throbber
Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series 43
`
`Second European Glaucoma Symposium
`
`Helsinki, May 1984
`
`Edited by E.L. Greve, W. Leydhecker
`
`and C. Raitta
`
`Dr W. Junk publishers
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 1 of 9
`
`

`

`Distributors
`
`for the United States and Canada: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 190 Old Derby
`Street, Hingham, MA 02043, USA
`for the UK and Ireland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, MTP Press Limited,
`Falcon House, Queen Square, Lancaster LAI lRN, UK
`for all other countries: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Distribution Center,
`P.O. Box 322, 3300 AH Dordrecht, The Netherlands
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
`
`European Glaucoma Symposium (2nd: 1984 : Helsinki,
`Finland)
`Second European Glaucoma Symposium, Helsinki, M~
`1984.
`
`(Document a ophthalmologica. Proceedings series ;
`v. 43)
`Includes index.
`1. Claucoma--Congresses. 2. Perimetry--Congresses.
`I. Greve, Erik L.
`II. Leydhecker, W. (Wolfgang)
`III. Raitta, C.
`IV. Title. V. Series.
`[DNLM:
`1. Glaucoma--congresses. 2. Glaucoma--therapy--con(cid:173)
`gresses. W3 D0637 v.43 I WW 290 E887 1984sJ
`
`RE871.E97 1984
`
`617.7'41
`
`85-4287
`
`ISBN-13: 978-94-010-8934-0
`DOI:I0.I007/978-94-009-5516-5
`
`e-ISBN-13: 978-94-009-5516-5
`
`Copyright
`
`© 1985 by Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.
`
`Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1 st edition 1985
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
`retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical,
`photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of
`the publishers,
`Dr W. Junk Publishers, P.O. Box 163, 3300 AD Dordrecht, The Netherlands
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 2 of 9
`
`

`

`GONIOSCOPIC TRABECULOTOMY. FIRST RESULTS
`
`MANUEL QUINTANA
`(Barcelona, Spain)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`We describe a surgical method of goniotrabeculotomy which achieves a
`section of the trabecular meshwork without damage to the external wall of
`Schlemm's canal. Complications are minimal. A one year follow-up shows a
`fall of intraocular pressure in almost all cases. However, this effect is non(cid:173)
`lasting and a slow rise in pressure occurs in most cases. Yet, medical therapy,
`if reinstituted, achieves a better control than before the operation and usually
`can be less intense.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Increased resistance to the outflow of aqueous through the trabecular mesh(cid:173)
`work is the most accepted pathogenic mechanism in the majority of open(cid:173)
`angle glaucomas ("trabecular glaucomas"). Thus, the rational treatment of
`the trabecular glaucomas should consist in opening the trabecular meshwork
`(TM). This has been attempted since the last century (11, 12; 13) and many
`times later on (1,2,4,5,8,9), but all the techniques described so far have
`failed (3, 10) despite the in vitro evidence (6, 7) of the effectiveness of
`trabeculotomy.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`
`A technique of trabeculotomy has been devised, which eliminates most of the
`presumed causes of failure of previous methods. The patient is operated
`under general anaesthesia; both eyes can be done at the same time. Pupils
`should be miotic. A coaxial operating microscope is necessary, with magni(cid:173)
`fication of x 10. We favour the Swann lens for angle visualisation. Our
`trabeculotome is a 0.4 x 15 mm needle, or an insuline-type needle; we bend
`the tip 20-30° with a needle-holder; a factory-made needle (Morie, France) is
`even better. The needle is inserted into a syringe filled with "healon".
`"Modus operandi" is as in classical goniotomy (surgeon in the temporal side
`of the patient, patient's head rotated away from the surgeon, assistant holding
`
`E.L. Greve, W. Leydhecker& C. Raitta (eds.), Second European Glaucoma Symposium, Helsinki 1984.
`© 1985, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht. ISBN 978-94-010-8934-0
`
`265
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 3 of 9
`
`

