throbber
Centralized CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txwd
`
`Page 1 of 17
`
`U.S. District Court [LIVE]
`Western District of Texas (Midland)
`CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 7:18-cv-00147-ADA
`
`PATENT/TRADEMARK
`
`Continental Intermodal Group-Trucking LLC v. Sand
`Revolution LLC et al
`Assigned to: Judge Alan D Albright
`Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement
`Plaintiff
`Continental Intermodal Group-
`Trucking LLC
`
`Date Filed: 08/21/2018
`Jury Demand: Both
`Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
`Jurisdiction: Federal Question
`
`represented by Andrew Harper Estes
`Lynch, Chappell & Alsup, PC
`300 N. Marienfeld, #700
`Midland, TX 79701
`(432) 683-3351
`Fax: 432/683-2587
`Email: hestes@lcalawfirm.com
`LEAD ATTORNEY
`ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
`
`Eric D. Sidler
`Lathrop Gage LLP
`2345 Grand Blvd.
`Suite 2200
`Kansas City, MO 64108
`816-292-2000
`Fax: 816-292-2001
`Email: esidler@lathropgage.com
`LEAD ATTORNEY
`ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
`
`Luke M. Meriwether
`Lathrop Gage LLP
`2345 Grand Blvd.
`Suite 2200
`Kansas City, MO 64108
`816-292-2000
`Fax: 816-292-2001
`Email: lmeriwether@lathropgage.com
`LEAD ATTORNEY
`ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
`
`Travis W. McCallon
`Lathrop GPM LLP
`2345 Grand Blvd.
`
`https://ecf.txwd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?886307512804154-L_1_0-1
`
`8/6/2020
`
`Parus Exhibit 2016
`Apple Inc. v. Parus Holdings, Inc.
`IPR2020-00686
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`Centralized CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:txwd
`
`Page 17 of 17
`
`07/12/2020
`
`07/21/2020
`
`07/22/2020
`
`Joint MOTION to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines 101 by Sand Revolution
`II LLC, Sand Revolution LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shahdadi,
`Armon) (Entered: 07/09/2020)
`103 ORDER GRANTING 102 Motion to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines.
`Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (slt) (Entered: 07/13/2020)
`104 MOTION to Stay Case After Institution of Inter Partes Review of Asserted
`Patent by Sand Revolution II LLC, Sand Revolution LLC. (Attachments: # 1
`Exhibit A - IPR Paper 24, # 2 Exhibit B - IPR Paper 25, # 3 Exhibit C - WSJ
`Article, # 4 Proposed Order)(Shahdadi, Armon) (Entered: 07/21/2020)
`Text Order DENYING 104 Motion to Stay Case entered by Judge Alan D
`Albright. Before the Court is Defendants' motion to stay pending conclusion of
`an instituted IPR. The Court DENIES this motion for at least the following
`reasons:
`
` (1) The Court strongly believes the Seventh Amendment,
` (2) This case has been pending since 2017 and staying the case would only
`further delay its resolution,
` (3) Denying the stay would allow the Parties to obtain a more timely and
`complete resolution of infringement, invalidity, and damages issues, and
` (4) Plaintiff opposes the stay.
`
`(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document
`associated with this entry.) (jy) (Entered: 07/22/2020)
`105 Sealed Order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (slt) (Entered: 07/27/2020)
`
`07/24/2020
`
`https://ecf.txwd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?886307512804154-L_1_0-1
`
`8/6/2020
`
`Parus Exhibit 2016, Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket