`571-272-7822 Entered: April 23, 2019
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES S.A. and DR. REDDY’S
`LABORATORIES, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`INDIVIOR UK LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00328 (Patent No. 9,687,454 B2)
` Case IPR2019-00329 (Patent No. 9,687,454 B2)1
`
`
`
`Before SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL and RICHARD J. SMITH,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioners’ Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Robert Frederickson III
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`1This Order addresses issues that are common to both cases. We, therefore,
`issue a single Order to be entered in both cases. The parties may use this
`style caption when filing a single paper in both cases, provided that such
`caption includes a footnote attesting that “the word-for-word identical paper
`is filed in each proceeding identified in the caption.”
`
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00328 and IPR2019-00329 (Patent No. 9,687,454 B2)
`
`Having considered Petitioners’ Renewed Motion for Admission Pro
`Hac Vice of Robert Frederickson III (Paper 13),2 and the corrected
`Declaration in support by Robert Frederickson III (Ex. 1051), it is:
`ORDERED that Petitioners’ unopposed motion for admission pro hac
`vice of Robert Frederickson III is granted; Mr. Frederickson is authorized to
`represent Petitioners only as back-up counsel in the instant proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners are to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Frederickson is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide (and updates thereto) and the Board’s
`Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of
`Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Frederickson is subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et.
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 The paper and exhibit numbers refer to documents filed in IPR2019-00328.
`The corrected pro hac vice Declaration is marked as Exhibit 1052, but
`appears in the record as Exhibit 1051. Similarly, the corrected pro hac vice
`Declaration in IPR2019-00329 is marked as Exhibit 1027, but appears in the
`record as Exhibit 1026. The corresponding pro hac vice paper and exhibit
`filed in IPR2019-00329 are substantially identical to those filed in IPR2019-
`00328.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2019-00328 and IPR2019-00329 (Patent No. 9,687,454 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Ira J. Levy
`John Coy Stull
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`ilevy@goodwinprocter.com
`jstull@goodwinprocter.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David A. Garr
`Peter P. Chen
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`dgarr@cov.com
`pchen@cov.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`