`

`Fig. 1. Schematic drawing comparing the tangential approach to the perpendicular
`approach as in classic goniotomy or goniotrabeculotomy.
`
`the vertical recti). The needle penetrates the anterior chamber at 6 hours
`(right eye) or 12 hours (left eye) through the scleral side of the limbus; this is
`in order to run parallel to Schlemm's canal. Penetration at 6 or 12 hours
`allows a tangential approach (Fig. 1) to the angle; this avoids the pupillary
`field and the convexity of the lens. Penetration is carried on under direct
`control, to avoid the prismatic effect of the goniolens. Once the needle is in
`the anterior chamber, the goniolens is inserted, held with the surgeon's left
`hand. A drop of "healon" is a good wetting agent between cornea and gonio(cid:173)
`lens. The TM is incised with the tip of the needle. From now on, and with the
`concavity of the tip towards the surgeon, the trabeculotome is progressively
`introduced in the angle. Only the tip of the instrument is introduced into
`Schlemm's canal, and the TM is stripped slowly, gently and easily from the
`canal's lumen towards the anterior chamber as the needle progresses in the
`angle (Fig. 2). Since the convexity of the tip is facing the external wall of the
`canal, this structure is not damaged. This is why we bend the tip and we point
`it towards the anterior chamber.
`As in goniotomy, the assistant will rotate the globe clockwise as the
`surgeon
`introduces the
`trabeculotome counter-clockwise. A 100-120°
`trabeculotomy can be achieved. Healon can be injected at will at any time if
`the surgeon wants to deepen the angle. There is usually no chamber loss, but
`if this is the case, healon is injected.
`Once trabeculotomy is completed, the trabeculotome is withdrawn, taking
`care of injecting some healon before leaving the anterior chamber (internal
`"tamponnade"); this avoids any loss of aqueous and the chamber remains
`full. The goniolens and rectus forceps are also withdrawn. A steroid-antibiotic
`ointment is applied, as well as a mild mydriatic. The eyes are patched for 24
`hours.
`
`266
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 4 of 9
`
`

`

`Fig. 2. Goniophotography at operation. The tip of the needle stripping the trabecular
`meshwork.
`
`Twenty-one eyes of 12 patients have been operated with this technique,
`with a follow-up period of one year (mean). There are 13 eyes with chronic
`open-angle glaucoma, 3 with pigmentary glaucoma, 4 disgenetic and 1 steroid(cid:173)
`induced. Details are summarized in Table 1.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Complications
`
`There are no operative complications, not even hyphema, provided there is no
`chamber loss ("ex vacuum" hyphema).
`Postoperative complications are hypherma, moderate, in 6 cases; and
`atropy of the iris in three cases. Iris atrophy does not occur since we give
`steroids and we dilate the pupils (see discussion).
`
`Clinical results
`
`The behaviour of the ocular pressures over one year is represented in Table 1
`and Fig. 3. They can be summarized as follows: fall of pressure below 20 mm
`Hg in almost all cases in the first postoperative weeks, followed by a progress(cid:173)
`ive rise in the second month (mean). From the second month, medical
`therapy must be reinstituted in most cases, although less intensively in
`regard to the preoperative treatment. At one year, most cases are controlled,
`
`267
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 5 of 9
`
`

`

`18 P-T
`
`22 -
`24 -
`
`19 P-T
`
`18 P-T
`20 T
`20 -
`19 T-A 250
`18 T-A 250
`20 T-A 125
`21 T-A 125
`16 T
`19 T
`lost
`lost
`17 P-T
`10 -
`17 T-A 125
`15 T-A 125
`13T
`15 P-T
`
`Po 1 Year
`
`18 P-T
`
`20 -
`24 -
`
`34 -
`
`30 -
`30 -
`23 -
`48 -
`38 -
`23 -
`28 -
`25 -
`22 -
`27 -
`26 -
`34 -
`14 -
`23 -:
`24 -
`23 -
`30 -
`
`Po 2 Months
`
`hyphema +
`
`Iris a trophy
`Iris a trophy
`hyphema +
`hyphema +
`hyphema + +
`
`Iris atropy
`
`hyphema +
`Complications
`
`Upper half of each patient: right eye; lower half: left eye
`Dash (-) after Po figures indicates no treatment.
`
`30 -
`
`14 -
`14 -
`
`10 -
`
`18 -
`18 -
`14 -
`28 -
`19 -
`18 -
`16 -
`19 -
`6-
`38 -
`18 -
`14 -
`14 -
`17 -
`15 -
`18 -
`17 -
`
`14
`38 P-T
`
`20 P-T
`20 P-T
`
`NOOP.
`
`24 -
`46 -
`24 P-T NOOP.
`32 P-T
`39 P-T-A 500
`21 P-T-A 500
`40 T-A 500
`45 T-A 500
`30 P-T-A 500
`30 P-T-A 500
`23 T-A-250
`25 T-A 250
`30 P-T-A 375
`34 P-T-A 375
`30 P-T
`21 P-T
`20 P-T-A 750
`20 P-T-A 750
`40 P-T-A 750
`40 P-T-A 750
`
`pigmentary
`
`(R.E.)
`cortisonic
`disgenetic
`
`+
`
`C.O.A.G.
`
`pigmentary
`
`C.O.A.G.
`
`C.O.A.G
`
`C.O.A.G.
`
`disgenetic
`
`C.O.A.G.
`
`disgenetic
`
`C.O.A.G.
`
`C.O.A.G.
`
`16
`
`45
`
`13
`
`41
`
`62
`
`76
`
`80
`
`24
`
`66
`
`61
`
`75
`
`60
`
`Mr.C.
`
`Mr. V.
`
`Miss O.
`
`Mrs.N.
`
`Mr. V.
`
`Mr. C.
`
`Mrs. s.
`
`Mr. V.
`
`Mr.B.
`
`Mr.Z.
`
`Mr.N.
`
`Mrs. C.
`
`Po 15 d.
`
`Po Preop./mmHg
`
`Glaucoma
`
`Age
`
`Patient
`
`2/day: A'= acetazolamide, number after A indicates mgrs. per day; COAG '= chronic open angle glaucoma).
`Table 1. Patient data: age, sex, type of glaucoma, ocular pressures, complications and treatment (P '= pilocarpine 2% 3/day: T'= timolol 0.50%
`
`00
`0\
`N
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 6 of 9
`
`

`

`ment; T = treatment -indicated in Table 1).
`Fig. 3. Graphic showing the behaviour of ocular pressures in the one year period. (MTT = maximum tolerated medical treatment; no T = no treat(cid:173)
`1.y
`
`f5"
`
`DAYS
`
`~~ ~O.'>
`
`~o
`
`O~I ____________ ~ ____ ~ __________________ ~ __________________ ~ ________________ ~
`
`- ---
`
`---
`
`--(cid:173)
`
`'----
`
`"
`
`iO
`
`l.O~
`
`\0
`0"(cid:173)
`N
`
`\
`
`\
`
`,
`
`"
`
`"" .............
`
`....
`
`\
`
`\
`
`\
`
`\
`,,'\
`
`'"
`
`""
`
`,
`
`,
`
`T
`
`NO T/2T/
`
`NO T /2T/
`
`-lMTT
`
`'0
`
`"" "c.
`
`,/
`
`""
`
`""
`
`""
`
`,
`
`,-
`
`,-
`
`""
`30-r .. · .. '~', \ ~
`,
`
`~O-1.. .~~
`
`\
`
`1
`
`~O
`
`.II ~"r _ •• ~-..
`
`. ,
`
`.,
`
`\
`
`\
`
`,
`
`.....
`"-
`
`.......
`
`,,"
`
`JI
`
`/ ~~ \
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 7 of 9
`
`

`

`but very few without treatment. Treatment is always weaker than preoperat(cid:173)
`ively.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The fall of pressure was predictable and is a clinical proof of the pathogenic
`mechanism of the TM in open-angle glaucomas. The rise in pressure after
`a few months indicates that there is some kind of repair in the surgically
`damaged area. Yet, the trabecular meshwork cells are known not to repro(cid:173)
`duce; moreover, with this technique the scleral wall of Schlemm's canal is
`not damaged. But the remaining cells can enlarge, as do the corneal endo(cid:173)
`thelial cells, and this is the subject of our present research; complete repair
`does not seem to take place in the majority of cases, since in almost all of
`them the medical control is better than before the operation.
`Hyphema is attributed to reflux from the open Schlemm's canal and is
`always transient.
`Iritis with secondary atrophy, similar to the "Urrets syndrome" described
`after some cases of keratoplasty, is attributed to the liberation of pros(cid:173)
`taglandins by the damaged trabecular cells. Avoiding postoperative miosis
`(since the angle is open) and therapy with topical steroids and antiprostag(cid:173)
`landins systemically or topically avoids iritis; this complication occurred in
`some of our first cases, but no more after we instituted the above-mentioned
`postoperative care.
`In conclusion, our results show that goniotrabeculotomy, although highly
`successful in the first postoperative month, is in the end a partially successful
`procedure. Further studies are necessary to disclose the "in vivo" behaviour
`of the sectioned trabecular meshwork.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Barkan, O. A new operation for chronic glaucoma. Restoration of physiological
`function by opening Schlemm's canal under direct magnification. Am. J. Opthalmol.
`19:951-966,1936.
`2. Barkan, O. Microsurgery in chronic simple glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 21 :403-
`405,1938.
`3. Becker, B., Podos, S. and Assef, C.F. Microsurgery of the outflow channels. Clinical
`research. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otol. 76:405-410, 1972.
`4. Bietti, G.B., Quaranta, C.A. Considerazioni sulla terapia di particolari forme di
`"glaucoma cortisone" con speziali riguardi a quella chirurgia mediane goniotomia.
`Documenta Ophthal. 20:257-271, 1966.
`5. Bietti, G.B., Quaranta, C.A. Indications for and results of iridocorneal angle incision
`(goniotomy, goniotrabeculotomy or trabeculotomy). Trans. ophthalmol. Soc. N.Z.
`20:20-42,1968.
`6. Grant, W.M. Microsurgery of the outflow channels. Laboratory research. Trans.
`Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otol. 76:398-404, 1972.
`7. Johnstone, M.A., Grant, W.M. Microsurgery of Schlemm's car>al and the human
`aquaeous outflow system. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 76 :906-917, 1973.
`8. Quintana, M. Variantes en microcirugia del glaucoma. Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftal. 33:
`929-932,1973.
`
`270
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 8 of 9
`
`

`

`9. Quintana, M. Trabecu10tomiaabinterno. Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftal. 37:193-200, 1977.
`10. Spencer, W.H. Histological evaluation of microsurgical glaucoma techniques. Trans.
`Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Oto!. 76:389-397,1972.
`11. Tailor, U. Sulla incisione del'angolo irideo (contributo a la cura del glaucoma).
`Ann. Ottal. e Clin. Oculistica 20:117-127, 1891.
`12. Vincentiis, C. and Tailor, U. Incisione del'angolo irideo nel glaucoma. Ann. Otta!. e
`Clin. Oculistica 22:540-542, 1983.
`13. de Wecker, L. La sc1erotomie interne. Ann. D'Oculistique 113:95-109,1985.
`
`Author's address:
`Departament d'Oftalmologia
`Hospital de Bellvitge
`"Princeps d 'Espanya"
`C/o Feixa Llarga, SIN
`Barcelona
`Spain
`
`271
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1004, p. 9 of 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket