`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5,781,150
`United States Patent c191
`
`[111 Patent Number:
`
`
`
`US00578 I I 50A
`
`
`Norris
`
`
`
`[451 Date of Patent: Jul. 14, 1998
`
`[54]GPS RELATIVE POSITION DETECTION
`SYSTEM
`
`X. A Marriage Made In Orbit: GPS and PCS by Francis
`
`
`
`
`Kane.
`
`[75]Inventor:
`Elwood G. Norris. Poway, Calif.
`
`
`
`A Sampling Of Global Positioning System Receivers by
`Don Herskovitz.
`Corporation.[73] Assignee: American Technology
`
`
`
`
`Poway. Calif.
`
`Gerald Houston.
`
`How Mobile Computers Can Help You Find Yourself by
`
`[21]Appl. No.: 542,799
`
`This 'Remote' Shows Its Users Exactly Where Here Is by
`
`
`
`Liz Mullen.
`
`(22] Filed: Oct. 13, 1995
`
`
`
`Related U .S. Application D ata
`
`[56]
`
`
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENf OOCUMENfS
`
`or Finn-Thorpe. North & Western. LLP
`
`CAR 54. Where Are You? By Michael Puttre.
`
`
`
`
`
`United States Securities And Exchange Commission Form
`
`10-K FRO Trimble Navigational Limited.
`[63]Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 377,973, Jan. 25, I 995, Pat.
`
`
`No. 5,689,269.
`M. Blum
`Primary Examiner-Theodore
`[51]Int. Cl.6 ............
`
`
`................... H04B 7/185; GOlS 5/02
`
`
`Attome); Agent,
`
`[52]U.S. Cl .............................................. 342/357; 342/419
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`
`
`
`[58]Field of S earch ..................................... 342/357. 419;
`455/12.1
`A system of GPS devices which receive civilian GPS signals
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and provide an intuitive graphical interface for displaying
`
`
`
`
`
`the relative position of GPS devices in relation to each other.
`
`
`
`the relative position being accurate to several meters and
`
`
`
`defined as the distance to. direction of and height variance
`
`11/1962 Lehan et al ..
`3,063,048
`
`
`
`
`between GPS devices. A first GPS device with the person or
`5/1977 Culpepper et al ..
`4,021,807
`
`
`
`to its GPS determined location object to be located transmits
`6/1986 Narcisse.
`4,593,273
`
`
`a second GPS device. This second GPS device includes a
`4,675,656
`
`6/1987 Narcisse .
`
`6/1991 Lawrence .
`5,021,794
`
`
`
`means for receiving the GPS determined position of the first
`5,119,504
`6/1992 Durboraw, III .
`
`
`
`GPS device. and also includes means for calculating the
`5,146,231
`
`9/1992 Ghaem et al ........................... 342/419
`
`
`
`relative position of the first GPS device relative to the
`5,172,110
`
`12/1992 Tiefengraber .
`
`
`second GPS device based on a comparison of the received
`5,245,314
`9/1993 Kah, Jr ..
`
`telemetry of the first GPS device and its own GPS deter
`
`
`2/1994 Inoue .
`5,289,195
`
`
`mined position. The relative position of the first device is
`4/1994 Hirano.
`5,307,277
`
`
`
`
`then graphically displayed on an interface of the second GPS
`
`7 /1995 Fraker et al. ........................... 364/460
`5,434,789
`the need for a map in
`device in a manner which eliminates
`
`4/1996 Lans ........................................ 342/357
`5,506,587
`
`
`
`order to travel to the location of the first GPS device. While
`
`7 /1996 Hall et al. ............................... 340/907
`5,539,398
`
`
`
`
`pr�iding an interface which displays a relative position of
`
`
`
`the first GPS device. this information remains accurate no
`
`
`matter how the orientation of the second GPS device
`GPS Technology and Opportunities by Clyde Haris and Roy
`
`
`
`
`changes with respect to a compass.
`Sikorski.
