throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REMBRANDT WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, LP,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`NOTICES OF THE PATENT OWNER
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`I. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST
`Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP, is the owner of U.S. Patent No.
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`8,023,580 (“the ’580 Patent”) by assignment.
`
`II. RELATED MATTERS
`Provided below are all proceedings related to the present inter partes review
`
`proceeding. Particular note is made to how the proceedings relate to the claims
`
`challenged in the Petition, claims 2 and 59 (“the Challenged Claims”) of the ’580
`
`Patent.
`
`The table below identifies pending inter partes review proceedings involving
`
`the ’580 Patent.
`
`Inter Partes Review
`IPR2020-00033
`
`Status
`Pending – Pre-Institution – requests review of
`the Challenged Claims
`
`
`The table below identifies pending district court proceedings related to the
`
`present inter partes review proceeding.
`
`District Court Litigation
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP v. Apple Inc.,
`2:19-cv-00025 (E.D. Tex.,
`filed Jan. 24, 2019)
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP v. Broadcom
`Inc., 8:19-cv-00708 (C.D. Cal.,
`filed Apr. 15, 2019)
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP v. Qualcomm
`
`Status
`• Pending
`• Challenged Claims are being asserted
`
`• Pending
`• Challenged Claims are being asserted
`
`• Pending
`• Challenged Claims are being asserted
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`Inc., 8:19-cv-00705 (C.D. Cal.,
`filed Apr. 15, 2019)
`
`The table below identifies prior Federal Circuit Court of Appeals proceedings
`
`related to the present inter partes review proceeding.
`
`Federal Circuit Appeal
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technology, LP v. Samsung
`Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., No.
`16-1729
`
`The table below identifies prior district court proceedings related to the
`
`Resolution
`Validity of Challenged Claims upheld.
`Rembrandt Wireless Techs., LP v. Samsung
`Elecs. Co., 853 F.3d 1370, 1380 (Fed. Cir.
`2017).
`
`present inter partes review proceeding.
`
`District Court Litigation
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP, v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No.
`2:13–CV–213–JRG–RSP (E.D.
`Tex).
`
`The table below identifies prior inter partes reviews involving the ’580 Patent.
`
`Resolution
`Validity of Challenged Claims confirmed.
`Rembrandt Wireless Techs., LP v. Samsung
`Elecs. Co., 853 F.3d 1370, 1374 (Fed. Cir.
`2017).
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`IPR2014-00518
`
`IPR2014-00519
`
`IPR2014-00514
`
`IPR2014-00515
`
`IPR2015-00114
`
`Resolution
`Institution denied with respect to the
`Challenged Claims
`Claims 38 and 47 of the ’580 Patent found
`unpatentable, did not request review of the
`Challenged Claims
`Institution Denied, including requests for
`review of the Challenged Claims
`Institution Denied, did not request review of
`the Challenged Claims
`Institution Denied, including requests for
`review of the Challenged Claims
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00118
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`Institution Denied, did not request review of
`the Challenged Claims
`
`
`The table below identifies prior ex partes reexaminations involving the ’580
`
`Patent.
`
`Ex Partes Reexamination
`90/013,808
`
`Resolution
`Challenged Claims confirmed
`For completeness, Patent Owner also notes the following proceedings directed
`
`to U.S. Patent No. 8,457,228 (“the ’228 Patent”), a child of the ’580 Patent. By way
`
`of background, Petitioner has submitted two inter partes review petitions (the
`
`pending inter partes review proceedings listed below), in which Petitioner has
`
`challenged claim 21 of the ’228 Patent. Like the Challenged Claims, claim 21 of the
`
`’228 Patent was found valid in the above-listed district court proceeding, Rembrandt
`
`Wireless Technologies, LP, v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:13–CV–
`
`213–JRG–RSP (E.D. Tex). This finding of validity was upheld in the above-listed
`
`Federal Circuit appeal, Rembrandt Wireless Technology, LP v. Samsung Electronics
`
`Co. Ltd. et al., No. 16-1729. The table below identifies pending and prior Patent
`
`Office proceedings involving the ’228 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`Status
`Pending – Pre-Institution –
`Challenging claim 21 of the
`’228 Patent
`Pending – Pre-Institution –
`Challenging claim 21 of the
`’228 Patent
`Institution denied, review of
`claim 21 of the ’228 Patent
`was requested
`Institution denied, review of
`claim 21 of the ’228 Patent
`was not requested
`Institution denied, review of
`claim 21 of the ’228 Patent
`was not requested
`Institution denied with
`respect to claim 21 of the
`’228 Patent
`Claims 22, 23 and 25 of the
`’228 Patent found
`unpatentable, review of
`claim 21 of the ’228 Patent
`was not requested
`Claims 26-29, 31, 36–41, 43,
`and 47-52 of the ’228 Patent
`found unpatentable, review
`of claim 21 of the ’228
`Patent was not requested
`Institution denied, claim 21
`was the sole claim
`challenged
`Confirmed claim 21 of the
`’228 Patent
`
`Proceeding
`IPR2020-00036
`
`Type
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2020-00037
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00889
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00890
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00891
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00892
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00893
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00895
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2015-00555
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`90/013,809
`
`Ex Parte Reexamination
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`BACK-UP COUNSEL
`Mark J. DeBoy
`Registration No. 66,983
`Edell, Shapiro and Finnan, LLC
`
`Nancy Linck
`Registration No. 31,920
`
`
`III. LEAD AND BACK-UP COUNSEL
`
`LEAD COUNSEL
`Jason Shapiro
`Registration No. 35,354
`Edell, Shapiro and Finnan, LLC
`
`
`IV. SERVICE INFORMATION
`
`Mark J. DeBoy
`Edell, Shapiro and Finnan, LLC
`9801 Washingtonian Boulevard
`Suite 750
`Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
`(Postal and hand delivery addresses
`same)
`Email: mjd@usiplaw.com
`Tel: (301) 424-3640
`Fax: (301) 762-4056
`
`
`
`
`
`Jason Shapiro
`Edell, Shapiro and Finnan, LLC
`9801 Washingtonian Boulevard
`Suite 750
`Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
`(Postal and hand delivery addresses
`same)
`Email: js@usiplaw.com
`Tel: (301) 424-3640
`Fax: (301) 762-4056
`Nancy Linck
`646 Westbourne Street
`La Jolla, CA 92037
`(Postal and hand delivery addresses
`same)
`Email: nancylinck@outlook.com
`Tel: (858) 255-8043
`
`Please address all correspondence and service to Counsel listed above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent owner also consents to electronic service via email at js@usiplaw.com,
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`mjd@usiplaw.com, nancylinck@outlook.com, and
`
`RembrandtWirelessIPRs@usiplaw.com.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 22, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Jason Shapiro/
`Jason Shapiro (Reg. No. 35,354)
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), a copy of the
`foregoing NOTICES OF THE PATENT OWNER PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.8 was served via email (as previously consented to by counsel) on November
`22, 2019 to lead and backup counsel of record for Petitioners as follows:
`
`
`Mark D. Rowland (Reg. No. 32,077) (Lead Counsel)
`Gabrielle E. Higgins (Reg. No. 38,916) (Back-up Counsel)
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
`
`Mark.Rowland@ropesgray.com
`Gabrielle.Higgins@ropesgray.com
`Josef.Schenker@ropesgray.com
`Carolyn.Redding@ropesgray.com
`Ropes-Rembrandt-IPR-Service@ropesgray.com
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 22, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Mark J. DeBoy/
`Mark J. DeBoy (Reg. No. 66,983)
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket