`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Counsel.
`
`Sheasby, Jason
`Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:08 PM
`Sewall, Michaela P.
`PanOptis_Apple2; #Hilco/PanOptis v Apple [Int]; Ppm_Apple@grayreed.com; WH Apple
`Optis Service; ~Smith, Melissa; Tom Gorham
`Re: Optis v. Apple: correspondence
`
`Apple’s letter represents an abuse of the judicial process. Apple is withdrawing prior art on the 557 and 833 patents as a
`tool for attempting to convince the PTAB not to deny initiation of Apple’s duplicative IPRs. PanOptis intends to present
`all of the art Apple has cited as to these patents to the jury and obtain a definitive ruling on validity.
`
`If Apple does not agree to this we request a lead to lead meet and confer as we will file a motion with the court.
`
`Best
`JS
`
`On Jul 2, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Sewall, Michaela P. <Michaela.Sewall@wilmerhale.com> wrote:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Please see the attached correspondence.
`
`Thanks,
`Michaela
`
`Michaela P. Sewall | WilmerHale
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109 USA
`+1 617 526 6770 (t)
`+1 617 526 5000 (f)
`michaela.sewall@wilmerhale.com
`
`Please consider the environment before printing this email.
`
`This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be
`privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately—by replying to this message or by sending an email to
`postmaster@wilmerhale.com—and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
`
`For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at http://www.wilmerhale.com.
`
`<2020-07-02 Selwyn to Sheasby re Case Narrowing.pdf>
`
`1
`
`Optis Cellular Ex 2032-p. 1
`Apple v Optis Cellular
`IPR2020-00465
`
`