`
`
`Utah Meeting Shows Amazing World of Navigation Satel
`
`lites By Lee Siegel.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`
`
`13 Claims, 8 Drawing S heets
`
`GPSCore
`Receiver
`
`#2
`
`l_ 450
`
`\__400
`
`CPU 1IQ
`
`Embedded Controlf&r
`42.i_
`
`RF Receiver
`Transmits GPS Location
`
`Coordinates
`
`475,
`
`430
`
`LCD Dis.play
`
`48P
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 1
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`Jul. 14, 1998 Sheet 1 of 8
`
`5,781,150
`
`FRONT
`
`BACK
`
`Fig .. 1
`(PRIOR ART)
`
`100
`
`Fig. 2A
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 2
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Jul. 14, 1998 Sheet 2 of 8 5,781,150
`
`-
`
`v-1
`
`-
`
`46
`
`142
`LONGITUDE XXX.XX.XX
`
`100
`
`f
`
`LATITUDE xxx.xx.xx
`144
`
`Fig. 2B
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 3
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`Jul. 14, 1998 Sheet 3 of 8
`
`5,781,150
`
`�
`
`200
`
`210
`
`Fig. 3
`
`340
`
`rv
`
`Fig. 4
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 4
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Jul. 14, 1998
`
`Sheet 4 of 8
`
`5,781,150
`
`---
`
`--
`--
`v,/\1\/V
`---
`
`358
`
`352
`J
`
`356
`
`Fig. SA
`
`Fig. 5B
`
`N 368
`
`Fig. 5C
`
`Fig. 5D
`
`wvvv
`
`wvvv
`
`�
`
`--378
`
`Fig. 6
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 5
`
`
`
`5,781,150
`U.S. Patent Jul. 14, 1998 Sheet 5 of 8
`
`\J\Al'VVV'-
`
`\J\l'\NVV'--
`
`384
`
`�
`: � ..... :::::::.:J--3=82====::::-;:;:=.=�-3-�
`
`352
`
`:::6:::
`
`380
`
`Fig. 7A
`
`380
`
`\,M/\IV'v'...
`
`\)\1\/'vvV',.
`
`l_352
`
`Fig. 7B
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 6
`
`
`
`01
`�
`_,.
`�
`00
`.......
`01
`
`QO
`
`
`=-- �
`
`�
`g:
`
`
` i
`
`""'"
`
`-..f;,,,.
`
` ""'"
`
`� C :--
`
`("O
`......
`
`•
`00
`0 •
`
`Fig. 8
`
`480
`
`LCD Display
`
`430
`
`RF Transmitter
`
`GPS Location
`
`Coord inates
`
`Transmits
`
`475
`
`RF Receiver
`
`Embedded Controller
`
`�
`
`CPU 470
`
`400
`
`450
`
`415
`
`420)
`
`460
`
`�
`
`RAM
`FLASH
`
`Antenna
`405
`
`GPS RF Receiver
`
`L1=1.575
`
`GHz
`
`Antenna\ r 455
`
`L 1=1.575
`GHz
`
`GPS RF Receiver
`fr-------------,\
`
`///
`
`///
`
`/////
`
`///
`
`Transmitters
`
`GPS Satellite
`
`?'410
`
`Do/
`
`///////
`
`/ // //
`
`///////
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 7
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Jul. 14, 1998 Sheet 7 of 8 5,781,150
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 8
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Jul. 14, 1998 Sheet 8 of 8 5,781,150
`
`620
`
`630
`
`
`
`. Fig. 10
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`5.781.150
`
`RELATED INVENTION
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`2
`sufficient number of satellites such that a person with a GPS
`
`
`
`
`GPS RELATIVE POSITION DETECTION
`
`
`
`receiver is able to determine their own longitude and latitude
`SYSTEM
`
`
`
`
`to within several meters. as well as their elevation. However.
`
`
`
`
`knowing your own position in longitude and latitude does
`
`
`
`
`precise topoextremely 5 not help others find you without
`
`
`
`This patent application is a continuation-in-part of U.S.
`
`
`graphical or geophysical maps which also show longitude
`
`
`
`
`patent application Ser. No. 08/377.973. filed Jan. 25. 1995.
`
`
`
`and latitude. Furthermore. the degree of precision in position
`now U.S. Pat. No. 5,689.269.
`
`
`
`determination is then only accurate to the resolution of the
`
`
`maps on hand. Nevertheless. the elements for a novel search
`
`
`
`
`are purpose locator. and rescue system. as well as a general
`1.Field of the Invention
`10
`
`
`
`
`made possible by the present invention utilizing GPS tech
`
`
`
`
`This invention pertains to position determining devices.
`
`
`
`
`nology. Before the invention can be explained. however. a
`
`
`
`
`and in particular to devices that enable the position of an
`
`
`
`potential problem with GPS signals must first be explained.
`
`
`
`
`object or person to be determined relative to another person
`
`
`
`In navigation. a method of guiding ships commonly used
`
`
`
`
`
`seeking said object. wherein a global positioning system
`
`
`
`and direc15 is dead-reckoning. whereby the known velocity
`
`
`
`
`receiver is used to determine the distance. direction and
`
`tion of travel of a ship from a known position such as a port
`
`
`
`
`possible elevation difference between another global posi
`
`
`
`is used to calculate the present position. The drawback is that
`
`tioning system receiver.
`
`
`the further a ship moves away from the known position. the
`2.Prior Art
`
`
`
`less accurate the dead-reckoning position becomes. lnclem-
`
`
`
`Being able to determine the precise whereabouts of some
`
`
`ent weather can further erode the accuracy of a ship's
`20
`
`
`one or something on or above the surface of the earth has
`
`
`navigation. and endanger lives and property when traveling
`
`
`long held promise for many purposes. Missing person
`
`
`in close proximity to land. However. using a GPS receiver
`
`
`
`searches would be much simpler if people who were lost had
`
`
`and a very accurate map with a sufficient degree of
`
`
`
`a transmitting device with them which constantly broadcast
`
`
`
`resolution. the movements of even a large vessel can be
`
`
`their precise position. Such a transmitter would be better
`
`
`
`The problemdegree of precision. 25 guided with a satisfactory
`
`
`than just a voice transmitter because the age of the people or
`
`
`with GPS signals. surprisingly. arises from the high degree
`
`
`
`their medical condition might prevent people from
`
`of precision that the system is able to provide.
`
`
`
`responding. or from responding in a helpful manner.
`
`
`
`It is the potential application of GPS technology to
`
`
`However. numerous difficulties arise when actually search
`
`
`
`military uses which is responsible for the concern over GPS
`
`
`ing for a transmitter which severely undermines the useful
`
`
`
`
`of targets 30 receiver accuracy. Specifically. precise positioning
`ness of such systems.
`
`
`
`can enable pinpoint accuracy in the delivery of highly
`For example. U.S. Pat. No. 4.021.807 teaches how a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`destructive military payloads. Therefore. the possibility
`
`
`transmitter hidden among stolen money could be used to
`
`
`
`exists that our own satellite network could be used against
`
`
`locate those responsible for the theft and the money. A UHF
`
`
`the United States. For this reason. the GPS timing signals
`homing device hidden among the money is capable of
`
`
`
`use are network for commercial 35 broadcast by the satellite
`
`
`transmitting a signal which can be tracked by UHF tracking
`
`
`
`
`intentionally made less accurate than the encoded military
`
`
`
`
`devices. Such a tracking device indicates whether the UHF
`
`
`
`
`signals. These timing and position errors are called Selective
`
`
`
`horning signal is being transmitted from the front or rear. and
`
`
`
`
`Availability (SA) and reduce the accuracy of civilian users
`
`
`from the left or right of a current position and orientation of
`
`
`
`
`to roughly 100 meters. While this inaccuracy is irrelevant on
`
`
`the tracking device. Signal strength can also be used to give
`
`
`
`
`applications or land-based 40 the high seas. coastal navigation
`
`
`
`a crude estimation of distance between the tracking and
`
`
`
`such as search and rescue suffer. and potentially destroy the
`
`
`
`horning devices if the signal is not too distorted by inter
`
`
`benefits of GPS technology.
`vening structures.
`To overcome the intentional errors introduced in the GPS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The UHF homing signal and tracking devices comprise
`
`
`timing signals. a system known as differential GPS (DGPS)
`
`
`the same principle taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5.021.794. This
`
`
`
`
`civilian users in a 45 was developed to reestablish accuracy for
`
`
`
`
`patent teaches how a miniaturized transceiver carried by a
`
`
`
`small. localized area such as coastal navigation. The system
`
`
`
`
`child can be remotely activated by a parent to enable the
`
`
`
`requires that a permanent GPS receiving and broadcasting
`child to be located by police cars with UHF trackers.
`
`
`
`station be established. and that the precise position of the
`
`
`
`One of the drawbacks of such locator systems is that the
`
`
`
`station be determined. Using the fact that the errors intro-
`
`position of the person or object is never known with any
`
`50 duced by a system of satellites will be the same errors
`
`
`great degree of accuracy. A related issue is that the reliability
`
`
`
`transmitted to all receivers in a localized area. a mobile GPS
`
`
`
`of the signal received is also suspect. and can not be
`
`
`
`receiver in range of the permanent station can determine its
`
`
`confirmed. Furthermore. a vehicle with a tracking device
`
`
`
`position and achieve the same degree of accuracy enjoyed
`
`
`might circle a homing beacon many times before finding it
`
`
`by the military. This is accomplished by having the perma
`
`
`
`due to the crude distance and direction indications of the 55
`
`
`nent station calculate the error introduced by the GPS
`technology.
`
`
`
`
`satellites by comparing the signal received with the actual
`
`
`
`
`Fortunately. a boon to precise location
`
`
`known position. determining This error factor can be transmitted to and
`
`
`used by all mobile receivers within the vicinity of the
`occurred when the United States saw fit to invest over $12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`permanent station to determine their position accurately to
`
`Billion in creating a network of 24 satellites in low earth
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`within several meters instead of 100 meters. Of course. the
`
`orbit. each broadcasting precise timing signals from two 60
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`accuracy of this DGPS determined position decreases the
`on-board atomic clocks. Using precise and well-developed
`
`
`
`
`
`further away that a GPS receiver is from the permanent GPS
`
`triangulation and quadrangulation formulas. a receiver that
`
`
`
`
`
`receiving and broadcasting station.
`
`picks up signals from several satellites simultaneously can
`
`
`determine its position in global coordinates. namely latitude
`
`
`
`
`
`Another form of differential GPS position determination
`and longitude.
`
`
`
`65 has also substantially increased the usefulness of GPS
`
`
`
`receivers. As taught in Smith. U.S. Pat. No. 5.408.238. a
`
`
`
`With this network orbiting overhead. a person anywhere
`
`
`
`
`comparison of absolute GPS determined locations can be
`
`on the earth has a 24 hour a day line-of-sight view to a
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 10
`
`
`
`
`
`5.781, 150
`
`35
`
`45
`
`3
`4
`of the GPS n or location used to determine the relative positio
`
`
`
`
`desired GPS device. a distance of, direction to and elevation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`eliminates devices relative This comparison to each other.
`
`
`
`
`variance of a plurality of different GPS devices is possible.
`
`
`the need for a permanent base station which transmits an
`
`
`Also disclosed is a method for determining the distance,
`
`
`
`
`error correction factor because the absolute position of the
`
`
`
`
`direction and elevation to a GPS device, and includes the
`
`
`GPS receivers is relevant only so far in that they are
`
`
`5 steps of (i) determining a location of a first GPS device
`
`
`
`
`compared to each other to provide a relative position dif
`
`
`
`
`including a Selective Availability (SA) induced longitude
`ference.
`
`
`
`
`a location of a second and latitude error. (ii) determining
`
`
`GPS including the approximately same SA induced longi
`
`
`
`Returning now to our problem of locating a missing
`
`
`
`the location of the tude and latitude error. (iii) transmitting
`
`
`person, the exact longitude and latitude provided by DGPS
`
`
`
`IO first GPS device to the second GPS device, (iv) enabling the
`
`
`is not often useful without very precise maps of sufficient
`
`
`
`
`second GPS device to receive the first GPS device's telem
`
`
`
`resolution and of the area in question. Elevation may also
`
`
`
`
`etry signal including the location of the first GPS device, (v)
`
`
`play a very important factor if someone is lost in mountain
`
`
`comparing the telemetry of the first GPS device to that of the
`
`
`ous terrain. Therefore. it would be an advance over the prior
`
`
`
`second GPS device. and using the comparison of absolute
`
`
`
`art if a graphical interface could be provided for a differen
`
`
`
`
`
`15 longitudes and latitudes to determine a relative distance to,
`
`
`
`
`
`tial or relative position GPS position detection system which
`
`
`
`
`direction of and elevation variance between said GPS
`
`
`
`would intuitively provide searchers a distance measurement
`
`
`
`
`devices. and (vi) displaying the relative position of the first
`
`
`and direction. It would also be an advantage if the graphical
`
`
`
`
`
`interlace provided position information accurate to several
`
`
`
`
`GPS device on an interface of the second GPS device in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`meters using only GPS signals and positions determined by graphical manner so as to intuitively provide the relative
`
`
`
`
`20 location of. the distance to and the elevation variance of the
`
`
`
`
`the systems GPS receivers. regardless of whether a perma
`
`
`
`first GPS device relative to the second GPS device.
