand that
`
`13:51:25
`13:51:26
`13:51:26
`13:51:28
`13:51:31
`13:51:32
`13:51:35
`13:51:37
`13:51:41
`13:51:45
`13:51:47
`13:51:52
`13:51:56
`13:51:57
`13:52:00
`13:52:03
`13:52:08
`13:52:12
`13:52:16
`13:52:19
`13:52:21
`13:52:24
`13:52:28
`13:52:33
`13:52:34
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`13:52:37
`13:52:40
`13:52:43
`13:52:46
`13:52:49
`13:52:52
`13:52:54
`13:52:58
`13:52:59
`13:53:01
`13:53:03
`13:53:07
`13:53:08
`13:53:10
`13:53:11
`13:53:14
`13:53:14
`13:53:15
`13:53:18
`13:53:18
`13:53:21
`13:53:22
`13:53:25
`13:53:29
`13:53:33
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 17
`the unlocking functionality was a very small part of
`the phone, but do you know if that unlocking
`functionality was in any of the literature that was
`distributed?
` A. I don't know. I can't say for sure.
` Q. Was the -- and I apologize because I'm probably
`going to butcher the name of this place. Was
`the Neonode N1 phone shown in December 2002 at a press
`conference in Fryshuset in Stockholm?
` A. Fryshuset.
` Q. Fryshuset. I practiced, just to let you know.
` A. Yes, it was. That was kind of the official
`launch in Sweden.
` Q. And was that conference in December of 2002?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And, again, was an N1 device shown at that
`conference?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Were people who attended the conference in 2002
`permitted to use the N1 device?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And did that device also have the locking and
`unlocking functionality?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did you -- were you the person that
`5 (Pages 14 to 17)
`Merrill Corporation - Chicago
`(312) 386-2000
`www.merrillcorp.com/law
`
`elaborate a little bit more about how the --
` A. The screen has a top and bottom, so if you hold
`the device there is a top side of screen and bottom
`side of the screen, and to reach the top of the screen
`is very difficult with one hand; that's why it's
`positioned on the bottom side.
` Q. What gesture would a user make to unlock the N1
`phone?
` A. Sweep from one side to the other.
` Q. From left to right or right to left?
` A. Actually both, depending if you're a left or
`right-handed person.
` Q. But was the phone capable --
` A. Yes.
` Q. -- of being set for left-handed or
`right-handed?
` A. Yes.
` Q. I see. And if you were right-handed, was it
`left to right?
` A. Typically. You can program it, it's not
`a setting in the phone.
` Q. Was the -- was a manual for the N1 phone
`available at the 2002 CeBit conference?
` A. No, it was not available to buy. We showed
`the concept. The phone was available to buy, I think
`
`13:54:32
`13:54:36
`13:54:40
`13:54:43
`13:54:44
`13:54:52
`13:54:56
`13:54:59
`13:55:03
`13:55:10
`13:55:14
`13:55:16
`13:55:18
`13:55:20
`13:55:23
`13:55:23
`13:55:27
`13:55:27
`13:55:28
`13:55:30
`13:55:33
`13:55:37
`13:55:42
`13:55:43
`13:55:49
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`77b7859f-2f5e-47cf-b77b-e569fade9eff
`
`Samsung et al. v. Neonode
`IPR2021-00145 (US 8,812,993)
`Neonode Ex. 2005 - Page 5
`
`

`

`Joseph Shain and Thomas Eriksson
`March 19, 2012
`Page 18
`demonstrated the phone at the December 2002 --
` A. Yeah, one of the few. A couple of other people
`that are not in the company any more.
` Q. And who were those people?
` A. Magnus Goertz, the other founder, and
`Jonas Lovgren, which is not in the company any more.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Did you get that name?
` THE COURT REPORTER: I can check them later
`if that's easier.
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. Did you demonstrate the unlocking functionality
`of the Neonode phone at the December 2002 conference?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And was that -- did you demonstrate it by
`making the sweep from left to right across the bottom
`of the screen?
` A. Yes.
` Q. I take it you're right-handed then?
` A. Yeah. Again, it's one of the -- one of the
`functions in the phone.
` Q. Did Neonode pass out literature about the N1
`phone at the December 2002 conference?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And did any of that literature describe how
`the phone functioned?
`
`13:58:26
`13:58:29
`13:58:35
`13:58:41
`13:58:44
`13:58:48
`13:58:51
`13:58:51
`13:58:56
`13:58:56
`13:58:57
`13:59:00
`13:59:06
`13:59:23
`13:59:27
`13:59:29
`13:59:30
`13:59:33
`13:59:35
`13:59:38
`13:59:41
`13:59:43
`13:59:50
`13:59:52
`13:59:52
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 20
` A. Because it was a new, innovative product that
`you could operate with one hand and it was very small
`and a new type of user interface that you haven't seen
`in a handset at that time.
