`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REMBRANDT WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, LP,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`U.S. Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`NOTICES OF THE PATENT OWNER
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST
`Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP, is the owner of U.S. Patent No.
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`8,023,580 (“the ’580 Patent”) by assignment.
`
`II. RELATED MATTERS
`Provided below are all proceedings related to the present inter partes review
`
`proceeding. Particular note is made to how the proceedings relate to the claims
`
`challenged in the Petition, claims 2 and 59 (“the Challenged Claims”) of the ’580
`
`Patent.
`
`The table below identifies pending inter partes review proceedings involving
`
`the ’580 Patent.
`
`Inter Partes Review
`IPR2020-00033
`
`Status
`Pending – Pre-Institution – requests review of
`the Challenged Claims
`
`
`The table below identifies pending district court proceedings related to the
`
`present inter partes review proceeding.
`
`District Court Litigation
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP v. Apple Inc.,
`2:19-cv-00025 (E.D. Tex.,
`filed Jan. 24, 2019)
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP v. Broadcom
`Inc., 8:19-cv-00708 (C.D. Cal.,
`filed Apr. 15, 2019)
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP v. Qualcomm
`
`Status
`• Pending
`• Challenged Claims are being asserted
`
`• Pending
`• Challenged Claims are being asserted
`
`• Pending
`• Challenged Claims are being asserted
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`Inc., 8:19-cv-00705 (C.D. Cal.,
`filed Apr. 15, 2019)
`
`The table below identifies prior Federal Circuit Court of Appeals proceedings
`
`related to the present inter partes review proceeding.
`
`Federal Circuit Appeal
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technology, LP v. Samsung
`Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., No.
`16-1729
`
`The table below identifies prior district court proceedings related to the
`
`Resolution
`Validity of Challenged Claims upheld.
`Rembrandt Wireless Techs., LP v. Samsung
`Elecs. Co., 853 F.3d 1370, 1380 (Fed. Cir.
`2017).
`
`present inter partes review proceeding.
`
`District Court Litigation
`Rembrandt Wireless
`Technologies, LP, v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No.
`2:13–CV–213–JRG–RSP (E.D.
`Tex).
`
`The table below identifies prior inter partes reviews involving the ’580 Patent.
`
`Resolution
`Validity of Challenged Claims confirmed.
`Rembrandt Wireless Techs., LP v. Samsung
`Elecs. Co., 853 F.3d 1370, 1374 (Fed. Cir.
`2017).
`
`
`Inter Partes Review
`IPR2014-00518
`
`IPR2014-00519
`
`IPR2014-00514
`
`IPR2014-00515
`
`IPR2015-00114
`
`Resolution
`Institution denied with respect to the
`Challenged Claims
`Claims 38 and 47 of the ’580 Patent found
`unpatentable, did not request review of the
`Challenged Claims
`Institution Denied, including requests for
`review of the Challenged Claims
`Institution Denied, did not request review of
`the Challenged Claims
`Institution Denied, including requests for
`review of the Challenged Claims
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00118
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`Institution Denied, did not request review of
`the Challenged Claims
`
`
`The table below identifies prior ex partes reexaminations involving the ’580
`
`Patent.
`
`Ex Partes Reexamination
`90/013,808
`
`Resolution
`Challenged Claims confirmed
`For completeness, Patent Owner also notes the following proceedings directed
`
`to U.S. Patent No. 8,457,228 (“the ’228 Patent”), a child of the ’580 Patent. By way
`
`of background, Petitioner has submitted two inter partes review petitions (the
`
`pending inter partes review proceedings listed below), in which Petitioner has
`
`challenged claim 21 of the ’228 Patent. Like the Challenged Claims, claim 21 of the
`
`’228 Patent was found valid in the above-listed district court proceeding, Rembrandt
`
`Wireless Technologies, LP, v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:13–CV–
`
`213–JRG–RSP (E.D. Tex). This finding of validity was upheld in the above-listed
`
`Federal Circuit appeal, Rembrandt Wireless Technology, LP v. Samsung Electronics
`
`Co. Ltd. et al., No. 16-1729. The table below identifies pending and prior Patent
`
`Office proceedings involving the ’228 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`Status
`Pending – Pre-Institution –
`Challenging claim 21 of the
`’228 Patent
`Pending – Pre-Institution –
`Challenging claim 21 of the
`’228 Patent
`Institution denied, review of
`claim 21 of the ’228 Patent
`was requested
`Institution denied, review of
`claim 21 of the ’228 Patent
`was not requested
`Institution denied, review of
`claim 21 of the ’228 Patent
`was not requested
`Institution denied with
`respect to claim 21 of the
`’228 Patent
`Claims 22, 23 and 25 of the
`’228 Patent found
`unpatentable, review of
`claim 21 of the ’228 Patent
`was not requested
`Claims 26-29, 31, 36–41, 43,
`and 47-52 of the ’228 Patent
`found unpatentable, review
`of claim 21 of the ’228
`Patent was not requested
`Institution denied, claim 21
`was the sole claim
`challenged
`Confirmed claim 21 of the
`’228 Patent
`
`Proceeding
`IPR2020-00036
`
`Type
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2020-00037
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00889
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00890
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00891
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00892
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00893
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2014-00895
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`IPR2015-00555
`
`Inter Partes Review
`
`90/013,809
`
`Ex Parte Reexamination
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`BACK-UP COUNSEL
`Mark J. DeBoy
`Registration No. 66,983
`Edell, Shapiro and Finnan, LLC
`
`Nancy Linck
`Registration No. 31,920
`
`
`III. LEAD AND BACK-UP COUNSEL
`
`LEAD COUNSEL
`Jason Shapiro
`Registration No. 35,354
`Edell, Shapiro and Finnan, LLC
`
`
`IV. SERVICE INFORMATION
`
`Mark J. DeBoy
`Edell, Shapiro and Finnan, LLC
`9801 Washingtonian Boulevard
`Suite 750
`Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
`(Postal and hand delivery addresses
`same)
`Email: mjd@usiplaw.com
`Tel: (301) 424-3640
`Fax: (301) 762-4056
`
`
`
`
`
`Jason Shapiro
`Edell, Shapiro and Finnan, LLC
`9801 Washingtonian Boulevard
`Suite 750
`Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
`(Postal and hand delivery addresses
`same)
`Email: js@usiplaw.com
`Tel: (301) 424-3640
`Fax: (301) 762-4056
`Nancy Linck
`646 Westbourne Street
`La Jolla, CA 92037
`(Postal and hand delivery addresses
`same)
`Email: nancylinck@outlook.com
`Tel: (858) 255-8043
`
`Please address all correspondence and service to Counsel listed above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent owner also consents to electronic service via email at js@usiplaw.com,
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`mjd@usiplaw.com, nancylinck@outlook.com, and
`
`RembrandtWirelessIPRs@usiplaw.com.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 22, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Jason Shapiro/
`Jason Shapiro (Reg. No. 35,354)
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-00034
`Patent No. 8,023,580
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), a copy of the
`foregoing NOTICES OF THE PATENT OWNER PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.8 was served via email (as previously consented to by counsel) on November
`22, 2019 to lead and backup counsel of record for Petitioners as follows:
`
`
`Mark D. Rowland (Reg. No. 32,077) (Lead Counsel)
`Gabrielle E. Higgins (Reg. No. 38,916) (Back-up Counsel)
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
`
`Mark.Rowland@ropesgray.com
`Gabrielle.Higgins@ropesgray.com
`Josef.Schenker@ropesgray.com
`Carolyn.Redding@ropesgray.com
`Ropes-Rembrandt-IPR-Service@ropesgray.com
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 22, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Mark J. DeBoy/
`Mark J. DeBoy (Reg. No. 66,983)
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP
`
`8
`
`