`
`
`nent station is nearby providing GPS SA error compensation
`
`
`information. It would also be an advance over the prior art
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`
`
`if the difference in elevation between the searchers and the
`
`FIG. 1 is an illustration of the components in a UHF
`
`lost person could be provided to that same degree of
`
`
`
`
`position tracking display 25 tracking device with the associated
`accuracy.
`of the prior art.
`OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE
`
`
`FIG. 2A is a perspective view of the components of a
`INVENTION
`
`
`Global Positioning System (GPS).
`
`
`FIG. 2B is an illustration of a GPS receiver and its
`
`
`
`
`It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide
`
`
`30 associated display as found in the prior
`
`
`
`
`a method and apparatus for locating the relative position of
`art.
`FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the components of a
`
`
`
`
`
`a first GPS receiver with respect to a second GPS receiver.
`
`
`
`Differential GPS (DGPS) system which provides absolute
`
`It is another object to provide a method and apparatus for
`
`
`
`
`longitude and latitude while eliminating the Selective Avail-
`graphically representing the relative position above. such
`
`
`
`
`
`ability induced error.
`that the information is displayed in an intuitive manner.
`
`
`in a view of the components It is yet another object of the present invention to provide FIG. 4 is a perspective
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`relative GPS system made in accordance with the principles
`
`
`
`a method and apparatus for determining the difference in
`
`of the present invention.
`
`
`
`elevation between the GPS receivers.
`of an interlace FIG. SA is the preferred embodiment
`
`
`It is still another object to provide a method and apparatus
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`providing a graphical display for the relative position deter-
`
`
`
`
`for providing the precise distance. direction and elevation to
`
`
`40 mining GPS device system illustrated in FIG. 4.
`
`
`
`
`a GPS receiver that broadcasts a predetermined signal by
`
`
`
`FIG. SB is a variation of the preferred embodiment shown
`
`
`
`selectively tuning the apparatus to the signal.
`in FIG. SA.
`
`
`
`These and other objects not specifically recited are real
`FIG. SC shows how the arrow of a graphical display
`
`
`ized in a system of GPS devices which receive civilian GPS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`remains stationary relative to a fixed reference point (a
`
`signals and provide an intuitive graphical interlace for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compass) when the GPS device is rotated relative to the
`
`displaying the relative position of GPS devices in relation to
`
`
`
`
`compass.
`each other. the relative position being accurate to several
`
`
`
`FIG. SD illustrates a modification to the preferred graphi
`
`
`
`
`meters and defined as the distance to. direction of and height
`
`
`cal display embodiment of FIG. SA.
`
`
`
`
`variance between GPS devices. A first GPS device with the
`FIG. 6 is an alternative embodiment of an interlace
`
`
`
`
`so person or object to be located transmits its GPS determined
`
`
`
`
`
`providing a graphical display for the system of GPS devices
`
`
`
`
`location to a second GPS device. This second GPS device
`
`illustrated in FIG. 4.
`
`
`includes a means for receiving the GPS determined position
`FIG. 7A is an alternative embodiment of an interface
`
`
`
`of the first GPS device. and also includes means for calcu
`
`
`
`
`providing a graphical display of variance in elevation for the
`
`
`
`lating the relative position of the first GPS device relative to
`the second GPS device based on a comparison of the 55
`
`
`
`system of GPS devices illustrated in FIG. 4.
`
`
`
`received telemetry of the first GPS device and its own GPS
`FIG. 7B is a variation of the embodiment of FIG. 7 A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determined position. The relative position of the first device
`
`FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the components of the
`
`
`
`is then graphically displayed on an interface of the second
`
`
`relative GPS system used in FIG. 4.
`
`GPS device in a manner which eliminates the need for a map
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in order to travel to the location of the first GPS device. 60
`
`present invention.
`
`
`
`While providing an interface which displays a relative
`
`
`
`
`position of the first GPS device. this information remains
`
`the present invention.
`
`accurate no matter how the orientation of the second GPS
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`
`
`device changes with respect to a compass.
`INVENTION
`
`
`
`The system would further include the ability of the second
`
`
`
`GPS device to tune to a signal broadcast by different GPS
`FIG. 1 illustrates the components and a typical display of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`transceiver devices. By selectively tuning to the signal of a
`
`
`
`a UHF tracking system. As shown. a transmitter 10 is at
`
`FIG. 10 is a perspective view of another embodiment of
`
`FIG. 9 is a perspective view of another embodiment of the
`
`65
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 11
`
`
`
`5.781.150
`
`6
`5
`
`
`FIG. 4 illustrates the preferred embodiment of the present
`
`
`some unknown location some distance from the tracking
`device
`
`
`
`20. The tracking device is typically mounted inside a
`
`
`
`invention which overcomes the need for detailed maps when
`
`vehicle, such as a police car. When the transmitter 10 is
`
`
`
`
`
`locating a GPS receiver made in accordance with the prin
`activated, the tracking device "homes in" on the transmitter.
`
`
`
`
`ciples of the present invention. The same number of satel-
`
`
`
`
`This is accomplished by a display 30 indicating whether the
`
`
`
`determinas in the normal GPS position 5 lites are necessary
`
`transmitter 10 is in front 40 or in back 50. to the left 60 or
`
`ing system of FIG. 1. Three satellites 300. 310 and 320
`
`
`
`the right 70 of the tracking device 20. A distance indicator
`
`
`
`
`
`provide sufficient information to determine a position. and a
`
`
`
`75 also shows a relative distance to the transmitter 10 by
`
`
`
`
`
`fourth satellite 330 can provide altitude information. What
`
`
`
`indicating the strength of the signal received.
`
`
`
`
`
`should also be explained before discussing the operation of
`
`
`invention is that while the
`10 the GPS devices of the present
`
`
`Such a system only provides vague references to the
`
`
`
`location of the transmitter 10 at best. For example. the
`
`
`
`term "receiver" is accurate or GPS device of the prior art. the
`
`
`direction of the transmitter 10 can only be known to within
`
`
`
`
`GPS devices of the present invention can be receivers or
`
`
`
`90 degrees. This is because the front\back and left\right
`
`
`transceivers. depending upon the particular application of
`indicators 40. 50. 60 and 70 only define four quadrants, 80.
`
`
`
`
`
`the present invention. Therefore. the specification will now
`82.84 and 86 in which the transmitter 10 can be found. In
`
`
`
`
`refer to GPS devices which implies that they can be either
`15
`
`
`
`
`addition. because the distance indicator 75 relies only on a
`
`
`
`receivers or transceivers. A last convention to note is that the
`
`
`
`
`
`measure of the signal strength received. distortion or inter
`
`"first GPS device" is always assumed to be the GPS device
`
`
`
`
`ference with the transmitted signal can give a false indica
`
`
`being tracked. and the "second GPS device" will always be
`
`
`
`tion of actual distance to the transmitter 10. There is also no
`
`
`
`assumed to be the GPS device which is receiving telemetry
`
`
`way to know whether there is interference until a UHF
`
`
`noted.
`20 so as to track the first GPS device. unless otherwise
`
`
`transmitter 10 is tracked down. Furthermore. the UHF signal
`
`
`
`
`As stated previously. the differential or relative location
`
`
`tracker 20 cannot indicate a height variance between the
`
`
`
`determining method used in the present invention is different
`
`
`transmitter 10 and the tracking device 20. A tracker using a
`
`
`from that described in FIG. 3. This method eliminates the
`
`
`
`UHF signal tracker 20 mounted in a car might arrive at a
`
`
`
`need for permanent GPS stations which provide error
`
`
`mountain and still show substantial distance to the trans
`
`
`
`correction. because the location of the GPS device defined
`
`
`
`mitter 10. and yet the distance might be vertical and impass-25
`
`
`
`
`by the actual longitude and latitude is relevant only insofar
`
`
`
`able. Forewarning of great altitude variations is helpful in
`
`
`
`as they are used to calculate the distance between a first or
`
`
`
`planning the method and supplies required for tracking.
`
`
`
`tracked GPS device and a second or tracking GPS device.
`
`
`FIG. 2A illustrates the original concept of the Global
`
`
`The only limitation is that the induced SA error be nearly the
`
`
`Positioning System (GPS). A GPS receiver 100 receives
`
`
`
`timing signals from at least three. and preferably four low
`
`
`
`same for both receivers to achieve a distance calculation
`30
`
`
`earth orbiting satellites 110. 120. 130 and 140. The timing
`
`
`
`accurate to less than 100 meters. This requirement is easily
`
`
`
`
`signals are provided by extremely accurate atomic clocks in
`
`
`
`satisfied because the induced SA position error will be
`
`
`the satellites. two redundant clocks aboard each satellite
`
`
`nearly the same for GPS devices within one hundred miles
`
`
`
`
`providing backup. Three satellites provide sufficient infor
`
`
`
`
`of each other and therefore substantially insignificant. In
`
`
`
`
`mation for a GPS receiver 100 to calculate a longitude and
`
`
`
`addition. as the GPS receivers get closer. the error becomes
`
`
`latitude using triangulation formulas well known to those 35
`
`
`
`negligible. What should be obvious. therefore. is that dis
`
`skilled in the art. If a signal can be received from four
`
`
`tance is always accurate to at lease 100 meters.
`
`
`
`satellites. the altitude of the GPS receiver 100 can also be
`
`
`The first and second GPS devices are capable of deter
`
`determined using a modified formula.
`
`
`mining their location in terms of longitude and latitude
`FIG. 2B illustrates a typical display of a GPS device 100
`
`
`
`
`
`
`according to the methods well known to those skilled in the
`40
`
`
`
`as found in the prior art which provides location information
`
`
`art through triangulation (location) and quadrangulation
`
`
`to the user in longitude 142 and latitude 144 coordinates.
`
`
`
`(location and elevation) formulas. The innovation of the
`
`
`
`This is because the GPS was originally intended for use as
`
`
`
`present invention begins with the first GPS device 340 being
`
`
`
`an absolute location determining device and had only an
`
`
`
`modified to be a transceiver so as to transmit this location or
`
`
`antenna 146 for receiving GPS signals. In this configuration.
`
`
`
`location and elevation as telemetry data. Another point of
`
`
`
`
`the only useful information the GPS device can provide is 45
`
`
`novelty is that the second GPS device 350 is modified not
`
`
`coordinates which can be used to find a location on a map.
`
`
`
`only to receive GPS signals. but also to receive this telem
`
`
`FIG. 3 illustrates the differential GPS (DGPS) concept
`etry data from the first GPS receiver.
`
`
`
`that was made necessary by the rnilitary's introduction of an
`
`error into the GPS signals broadcast by the GPS satellites.
`A further modification is that the second GPS device 350
`
`
`
`
`For coastal navigation. a series of permanent GPS stations
`
`
`
`is advantageously and selectively tuneable to receive telem
`50
`
`
`200 such as the one shown broadcast an error correction
`
`etry from a desired frequency. This enables the second GPS
`
`
`
`code which enables mobile GPS receivers 210 in the vicinity
`
`
`
`device 350 to be be able to track multiple GPS devices. It is
`
`
`of the permanent GPS station 200 to determine their location
`
`
`also possible to provide a tuner such that a plurality of GPS
`
`
`
`to the same level of accuracy enjoyed by military systems.
`
`
`
`devices can be simultaneously tracked and displayed on the
`
`
`
`The Selective Availability (SA) error is corrected by using
`
`
`
`second GPS device 350 interface. These features also imply
`55
`
`
`
`
`the previously determined accurate location of the perma
`
`
`
`that the first GPS device 340 can advantageously selectively
`
`
`
`
`nent station 200, receiving the GPS signals to calculate a
`transmit
`
`
`telemetry on a desired freq uency.
`
`
`location. determining the error between the broadcast posi
`
`
`
`After receiving the telemetry transmission of the first GPS
`
`
`tion and the known position. and then broadcasting the error
`
`
`device 340. device 350 calculates a relative distance
`
`
`correction factor to mobile GPS receivers. GPS receivers
`
`
`
`between the GPS receivers 340 and 350 by comparing
`
`210 then correct their own GPS calculated position using the 60
`
`
`
`
`
`
`absolute longitudes and latitudes. The interface of the sec
`
`
`
`
`
`broadcast correction factor. The error correction factor is
`
`
`
`ond GPS device 350 then graphically displays the position
`thus only accurate for GPS receivers near the permanent
`
`
`of the first GPS device 340 relative to the second GPS device
`station.
`
`
`
`immediate travel 350 in an intuitive manner which facilitates
`
`
`
`While the DGPS system does restore accuracy to the GPS
`
`
`to the first GPS device 340 without consulting a map.
`
`
`location calculations. the system is only useful for search
`65
`
`
`
`Specifically, the interface 352 of the second GPS receiver is
`
`
`
`
`and rescue or location determination if very detailed maps
`
`
`shown in FIG. SA and is comprised of an LCD screen 352.
`are available.
`
`IPR2020-00408
`Apple EX1031 Page 12
`
`
`
`5,781.150
`
`7
`8
`GPS device 350 is an arrow 370 as shown in figure SD.
`
`
`
`
`such as the type used in portable notebook computers but
`
`
`
`smaller. The interface 352 consists of an arrow 354. an end
`
`
`
`Instead of being anchored at an end point 356. this arrow 370
`
`
`
`rotates about a midpoint of the arrow 370. The advantage of
`
`
`352 and 356 of the arrow 354 generally fixed on the display
`
`
`
`
`this design is that it provides a larger arrow 370 within the
`
`an opposite pointing end 358 of the arrow 354 which
`
`continuously points in the direction of the first GPS device
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`screen 352 of the second GPS 5 relatively small LCD display
`
`device 350.
`
`
`
`340. This is accomplished by pivoting or rotating the arrow
`
`
`354 about the fixed end 356. The circle 360 defines the limit
`FlG. 6 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the graphi
`
`
`
`of travel of the arrow 354 on the interface 352 and does not
`
`cal screen display of FlGS. SA and SD. The displayed
`
`
`
`need to be shown. However. if left on the display. the circle
`
`
`information can be modified to present different and advan
`
`
`
`360 can be conveniently divided by tick marks 362. as 10
`
`
`
`
`tageously more useful and intuitive information to the user.
`
`shown in close-up view FlG. SB. The tick marks 362
`
`
`at a cost to the user of more circuitry and sophistication of
`
`represent the 360 degrees of a compass.
`
`
`
`the GPS devices. More intuitively useful information is
`
`
`
`displayed on the interface 352 by replacing the direction
`
`
`Returing now to the system of GPS devices, the second
`
`
`GPS device 350 is constantly receiving updated telemetry
`
`
`arrows 354 or 370 with a grid. Centered on the location of
`
`
`the user or second GPS device 350. represented by some
`data from the first GPS device 340 and from the GPS 15
`
`
`satellites 300. 310. 320. 330 overhead. This allows the
`
`
`type of mark 372. are a plurality of increasingly larger
`
`
`
`
`concentric circles 374. The circles 374 are scaled so as to
`
`
`
`second GPS device 350 to continuously update the direction
`
`
`
`
`represent uniformly spaced distances. Finally. some type of
`
`
`
`This ability is crucil!l in which the arrow 354 is pointing.
`
`
`because the orientation of the second GPS device 350
`
`
`mark 378 such as a small circle. square or other designation
`
`relative to a compass may be changing constantly. 20
`
`
`
`which is easily visible on the screen represents the first GPS
`
`
`
`
`
`Therefore, the present invention envisions that a user will be
`
`device 340 which is being tracked.
`
`
`able to hold the second GPS device 350 and turn in a circle.
`
`
`
`The significant advantage of this display is that not only
`
`and the arrow 354 will always point toward the first GPS
`
`
`
`does it show the direction to travel. but at a single glance
`
`
`
`device 340. This implies that the circle 360. if shown. also
`
`
`gives the user some easily discernible and graphical repre
`
`
`
`
`remains fixed relative to the compass. This ability is a result 25
`
`
`
`sentation of the distance to the first GPS device 340. A scale
`
`
`
`of an internal compass of the second GPS device 350. The
`
`also appears on the display so that the user is able to quickly
`
`
`
`
`internal compass provides a fixed reference point relative to
`
`on the uniform distance between
`
`calculate the distance based
`
`
`which the continuously displayed arrow 354 will use to
`
`
`
`each concentric circle. This is done by counting the number
`
`always point toward the first GPS device 340.
`
`
`
`
`of circles from the center 372 out to the relative position 378
`
`
`
`The feature described above is illustrated. for example. in 30
`
`
`of the first GPS device 340. then multiplying this number by
`
`
`FIG. SC. For this drawing. the direction north of the fixed
`
`
`
`
`the scale of the