` Q. Let's talk about that user interface for
`a minute; is there a name for it?
` A. Neno.
` Q. And did Neonode do the programming for the Neno
`interface?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did anyone other than Neonode do any of
`the programming for the Neno -- Neno interface?
` A. No.
` Q. Did the Neno interface include the unlocking
`and locking functionality?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So that was programmed by Neonode as well?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do you know whose idea it was to have the phone
`unlock with a sweeping gesture?
` A. It was my -- myself and the other founder,
`Magnus Goertz.
` Q. How did you come up with the idea?
` MR. KRONENGOLD: I object to the extent that
`the question calls for the disclosure of confidential
`Page 21
`
`Page 19
`
`and proprietary information.
` To the extent that you can answer
`the question without revealing proprietary
`information --
` THE WITNESS: No, I'm not answering
`the question.
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. That's fine.
` Did -- after the 2002 conferences, did Neonode
`begin taking preorders for the N1 phone?
` A. Yes.
` Q. About how many preorders did Neonode receive?
` A. About 120,000.
` Q. When was the N1 phone first available for sale?
` A. It was after summer 2004.
` Q. And who was in --
` A. We had a press release out. I don't remember
`exactly, I think it was -- I think we have that
`somewhere, but it should be after summer 2004.
` MS. GARRIGAN: Counsel, do you want me to
`reserve questions about the sale of the Neonode phone
`for Mr. Shain?
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Yes.
` MS. GARRIGAN: Okay.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Thank you.
`6 (Pages 18 to 21)
`Merrill Corporation - Chicago
`(312) 386-2000
`www.merrillcorp.com/law
`
`13:55:52
`13:55:54
`13:55:59
`13:56:01
`13:56:03
`13:56:08
`13:56:16
`13:56:18
`13:56:21
`13:56:22
`13:56:23
`13:56:26
`13:56:32
`13:56:32
`13:56:35
`13:56:39
`13:56:40
`13:56:40
`13:56:44
`13:56:46
`13:56:52
`13:56:55
`13:56:58
`13:56:59
`13:57:02
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`13:57:05
`13:57:06
`13:57:09
`13:57:13
`13:57:14
`13:57:17
`13:57:20
`13:57:22
`13:57:24
`13:57:24
`13:57:25
`13:57:27
`13:57:31
`13:57:32
`13:57:47
`13:57:52
`13:57:59
`13:58:03
`13:58:06
`13:58:10
`13:58:13
`13:58:16
`13:58:17
`13:58:22
`13:58:25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. I believe so.
` Q. Would it have been the same literature that was
`passed out at the March conference?
` MR. KRONENGOLD: I object to the extent that
`you're asking the witness to speculate.
` If you know, great. If you do not know,
`simply say "I don't know".
` THE WITNESS: I don't know. I don't
`remember.
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. Do you remember if the literature passed out at
`the December 2002 conference described the unlocking
`functionality?
` A. I don't remember.
` Q. Did the two -- did Neonode demonstrate the N1
`phone at any other conferences in 2002?
` A. No, not that -- no.
` Q. Did -- was the phone demonstrated at any
`conferences before it was available for sale?
` A. Don't remember.
` Q. Did the conferences in 2002 generate a lot of
`attention for the N1 phone?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Why do you believe it generated so much
`attention?
`
`13:59:53
`13:59:54
`13:59:56
`13:59:59
`14:00:02
`14:00:03
`14:00:04
`14:00:04
`14:00:05
`14:00:07
`14:00:09
`14:00:11
`14:00:14
`14:00:33
`14:00:42
`14:00:46
`14:00:48
`14:00:53
`14:00:57
`14:01:03
`14:01:06
`14:01:08
`14:01:10
`14:01:11
`14:01:23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`77b7859f-2f5e-47cf-b77b-e569fade9eff
`
`Samsung et al. v. Neonode
`IPR2021-00145 (US 8,812,993)
`Neonode Ex. 2005 - Page 6
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`Joseph Shain and Thomas Eriksson
`March 19, 2012
`Page 22
` MS. GARRIGAN: Can you mark exhibit 2?
` THE COURT REPORTER: Has the witness got
`a copy?
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Yes.
` MS. GARRIGAN: Yes, but take the marked
`exhibit.
` (Exhibit 2 marked for identification)
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. Do you recognize this document?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Is this a true and correct copy of the N1 user
`manual?
` A. It looks like it, yes.
` Q. Take your time if you want to look at the whole
`document.
` MR. KRONENGOLD: Counsel, I think that Yossi
`Shain would be able to identify.
` MS. GARRIGAN: Okay.
