throbber
Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:1059
`
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser (SBN 179495)
`doug.muehlhauser@knobbe.com
`Mark Lezama (SBN 253479)
`mark.lezama@knobbe.com
`Alexander J. Martinez (SBN 293925)
`alex.martinez@knobbe.com
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Telephone: 949-760-0404
`Facsimile: 949-760-9502
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`NOMADIX, INC.
`
`Michael R. Matthias (SBN 57728)
`mmatthias@bakerlaw.com
`F. Lucas Paule (SBN 313282)
`fpaule@bakerlaw.com
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509
`Telephone: 310-820-8800
`Facsimile: 310-820-8859
`Attorneys for Defendant
`GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`NOMADIX, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.
`CV16-08033 AB (FFMx)
`
`STIPULATION TO RESET
`GUEST-TEK’S DEADLINE
`TO RESPOND TO
`COMPLAINT
`
`Honorable André Birotte Jr.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25 Filed 03/06/17 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:1060
`
`
`BACKGROUND
`Plaintiff Nomadix filed the complaint in this action on October 28, 2016. On
`November 1, Nomadix’s counsel sent Defendant Guest-Tek
`Interactive
`Entertainment’s U.S. counsel at Baker & Hostetler LLP a copy of the complaint
`and asked whether Guest-Tek, a company located in Alberta, Canada, would
`accept service of process through Baker & Hostetler. Guest-Tek did not agree to
`accept service of process through Baker & Hostetler.
`Nomadix took steps to effect service in accordance with the Hague
`Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in
`Civil or Commercial Matters. The Alberta Central Authority issued a certificate of
`service certifying that Guest-Tek was served with the complaint and summons on
`January 12, 2017. Nomadix filed this certificate as part of its proof of service.
`(Dkt. No. 17.) On February 10, 2017, as Guest-Tek had not responded to the
`complaint, Nomadix requested entry of default against Guest-Tek. (Dkt. No. 19.)
`In a pending opposition to Nomadix’s request for entry of default, Guest-
`Tek asserts that (1) it did not receive any packages or deliveries on January 12,
`2017, (2) it received a package on January 13, but the circumstances of the
`delivery led Guest-Tek to call law enforcement, who eventually detonated the
`package, and (3) Guest-Tek did not become aware of Nomadix’s proof-of-service
`filing or request for entry of default until February 14. (Dkt. No. 22.)
`STIPULATION
`In view of the foregoing, the parties stipulate as follows:
`Nomadix withdraws its request for entry of default.
`1.
`2.
`Guest-Tek does not contest the sufficiency of process or service of
`process.
`Guest-Tek’s deadline for responding to the complaint shall be reset to
`3.
`March 10, 2017.
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25 Filed 03/06/17 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:1061
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`Dated: March 6, 2017
`
`/s/ Mark Lezama
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser
`Mark Lezama
`Alexander J. Martinez
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`NOMADIX, INC.
`
`Dated: March 6, 2017
`
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`
`/s/ Michael R. Matthias (with permission)
`Michael R. Matthias
`F. Lucas Paule
`Attorneys for Defendant
`GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.
`
`- 2 -
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25-1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:1062
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`NOMADIX, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.
`CV16-08033 AB (FFMx)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`APPROVING STIPULATION
`TO RESET GUEST-TEK’S
`DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
`COMPLAINT
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25-1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:1063
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Reset Guest-Tek’s Deadline to
`Respond to Complaint, and finding good cause therefor, the Court approves the
`stipulation.
`Plaintiff Nomadix’s request for entry of default (Dkt. No. 19) is
`1.
`deemed withdrawn.
`2.
`It is established that Defendant Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment
`does not contest the sufficiency of process or service of process.
`3.
`Guest-Tek’s deadline for responding to the complaint is reset to
`March 10, 2017.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`Honorable André Birotte Jr.
`
`- 1 -
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket