`v.
`Masimo Corporation (Patent Owner)
`Petitioner Demonstratives
`Case No. IPR2020-01722
`U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`Before Hon. Josiah C. Cocks, Robert L. Kinder, Amanda F. Wieker
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE(cid:3)EXHIBIT(cid:3)– NOT(cid:3)EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1023
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01722
`
`1
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds
`
`Petition, 2-3; see Institution Decision (Paper 8), 9-10, 25; Ex. 2004
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`2
`
`
`
`Issues Narrowed to Claims 6, 14, and 21
`
`Reply, 1 note 1 (citing Exhibit 2004)
`
`’695 patent, claim 6
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`3
`
`
`
`Grounds Remaining After Masimo’s Disclaimer
`
`Petition, 2-3; see Institution Decision (Paper 8), 9-10, 25; Ex. 2004
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`4
`
`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Overview of the ’695 Patent
`
`Overview of the Prior Art
`
`Issue 1: Masimo's Tissue Thickness Arguments are Ineffectual
`
`Issue 2: Masimo’s “Experiment” is Unavailing
`
`Issue 3: A POSITA would have had a Reasonable Expectation
`of Success when Performing the Proposed Modifications
`
`Issue 4: Masimo Mischaracterizes the Prior Art
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`9
`
`14
`
`25
`
`31
`
`38
`
`5
`
`
`
`Overview of the ’695 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE(cid:3)EXHIBIT(cid:3)– NOT(cid:3)EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`6
`
`
`
`’695 Patent Overview
`
`APPLE-1001, Abstract
`
`APPLE-1001, 8:9-19
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1001, FIG. 3
`
`7
`
`7
`
`
`
`’695 Patent Overview
`
`APPLE-1001, claims 6, 14, 21
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`8
`
`
`
`Overview of the Prior Art
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE(cid:3)EXHIBIT(cid:3)– NOT(cid:3)EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`9
`
`
`
`Chin Overview
`
`APPLE-1006, 8:25-29 (cited at Petition, 61)
`
`APPLE-1006, FIG. 7B (from POR, 19)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`10
`
`
`
`Sarantos / Mendeslon 1991 Overview
`
`Petition, 37
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Petition, 41
`
`11
`
`11
`
`
`
`Ackermans Overview
`
`APPLE-1015, Abstract (cited at Petition, 64)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1016, FIG. 2 (from Petition, 65)
`
`12
`
`12
`
`
`
`Chin in Combination with Sarantos / Ackermans
`
`Petition, 62; see also 103
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Petition, 62, 103
`
`13
`
`13
`
`
`
`Issue 1
`
`Masimo's Tissue Thickness Arguments are
`Ineffectual
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE(cid:3)EXHIBIT(cid:3)– NOT(cid:3)EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`14
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Patent Owner Response
`
`POR, 17
`
`POR, 20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`15
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 5
`
`Chin
`
`APPLE-1006, 5:55-56 (cited at Reply, 5)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`16
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Webster
`
`APPLE-1021, 88 (cited at Reply, 6)
`
`APPLE-1021, 91 (cited at Reply, 6)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`17
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 5
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`18
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Dr. Anthony’s Declaration
`
`Reply, 4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1003, [99] (cited at Petition, 63)
`
`19
`
`19
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Chin
`
`Reply, 4
`
`APPLE-1006, 5:55-56 (cited at Reply, 5)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`20
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`POR, 22
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`21
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Chin
`
`Reply, 10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`APPLE-1006, 5:55-56 (cited at Reply, 5)
`
`22
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`POR, 34
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`23
`
`
`
`Masimo's tissue thickness arguments are ineffectual
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Chin
`
`Reply, 14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`24
`
`APPLE-1006, 5:55-56 (cited at Reply, 5)
`
`24
`
`
`
`Issue 2
`
`Masimo’s “Experiment” is Unavailing
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE(cid:3)EXHIBIT(cid:3)– NOT(cid:3)EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`25
`
`
`
`Masimo’s “experiment” is unavailing
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`POR, 20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`26
`
`
`
`Masimo’s “experiment” is unavailing
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 7
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Reply, 7
`
`27
`
`27
`
`
`
`Masimo’s “experiment” is unavailing
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 7
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Reply, 7
`
`28
`
`28
`
`
`
`Masimo’s “experiment” is unavailing
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 8 (quoting Sarantos, Mendelson 1991)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`29
`
`
`
`Masimo’s “experiment” is unavailing
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 8-9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`30
`
`
`
`Issue 3
`
`A POSITA would have had a Reasonable
`Expectation of Success when Performing the
`Proposed Modifications
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE(cid:3)EXHIBIT(cid:3)– NOT(cid:3)EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`31
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in
`combining Sarantos-Mendelson and Chin
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`POR, 25
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`32
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in
`combining Sarantos-Mendelson and Chin
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`33
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in
`combining Sarantos-Mendelson and Chin
`Dr. Anthony’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1003, [98] (cited at Petition, 62)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`34
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in
`combining Ackermans and Chin
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`POR, 37
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`35
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in
`combining Ackermans and Chin
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`36
`
`
`
`A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in
`combining Ackermans and Chin
`Dr. Anthony’s Declaration
`
`APPLE-1003, [162] (cited at Petition, 104)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`37
`
`37
`
`
`
`Issue 4
`
`Masimo’s Arguments Rely on
`Mischaracterizations of the Prior Art
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE(cid:3)EXHIBIT(cid:3)– NOT(cid:3)EVIDENCE
`
`38
`
`38
`
`
`
`Masimo mischaracterizes Sarantos
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Reply, 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`39
`
`
`
`Masimo mischaracterizes Chin
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Chin
`
`POR, 12, 23, 34
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`40
`
`APPLE-1006, 5:55-56 (cited at Reply, 5)
`
`40
`
`
`
`Masimo mischaracterizes the Sarantos/Chin combination
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`41
`
`Reply, 12
`
`41
`
`
`
`Masimo mischaracterizes Ackermans
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`Reply, 16
`
`42
`
`
`
`Appendix
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE(cid:3)EXHIBIT(cid:3)– NOT(cid:3)EVIDENCE
`
`43
`
`43
`
`
`
`Overview of the Instituted Grounds
`
`Grounds covering only disclaimed claims
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Petition, 2-3; see Institution Decision
`(Paper 8), 9-10, 25; Ex. 2004
`
`44
`
`44
`
`