Case 3:19-cv-02471-WHO Document 62 Filed 05/15/20 Page 1 of 3
`
`James R. Batchelder (CSB # 136347)
`Mark D. Rowland (CSB # 157862)
`Andrew T. Radsch (CSB # 303665)
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1900 University Ave., Sixth Floor
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
`Tel: (650) 617-4000
`Fax: (650) 617-4090
`james.batchelder@ropesgray.com
`mark.rowland@ropesgray.com
`andrew.radsch@ropesgray.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
`PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.
`
`Brian A. E. Smith (SBN 188147)
`Alden KW Lee (SBN 257973)
`Jeffrey D. Chen (SBN 267837)
`Joseph J. Fraresso (SBN 289228)
`BARTKO ZANKEL BUNZEL & MILLER
`One Embarcadero Center, Suite 800
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Tel: (415) 956-1900
`Email: bsmith@bzbm.com
`Email: alee@bzbm.com
`Email: jchen@bzbm.com
`Email: jfraresso@bzbm.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant and
`Counterclaimant
`PACKET INTELLIGENCE LLC
`
`[Additional counsel listed on signature
`page]
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`PACKET INTELLIGENCE LLC,
`
`Defendant and Counterclaimant.
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-02471-WHO
`
`Assigned to: Hon. William H. Orrick
`
`ORDER GRANTING PALO ALTO
`NETWORKS’ PROPOSED
`MODIFICATION TO THE
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`On this date, the Court considered the Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order provided
`
`by the parties. The Court, having considered the parties’ competing proposals, is of the opinion that
`
`Palo Alto Networks’ proposal for modifying the case schedule should be GRANTED.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following remaining schedule is adopted:
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`//
`
`28
`
`//
`
`-1-
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PALO ALTO NETWORKS’ PROPOSED
`MODIFICATION TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`CASE NO. 3:19-CV-02471-WHO
`
`Packet Intelligence Ex. 2006 Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-cv-02471-WHO Document 62 Filed 05/15/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`EVENT
`
`PREVIOUS DATE
`
`PROPOSED DATE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`Completion of Claim
`Construction Discovery
`pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-
`4, including the
`deposition of any expert
`that submitted an expert
`declaration concerning
`claim construction, if any
`Packet Intelligence’s
`Opening Claim
`Construction Brief
`pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-
`5(a)
`Palo Alto Networks’
`Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief
`pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-
`5(b)
`Packet Intelligence’s
`Reply Claim
`Construction Brief
`pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-
`5(c)
`Technology Tutorial
`
`Claim Construction
`Hearing pursuant to
`Patent L.R. 4.6
`
`Claim Construction
`Ruling
`
`Disclosure of Advice of
`Counsel and
`accompanying document
`production pursuant to
`Pat. L.R. 3-7
`
`April 24, 2020
`(Per Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`May 21, 2020
`
`May 8, 2020
`(Per Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`June 4, 2020
`
`May 22, 2020
`(Per Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`July 2, 2020
`
`June 1, 2020
`(Per Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`July 21, 2020
`
`June 15, 2020
`(Per Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`August 11, 2020, or as the
`Court determines
`
`June 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.
`(Per Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`August 14, 2020, or as the
`Court determines
`
`To Be Determined By Court
`
`To Be Determined By
`Court
`
`30 days after service of
`Court’s Claim Construction
`Ruling
`
`30 days after service of
`Court’s Claim Construction
`Ruling
`
`9
`
`Deadline to Complete
`Mediation
`
`Within 60 days of Court’s
`Claim Construction Ruling
`(Per Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`10 Close of fact discovery
`
`September 25, 2020
`(Stipulated)
`
`Within 60 days after
`service of Court’s Claim
`Construction Ruling (Per
`Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`December 22, 2020
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-2-
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PALO ALTO NETWORKS’ PROPOSED
`MODIFICATION TO THE CASE SCHEDULE
`
`CASE NO. 3:19-CV-02471-WHO
`
`Packet Intelligence Ex. 2006 Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-cv-02471-WHO Document 62 Filed 05/15/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`11
`
`Initial expert reports
`
`October 23, 2020 (Stipulated)
`
`January 26, 2021
`
`12 Rebuttal expert reports
`
`November 20, 2020
`(Stipulated)
`
`February 25, 2021
`
`13 Close of expert discovery December 18, 2020
`(Stipulated)
`
`March 23, 2021
`
`14 Last Day to File
`Dispositive Motions
`(including Daubert
`Motions)
`15 Dispositive Motions
`heard by
`
`January 20, 2021 (Per Civil
`L.R. 7-2(a))
`
`May 5, 2021
`Per Civil L.R. 7-2(a))
`
`February 24, 2021 (Per Court
`Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`June 9, 2021
`
`16 Pretrial disclosures
`
`March 19, 2021 (Stipulated)
`
`June 29, 2021
`
`17 Objections to pretrial
`disclosures
`
`April 9, 2021 (Stipulated)
`
`July 20, 2021
`
`18 Final pretrial conference May 3, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. (Per
`Court Order, Dkt. 50)
`
`August 9, 2021
`
`19 Trial
`
`May 31, 2021 at 8:30 a.m.
`
`August 30, 2021, or as
`determined by the Court
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`Signed this 15th day of May, 2020.
`
`_________________________________
`HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-3-
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PALO ALTO NETWORKS’ PROPOSED
`MODIFICATION TO THE CASE SCHEDULE
`
`CASE NO. 3:19-CV-02471-WHO
`
`Packet Intelligence Ex. 2006 Page 3 of 3
`
`