` Can I mark exhibit 3.
` (Exhibit 3 marked for identification)
`BY MS. GARRIGAN
` Q. Mr. Eriksson, have you ever seen this document
`before?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What is it?
`
`14:06:38
`14:06:40
`14:06:42
`14:06:47
`14:06:51
`14:06:52
`14:06:52
`14:06:55
`14:06:59
`14:06:59
`14:07:00
`14:07:04
`14:07:06
`14:07:11
`14:07:14
`14:07:18
`14:07:19
`14:07:20
`14:07:27
`14:07:32
`14:07:34
`14:07:35
`14:07:37
`14:08:00
`14:08:05
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes, I see that.
` Q. And the instructions tell the user to, "Press
`the power button once", and then, "The text 'Right
`sweep to unlock' appears on the screen"; do you see
`that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did the N1 phone ever have an unlock user
`interface where the words "Right sweep to unlock"
`appeared?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do you know about when that user interface
`would have existed on the N1 phone?
` A. 2004, at the start.
` Q. And did the user interface for the N1 ever
`change so that it didn't say "Right sweep to unlock"?
` A. Yes.
` Q. When was -- and when was that?
` A. At the launch of our second product, the N1m.
` Q. And did the N1 and the N1m require the same
`gesture to unlock the phone?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And is that an accept sweep?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did Neonode write the N1 Quick Start Guide?
` A. Yes.
`
`Page 25
` Q. And is that the type of document that Neonode
`would normally generate during the course of its
`business?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And do you know about when the N1 Quick Start
`Guide was first written, as opposed to version 5?
` A. It was in -- in terms of development of
`the product, so I would say the first draft early 2004,
`and then it was released as a final version with
`the product when it was launched.
` MS. GARRIGAN: I believe that's all
`the questions I have for Mr. Eriksson. Thank you very
`much for your time, I really appreciate it.
`EXAMINATION BY MS. HO
` Q. I do have some follow-up questions.
` If you could go back in your mind to
`the demonstration in March 2002 that you discussed with
`counsel. I believe you stated that certain customers were
`permitted to -- to use the device at that demonstration; is
`that correct?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. Was any of that under non-disclosure agreement?
` A. Not that I know of.
` Q. So who were the -- the people who attended that
`conference that were permitted to use the prototype N1
`7 (Pages 22 to 25)
`Merrill Corporation - Chicago
`(312) 386-2000
`www.merrillcorp.com/law
`
`14:01:24
`14:01:24
`14:01:24
`14:01:24
`14:01:24
`14:01:24
`14:02:06
`14:02:12
`14:02:13
`14:02:14
`14:02:16
`14:02:20
`14:02:22
`14:02:24
`14:02:27
`14:02:38
`14:02:41
`14:02:43
`14:03:57
`14:03:59
`14:04:11
`14:04:11
`14:04:15
`14:04:15
`14:04:16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`14:04:17
`14:04:20
`14:04:24
`14:04:27
`14:04:31
`14:04:34
`14:04:54
`14:04:57
`14:04:57
`14:05:00
`14:05:05
`14:05:09
`14:05:13
`14:05:19
`14:05:41
`14:05:45
`14:05:53
`14:05:58
`14:06:01
`14:06:05
`14:06:07
`14:06:08
`14:06:10
`14:06:23
`14:06:28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 23
` A. It's the manual attached to the product,
`I think version 0.5 it says. I think it came in
`several versions but this is one of them.
` Q. Are you able to attribute any date to this
`document?
` A. This is probably early 2004 document.
` Q. Is this a true and correct copy of an N1
`manual?
` A. There's actually several, but this is -- yes,
`this is one of them -- one of the -- the first ones.
`We did several versions of this, but ...
` Q. Do you know if this is a draft or a final copy
`of the manual, or is there any way to tell?
` A. Mm. This is the same as was with
`the product -- the format of this is that the manual is
`much smaller, it's -- the format of this manual was
`about this size, so this is enlarged, the sizes are
`smaller and attached in the product package.
` Q. So when a user bought an N1 phone, they would
`have received a manual like this?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Can I draw your attention to the page that ends
`in 119, the numbers in the bottom right-hand corner.
`Do you see about halfway down there's a heading that
`says "Keylock - unlocking the unit"?
`
`14:08:06
`14:08:09
`14:08:11
`14:08:12
`14:08:14
`14:08:17
`14:08:26
`14:08:29
`14:08:32
`14:08:37
`14:08:41
`14:08:42
`14:08:44
`14:08:47
`14:08:47
`14:08:51
`14:08:53
`14:08:56
`14:09:00
`14:09:05
`14:09:06
`14:09:06
`14:09:11
`14:09:13
`14:09:19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket