throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 32
`
`
` Date: November 3, 2020
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`AQUILA INNOVATIONS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2019-01525
`Patent 6,239,614 B1
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, DENISE M. POTHIER, and
`AMBER L. HAGY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`HAGY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Joshua L. Young
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-01525
`Patent 6,239,614 B1
`
`On October 19, 2020, Patent Owner filed a Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Joshua L. Young. Paper 24 (“Motion”). The Motion is
`supported by a Declaration of Mr. Young. Paper 25.1 Petitioner has not
`opposed the Motion.
`Upon review of the record before us, we determine that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Young pro hac vice.
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`of Joshua L. Young is granted; Mr. Young is authorized to act only as back-
`up counsel;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Young is to comply with the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide2 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)),
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials as set forth in Part 42 of Title
`37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`
`1 Patent Owner filed the Declaration as a Paper. We deem this to be
`harmless error. Patent Owner is reminded, however, that affidavits and
`declarations must be filed as exhibits. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(a) (“Evidence
`consists of affidavits, transcripts of depositions, documents, and things. All
`evidence must be filed in the form of an exhibit.”).
`2 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-01525
`Patent 6,239,614 B1
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Young is to be subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.3
`
`
`
`
`3 Mr. Young declares he “will be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional
`Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.,” rather than the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq. Paper 25, 2. We deem this to be harmless error.
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-01525
`Patent 6,239,614 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael Specht
`Mspecht-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`Christopher O’Brien
`Cobrien-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`Wenchong Shu
`Wshu-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`Micahel Ray
`Mray-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`Jonathan Tuminaro
`Jtuminar-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jing Cherng
`gcherng@fawlaw.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket