`
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser (SBN 179495)
`doug.muehlhauser@knobbe.com
`Mark Lezama (SBN 253479)
`mark.lezama@knobbe.com
`Alexander J. Martinez (SBN 293925)
`alex.martinez@knobbe.com
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Telephone: 949-760-0404
`Facsimile: 949-760-9502
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`NOMADIX, INC.
`
`Michael R. Matthias (SBN 57728)
`mmatthias@bakerlaw.com
`F. Lucas Paule (SBN 313282)
`fpaule@bakerlaw.com
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509
`Telephone: 310-820-8800
`Facsimile: 310-820-8859
`Attorneys for Defendant
`GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`NOMADIX, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.
`CV16-08033 AB (FFMx)
`
`STIPULATION TO RESET
`GUEST-TEK’S DEADLINE
`TO RESPOND TO
`COMPLAINT
`
`Honorable André Birotte Jr.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25 Filed 03/06/17 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:1060
`
`
`BACKGROUND
`Plaintiff Nomadix filed the complaint in this action on October 28, 2016. On
`November 1, Nomadix’s counsel sent Defendant Guest-Tek
`Interactive
`Entertainment’s U.S. counsel at Baker & Hostetler LLP a copy of the complaint
`and asked whether Guest-Tek, a company located in Alberta, Canada, would
`accept service of process through Baker & Hostetler. Guest-Tek did not agree to
`accept service of process through Baker & Hostetler.
`Nomadix took steps to effect service in accordance with the Hague
`Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in
`Civil or Commercial Matters. The Alberta Central Authority issued a certificate of
`service certifying that Guest-Tek was served with the complaint and summons on
`January 12, 2017. Nomadix filed this certificate as part of its proof of service.
`(Dkt. No. 17.) On February 10, 2017, as Guest-Tek had not responded to the
`complaint, Nomadix requested entry of default against Guest-Tek. (Dkt. No. 19.)
`In a pending opposition to Nomadix’s request for entry of default, Guest-
`Tek asserts that (1) it did not receive any packages or deliveries on January 12,
`2017, (2) it received a package on January 13, but the circumstances of the
`delivery led Guest-Tek to call law enforcement, who eventually detonated the
`package, and (3) Guest-Tek did not become aware of Nomadix’s proof-of-service
`filing or request for entry of default until February 14. (Dkt. No. 22.)
`STIPULATION
`In view of the foregoing, the parties stipulate as follows:
`Nomadix withdraws its request for entry of default.
`1.
`2.
`Guest-Tek does not contest the sufficiency of process or service of
`process.
`Guest-Tek’s deadline for responding to the complaint shall be reset to
`3.
`March 10, 2017.
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25 Filed 03/06/17 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:1061
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`Dated: March 6, 2017
`
`/s/ Mark Lezama
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser
`Mark Lezama
`Alexander J. Martinez
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`NOMADIX, INC.
`
`Dated: March 6, 2017
`
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`
`/s/ Michael R. Matthias (with permission)
`Michael R. Matthias
`F. Lucas Paule
`Attorneys for Defendant
`GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.
`
`- 2 -
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25-1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:1062
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`NOMADIX, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.
`CV16-08033 AB (FFMx)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`APPROVING STIPULATION
`TO RESET GUEST-TEK’S
`DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
`COMPLAINT
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-08033-AB-FFM Document 25-1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:1063
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Reset Guest-Tek’s Deadline to
`Respond to Complaint, and finding good cause therefor, the Court approves the
`stipulation.
`Plaintiff Nomadix’s request for entry of default (Dkt. No. 19) is
`1.
`deemed withdrawn.
`2.
`It is established that Defendant Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment
`does not contest the sufficiency of process or service of process.
`3.
`Guest-Tek’s deadline for responding to the complaint is reset to
`March 10, 2017.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`Honorable André Birotte Jr.
`
`- 1 -
`
`NOMADIX 2009
`Guest Tek v. Nomadix
`IPR2019-01191
`
`